Annual/Termination Reports:

[01/28/2003] [01/31/2004] [07/07/2005] [06/05/2006] [02/07/2007] [04/07/2008] [03/30/2009] [01/27/2010] [04/28/2011] [02/16/2012] [02/04/2015] [02/22/2013] [02/15/2015] [01/27/2016] [03/10/2020] [03/12/2021] [03/12/2021] [02/16/2023] [03/15/2024]

Report Information

Participants

Nancy Cox - University of Kentucky (serving as AA for D. Morrison);
Peter Burfening - CSREES representative;
Hardin Rahe - Southwest Texas State University;
Keith Lusby - University of Arkansas;
Mark McCann - Virginia Tech University;
Gerald Havenstein - North Carolina State University;
Charles Kadzere - North Carolina A&T State University;
Kelly Robbins - University of Tennessee;
Don Wagner - Oklahoma State University;
Paul Humes - Louisiana State University;
Terry Kiser - Mississippi State University;
Glen Hembry - University of Florida;
John McNeil - Texas A&M University;
Glenn Birrenkott - Clemson University (Secretary);

Brief Summary of Minutes

Everyone was reminded that stakeholder input (and review) is crucial to all projects but particularly multistate projects. This can take the form of meeting at national commodity meetings (i.e. American Feed Industry Association). Stakeholder input should also be sought and documented on state plans. Glen Hembry mentioned that this should be a continuous process of regional priority setting and involve not just a single state.





Dick Frahm mentioned that if anyone was interested in the Biotech Information Exchange Group that they should contact Peter Burfening.





Nancy Cox (ncox@uky.edu) explained the web-based system National Information Management and Support System (NIMSS) from the NE region (www.LGU.UMD.EDU/login.cfm). You can access this system as a guest but will not have print privileges. You may apply for your own login ID. The application will allow participants of Multistate Research Projects and Activities to submit proposals and reports online. Interested parties, stakeholders and cooperators can also query the System for relevant and timely information.





The Midwest is looking at midterm project reviews. Glen Hembry made a motion that midterm project reviews are NOT needed given our annual SRAC-2 evaluation of all animal projects in our region. Keith Lusby seconded the motion, and it passed unanimously.





Eric Young, from NCSU, is the new Executive Director for the southern experiment station directors.





The Southern Multistate Research Committee is looking for multidisciplinary projects.





There will be a limit of 15 pages for new proposals.





Peter Burfening - CSREES indicated that electronic grant submission was still 1 or 2 years away. NRI deadlines will move up about 1 month this year but will be in the same chronological order as in previous years. There will be a standard E-government "front end" on grant submissions, peer reviews, etc.





Peter Burfening (CSREES) noted that NRSP-8 the National Animal Genome Project is up for renewal. It is the only off-the-top funded animal project and needs the vote of 26 directors. Paul Humes made a motion, seconded by Jerry Havenstein, to support this initiative. Motion carried.



Kelly Robbins (TN) recommended an increased awareness of surveying all animal projects, especially using the NIMSS (see above) for participation, elimination of redundancies and making true regional/national projects.



Hardin Rahe (SWTSU) expressed concerns about the ability of animal scientists, especially in small departments, to partner with those doing molecular technologies. This is what regional projects should do ? encourage all departments to use their strengths in a team approach to problem solving.



Don Wagner (Oklahoma State) stated the importance and need for impact statements. He used the example of a beach vs grains of sand to explain that regional projects are often the summation of individual accomplishments. These need to be tied together and used (marketed). This would probably have to be done by department heads (SRAC-2 monitors?) since scientists do not like to write reports without a tangible endpoint. Texas A&M has some experience with this, having actually hired someone to market their accomplishments. Another problem with delineating these accomplishments is that for many projects there is only incremental progress every year (ex. long term animal breeding/genetics programs).



It was decided that some prototypes of impact statements, based on the FASS format, should be prepared. These would be 600 words or less and would be bulleted / targeted. Three prototype impact statements will be prepared by:


Jerry Havenstein (NSCU) - animal waste


Someone?? (TAMU) - genomics


Don Wagner (Oklahoma State) - EPDs





Charles Kadzere (NC A&T) offered his services to those working on the prototype

impact statements.





(See Project Reports in "Minutes Attachment" below.)

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Terry Kiser, Mississippi State University;
Alan Mathew, University of Tennessee;
Hardin Rahe, Texas State University;
Mike Lacy, University of Georgia (Poultry Science);
Joe West, University of Georgia (Animal & Dairy Science);
Bob Harmon, University of Kentucky;
Glen Hembry, University of Florida;
Bruce Jenny, Louisiana State University (Dairy Science);
Paul Humes, Louisiana State University (Animal Sciences);
Don Connor, Auburn University;
Don Wagner, Oklahoma State University;
Gerald Havenstein, North Carolina State University (Poultry Science);
Peter Burfening, CSREES Representative;
Muquarrab Qureshi, CSREES (visitor);
David Morrison, Administrative Advisor

Brief Summary of Minutes

Dr. Glen Birrenkott, elected AC-2 Chair last year, did not attend this year?s meeting because Dr. A. B. (Bud) Bodine was appointed Department Chair at Clemson University during 2003. Therefore, Terry Kiser agreed to chair this year?s meeting.

Peter Burfening gave an update on the REE Strategic Plan, which had just been released. He also provided a handout that presented a NRI funding summary, updated NRI competitive grants deadlines and main contacts, and several other informative items. David Morrison informed the group that the ED?s office had a new administrative assistant in Ms. Donna Pearce. Her email address (donna_pearce@ncsu.edu) and phone number (919-513-4285) were provided. He also informed the group of the new SAAESD web address (www.cals.ncsu.edu/saaesd). In addition, he provided handouts on the Science Roadmap for Agriculture, the National Research Priorities 2005-2010, and reviewed the criteria for mid-term review of MRF projects. Dr. Morrison also went over the process for adding faculty to new or existing MRF projects and asked AC-2 members to work closely with their Experiment Station Directors to inform them of the need to add faculty.

The AC-2 group then proceeded to provide review comments about each of the southern regional multi-state activities. A summary of those comments follows:

Mid-Term Reviews

S-299 - (Dr. Morrison-monitor) Progress of this project has been good but the level of collaboration needs to be improved. AC-2 believes this multi-state group should not be judged too harshly as this is the first 5-year period for this project and the group should be encouraged to increase the use of shared protocols and perhaps better document the collaboration that may exist. Information and technology transfer for this project is considered good.

S-1000 - (Dr. Jenny-monitor) Progress, collaboration and information/technology transfer of this project was considered to be good to excellent. The group should be complimented for the addition of animal scientists and animal science objectives to the project for this 5-year period. It is requested that the publications in the annual report be broken out by type, i.e., refereed journals, proceedings, abstracts, etc.

S-1005 - (Dr. Wagner-monitor) Progress and collaboration for this project was considered to be good, however, it was not apparent that Objective 1 of the project was being addressed. The information/technology transfer for this project was considered poor as there was a rather sparse list of publications.

S-1006 - (Dr. Lacy-monitor) A SAES 422 report could not be obtained for this project; nothing was on the project web site. This project is related to S-1005 and AC-2 decided to give this project the same ratings as S-1005 because the two groups apparently met together for their annual meetings. Concern was expressed that S-1006 needs to document their activities separately from S-1005.

Other activity evaluations:

S-285 - (Dr. Havenstein- monitor) - this group is currently in the middle of a re-write to continue the project for another 5 years. The current project is scheduled to terminate in September of 2005. A DC has been approved as DC305 and John Kirby of Arkansas is writing committee chair. This has been a very active and productive group and AC-2 recommends continued support.

S-289 - (Dr. Connor- monitor) - no information was provided on this project other than it was being re-written. Project is scheduled to terminate September 2004.

S-291 - (Dr. Lacy- monitor) - no report was provided

S-292 - (Dr. Birrenkott- monitor) - no report was provided (Dr. Connor agreed to be the new project monitor)

S-1008 - (Dr. Jenny- monitor)- This is the replacement for S-284. Good collaboration by this group was reported. The 2003 National Dairy Genetics Workshop was planned under the leadership of this group. Recommendations developed by this group have been implemented by the dairy industry. AC-2 recommends continued support for this project.

S-1012 - (Dr. Mathew- monitor) - This is a replacement for S-288 related to swine nutrition. The new objectives were reviewed. This has been a very productive group and AC-2 recommends continued support for this project.

S-1013 - (Dr. Kiser- monitor) - This is a replacement for S-277 related to beef cattle genetics. The new project objectives were reviewed by group and concern was expressed about the need to better organize how Objective 4 would be addressed. AC-2 recommends continued support of this project.

IEG 72 - (Dr. Humes- monitor) - This group meets each year in conjunction with SAAS. At these meetings, a particular topic related to reproductive enhancement in cattle is selected and invited speakers from within the group present information. These activities have been positive and well received and AC-2 recommends continued support of this activity.

IEG 75 - (Dr. Hembry- monitor) - This group also meets each year in conjunction with SAAS. Main topic this past year was how best to standardize reporting of data related to supplementation of grazing beef cattle. AC-2 recommends continued support of this activity.

SERA- IEG 15 - (Dr. Nickerson- monitor) - Dr. Kiser represented Dr. Nickerson in reporting on this activity. This group continues to plan the Southern Dairy Conference (February 9-10, 2004 in Atlanta). They meet prior to this conference to facilitate the IEG activities. AC-2 recommends continued support of this activity.

Dr. Paul Humes was elected as AC-2 Chair and Dr. Bob Harmon was elected Secretary for 2004-2005. Next year?s AC-2 meeting will be held on February 3-4, 2005 in San Antonio again in conjunction with NCBA annual meeting. Additional recommendations/ concerns of AC-2 were as follows:

1.) Are the impacts of MRF projects being captured well enough within each State?s Plan of Work?

2.) MRF technical committees must ensure that they are doing a thorough job of documenting multi-state collaboration occurring within the project.

3.) AAs should make sure the criteria for conducting mid-term project reviews are adequately communicated to MRF technical committees. The animal, dairy, and poultry science salary survey was completed and distributed to AC-2 members.

Submitted by:
David G. Morrison
Administrative Advisor for AC-2

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Glen Hembry, University of Florida;
Bob Harmon, University of Kentucky;
Walter Bottje, University of Arkansas (Poultry Science);
Keith Lusby, University of Arkansas (Animal Science);
Don Conner, Auburn University (Poultry Science);
Alan Mathew, University of Tennessee;
Steve Nickerson, University of Georgia;
Bruce Jenny, Louisiana State University (Dairy Science);
Paul Humes, Louisiana State University (Animal Sciences);
Peter Burfening, CSREES Representative;
David Morrison, Louisiana State University/Administrative Advisor;

Brief Summary of Minutes

David Morrison gave an update on SAAESD. The new Director is Dr. Eric Young and new location is Raleigh, NC. The website is http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/saaesd. New nomenclature was reviewed with a handout explaining changes, e.g. SCC Southern Coordinating Committee) replaces IEG and SAC is the new acronym for Advisory Committees. The NIMSS system has been updated so everyone can register and access the system. Entry of the Appendix E information can be performed by the faculty member directly as a participant in a project. Faculty still must fill out AD 416/417 forms for spending authority on a project.


LEAD 21 is a new leadership development program that replaces ESCOP/ACOP and has been combined with the previous extension leadership program referred to as NELD.. This is three-phase training that can be very valuable for individuals new to leadership positions.


An overview of the SAES funding situation was given using information from the so-called Counterfactual Study. Basically our state appropriations and federal formula funds have been declining as a percentage of total SAES funds and competitive grants and industry funds have borne any increases in funding. Considerable discussion ensued regarding issues surrounding federal funding.


Peter Burfening gave a CSREES report. His email address has changed to pburfening@csrees.usda.gov. The NRI Program  The Farm Bill authorized up to 20% of funds for integrated projects (related to old IFAFS) and USDA is serious about doing this. For example, the Animal Reproduction area is soliciting proposals in Dairy Infertility but no integrated projects are solicited in Animal Genomics. Integrated proposals integrate two of the three components from research, outreach or instruction. At least one objective must address a second component. Some panel members will have extension or instruction appointments. Electronic grant submission for USDA may be a couple years away. Faculty are encouraged to be conscientious when filling out AD 416/417 forms. CRIS reports are taken very seriously so encourage faculty to do a good job of reporting research results, impact, and productivity.

Project Reports:

S-285 (Mike Lacy  monitor)  No report. SDC 305 is in the rewrite phase and project will terminate 09-05.

S-292 (Don Connor  monitor)  Has been approved as a development committee (SDC 311) so the group has started rewriting the project. This is a long-standing committee that has been productive. Have a number of young researchers involved.

S-299 (David Morrison  monitor)  Project is in its fifth year. There has been some fallout from the group but they seem to be making progress. Recent SAES 422 has good list of impacts and publications. SDC 312 is the rewrite committee and the project will terminate 09-05. Recommend support of the project. Discussed multi-state cooperation among members.

S-1000 (Bob Harmon - monitor)  Participants to be complemented for meeting with the National Center for Manure and Waste Management. Review of accomplishments and impacts shows significant progress is being made. It appears that research publication productivity is good and some evidence of multi-state cooperation in the 61page annual report. Suggest the committee submit an abbreviated summary of accomplishments (3-page) with attached list of current publications. Project terminates 09-06. Recommend continued support.

S-1005 (Don Wagner  monitor) and S-1006 (Mike Lacy  monitor)  These two projects are meeting together to share information. Dr. Morrison reported that the groups met together in baton Rouge in January but he had no further information. SAC-2 requested that reports be submitted to Bob Harmon so we can complete our report. It was questioned why there were two groups if they meet together.

S-1008 (Bruce Jenny  monitor)  This has been a long-standing, productive project. They are addressing objectives and maintaining good interaction with industry. Recommend continued support of the project. Also recommend breaking out publications by category.

S-1012 (Alan Mathew  monitor)  Strong group that interacts with NCCC-42. Have guest speakers and have continued in a cohesive manner. Stress standardization of data sets across stations. Generate multi-state surveys. Publication record appears to be very good and have generated some multi-state publications. Have put out a call for other collaborators. Recommend continued support.

S-1013 (formerly S-277)  Dr. Kiser (monitor) was unable to attend so Dr. Morrison (AA) gave a report. The project met in El Reno, OK in 2004 so it has not completed a full year. Performance of sub-tropically adapted beef breeds and genetic selection for parasite resistance and temperament are the objectives. There is some concern about Objective 1 because there appears to be only one participating state currently. Objectives 2 and 3 are in good shape. There has been some discussion on how to accomplish Objective 4 on storage of germplasm (DNA). The group works well together. Recommend continued support.

SCC 72 (Paul Humes  monitor)  No report was found. Dr. Morrison recalled the group usually has invited speakers and meets jointly with the SAAS annual meeting. This is a very productive, interactive group that involves graduate students with usually about 15 participants. It was recommended that a report be sent to Bob Harmon.

SCC 75 (Glen Hembry  monitor)  About 30 people met at the annual meeting with a mix of extension and research faculty. There appears to be no move to form a multi-state project. Apparently no report has been files. There is a great deal of interest by this group. Request that a report be filed.

SERA 15 (Steve Nickerson  monitor)  About 13 Southern state are participating in the project. The group includes researchers and extension specialists. To meet the five objectives, the major activity of the SERA-015 group is to organize the Annual Southern Dairy Conference (SDC). The conference program meets both research and extension components of this IEG, providing for industry contact and several opportunities for input from this clientele group. The 2004 SDC program (held at the Westin Atlanta Airport Hotel, Atlanta, GA on 2/9/04-2/10/04) included ~150 participants ranging from individuals working in the areas of production, marketing, manufacturing, academia, and government, and covered numerous general topic areas as oral presentations and poster sessions. (Report submitted by Dr. Nickerson via email.)

General: It is the request from SAC-2 that each project committee develop a concise 2-3 page summary of the years progress and attach a list of publications for that year. Each committee should get reports posted on the web in a timely fashion. Some projects have yet to post reports.

General Business:

The following potential program topics were suggested for the 2006 Animal Science Department Heads Meeting:
· Regionalization in extension, research, instruction
o Both multi-state and multi-institution within state
· National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) update
· Administrative organization of research farms  potential survey
· Recruiting efforts, e.g. CD, web, etc.
· Distance learning efforts

Proposed date for 2006 meeting is January 24-25, 2006 before the International Poultry Exposition at the GA World Congress Center in Atlanta. Don Conner, Mike Lacy, and Steve Nickerson volunteered (or were volunteered) to help coordinate with the US Poultry & Egg Association.

Respectfully submitted,
Bob Harmon
Secretary SAC-2

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Bottje, Walter (wbottje@uark.edu) - University of Arkansas (Poultry Science); Conner, Don (dconner@acesag.auburn.edu) - Auburn University (Poultry Science); Greene, Wayne (wgreene@auburn.edu) - Auburn University; Harmon, Bob (rharmon@uky.edu) - University of Kentucky; Hembry, Glen ( hembry@animal.ufl.edu) - University of Florida; Lacy, Mike (mlacy@uga.edu) - University of Georgia (Poultry Science); Mathew, Alan (amathew@utk.edu) - University of Tennessee; Nickerson, Steve (scn@uga.edu) - University of Georgia; Noble, Ralph - North Carolina A&T University; Pardue, Sam (Sam_Pardue@ncsu.edu) - North Carolina State University (Poultry Science); Webb, Kenny (webbk@vt.edu) - VaTech; Burfening, Peter - CSREES Representative; Young, Eric (eric_young@ncsu.edu) - SAAESD, Administrative Advisor Representative

Brief Summary of Minutes

The meeting was called to order at 8:30 a.m. Glen Hembry agreed to chair the meeting in the absence of Paul Humes.

Dr. Eric Young, the Executive Director of SAAESD, represented Dr. David Morrison as Administrative Advisor for this meeting and gave an update on SAAESD activities. Dr. Young is located in Raleigh, NC. The website is http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/saaesd. Directors are trying to facilitate grantsmanship by hosting grant writing workshops. Typically the pattern has been one east of the Mississippi River and one to the west. The attempt is to hold a workshop back-to-back with CSREES. The next scheduled workshop is in Dallas on October 17-18, 2006. Registration is usually about $100. A Southern Region Grantsmanship Workshop on CSREES Integrated Programs is scheduled for February 8-9, 2006 at Radisson Hotel, Cincinnati Airport. CSREES is very interested in having Extension faculty serve on review panels for the Integrated Programs. Although the workshops are valuable, the group expressed concern about success rates for NRI grants and the potential direction of Hatch funding. Also some research areas do not and will not have the opportunity to compete for NRI funding. The bottom line, there are many very good proposals that do not get funded. A grantsmanship workshop to serve Gulf Coast states will be held May 9-10, 2006 in Puerto Rico.

Eric explained the resources available on the SAAESD website for multi-institutional collaboration: 1) scientist expertise, 2) outlying research stations, and 3) examples of existing MOAs for multi-institutional collaborations. The NIMMS webpage is much improved and provides good search functions that can be valuable to SAC-2. Dr. Young was complimentary of SAC-2 on their oversight of projects.

Peter Burfening gave a CSREES report. As a result of portfolio reviews in the agency it has become apparent that we dont capture Extension effort very well. This will be keyed into CRIS in some way. CRIS will change the type of database in the future to improve usability and make it more readily searchable; CRIS will be moving to Oracle database. CRIS reports are taken very seriously so encourage faculty to do a good job of reporting research results, impact, and productivity. The main source of information for reports to Congress is from CRIS; Congress is mainly interested in the impacts of our programs. The Plan of Work will also be changing. There are a number of other competitive programs besides NRI that we should be aware of, e.g. Water Quality, SBIR, etc. Success rate for the SBIR is about 15% Phase I proposals.

Project Reports:

SDC 320 - Jerry Cherry is Administrative Advisor. This project is waiting for approval for peer review. Walter Bottje has agreed to be monitor.

SDC 321 - Nancy Cox is Administrative Advisor. Switched from a Western to a Southern project. This project is waiting for approval for peer review. Sam Pardue has agreed to be monitor.

SDC 308 - Jerry Cherry is Administrative Advisor. The project will be sent back to the committee for revision. No monitor was assigned at this time.

SDC 311 (Don Connor - monitor) - The project has gone back to the committee for revision. The group is meeting in Atlanta to finalize revisions. This has been a very productive project in the past. The group is encouraged to write an impact statement. Recommended continued support. Passed.

S-1000 (Bob Harmon - monitor) - Participants meet with the National Center for Manure and Waste Management. The 2005 meeting was held in conjunction with a symposium entitled State of the Science of Animal Manure and Waste Management. Review of accomplishments and impacts (28 listed) shows significant progress is being made. Research publication productivity is good with 36 peer-reviewed publications, 78 conference proceedings, and 34 book chapters and other publications. There is evidence of multi-state cooperation in the full annual report. Project terminates 09-06. Recommended continued support. Passed.

S-1005 (Don Wagner - monitor) and S-1006 (Mike Lacy - monitor) - No report for S-1005. Need to touch base with Don Wagner on status of project and monitor. These two projects have met together to share information in the past. The groups met last winter but the 2005 meeting was interrupted by the hurricane. Rick Roeder is Administrative Advisor for both and there has been discussion of combining the projects. At the 2005 meeting of SAC-2, the question of having two separate projects was raised. The SAC-2 group suggested clarification from Mike Lacy on the future project plans.

S-1008 (Bruce Jenny - monitor) - Report was submitted. This has been a long-standing, productive project. They are addressing objectives and maintain good interaction. The AA has complemented the committee on the work that has been accomplished to date. The project terminates in 2007 and the group has been reminded that they must begin a revision in 2006 for submission by mid-2007. Plans are to include economic analyses in the rewrite. Recommended continued support of the project and of revision and rewrite. Passed.

S-1012 (Alan Mathew - monitor) - Strong group that interacts and meets jointly with NCCC-042. Have guest speakers and have continued in a cohesive manner. Stress standardization of data sets across stations. Generate multi-state surveys. Some concern was expressed that 2004 and 2005 reports could not be found in NIMMS; either no report posted or a problem in NIMMS. Further checking with one of the committee members (after the SAC-2 meeting) did result in discovery of the most recent reports in NIMMS. Would suggest separation of S-1012 accomplishments from those of NCCC-042. Recommended continued support. Passed.

S-1013 (Terry Kiser - monitor) - Dr Kiser was unable to attend, but a report was submitted. The project met at the Central Mississippi Research and Extension Center, MSU in 2005. Performance of sub-tropical breeds and selection for parasite resistance are the objectives. The group is collecting germplasm for the creation of a DNA repository. They are using true common protocols. They also held a symposium at Southern ASAS. The group works well together. Recommended continued support. Passed.

S-1023 - (David Morrison - monitor) - No report. Need to check on project.

SCC 72 (Paul Humes - monitor) - No report. Need to check on project.

SCC 75 (Glen Hembry - monitor) - About 20 particpants at the annual meeting with a mix of extension and research faculty who actively exchange information. The project has terminated as of 9-30-05 so no new monitor will be assigned. There are no plans to renew or to form a multi-state project.

SERA 15 (Steve Nickerson - monitor) - About 13 Southern states are participating in the project, including researchers and extension specialists. The project is realized as the Southern Dairy Conference (SDC) each year with about 150 participants ranging from individuals working in the areas of production, marketing, manufacturing, academia, and government. The conference covers a wide variety of timely topics. Recommended continued support. Passed.

General Business:

Bob Harmon was elected chair of SAC-2 for 2007-2008 by acclamation. Mike Lacy was elected secretary for 2007-2008 by acclamation. Glen Hembry was recognized for his many contributions over the years.

Proposed 2007 meeting is associated with NCBA meeting in Nashville, TN.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

1. Don Conner, Auburn University;
2. Geoff Dahl, University of Florida;
3. Wayne Green, Auburn University;
4. Bob Harmon, University of Kentucky (Chair);
5. Paul Humes, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center;
6. Terry Kiser, Mississippi State University;
7. Keith Lusby, University of Arkansas;
8. Alan Mathew, University of Tennessee;
9. David Morrison, Admin. Advisor, LSU Agricultural Center;
10. Steve Nickerson, University of Georgia (Acting Secretary);
11. Ralph Nobel, North Carolina A&T State University;
12. Kenny Webb, Virginia Tech University

Brief Summary of Minutes

This years meeting was called to order at 8:08 AM by Chairman Bob Harmon (KY) and an attendance sheet and a record of the 2006 SAC-2 meeting were distributed. In the absence of Mike Lacy (GA), Steve Nickerson (GA) was appointed to serve as Recording Secretary. The minutes were corrected to show that Keith Lusby (AR) was indeed in attendance at the 2006 meeting and the minutes were amended to reflect this oversight. Terry Kiser (MS) moved to accept the 2006 minutes as amended, which was seconded by Alan Mathew (TN), and the motion was passed. Chairman Harmon next asked that attendees go around the table and introduce themselves.

Comments from Administrative Advisor, David Morrison (LA):
" David emphasized that the SAC-2 group has functioned well this past year, and that we need to select new monitors for several projects.
" Other recommendations and comments included: We as administrators need to spend time lobbying for/against certain federal earmarks. For example, Special Grants may not be funded at all or at a lower level next year.
" We were encouraged to have our university leaders communicate with legislators and plead our case regarding the possible lack of funding. There is ~$400M in funding nationally that could be reduced or lost altogether.
" Kenny Webb (VA) addressed the Special Funds issue: This may be an opportune time to address this predicament as we fight such lack of funding ever year. As department heads, we should communicate with our administrators to position us to continue to have this form of funding available. As an example, Bob Harmon stated that 50% of formula funds would have been placed in the competitive category, but this change was strongly opposed by university administrators, and so was not realized.
" David Morrison suggested that CREATE 21 could be beneficial, as it would maintain formula funds plus have capacity to grow these funds at the rate of inflation. One possible outcome of CREATE 21 would be to create a NIFA (National Institute of Food Agriculture). CREATE 21 is tied to the next Farm Bill. Experiment Station Directors feel that it would be a positive direction and although there seems to be less buy-in from the Extension Directors, the majority are in support.
" Bob Harmon noted that the face of the CREATE 21 proposal has changed, and that we should study the website in order to be aware of what is going on with this proposal as our Associate Deans of Research will vote on this. The question of whether there was any stakeholder input for the proposal was brought up.
" David Morrisons concern was that there was too much emphasis on competitive grants in the initial version, but the proposal is now more palatable to Experiment Station Directors; thus, their concerns were heard and addressed. In addition, the latest version provided protection for formula funds.
" Bob Harmon asked what metrics are to be used to allocate funding; for example, is it based on the number of farms in each state?

Comments from CSREES Representative, Peter Burfening:
" Peter could not make it due to lack of travel funds, as his unit experienced a 25% reduction in travel allowance.

Project Reports: Present and (former project number)  David provided a project by project summary of the status of each project obtained from the southern Executive Directors office at NCSU.

" S-1000 (S-275): Bob Harmon, Monitor  Is now SDC (Southern Development Committee) 326, and Bob will continue to serve as Monitor. This group met in Feb 06 to revise the project. It has been very productive, publishing 53 journal articles, 61 Abstracts, and 15 book chapters, proceedings, and other publications. Recommended continued support. Passed unanimously.
" S-1008 (S-284): Geoff Dahl (FL), New Monitor was appointed to replace Bruce Jenny (LA) who is no longer a member of SAC-2. Paul Humes (LA) agreed to send report to Steve Nickerson.
" S-1012 (S-288): Alan Mathew, Monitor  Involves swine and reproductive efficiency, with focus on the sow. Vertical production in conjunction with the swine nutrition group; due for a rewrite in 08. Met in early Jan 07 in Orlando. They do publish as a multi-state group. Recommended continued support. Passed unanimously.
" S-1013 (S-277): Terry Kiser, Monitor  Terminates in 08. This group met in Lexington, KY Jun 7-8, 2006 as an assembly of quantitative geneticists from 9 states that are following common protocols. Their work relates to determining opportunities for genetic selection to improve temperament and parasite resistance in traditional and non-Bos indicus tropically-adapted breeds. They are collecting DNA samples for QTL x environmental interactions. Temperament is a large issue. David Morrisons concern was whether they are being consistent enough across states to analyze data and publish results. The group has been very productive in publishing. Johnny Rossi (GA) was elected as Secretary. Sid DeRouen (LA) is chair-elect. Recommend continued support. Passed unanimously.
" S-1020 (S-285): Mike Lacy, Monitor  Not present; no report; need to check on project.
" S-1023 (S-299): David Morrison, Monitor  No written report. This project is in its second 5-yr period and evaluates mechanisms to enhance productivity of dairy cattle under heat-stress conditions. Terminates in 2010. David is concerned about numerous participants but only a few attend meetings, which are associated with the ASAS Southern Section meeting. A core group of scientists is active, but others do not take part. Publication record is very good. It is difficult to be a fully active multi-state group with so much lack of participation? The group previously received an IFAFS grant as a multi-state effort. Currently, some objectives are not being addressed in project. David has relayed to the S-1023 group that he is concerned. Travel funds may be an issue. On each objective, there should be at least 2 people working on a study, and David does not believe this is happening. The W-1173 group has asked the S-1023 group to meet with them at Virgin Islands in August as W-1173 also is involved in domestic animal stress and has a sub-group working on dairy heat-stress. S-1023 may need to merge with W-1173 in the future. A regional project is intended to address issues too great for a single institution to handle and to collaborate by sharing common protocols, publications, etc. Continued support passed unanimously but David will communicate his concerns to group.
" As an aside, at this point in the meeting, we discussed bringing dairy back to the ASAS Southern Section Meetings as it is a great training ground for graduate students and thus future investigators in the dairy area. With decreases in investigators at universities and operating budgets, this may not happen. For example, investigators in GA, FL, AL, LA, and MS should form a group to emphasize dairy, and if we want folks to participate, we ourselves should support this effort. However, with the culture of dairy decreasing in the South, this assembly of investigators may not happen.
" S-1025 (S-291): Alan Mathew, Monitor  No report. (Mike Lacy as former Monitor may have a copy of this report).
" S-1027 (S-292): Don Conner (AL), Monitor  This project was recently approved in Oct of 06, and met in Verona, Italy. Good interaction and collaboration with projects and grant writing. Extension and outreach are strong. All 3 objectives are being met. Approximately 60% of group effort is in the food safety arena as well as most of the collaboration. Leadership is young and enthusiastic. Recommended continued support. Approved unanimously.
" SDC320 (New project): Walter Bottje (AR), Monitor  A couple of projects are well underway in the review process following peer review in the SDC. An SDC is only approved for 2 yr according to David Morrison. A common goal of all projects is to have all multi-state projects initiate on October 1 of a given year. SDC 320 will be a new project for next year. No action taken. David deduced that this proposal has been blessed and it has evidently moved forward. Walter will continue as Monitor. David noted that during peer review, there is an opportunity for Monitors to be peer reviewers; David is looking for volunteers as we as monitors are probably in a good position to handle these proposals.
" At 9:20 AM, Renee Lloyd and Ashby Green of NCBA met with us to welcome the group to this years meeting. David and Bob relayed that we appreciated their help in providing facilities at NCBA for our SAC-2 Meeting. They offered to be spokespersons for us in DC in our continued quest for funding, and offered NCBAs help in strengthening the beef industry. . It was mentioned that eXtension needs to have real connections with commodity groups. We discussed Community of Practice (COP) for beef and for dairy. Dairy COP is under development (led by KY) and the status of beef COP is unknown.
" SDC321 (W-195): Sam Pardue (NC), Monitor  This poultry project originated from the Western Region, but is very applicable to the South and our large poultry industry. The group met on 11/23/06 in Arkansas to accept SDC321 as regional project. Location and date for next meeting is in Australia. Air quality and ammonia control as agricultural emissions are focus areas. Recommended continued support. Approved unanimously.
" SDC322 (New project); formerly S-1005 and S-1006, which were monitored by Mike Lacy and Don Wagner (OK). Keith Lusby will be the New Monitor for SDC322, which focuses on flies and their impact on food safety, and combines the two previous projects (S-1005, S-1006) into this one. Progress is questionable at this time, as it was just formed in the last year and is still in the peer review process, but this group has been productive in the past.
" SDC326: No report; in revision since 11/30/06.
" SCC72: Paul Humes, Monitor  No written report, but Paul indicated that this group meets each year in conjunction with Southern Section ASAS and will therefore meet in Mobile on February 4. This is a beef reproduction information exchange group and this year, Les Anderson of KY is scheduled to speak and lead the discussion.
" SERA15: Steve Nickerson, Monitor  This group is made up of extension specialists and researchers from 13 Southern states with a keen interest in sustaining the Southern dairy industry. Investigators assemble at the Southern Dairy Conference in Atlanta, GA, and have met continuously for the past 33 yr. Approximately 150 participants join in the program, which covers areas in production, milk marketing/manufacturing, academia, and government. They are particularly interested in getting the Southeast out of being a milk deficit area. Recommend continued support. Passed unanimously.
" s_temp1422; s_temp1582: see Business Items below.




Business Items:

Select Monitors-

" SDC322: Keith Lusby selected as Monitor.
" SDC 326: Bob Harmon selected as Monitor.
" s_temp1422: Wayne Green (AL) selected as Monitor.
" s_temp1582: Ralph Nobel (NC) selected as Monitor.
" S-1008: New Monitor is Geoff Dahl to replace Bruce Jenny (LA). Project to terminate in the fall of 08, and will become a SDC (Southern Development Committee) when it is rewritten.

Other items-

" David mentioned that the aquaculture advisory group was disbanded several years ago and was never integrated into SAC-2 because there were no developed multistate projects on aquaculture. Currently, a new project proposal (S_temp1542) has been prepared related to channel-blue catfish hybrid embryo production and performance and SAC-2 has been asked to review and act on the proposal. David asked if the group was comfortable reviewing the proposal and it was suggested that he contact several aquaculture unit heads in the region to see if they could review the proposal. Carol Engle (AR), Bruce Leopold (MS), and David Rouse (Auburn) were suggested and will be contacted.
" The group agreed that Bob Harmon, as Chair, would serve in this capacity again in 2008; thus, each Chair will serve a 2-yr term.
" Steve Nickerson served as Acting Secretary for 2007 and was nominated Secretary for 2008. However, if Mike Lacy is able, he will serve as Secretary for 2008 and then Chair for 2009, replacing Harmon.
" The group will meet in Reno in 2008 in conjunction with the NCBA; an email will be forthcoming with this announcement.
" Bob Harmon moved that the group adjourn followed by a second by Terry Kiser.
" The group adjourned at 10:31 AM.

Accomplishments

SAC-2 members reviewed all multistate project activities pertaining to animal, dairy, and poultry sciences. Recommendations were made that can be useful to SAAESD members regarding the effectivness of multistate collaborations and the resulting outcomes and impacts.

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Mary Beck - Clemson University;
Peter Burfening - CSREES Representative;
John Carey - Texas A & M University;
Don Conner, Auburn University;
Geoff Dahl- University of Florida;
Wayne Greene - Auburn University;
Bob Harmon- University of Kentucky, (Chair);
Paul Humes - Louisiana State University;
Ron Kensinger - Oklahoma State University;
Terry Kiser - Mississippi State University;
Mike Lacy- University of Georgia;
Alan Mathew - University of Tennessee;
David Morrison - LSU AgCenter, (Administrative Advisor);
Kenny Webb - Virginia Tech;

Brief Summary of Minutes

Bob Harmon called the meeting to order. Introductions were made and the general purpose and agenda of the meeting were outlined. Kenny Webb moved that the minutes of last years meeting be approved. Paul Humes seconded. The motion passed.

David Morrison gave an administrative update. He briefed the group on the new Excellence in Multi-State Research Award and indicated he would like to see a project from the Southeast Region be nominated. He also briefed the group about Knowledge Areas (KAs) associated with the Appendix E form for participants in Multi-State and Regional Projects. CRIS is moving to CIS (Current Information System). There is a desire to capture KAs for Extension contributions as well as Research. Extension scientists will now be asked to declare KAs. USDA is working toward a One Solution type reporting system. Attempting to reduce and unify report numbers provided to USDA.

Peter Burfening further detailed and explained One Solution. The purpose is to allow better accountability for Extension. Implementation date for this reporting is expected relatively soon. He emphasized that accurate and careful CRIS reporting is extremely important. Foe example, the Government Accounting Office (GAO), which analyzes data as requested by Congress, has been looking at funding and scientist years expended in classical breeding and genetics. The GAO has used CRIS numbers to assemble that report. CRIS is being used for things that it was not intended for and is becoming more important. It is becoming more outward facing. Peter also alerted the group that the current Farm Bill apparently does away with the the current Plans of Work. Burfening described briefly what he knew about the just released USDA budget. It probably will not be signed until early 2009. Special grants came back in the new budget at about a 25% decrease from previous funding levels.

Morrison continued with an update of the Farm Bill. House and Senate versions differ. IFAS remains in the House version but is reduced in the Senate. Some positive attributes in the new Farm Bill, such as IFAS and NIR. David also informed the group that Impact Statements are required for S projects the third year and final year of the project.

Project Reports

S-501: Improving Growth and Feed Efficiency in Warmwater Aquaculture
The Aquaculture Advising Committee has disbanded after completing its objectives. This was an example of a rapid response/quick reaction/emergency issue type project. Two year life span.

S-502: Regional Animal Health Situational Awareness Project
This is a collaborative project between the University of Kentucky and University of Tennessee Colleges of Vet Medicine addressing animal health monitoring systems. Project has nationwide application and human health implications. Monitors prevalence of disease, maps spread, plots outbreaks and measures impact. Very exciting project. Investigators want to take this past just information received from diagnostic labs and include information and reports from practicing vets. Approved from August 2007 - 2009. Not sure if it will be expanded to a full project.

S-1012: Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency
This project on swine nutrition continues to be active and productive. Good example of multi-institutional cooperation across research and extension missions. Has a good publication record. Current project is set to expire in 2008. New project has been drafted and is currently under consideration by the participating institutions. Recommended project be continued.

S-1013: Genetic (Co)Variance of Parasite Resistance, Temperament, and Production Traits of Traditional and Non-Bos indicus Tropically Adapted Breeds
This is a classical animal breeding project. It has enjoyed good participation from scientists from several institutions. Participants have been very engaged, they put together comprehensive reports, overall do a good job. Project scheduled to end in 2009. Currently putting together a new submission. This is a critical area. Classical geneticists are becoming fewer and many are approaching retirement. Group has received two NRI grants in recent years. Very productive with very few resources. Looking at tropical breeds. Banking DNA. Project was recommended and approved for continuance.

S-1020: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency of Poultry (S-285)
This project deals with reproductive efficiency in poultry. Recommended and approved for continuance.

S-1022: Basic and Applied Aspects of Bacterial Source Tracking (S297)
Currently this project is without a monitor. Don Conner was temporarily assigned to check on its status.

S-1023: Enhancing Production and Reproductive Performance of Heat-Stressed Dairy Cattle
The focus of this project is heat stress and dairy cattle. Some disappointment in participation - only 5 or 6 (out of 20) attended most recent project meeting. Met twice in 2007. Collaboration does not appear to be as good as it should be or could be. Group is a little frustrated and discouraged. S-1023 group decided to continue to meet with related W-1173 group. Consensus was to recommend that if S-1023 participation does not approve that it should be combined with W-1173.

S-1025: Systems for Controlling Air Pollutant Emissions and Indoor Environments of Poultry, Swine, and Dairy Facilities
This project is examining air pollutants/emissions. It was approved in 2006 and will expire in 2011. Group consists of a strong core of research and extension personnel. Annual meetings have been well attended. Group will meet with S-1032 in May. Recommended continuance.

S-1027: The Poultry Food System: A Farm to Table Model
Very active group, usually meets three times a year. Conducted a symposium at the Poultry Science Association annual meeting. Very prolific, 60 refereed publications, leveraged funding, adding new members. Nineteen participants attending the most recent meeting at Clemson.

S-1030: Flies Impacting Livestock, Poultry and Food Safety
Group was not sure of termination date - possibly 2009. Questioned whether it was in need of renewal. Recommended continuation.

S-1031: Improvement and Sustainability of Channel-Blue Hybrid Catfish Embryo Production and Performance
David Morrison was authorized to seek out aquaculture experts to make decisions on aquaculture projects.

S-1032: Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States
This project focuses on sustainability of livestock and poultry. Has a new title and new objective as of 2007. Consistently productive project, over 50 publications listed in last project report. Will meet with S-1025 - logical match. Productive relationships among animal scientists, poultry scientists, engineers, crop scientists, soil scientists. Recommended continuance.

S-1035: Nutritional and Management Abatement Strategies for Improvement of Poultry Air and Water Quality
This project has been working hard on being reinstated. Primary focus has been on reducing pollution that might impact ground water. This has included substantial efforts in litter and waste management in broiler and layer houses and nutrient reformulation to reduce waste. Other contributions include work with vegetative buffers, drinking water quality and water sanitizers. The participants met in January 2007 and will meet again in July 2008.

S1037: Integrative Functional and Physiological Genomics of Poultry
This is a new project. Continuance was recommended.

SDC-330 Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle (S-1008)
Project is associated with classic genetics of dairy cattle. The project terminated in September 2007 and is currently being rewritten. Has been a productive project. Good integration. Working hard to get approval as a S project. Participant list has decreased by 5 or 6.

SCC-72: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency in Cattle
This is a productive group. Very close knit, cooperative, much in common. Fewer participants in recent years. Met in February 2007 and submitted an informative report describing their progress. Recommended continuation.

SCC-81: Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern U.S.
This project focuses on small ruminants. Group met at Southern Section informally for a number of years. Were formally approved at last years meeting. Met in February 2008. Thirty-two in attendance. Published a very good compilation of activities. Project doing very well. Recommended continuation.

SERA-9: Aquatic Food Animals from Warm Water Aquaculture
David Morrison provided for informational purposes a brief update on this aquaculture project. Group meets annually. Very active.

SERA-15: Competitiveness and Sustainability of the Southern Dairy Industry
Southern Dairy Conference held in January 2008. Very good program. Large group -9 or so universities involved. Several economists attended. Mary Beck volunteered to take on responsibility of monitoring this group. Recommended continuance.

SERA-36: Beef Cattle Production Utilizing Forages in the Southeast to Integrate Research and Extension Programs across State Boundaries
Originally extension was not well represented but now extension is well integrated. Extension participants instrumental in getting project off the ground. Committee is working on extension outcomes. Has a one year approval contingent on getting extension outcomes fleshed out. Group is recommending that beef reports be merged. Group is active, good leadership, effective leadership succession plan. Have good outcomes established, hopefully just need to communicate those better to get full approval. Good group. David Morrison will send an email indicating department heads support.

The group elected new officers. Mike Lacy was elected chair. Alan Mathew was elected secretary.

Bob Harmon expressed appreciation to everyone for their contributions, and the group thanked Bob for the outstanding job he has done chairing the group.
Meeting was adjourned.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

David Morrison (dmorrison@agcenter.lsu.edu) - administrative advisor, LSU AgCenter; Wayne Greene (waynegreene@auburn.edu) - Auburn University; Don Conner (connede@auburn.edu) - Auburn University; Geoff Dahl (gdahl@ufl.edu) - University of Florida; Keith Bertrand (jkbert@uga.edu) - University of Georgia; Mike Lacy (mlacy@uga.edu) - University of Georgia; Bob Harmon (rharmon@uky.edu) - University of Kentucky; Terry Kiser (tkiser@ads.msstate.edu) - Mississippi State University; Sam Pardue (Sam_Pardue@ncsu.edu) - North Carolina State University; Ralph Noble (rcnoble@ncat.edu) - North Carolina A&T University; Mary Beck (mbeck@clemson.edu) - Clemson University; Alan Mathew (amathew@utk.edu) - University of Tennessee; Dave Gerrard (dgerrard@vt.edu) - Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University); Leslie Thompson, (leslie.thompson@ttu.edu) - Texas Tech University;

Brief Summary of Minutes

Mike Lacy presided over the meeting. Alan Mathew took the minutes.

Following a welcome from Lacy, David Morrison provided some opening thoughts, including the benefits the appointment of a FASS scientific liaison located in Washington, D.C. would have in representing member organizations as one unified voice to congressional staff, decision-making bodies and other groups. Among the missions for the liaison would be greater advocacy for increased funding for animal research.

Morrison reminded the Committee to nominate multi-state projects from the southern region for the 2009 Excellence in Multi-State Research Award. He noted that S-1039, related to soybeans, was nominated from our region last year; however, the national award went to a project in another region (NC-229). Morrison noted that among the criteria used by the review panel was the national scope of the project and the success in leveraging external funding for the joint activities.

Following Morrisons comments, Lacy asked project monitors to provide reports of the respective projects.

The report of S-502, Regional Animal Health Situational Awareness Project was provided by Bob Harmon. He noted this is a rapid response project designed to address emerging disease issues. It was established as a 2-year project and is set to terminate 9/30/09. This is primarily a collaborative activity between the Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at the U. of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine and the University of Kentucky and involves disease diagnostics, high-end computing and bioinformatics. Harmon noted the project was supported in part by funding from the Office of Homeland Security. Harmon recommended continuation of the project up to the expiration date, at which time the project should have completed its role. The Committee provided a consensus of agreement.

The report of S-1013  Genetic (Co)Variance of Parasite Resistance, Temperament, and Production Traits of Traditional and Non-Bos indicus Tropically Adapted Breeds was provided by Terry Kiser who noted this multi-state project consisted of a long-standing group of scientists from nine universities. The project is set to expire this year (2009). A new proposal will likely be ready for review in the near future, with plans for a final draft by August. The project is noted for common protocols across institutions, with 28 publications in 2008 covering applied and basic research and outcomes. The new proposal will include new objectives. The group has been very productive; however they have recently lost some key geneticists due to retirements and are looking to fill that void. Kiser recommended continuation of the project, Harmon seconded, and this was followed by a unanimous vote of approval.

The report of S-1020 Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency of Poultry (S-285)
was provided by Mike Lacy. He noted this project terminates in September 2009, and the group is in the process of drafting a new proposal. Lacy noted this multi-state project has a history of good collaboration across the country, and recommended continuation of the project. A second to the motion was provided by Conner and the motion passed by unanimous vote.

David Morrison questioned if the Committee should re-nominate this project for the Excellence in Multi-State Research Award. It was suggested that we may need to better emphasize national scope and grant success. After deliberation it was determined that this project would likely not meet the criteria and the consensus was not to nominate this project for the award.

The report of S-1022 - Basic and Applied Aspects of Bacterial Source Tracking (S297) was provided by Don Conner, who continues to serve as temporary monitor of this project. The project is scheduled to expire in 2010. It was questioned whether this multi-state project fits in with the Animal Science group as it is constituted primarily by agronomists and soil microbiologists. It was noted that this continues to be an active group with an objective of characterizing sources of livestock waste contaminants and source tracking, thus providing a clear connection with Animal Science. The Committee agreed that even though no animal scientists are participating, the project does have relevance to our discipline and we should continue interacting with the project. Morrison suggested that heads/chairs should urge Animal Science faculty to participate in this project. Conner recommended continuation of the project with a second from Harmon. The motion was carried by unanimous vote. Morrison indicated he would discuss this project with the SAC Agronomy Advisor to gather more input regarding the most appropriate oversight of this project.

Morrison provided a report of the situation regarding project S-1023 - Enhancing Production and Reproductive Performance of Heat-Stressed Dairy Cattle. He noted the project was terminated in September 2008 following recommendations from the Committee last year that more interaction between participating institutions was needed to justify continuation of the project. Morrison noted that following communications with participants about these concerns and the possibility of termination, he did not receive a single response; thus, the decision was made to terminate the project.

Mathew provided the report of S-1025 - Systems for Controlling Air Pollutant Emissions and Indoor Environments of Poultry, Swine, and Dairy Facilities. Mathew noted this multi-state group has a good history of activity and productivity, although recently there appeared to be a greater proportion of single-institution projects among the project activities. Mathew indicated that out of 20 ongoing projects listed in their 2008 report, nine were cooperative ventures (2 or more institutions), with the remainder being single institution endeavors. The group meets annually and at their most recent meeting approximately one half of the participating institutions were present. At that meeting, Project Advisor, Ron Lacewell, urged the membership to pull together more cooperatively and seek projects and mechanisms that promote more interactive work. A good number of publications were listed for 2008 across extension and producer-oriented venues and peer-reviewed journals. Mathew recommended continuation of S-1025 with urging from the SAC-2 that the group consider more joint activities. Morrison indicated he would communicate such to the project participants. Beck seconded the motion which was passed by unanimous vote.

Conner provided the report for S-1027 - The Poultry Food System: A Farm to Table Model. He noted this is an active project but the annual meeting did not occur during 2008 due to various conflicts. However the group planned to meet during the current World Poultry Expo. He further noted this group has a national scope and good representation across several institutions. It was noted that with some expected changes of appointments and retirements the project may see a change of leadership. Conner recommended continuation of the project. Morrison asked for information regarding the objectives for this project and Conner indicated most of the focus was on food safety, egg quality, microbial issues, and intervention strategies to address issues of concern. Conner noted the group has a good publication record across research and extension venues and has ties to ARS Labs. Morrison asked the Committee if this project might make a good nominee for the Multi-state award, and Conner indicated he had suggested last year that the group submit nomination materials, but the project participants did not follow through with that activity. It was suggested that we consider nominating the project next year. Following the discussion, Beck provided a second towards the motion to continue the project and the motion was passed by unanimous vote.

The report for S-1030 - Flies Impacting Livestock, Poultry and Food Safety was to be provided by Keith Lusby; however, he was not in attendance. It was noted that the project is set to terminate in 2009, thus the Committee was to follow up on this project.

Harmon provided the report of S-1032 (formerly S-1000) - Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States. Harmon noted the project was currently being re-written with significant revisions, including to the objectives. Harmon noted that animal scientists, soil sciences, engineers, and others were participating in this project. The project includes a systems approach in the primary objectives and includes 4 relevant subcategories within the second objective. The group meets jointly with S-1025. The project is very productive in terms of outcomes, including peer-reviewed publications and other venues. Harmon recommended continuation of the project, followed by a second from Kiser. The motion was passed by unanimous vote.

Pardue provided a report of S-1035- Nutritional and Management Abatement Strategies for Improvement of Poultry Air and Water Quality (formerly w-195). The most recent meeting of this group was in Australia at the World Poultry Congress, with an additional meeting to occur at the current World Poultry Expo. Pardue noted there was a good distribution of institutions involved in the projects, including from the Midwest and Southern regions. There was a significant emphasis on extension activities within the project. The focus included trace minerals, use of distillers grains, issues of high phosphorus content, hormones in the environment, and uptake rates by various plants. Pardue recommended continuation of the project, followed by a second from Beck. The motion passed on a unanimous vote.

Lacy provided a report for Project S-1037 - Integrative Functional and Physiological Genomics of Poultry as Walter Bottje, the original monitor for this project was not in attendance. Lacy indicated he had conducted a review of the project and noted this is an active and well-funded group, and one which the Committee might way want to nominate for the Multi-state award. The group was planning a tele-conference in the near future. Lacy recommended continuation and Thompson seconded. The motion was passed on a unanimous vote. Beck volunteered to act as the official monitor for this project.

Dahl provided a report for S-1040 Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle (formerly S-1008). He indicated he attended the most recent meeting of this group where he noted a good level of discussion, although a high level of project interaction was not clearly indicated. About half of the participants are associated with Southern institutions and the other half with Midwestern institutions. The project is in its first year following re-approval. Dahl noted that graduate students attended the meeting, which was seen as a positive aspect. The activities include a mix of quantitative and qualitative genetics and cross-breeding research and reporting. The group had originally considered travel to Scandinavia this year to tour and review crossbreeding programs; however, because of budget issues they may adjust those plans to a more economical tour of similar systems in France. The group has been able to garner sponsorships for the travel and the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) has agreed to provide the venue for this tour. A question was raised regarding the project's interests in breeding systems for pasture-based dairies. Dahl indicated that was to be a component of the international trip. Dahl recommended continuation of the project followed by a second from Gerrard. Dahl encouraged the department heads/chairs who supervise participants to consider funding the travel request for this international activity. The motion to continue the project was passed by unanimous vote.

Mathew provided the report for S-1044 - Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency (formerly S-1012). He noted this multi-state project was a revision of the recently expired S-1012. The S-1012 had a good history of productivity and multi-institutional cooperation. The Committee meets annually, in conjunction with the NCCC-42 (Technical Committee on Swine Nutrition), with the meeting including joint discussions between both groups as well as breakout sessions specific to each of the 2 groups. The meeting agendas are typically conducive to good discussion and usually include guest speakers from USDA, commodity organizations, and others. Among the aspects of the newly approved project are specific points to standardize methods, data and statistical analyses across institutions participating in joint research to provide more robust datasets. Mathew recommended continuation of S-1044. Dahl seconded and the motion was passed by unanimous vote.

The report for SCC-72 Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency in Cattle was provided by Kiser, who noted that Paul Humes, the current monitor for this project was retiring and not available to provide the report. Kiser noted this project was constituted by a small group that routinely meets at the Southern Section Animal Science meetings. Four to five topics were discussed at the most recent meeting, which included a significant contingent of graduate students. The project will likely see some change in leadership and participation given retirements and turnover at participating institutions, so some transition is expected over the coming year. Kiser noted the group is currently struggling to find additional participants, but recommended approval for continuation, and urged the heads/chairs on the Committee to stress participation of appropriate faculty members in this project. Kiser suggested that he take on the role of Monitor for this project, if Keith Bertrand would take on the duties of Monitor for the genetics project (S-1013), as he (Bertrand) is more familiar with that discipline. Bertand agreed to do so. The motion to recommend continuation of SCC-72 was seconded by Noble and passed by unanimous vote.

Morrison took the opportunity to explain to the Committee the 3 types of multi-state projects under the Committees purview. These include S (research) projects, CC (Coordinating Committee) projects, and ERA (Extension, Research Activities) projects. He noted that CCs and ERAs are primarily information exchange groups but with some expectation of specific outcomes.

Noble provided the report for SCC-081 - Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern U.S. He noted that among the focus areas of the group was parasite control, problems with resistance to anti-parasitic agents, and characterizing optimal year-round grazing systems. Publications and abstract output from this project reflect good multi-institutional work. He noted that Missouri State U and Tennessee State U./U. of Tennessee (these 2 universities jointly fund a faculty position in small ruminants) are considering joining the project. The project promotes good research and extension involvement, including coordinated outreach that includes train-the-trainer (agents) activities. The group has scheduled a meeting for 2009 and they annually appoint a rotating chair. It was also noted that the group has established and maintained a good website. Noble recommended continuation for the project, with Greene seconding the motion. The motion was passed by unanimous vote.

Beck provided the report for SERA 15 Competitiveness and Sustainability of the Southern Dairy Industry. She noted the group was meeting this week. The project has a primarily economic focus, but also addresses other issues that impact the dairy industry. The project provides a forum for producers, processors and retailers to discuss issues and disseminate information. Some recent outcomes included a refundable tax, merger of Dairy Herd Improvement Associations (DHIAs) across some closely aligned states, and success in garnering SARE grants. Kiser noted the project was originally set to expire, but was granted a 1-year extension because the Southern Directors had asked for some adjustments before approval of a new project. It was noted that the project included interactions of extension, research, and industry partners with approximately 100 total participants involved in the discussions. Much of that interaction occurs annually at the Southern Dairy Conference. The group has garnered industry support for these meetings. It was suggested that there is a need to generate and post a comprehensive list of participants, as such was not available on the NIMSS website. Morrison noted issues related to participant input of information and approval of such for submission into the NIMSS system. Beck recommended continuation of the project, pending the groups addressing of issues indicated for administrative approval. Kiser seconded and the motion was passed by unanimous vote.

Greene provided the report for SERA  36 - Beef Cattle Production Utilizing Forages in the Southeast to Integrate Research and Extension Programs across State Boundaries. He noted the project began to develop in 2005 when it was suggested that ongoing activities would fit well under a SERA. Greene was involved with the activities of this group early on and noted some initial concerns, including weak extension components, lack of outcomes, and questions regarding the range of participants, but these issues seem to have been addressed. Greene noted that participants represented every state in the southern region, plus West Virginia. Last year they hosted a meeting using video technology at the MidSouth Beef Cattle Nutrition Conference. Lectures were provided by several faculty members from some participating states. However, the new project was only approved for one year, pending the groups addressing other issues of concern.

Morrison noted that some adjustments may be needed to facilititate SERA approvals. Among the concerns was an apparent lack of clear directives regarding the criteria for approval. This seemed to be the primary issue for SERA 36 and may become a problem for SERA 15. It was strongly suggested that approvers of ERAs clearly communicate the criteria for approval so participating groups can address such. Greene suggested that from his perspective SERA 36 accomplished goals consistent with those expected of integrated extension and research activities. Greene suggested that the Committee encourage continuation of the activities by this group, and encourage them to draft a new SERA project for review. Additionally, it was suggested that the Committee provide a vote of confidence for such. Dahl made a motion to that effect and Beck seconded. Gerrard asked if this should be an S (research), or a CC (Coordinating Committee) project. Greene and Morrison suggested that the activity should remain a SERA, as this activity appeared to be more in line with an extension/research information exchange group. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Committee.

Greene made a motion that our Advisory Committee ask the SERA Review Committee to provide the criteria for approval of SERA projects, and encourage them to look favorably upon resubmissions of SERA 36 & 15 as they appear to have true interaction across extension and research programs across states. Additionally, it was recommended that the review committee openly report changes in those criteria should they occur. It was suggested that the minutes of this meeting provide a record of that recommendation to the reviewers of SERA proposals. It was further suggested that we include a statement of our Committees disappointment regarding the termination of SERA 15, as it would appear to be the responsibility of the SERA review committee to educate Extension faculty regarding how to meet those criteria. Dahl seconded the motion and the motion was passed on unanimous vote of the Committee. The Committee further granted approval for David Morrison to communicate this to the SERA reviewers at the first opportunity.

Beck posed the question if there is an expectation for monitors to attend multi-state project annual meetings. Lacy indicated that while it might be beneficial, attendance at the meetings is not a requirement for monitors. Morrison suggested that it might be good to attend the first 2 years or so following the initiation of a project.

Lacy noted that projects S-1020, 1027, 1032, 1035, and 1037 were suggested for nomination for the Excellence in Multi-state Research Award. Morrison indicated he would contact administrative advisors of S-1020, 1032, 1035, and 1037 to urge them to submit nomination documents. Conner volunteered to contact the administrator of S-1027 with the same suggestion.

Lacy noted the issue of budgets and funding for travel to multi-state project meetings. Harmon noted that UK had an internal mechanism to fund travel for multi-state travel, but was not sure this mechanism would continue for lengthy budget distress scenarios. As such, we may need to look for other sources of funding. It would certainly be a concern if participation in these projects would be lost due to lack of travel support. After some discussion, Lacy noted we should encourage and facilitate faculty members, including young faculty members attendance, as these activities present networking and funding opportunities.

Morrison noted the upcoming ASAS and ADSA meetings in Montreal, reminding all that a passport is needed for air travel to Canada, and that international students travelling from the US to Canada may require visas. Committee members were urged to remind their faculties of these requirements. Pardue also reminded the group that if items were to be shipped to the meeting, ample time would need to be considered for clearing through customs.

Morrison requested input from the group regarding how and if activity in professional societies is considered towards tenure and promotion considerations. He noted the concern over declining memberships in our professional societies. Dahl noted that national awards and national recognition are criteria for promotion and tenure, and as such, interactions in professional societies would seem to be very important towards such.

Kiser posed the question of whether there has been any discussion of a merger of ASAS and ADSA. Morrison indicated this suggestion may have some merit in our current economic environment. Kiser posed the question to the group of whether and/or how departments provided funds for faculty members to pay for dues for society membership. The majority of Committee members indicated that state and federal funds are not used for such; however extramural funds can be used for society membership dues.

The Committee was informed that it was the Southern Regions turn to host the 2010 Animal Science Heads/Chairs meeting. It was agreed that we would host the meeting in conjunction with the National Cattlemens Association meeting in San Antonio in late January. Details regarding the dates, agenda, and venue would be determined in the near future.

With no further business to discuss, the 2009 meeting of the SAC-2 Advisory Committee was adjourned.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

David Morrison (dmorrison@agcenter.lsu.edu) - administrative advisor, LSU AgCenter;
Wayne Greene (waynegreene@auburn.edu) - Auburn University;
Geoff Dahl (gdahl@ufl.edu) - University of Florida;
Keith Bertrand (jkbert@uga.edu) - University of Georgia;
Mike Lacy (mlacy@uga.edu) - University of Georgia;
Bob Harmon (rharmon@uky.edu) - University of Kentucky;
Terry Kiser (tkiser@ads.msstate.edu) - Mississippi State University;
Ralph Noble (rcnoble@ncat.edu) - North Carolina A&T University;
Alan Mathew (amathew@utk.edu) - University of Tennesse;
Todd See, (todd_see@ncsu.edu) - North Carolina State University;
Ron Kensinger, (ron.kensinger@okstate.edu) - Oklahoma State University;
Peter Burfening, pburfening@nifa.usda.gov - USDA/NIFA;
Kevin Pond, (kevin.pond@ttu.edu) - Texas Tech University;
Gary Hay, ghay@agcenter.lsu.edu - Louisiana State University Agricultural Center

Brief Summary of Minutes

Mike Lacy presided over the meeting and Alan Mathew recorded the minutes.

David Morrison (Admin. Advisor) addressed the SAC-2 group. He noted that an update of the ESCOP Science Road Map was underway and included rewording of some components. Among other aspects, a description of the seven challenges is now expressed in more generic terms and specific language related to improving animal and crop production has been removed. This seems to more closely follow the alignment with the new five priorities of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Morrison reminded the Committee that our report was due within 60 days following this meeting. He also noted that this is the 3rd year for the Excellence in Multi-state Research Award, for which each region submits a nominee. He reminded the Committee that we had previously recommended nomination of S-projects from our region. He noted that S-1032, Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States, was previously nominated for this award; however the award was presented to another multi-state project. Morrison further noted the criteria for the award and indicated the project's need to be national in scope and have leveraged funds from grants. He noted the nomination includes a 3-page document, with six areas to be addressed by each nominated group.

A general discussion of commodity check-off programs was conducted. In particular, the lack of support for research by such programs was noted. It was observed that two years ago, some members of the NCBA suggested an expansion of check-off support; however the initiative was not successful. It was further noted that the industry check-off input has not changed for 25 years, thus limiting any expansion for support of programs. It was suggested that we invite someone from NCBA to our meeting next year to discuss this issue. Another suggestion was to bring this topic to the ASAS meetings in Denver in July.

On another topic, it was noted that Animal Science Departments have a large teaching load, and this impacts our other activities. Several members commented that funds for our teaching programs are not adequate and strategies were discussed for generating money for teaching programs, including lab and/or course fees.

Members of the SAC-2 Committee then provided reports and recommendations regarding multi-state projects under the Committee's oversight, as per the below.

S-1020: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency of Poultry. Mike Lacy, Monitor for the project provided the report. He noted this project is currently under review by the Multi-state Research Committee, and Morrison noted the review had recently been completed and the report was on his desk for consideration. Lacy indicated this has been a small but productive group which has conducted good work. He noted some concern that the level of collaboration may not be as high as it could be. Morrison noted that the most recent review had indicated increased collaboration, thus addressing this concern. Lacy indicated that the group was additionally productive with grants and publications. He recommended continuation of the project and the SAC-2 Committee agreed.

S-1025: Systems for Controlling Air Pollutant Emissions and Indoor Environments of Poultry, Swine, and Dairy Facilities. Mathew, Monitor for the project provided the report. He noted the project was renewed as S-1025 in 2006 and the project will expire in 2011. He indicated this group has a good history of activity and productivity and has recently increased collaborative projects, thus decreasing the proportion of single-institution projects that was a concern in the past. In their most recent meeting of June 2009, they had very good attendance with 14 of the 19 participating institutions represented at the meeting. This participation was improved over previous meetings, which had been a concern. The meeting included guests from the USDA and 3 invited speakers. This group has provided an informative and comprehensive annual report and they also did a good job of listing impacts as a part of their report. Numerous publications were listed for 2009, with a good balance of Extension and producer-oriented publications, peer-reviewed publications, abstracts, presentations and proceedings papers. Mathew recommended continuation of the project and the SAC-2 Committee agreed.

S-1027: The Poultry Food System: A Farm to Table Model. Monitor Don Conner was not present. Lacy provided an update on the project. He noted most Poultry Science departments participate in this project. Members have been very active and have demonstrated a collaborative spirit. They have been modestly successful in grantsmanship. Lacy recommended continuation of the project and indicated Conner would be asked to provide a formal report. The SAC-2 Committee agreed with the recommendation for continuation of the project.

S-1030: Flies Impacting Livestock, Poultry and Food Safety. Monitor Keith Lusby was not present. Morrison indicated Lusby would be asked to provide a report.

Lusby provided the following report on 2/3/2010: This report is written from minutes submitted by Chair Dr. Wes Watson. Twenty five participated in the meeting held in San Diego on Jan 13-14, 2010. Objectives are 1: Characterize dispersal and population biology of stable flies (SF) and house flies (HF) and develop monitoring methods for use in indoor and outdoor environments; 2: Establish extent of fly-borne dispersal of human and animal pathogens; and 3: Improve management tactics for stable flies and house flies. The report indicates a good degree of activities across several states and activity with species including cattle, swine and horses. The suggested date for 2011 meeting is 12-13 January 2010 in San Antonio, TX, hosted by the USDA Cattle Fever Tick Laboratory. Objective groups discussed specific projects for the next year and set out collaborations to develop proposals for funding. Objective groups also presented their goals for the next year including proposal concepts and possible funding sources.

Lusby recommended continuation of the project.

S-1032: Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States. Bob Harmon, Monitor for the project provided the report. He noted this was an active project that was renewed in 2007. Twenty states are involved in the project and the group demonstrates multi-disciplinary activities. Their objectives include addressing waste streams and air emissions, and they are taking a more global approach to reducing nutrient streams. Harmon noted the group provided a very good annual report. They met in conjunction with the S-1025 group in June where they provided updates on projects, including poster sessions and oral presentations in a very interactive meeting. They show good multi-state cooperation. Harmon questioned whether they have reported all of their publications in their annual report. He recommended continuation for the project and also recommended re-nomination of this group for the Excellence in Multi-State Projects award. The SAC-2 Committee agreed with both recommendations.

S-1035: Nutritional and Management Abatement Strategies for Improvement of Poultry Air and Water Quality. Sam Pardue, Monitor for the project was not present. Morrison reported on the project indicating their annual report had been sent to him by Dr. Pardue. He noted their meeting was held in July, in association with Poultry Science Association meetings. Fifteen institutions are participating in this project. Morrison described some example projects and accomplishments from the annual report, noting this group has an obvious Extension component and a mix of single institution and collaborative projects. It was further noted that they have a good publication record. Morrison noted a need to increase the emphasis on collaborative efforts. Morrison recommended continuation of the project and the SAC-2 Committee agreed.

S-1037: Integrative Functional and Physiological Genomics of Poultry. Mary Beck, Monitor for the project was not present. Terry Kiser stated that Mary Beck was no longer the department head at Clemson and suggested that Mike Kidd, new Head of the Poultry Science Department at the University of Arkansas be asked to accept the responsibility as Monitor for this project. Mike Lacy indicated he would provide a report for this project to the Committee and to Morrison. Lacy recommended continuation of the project based on past history of good activity and accomplishments. The SAC-2 Committee agreed.

(Mike Lacy confirmed on February 8, 2010 that Mike Kidd had agreed to take on the role of Monitor for S-1037)

S-1040: Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle. Dahl, Monitor for the project provided the report. He noted the group held their annual meeting in France and he was able to attend. He noted he was very impressed with the meeting as it was well-organized, interactive and informative. The meeting was hosted by an industry partner (breeding company) in France. Dahl further noted this project has been a long-standing multi-state activity that is now focused on 3-way genetic crosses. Their meetings have seen good attendance and the project is national in scope and across participants, with a Southeast and Midwest emphasis. Graduate students also participate in the meetings. The most recent meeting was a two and a half day venue with several invited speakers from INRA and other European groups. The group will continue to plan for future joint meetings with European partners. He noted the group demonstrates good collaboration and integration. Dahl noted one minor concern regarding the need for more junior researchers and newer investigations. He recommended continuation of the project and the SAC-2 Committee agreed. Bob Harmon noted that U. of Kentucky's participation in the project is jeopardized by a recent mandate to downsize their dairy. Kensinger suggested approaching stakeholders regarding funding issues, downsizing of faculty in this discipline and downsizing of herds/flocks. All will challenge our ability to maintain productive research in this area.

S-1044: Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency. Mathew, Monitor for the project, provided the report. He noted the S-1044 multi-state project is a revision of the expired S-1012 multistate project, which had a good history of productivity and multi-institutional cooperation across research and extension missions. With the expiration of that project, participating member institutions drafted a new proposal, which was approved last year for a 5-year period and thus they have just completed the first year under the new project. The Committee meets annually, with their most recent meeting occurring January 4 & 5, 2010 in conjunction with the NCCC-42, Technical Committee on Swine Nutrition. As has been typical for their annual meetings, their recent meeting included joint discussions with NCCC-42 and breakout sessions specific to each of the 2 groups. The meeting agendas are typically conducive to good discussion and usually include guest speakers from USDA, commodity organizations, and others. Among the aspects of the approved new project are specific points to coordinate the various research and Extension initiatives across participating institutions, and to standardize methods, data, and statistical analyses to provide a larger and more robust datasets that should result in more comprehensive outcomes and recommendations. Mathew recommended continuation of the project and the SAC-2 Committee agreed. Morrison asked if this project should be nominated for the Excellence in Multi-State Projects award, but Mathew suggested re-nominating S-1032 as had been recommended earlier.

S-1045: Genetic (Co) Variance of Parasite Resistance, Temperment, and Production Traits of Traditional and Non-Bos indicus Tropically-Adapted Breeds. Bertrand, Monitor for the project provided the report. He noted this project focuses on genetic considerations for beef cattle in challenging environments. It was renewed from the previous S-1013. He noted numerous research stations are involved in this project. It has been generally productive, but there are some weakness in that the project is somewhat isolated by stations across sire usage and investigations of genomic components for adaptability and disease resistance. Bertrand further noted that if the group could succeed in this area, this would be a very important project that would also lead to increased granting opportunities. Burfening noted he was concerned by the high proportion of senior investigators and the recent retirements that have resulted in lost expertise in this area. He noted they should strive for a new influx of new investigators. Burfening also suggested that while one of their objectives is to store DNA, currently there are no real plans to use such. He noted the National Animal Germplasm program would likely be interested in banking these genetics in the form of DNA, semen, and embryos and possibly other forms. Burfening indicated we should suggest to the S-1045 group that a representative contact Harvey Blackburn, Animal Geneticist for National Germplasm program, to take advantage of this opportunity. Bertrand recommended continuation of the project and the SAC-2 Committee agreed.

SCC-72: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency in Cattle. Kiser, Monitor for the project provided the report. He noted this is an information exchange group encompassing five institutions and representing extension, research and teaching. They typically meet at the Animal Science Southern Section meetings and conduct a planned program with invited speakers. Their emphasis is on estrous synchronization. Kiser noted he attended the meeting last year and indicated that some good multi-state collaboration have come out of this information exchange group. He noted however that he had some concerns when visiting the NIMSS site in that Appendix E, denoting participants, is very incomplete. He further noted that the administrative advisor has not been active with the group and this issue should be addressed. Kiser indicated he will address the group in that regard. He also noted there was no evidence of a report and he would address the group in that regard as well. Morrison suggested the group needs to promote and invite larger participation from other institutions. Kiser recommended continuation of SCC-72, with the above recommendations to the group. The SAC-2 Committee agreed.

SCC-81: Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern U.S
Ralph Noble, Monitor for this multi-state information exchange group was not present. Morrison provided the report, indicating that this group includes 25 participants who do a good job in interacting and providing impacts. This group is primarily constituted by 1890's institutions, and Morrison noted that the NIMSS reporting structure is not set up to fully accommodate reporting by those institutions. He noted that the three primary objectives of the group include exchange and use of information on parasites, reproductive performance and grazing. He also noted they do a good job with governance and the conduct of meetings. Morrison recommended continuation of SCC-81 and further recommended continuation of Ralph Noble as monitor. The SAC-2 Committee agreed with both recommendations.

SERA-15: Competitiveness and Sustainability of the Southern Dairy Industry. Mary Beck, Monitor for this project was not present. Morrison suggested that Gary Hay take on the monitoring responsibility for this project. Morrison noted that SERA-15 clearly includes research and extension components. Kiser provided the report and indicated he typically attends the meeting. The group usually meets the day before the Southern Dairy Conference. One concern is the number of retirements, particularly of dairy economists. It was further noted that travel and registration fees may be keeping participation lower than it should be. It may take some leadership to increase participation. Kiser noted that during the formulation of this project, some questions were raised in the approval process regarding impacts and other aspects. Morrison questioned that other than organizing the Southern Dairy Conference, it was not clear what the group does. Kiser noted that among other things, Jeff Bewley of U. of Kentucky and others have put together a good DAIReXNET site and increased the educational component with grant funding. One of the challenges is that this group was originally initiated by dairy extension economists, so there has not been a lot of production information exchanged. This group is thus still searching for an identity, and challenges exist for the scope of this multi-state project especially with recent and pending retirements. Kiser further noted that the Southern Dairy Conference is a big gathering providing considerable information for producers and the industry, and they post their proceedings on the web for a broad outreach. He indicated the Chair for SERA-15 and the Southern Dairy Conference are the same individual, and it is the one meeting where a lot of the industry folks come together. Kiser recommended continuation of SERA-15 and the SAC-2 Committee agreed.

SERA-41: Beef Cattle Production Utilizing Forages in the Southeast to Integrate Research and Extension Programs across State Boundaries. Wayne Green, Monitor for this multi-state project provided the report. He noted that last year this project received temporary approval, with concerns that a revision of anticipated impacts was needed. The SAC-2 Committee left our meeting last year noting the Department Heads unanimously supported this project. The SERA-41 group re-wrote the project, re-submitted the proposal, and again it was not approved. Morrison read the response from the Review Committee in which a statement was made that the proposal needed more tangible impacts and outcomes. It was noted that this group is meeting in Orlando on January 31 in conjunction with the Southern Section meetings, and it was suggested that Department Heads/Chairs participate in that meeting to provide additional guidance. Greene recommended continued support for this project, further noting that increased support from their advisor and leadership may be needed to get through this hurdle. Morrison suggested the problem may be that the statement of outcomes in the proposal is too generic, and no real distinct outcomes, such as a conference, websites or other outreach components are noted. The SAC-2 Committee agreed.

Lacy asked for further business items for the SAC-2 Committee.
A discussion was held regarding incoming officers for the SAC-2 Committee. Dahl nominated Dave Gerrard, Head of Animal and Poultry Sciences at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, as incoming secretary. Kiser seconded the nomination. It was noted that this is a 2-year position, and the individual will transition to the Chair of the SAC-2 Committee for a term of two years. Mathew will take on the position of Chair for the 2011 and 2012 meetings. A motion was made and seconded to close nominations. The motion was carried by unanimous vote, as was the initial motion of Dahl, thus placing Dave Gerrard as Secretary and Alan Mathew as Chair of the SAC-2 for a term of 2 years.

Kiser recommended that members of the SAC-2 Committee attend the Department Heads Breakfast at the Southern Section meetings to be held on Monday morning, January 8 in Orlando FL (program can be accessed at http://www.saasinc.org/2010-Orlando/Programs/2010_Program_Book.pdf ). He noted that this activity provided a good opportunity to meet with heads of other disciplines, including economists, agronomists, horticulturalists and others.

With no further business to conduct, the 2010 meeting of the SAC-2 was adjourned.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Don Conner (connede@auburn.edu)- Auburn U.;
Wayne Greene (wgreene@auburn.edu) - Auburn U.;
Todd See (todd_see@ncsu.edu) - NC State U.;
Geoff Dahl (gdahl@ufl.edu) - U. of Florida);
Keith Bertrand (jkbert@uga.edu) - U. of Georgia;
Bob Harmon (rharmon@uky.edu) - U. of Kentucky;
Gary Hay (ghay@agcenter.lsu.edu) - Louisiana State U. AgCenter;
Alan Mathew (amathew@utk.edu) - U. of Tennessee;
Ron Kensinger (ron.kensinger@okstate.edu) - Oklahoma State U.;
David Gerrard (dgerrard@vt.edu) - Virginia Tech);
Ralph Noble (rcnoble@ncat.edu) - North Carolina A&T University;
David Morrison, Admin. Advisor, (dmorrison@agcenter.lsu.edu)- Louisiana State U. AgCenter);
Mark Mirando, (MMIRANDO@CSREES.USDA.GOV) - USDA-NIFA;

Brief Summary of Minutes

Alan Mathew presided over the meeting and Dave Gerrard recorded the minutes.

David Morrison, Admin. Advisor, addressed the SAC-2 group. He reviewed the NIFA structure and reminded the committee of undersecretary Woteki's three major thrusts.

Morrison asked the committee to again assist in identifying projects that are worthy of nomination for the National Excellence in Multistate Research Award. S-1032, which had been the Southern Region's nominee in 2010 was again supported by SAC-2 as the 2011 nominee. Morrison reminded the Committee that our report was due within 60 days following this meeting.

Members of the SAC-2 Committee then provided reports and recommendations regarding multi-state projects under the Committee's oversight.

Mathew asked for further business items for the SAC-2 Committee.

A discussion ensued regarding funding for animal agriculture. It was recommended that a white paper be put together outlining: 1) growing animal costs and 2) the possibility of conducting education and extension functions cross-state.

A motion was made that Jeff Dahl and Bob Harmon draft the paper and the motion carried.

David Gerrard was nominated for chair of the committee next year and the nomination carried.

Wayne Greene was nominated as secretary and the motion carried.

With no further business to conduct, the 2010 meeting of the SAC-2 was adjourned.

Accomplishments

S-1025: Systems for Controlling Air Pollutant Emissions and Indoor Environments of Poultry, Swine, and Dairy Facilities <br /> <br /> Alan Mathew (UT) reported this project was renewed as S-1025 in 2006 and will expire this year. This multi-state group has a good history of activity and productivity, although recently there appears to be a greater proportion of single-institution projects counted among the groups activities. The group meets annually, with the dates and venues listed several years in advance. In their most recent meeting May, 2010, 11 of the 32 participating members were represented. The meeting was held in conjunction with S-1032: Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States. One of the agenda items for this years meeting was a discussion of the future of this multi-state group, with options including termination of the project upon its expiration, initiate a new project, or merge with S-1032. The decision of the group was to continue the work of S-1025 with the submission of a new project upon expiration of the current project. <br /> <br /> Under the accomplishments of the group over the past reporting periods are a number of large coordinated multi-state collaborations and smaller collaborations between 2 or 3 participating institutions. The latest report listed on the NIMSS site was provided in September 2009; for which the group did a good in listing impacts as a part of their report. Numerous publications were listed for 2009, with a good balance of Extension and producer-oriented publications, peer-reviewed publications and abstracts, presentations and proceedings papers. While I was provided the minutes of their most recent meeting (see above), the group should be encouraged to provide a report of the most recent reporting period. <br /> <br /> Based on the accomplishments of the group over the course of this multi-state project, I recommend encouraging the group to provide updated reports, including a comprehensive final report in a timely manner, and submit a new project to continue the S-1025 work for consideration by the SAC-2 upon expiration of the current project.<br /> <br /> Alan Matthew made a suggestion the committee should merge with S-1032. Dave Morrison suggested if the committee wanted to continue, they should organize a development committee. The motions were carried unanimously. Bob Harmon (UK) volunteered to take over for Alan to monitor this committee.<br /> <br /> S-1027: The Poultry Food System: A Farm to Table Model<br /> <br /> Monitor Don Conner (Auburn) provided an update on the project. He noted the committee has been granted an extension and plans to resubmit. The group (project) of 12 has been very active. He noted that they needed a cross-state component and their reports are behind. A subset of the group is actively pursuing NIFA funding. <br /> <br /> Don recommended reports be submitted but continue meeting. Motion carried unanimously.<br /> <br /> S-1030: Flies Impacting Livestock, Poultry and Food Safety. Monitor Keith Lusby was not present and no report had been submitted. <br /> <br /> Given the topic, it was moved that the group be reallocated to Entomology department heads. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> S-1032: Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States. <br /> <br /> Monitor Bob Harmon (UK) reported the project terminates in 2012. The group has been highly published (40 pubs last year) and consists of a good mixture of animal scientists and agricultural engineers. This group collaborates extensively with S-1025 and the issue of combining was entertained but no action taken. <br /> <br /> Harmon recommended a development committee and writing team be formed, or an extension be requested. Mirando (NIFA) stated it was a bit too early to think of extension. Harmon suggested conversation be held about the future of the group and the motion to continue under the aforementioned carried unanimously.<br /> <br /> S-1035: Nutritional and Management Abatement Strategies for Improvement of Poultry Air and Water Quality. No report.<br /> <br /> S-1037: Integrative Functional and Physiological Genomics of Poultry. <br /> <br /> Mike Kidd (University of Arkansas) reported (sent) that the committee met in March with Dr. Roeder serving as monitor at the DFW Airport and discussed current research projects and how to increase members to collaborate with / expand on current projects. The business meeting discussions consisted of: ways to increase participation and future meeting dates. Current projects were also discussed. Current activities for active members consist of, but are not limited to: Divergent selection for pale, soft, and exudative like (PSE-like) meat in broilers; Genomic SNP analysis differentiates ascites susceptible from resistant broilers; Impact of diet and feeding program on growth and yield of Commercial Pheasants; Impact of maternal inheritance of turkeys on muscle phenotype and the muscle structure of the dam or dam line; Assessment of functional mechanisms of genetic changes as a result of selection and gene introgression Genetic predisposition of turkey to round heart disease; and Gompertz-Laird Prediction of the Requirement for Crude Protein and Metabolizable Energy by French Guinea Fowl Broilers. To date, twenty peer reviewed articles have been published by the group.<br /> <br /> Avian genetic research is important to the efficient progress of poultry breeding in a global climate of increased feed costs and increasing populations that consume poultry products. The project impacts poultry breeding programs in terms of line selection on disease resistance, nutrient utilization, and meat quality.<br /> <br /> It was moved and seconded that the committee continue and the committee voted unanimously to support the motion.<br /> <br /> <br /> S-1040: Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle. <br /> <br /> Jeff Dahl (University of Florida) reported the project is dominated by participants from the North Central and Southern regions with an interest in population genetics. Recent retirements have reduced the number of participants; however, the group is being re-populated by former student participants and junior faculty that bring cutting edge molecular and genomic approaches to the project. In 2010 the group met in Gainesville, Florida on October 25 and 26. The meeting included invited speakers (Dr. Pete Hansen and Mr. Don Bennink) and station reports. The group visited a grazing dairy and a large purebred Holstein farm. The meeting was well attended with over 15 participants including graduate students.<br /> <br /> The group continues to be productive with regard to journal articles. Recent publications include joint authorship papers that address the impact of crossbreeding on performance and survivability under southeast grazing conditions. The 2011 meeting will be hosted by Mike Schutz at Purdue University on October 24 and 25. The project website is http://lgu.umd.edu/lgu_v2/homepages/home.cfm?trackID=9943. <br /> <br /> It was moved and seconded that the committee continue and the committee voted unanimously to support the motion.<br /> <br /> S-1044: Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency.<br /> <br /> Alan Mathew (University of Tennessee) reported that the project is a revision of the expired S-1012 multistate project, which had a good history of productivity and multi-institutional cooperation across research and extension missions. With the expiration of that project, participating member institutions drafted a new proposal, which was approved December 1, 2008 for a 5-year period; thus they have just completed the second year under the new project.<br /> <br /> The Committee meets annually in early January, in conjunction with the NCCC-42 (Technical Committee on Swine Nutrition), with the meeting including joint discussions between both groups as well as breakout sessions specific to each of the 2 groups. The meeting agendas are typically conducive to good discussion and usually include guest speakers from USDA, commodity organizations, and others. This years meeting held January 4-5 in Orlando included discussions with USDA NIFA and ARS Program Leaders, Steven Smith and Mark Boggess.<br /> <br /> Among the aspects of the S-1044 project are specific points to coordinate the various research and Extension initiatives across participating institutions, and to standardize methods, data and statistical analyses to provide a larger and more robust datasets that should result in more comprehensive recommendations. It was suggested that this project be submitted for a multi-state award in the near future. David Morrison outlined the criteria used for such selection. The committee considered the suggestion but opted for S-1032 this year and will reconsider S-1044 next year.<br /> <br /> It was moved and seconded that the committee continue and the committee voted unanimously to support the motion.<br /> <br /> S-1045: Regional Research Project: Genetic Considerations for Beef Cattle Production in Challenging Environments. <br /> <br /> Keith Bertrand (University of Georgia) reported there are 11 universities or government research entities participating in this project. This group met in June of 2010 to discuss progress on the project, and the attendance at the meeting was very good. An annual report was also submitted in July of 2010. Although the project was just initiated in 2009, during the current year, the project published 27 papers and reports. There are four objectives in this project. The first objective involves the estimation of genetic variation associated with susceptibility or resistance to measures of disease stress in cattle managed on forage. Nine stations are participating in this objective. Some effort has been made to encourage the use of common sires across locations and to standardize the methods of collecting disease information across locations  both the use of common sires and/or breeds and common data collection techniques need to be priorities for all the objectives of this project. Objective 2 seeks to characterize diverse, tropically adapted breeds with an emphasis on cow fertility and productivity. Nine stations are participating in this objective. Objective 3 seeks to establish a DNA bank for the characterization of molecular markers, genetic parameters and future gene discovery. Nine stations are participating in this objective. Participants in the project need to put some thought into who gets access to the phenotypes and genotypes produced in this project and for how much. The information (phenotypes and genotypes) produced in this project could possibly be leveraged in future research grants. Goal of Objective 4 is to evaluate the relationship between hair coat and production traits in beef cattle. Five stations are participating in this objective. <br /> <br /> Bertrand recommended that this project be continued and the committee supported the recommendation. <br /> <br /> S-1047: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency of Poultry. <br /> <br /> Mike Lacy (University of Georgia), in a letter, reported the group continues to be active and productive. This project has recently been approved for the next 5 year period. The group had a very successful meeting in October 2010 hosted by the University of Arkansas. They are working to include more extension faculty in the project and therefore invited Keith Bramwell and Jon Moyle to make presentations to the group. John Hardiman from Cobb-Vantress gave an excellent update on the poultry industry perspective on problems/opportunities that would be worth pursuing in poultry.<br /> <br /> Current objectives of the project include: 1) characterize mechanisms enabling rhythmic regulation of dopaminergic-melatoninergic neurons within the hypothalamus of photosensitive turkey hens, 2) characterize molecular mechanisms affecting egg production in chickens, 3) identify chromosomal regions affecting phenotypic variation in sperm mobility, a primary determinant of male fertility, and 4) characterize the mating behavior of contemporary broiler breeders and define central pathways affecting reproductive behavior.<br /> <br /> Mike Lacy concluded that this project has been highly productive and recommended it be continued, the committee agreed. <br /> <br /> SCC-72: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency in Cattle. <br /> <br /> Terry Kiser (Mississippi State University) emailed a report and recommended the project be terminated and stated Nancy Cox (University of Kentucky) agreed. Much discussion ensued. Namely, the group felt that if someone wanted to keep the project going forward, the committee should support it. It was recommended it be continued and the motion carried. Wayne Greene (Auburn) offered to monitor the committee. The group agreed.<br /> <br /> SCC-081: Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern U.S. <br /> <br /> Ralph Noble (North Carolina A&T) noted that the group was using a non-drug approach to reduce parasites. Output was high. David Morrison suggested the group could become a research group. A motion to continue was made by Noble and it was seconded. The committee carried the motion.<br /> <br /> SERA-15: Competitiveness and Sustainability of the Southern Dairy Industry. <br /> <br /> Gary Hay (LSU AgCenter) suggested the group is very productive and included 8-13 states. This is a long-time group and faculty from the University of Missouri wish to join. The group sponsors the Southern Dairy Conference and reports are timely. Gary moved the committee be continued. The group agreed unanimously. <br /> <br /> SERA041 Beef Cattle Production Utilizing Forages in the Southeast to Integrate Research and Extension Programs across State Boundaries <br /> <br /> Wayne Greene (Auburn) reported the committee met on 02/07/10 in Orlando Florida with the SAAS meeting. Twenty three members were in attendance from the 13 Southern states. The immediate goal of the meeting was to discuss, strategize, and implement actions to address the deficiencies expressed by the SERA Review Committee. The long term goal of the participants is to achieve approved status of SERA041 for the 5 year period of 2010 through 2014. The discussion addressed the key comment by the Review Committee that the original proposal needed to develop specific, tangible, measureable objectives, procedures, and outcomes, particularly in research and Extension. They had significant discussion of the repackaging of the 3 objectives in their previous proposal. They repackaged their objectives to: 1) develop a Southern Extension/Research Activity for identifying and prioritizing beef/forages research and extension programming issues in the Southeast, 2) develop a Southern Extension/Research Activity to develop cooperative extension and research programs across Southern state boundaries, 3) develop strategies for funding high-priority research and extension programs and 4) enhance relationships between the Land-Grant University missions of research and extension with beef cattle commodity groups through State Beef Cattle Associations and other beef cattle organizations.<br /> Working groups were created to address revision of the objectives and identify specific-tangible outputs that would occur as a result of the SERA041 group associated with each objective. The working groups were assigned relative to the original proposal and handled the revision of the objectives. The project was approved in 2010 as a result of their combined work. Matt Hersom served as chair for 2010 and did a good job in keeping them moving forward.<br /> The group will be meeting this coming Sunday, February 6, 2011 in Corpus Christi TX in partnership with the SAAS/Southern Section ASAS meeting. Wayne moved the committee be continued and the committee agreed unanimously.<br />

Publications

Not applicable to this committee.

Impact Statements

1. Not applicable to this committee

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Wayne Greene, Auburn; Bill Brown, UT Associate Director; Neal Schrick, UT; Ralph Noble, NCA&T; Mike Looper, UA; Bob Harmon, UK; Gary Hay, LSU; Mike Lacy, UGA; and Eric Young, Southern Experiment Station Director. Keith Bertand, UGA; Geoff Dahl, UF; and Mark Mirando  USDA joined the meeting in progress

Brief Summary of Minutes

Welcome: Chairman Gerrard welcomed the group and introduced Bill Brown for comments.
Brown commented that the he was glad to be here and work with group. The following are items Dr. Brown presented:
UT Dean and Associates went to visit KY administrators and discussed budgets, and sharing physical and faculty resources. Dr. Brown reported that as we move forward in agriculture while experiencing budget and resources cuts, we will have to rethink how we meet the needs of our programs. We have to address the things we can control. Development of partnerships across academic areas/programs is becoming a necessity. Their discussions between UT and UK revolved around getting courses taught in an underfunded environment and how to maintain our missions of research and extension centers in Land Grant Universities. The department heads in the southern region can help develop mechanisms to impact academic programs across the region. Dr. Brown discussed the need to share facilities for both teaching and research endeavors. UT and KY have shared tobacco money in past years. Work needs to be done on how to fully participate in proposal linkage for the future.
A discussion was held on issues with partnership from an administrative level on partnering in teaching common courses across departments. A model for all universities to prevent fighting the battle at local levels is needed. We must develop a way to make the system work. The technology is available; we just have to solve the administrative interaction.
The discussion concluded with Dr. Gerrard asking each head to provide short bullets containing an inventory of strengths and weakness within each of our departments on faculty expertise, facilities, etc. These are to be sent to Dr. David Gerrard at Virginia Tech for compilation and sharing across the region.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Wayne Greene Auburn (AS) wgreene@auburn.edu
334.844.1523
Clint Rusk OK State (AS) Clint.rusk@okstate.edu
765.491.9437
Ralph Noble NC A&T (AS) rcnoble@ncat.edu
336.334.7547
Mike Lacy UGA (Poultry) Mlacy@uga.edu
706.542.1351
Geoff Dahl U. FL (AS) gdahl@ufl.edu
352.392.1981
Neal Schrick UT (AS) fschrick@utk.edu
865.974.3130
David Gerrard VT (AS) Dgerrard@vt.edu
540.449.2165
Keith Bertrand UGA (AS) jkbert@uga.edu
706.542.6259
Bill Brown UT (Director’s Office wfbrown@utk.edu
865.974.7121
Jim Strickland Clemson (AVS) Jstrick@clemson.edu
864.656.3138
Todd See NCSU (AS) Tsee@ncsu.edu
919.515.2755
Don Conner Auburn (Poultry) connede@auburn.edu
334.844.2639
Mary Beck MSSTATE (Poultry) m.beck@msstate.edu
662.325.3416

Brief Summary of Minutes

Approval of Minutes:

The 2014 meeting minutes were posted to the NIMSS website.  Chair Wayne Greene called for a motion to approve the 2014 minutes.  Beck asked for clarification of the SAAS issue raised last year (Section B of Minutes). Greene wrote the SAAS Directors after the 2014 meeting to clarify intentions with regard to overlap of the SAAS meeting with the NCBA and IPPE.  Some discussion ensued regarding this overlap and an attempt to separate the two meetings.  Currently the upcoming department heads meeting  is scheduled for Western region in 2016, NE in 2017, and S in 2018.  Harmon had asked about the rotation with IPPE, which had been agreed on as an every 3-year location.  Conner moved approval of the minute; it was seconded; motion passed.

Discussion – Topics Important to Southern Region:
Engaging Freshman/Transfer Students:
Greene opened the discussion with observations from his freshman learning community course that students today, in his opinion, are very naïve with regard to the real world.  Non-science information becomes factual to them because they don’t have a good grasp on manipulating and understanding numbers and data.  They don’t have much experience with animals and are mostly city kids and pre-vet.

Strickland discussed Clemson’s introductory AS course with intro to every species (physiology, feeding practices, etc).  It has a weekly hands-on lab rotating through all the farms, learning about biosecurity, general handling.  It is followed by species-specific techniques courses where students actually work at the farms.  There is also a 1000 level seminar with guest speakers from industry.

Greene indicated study skills are important but also managing the diversity of vegetarianism or anti-animal ag perspectives.  Schrick teaches a general course on etiquette, ethics.  Recently TN held a teaching summit and threw out their entire curriculum and started over.
Rusk indicated OK has a student success coordinator to deal with 900 students seeking internships, tours, meeting with parents, coordinating with alumni.
Strickland indicated Clemson has a student manager for freshmen and professional development course at the Junior level for developing personal profiles, communication skills, internships, study abroad process.
Conner suggested this goes beyond the familiarity with animal ag and has to do with any hand on.  A food science course is required in PS at Auburn to educate PS students about the end product.  They can calculate but have no concept of the actual units of measure (g, kg, ton, pound).  This is anecdotal but persistent.  Food Science students are very strong academically perhaps because of K-12 teaching to standardized tests, but hug gap with regard to hands-on.
Strickland reported on Clemson’s freshman women living/learning community managed by 3 women in the department.  The students live together in one dorm and have study sessions.

Noble indicated that his 70% female students have a hands-on lab learning to identify all 7 species and that internships are encouraged. Alumni come back and talk about their experiences.

See has faculty member who runs a veterinary advising center for all pre-vet students on campus; there is a pre-professional course but alternate career tracks has helped admissions.  Also has a “vet pack” of interns who come in to help.  It is a guided process to opportunities.  She pushes students out to faculty in areas the students are interested in – e.g., dairy – so students are matched to interest areas but also areas that are realistic..  Several mentioned not talking about “plan B” but rather options to avoid discouraging those who don’t get into vet school or choose other pathways.

Brown asked about staffing and funding for these various positions: faculty? Staff? Teaching? Academic appointments?  Strickland’s position is a former research tech position converted to academic advising.  Rusk blocked salary dollars and moved a clerical position to advising.  See uses faculty.

Jointly administered Teaching Programs across Institution:

Brown reported that the Academic Program Leaders and Experiment Station Directors meet regularly in Atlanta to discuss issues of mutual interest/concern.  With shrinking teaching budgets, increasing numbers of students, and various levels of subsidy from Extension and Research Divisions, a recent topic has been the feasibility of offering jointly taught undergrad and graduate programs across states and institutions. Two programs already in use are Ag*Idea (GA, Auburn) and ACCEPS (LA, AR, MS, OK).  Both programs share tuition; ACCEPS was developed by primarily horticultural faculty whose individual classes were not making because of low enrollment.  Gerrard, Dahl and Schrick all indicated their institutions have said no to Ag*Idea; MS is on the fence.  Most present indicated they can all handle the core discipline courses, but its the “lighter” courses (swine, goats, sheep, dairy) that are problematic.  The Poultry Consortium in the upper MW was cited as a viable program, as was the swine production program developed by the US Pork Center.

A considerable discussion ensued about achieving joint programs at the faculty level but that upper administration is where these collaborations typically fail. The issues are where tuition is paid vs. where courses are taken/taught and who gets credit.  It’s all about credit and money and until that’s solved, joint teaching programs are unlikely to succeed formally; at the graduate level it’s even more complicated because grad students don’t actually pay tuition.

The Directors are meeting next in 2016.

 

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Name Location email Phone
Wayne Greene Auburn (animal) wgreene@auburn.edu (334) 844-1523
David Gerrard Virginia Tech (animal/poul.) dgerrard@vt.edu (540) 231-9157
Mike Looper Arkansas (animal) looper@uark.edu (479) 575-3476
Jim Stickland Clemson (animal/poultry) jrstric@clemson.edu (864) 656-3138
Mike Lacy Georgia (poultry) mlacy@uga.edu (706) 542-6259
Keith Bertrand Georgia (animal) jkbert@uga.edu (706) 542-6259
Todd See North Carolina State (animal) todd_see @ncsu.edu (919) 515-2755
Bob Harmon Kentucky rharmon@uky.edu (859) 257-2686
Bill Brown Tennessee (Director’s office) wfbrown@utk.edu (865) 974-7121
Clint Rusk Oklahoma clint.rusk@okstate.edu (405) 744-9254
Neal Schrick Tennessee fschrick@utk.edu (865) 975-3139
Mark Mirando USDA – NIFA mmirando@nifa.usda.gov (202) 401-4336
Ralph Noble North Carolina A&T rcnoble@ncat.edu (336) 334-7547
Mary Beck Mississippi State (poultry) mbeck@poultry.msstate.edu (662) 325-3416
Gary Hay Louisiana State ghay@agcenter.lsu.edu (225) 578-3241
Don Conner Auburn (poultry) connede@auburn.edu (334) 844-2639
Geoff Dahl Florida gdahl@ufl.edu (352) 392-1981

Brief Summary of Minutes

Comments from Bill Brown – Representative of Experiment Station Directors:
Dr. Brown indicated that a couple of agenda items had been passed around during the last few weeks. He indicated that it appeared that some universities were coming out of the most recent budget issues and attendance at the meeting seemed to be better than last year. He indicated that that Animal Science departments continue to increase in student numbers. With the increase in student numbers Dr. Brown indicated that it is imperative that we continue to look at ways to become more collaborative across university boundaries. We must consider joint teaching programs as a means of future success. He indicated that faculty members in animal science departments are teaching greatly above their teaching appointment. He suggested that one way to think about collaborating is developing partnerships across universities. He indicated that if this is done on an official basis, it gets bogged down. Experiment Station Directors believe we can move this forward in an unofficial basis. If each location had two distance education rooms, they could rack up FTE pretty quick. Faculty could receive adjunct status across campuses to help solve some issues. For the program to receive accreditation, we would have to talk to SACS about the plans.

Wayne Greene indicated that partnerships across universities and/or state boundaries must have formal approval by university officials. If these partnerships are based upon ‘good faith’ partnerships, departments/programs do not have enough control for replacing faculty resignations/retirements to maintain continuity across joint teaching programs.

Bob Harmon commented that two years ago at Southern dairy conference the participants at the conference discussed a dairy consortium as a partnership across state boundaries. He presented a document prepared by the organizers for the development of this partnership. They proposed this across teaching and extension and potentially using a Higher Education Challenge Grant on the teaching component of the program. It was presented that it takes a champion to make these types of initiatives to work out the road blocks. It is believed that both Stephanie Ward (MS State) and Jeff Bewley (UKY) have the leadership to make this organizational structure work. Bob Harmon made a motion that our group (SAC-2) provide support for the continued development of the Southeast Dairy Consortium. The motion was seconded by Keith Bertrand. Motion passed.

A general discussion pursued on the mechanics of how partnerships in teaching could be accomplished without any specific details identified. .

Keith Bertrand presented the 4 state partnership being developed at the graduate level utilizing Ag*IDEA for delivering graduate student courses between NCSU, Auburn, Clemson and UGA.

Chairman Gerrard then asked that each head provide a listing of their strengths in the graduate program. The following data was collected:

University Areas of Strength
Virginia Tech Muscle, Growth, Biology, Neurophysiology, Gut Health, Dairy Nutrition
Oklahoma State Ruminant Nutrition, Stocker/Feeders, Meat Science, Reproductive Physiology
North Carolina A&T Animal Health, Biotechnology
North Carolina State Nutrition (ruminant, non-ruminant), Reproduction, Breeding, Genetics, Genomics.
Florida Reproduction, Nutrition (ruminant) Immunology
Tennessee Reproduction, Immunology, Behavior
Louisiana State Beef Genomics, Embryology, Dairy Calf Nutrition, Dairy Feeds, Cow/calf Management, Meats
Georgia – Animal Animal Breeding, Genetics, Stem Cell Biology-Regenerative Medicine, Ruminant Nutrition (strongest in dairy), Meat Science (at MS level)
Georgia – Poultry Reproduction (endocrinology), Nutrition, Genetics, Physiology
Clemson Currently in rebuilding phase. Three new hires coming providing a chance to focus. Currently strong in Forage Interactions with Reproduction and Carcass Characteristics
Arkansas – Animal Ruminant Nutrition, Forage/Ruminant Interaction, Reproductive Physiology/Endocrinology.
Auburn Beef/Forage Interface, Ruminant Nutrition, Non-ruminant Nutrition, Growth Biology, Molecular Biology,


Reporting on Multi-State Projects

S-1025: Systems for Controlling Air Pollutant Emissions and Indoor Environments of Poultry, Swine, and Dairy Facilities
Report provided by Bob Harmon (KY), Monitor
Bob Harmon reported that project terminated 9-30-12. The committee met May 16-17, 2012 in East Lansing, MI in conjunction with S-1032, with breakout sessions for individual projects. None of the 20 member states were represented and the final report was posted on the website. The focus of the meeting was the development of a new proposal. Although potential redundancy with S-1032 was discussed, the consensus was that S-1032 has a much broader, systems perspective and there is an unmet need to do indoor animal environment work. A coordinating committee was also discussed but it was decided it is preferable to achieve the desired objectives as a research committee. Three objectives were outlined: 1) Measure and model source, fate and transport of emissions, 2) Develop, evaluate and demonstrate effective mitigation strategies, and 3) Develop, evaluate and demonstrate food animal production facilities that meet current and future industry challenges (paraphrased). Leaders for each objective were assigned. S- 1025 has been a very productive project based on the termination report. Based on past accomplishments and defined focus for the future, I recommend the committee move forward in developing a new proposal. The motion was seconded by Keith Bertrand. It was recommended that 1025 and 1027 communicate as revisions are made. Motion passed.


S-1027: The Poultry Food System: A Farm to Table Model
Report provided by Mike Lacy (UGA) monitor
The termination date for the project was 9/30/12. The project is similar to S-1025. The reviewed proposal shows some new information and updates but not as much synergy. The written objectives were good; but, limited to food safety and quality. Dr. Lacy suggested that the project needed to have a broader food systems sustainability approach. Currently, the group is working on the revision. Dr. Connor recommended that the committee proceed but work out details pertaining to the crossover between S-1027 and S-1025. The motion was seconded by Mike Lacy. Motion passed.

S-1032: Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States
This project terminated 9/30/12 but was extended to September 2013
The project monitor is Bob Harmon (KY). Ten of the 20 member states were represented at the meeting of this project that was held in East Lansing, MI in conjunction with S-1025 on May 15-16, 2012. The afternoon of May 16 was a joint field trip. Although the project was originally scheduled to terminate in 2012, the project was granted a one-year extension and will terminate 9-30-13. The project received the Outstanding Multi-State Project Award ($12,688), and discussed possible uses of the award, including publication of a capstone document summarizing their current thoughts on causalities of ecological risks in food animal production and a final meeting with special guest to launch the new project. A logic model was proposed and edited to serve as the basis for the next project. A writing committee was appointed and will start with the logic model. A joint session with S-1025 reviewed the objectives for their project and identified accomplishments were documented in their annual report, as well as a respectable series of impact statements. Bob Harmon recommended that the project be continued and encourage the full development of a new project. The motion was seconded by Geoff Dahl. Motion passed.

S-1035: Nutritional and Management Abatement Strategies for Improvement of Poultry Air and Water Quality
The project terminated on 9/30/12. A development committee has been established for a potential rewrite. Mike Lacy will check on the status of this project. Mary Beck volunteered to become the monitor for this project.

S1037: Integrative Functional and Physiological Genomics of Poultry
This project terminated 9/30/12. No report was given and Dr. Brown will check with the NIMSS administration to determine if any activity has occurred.


S-1040: Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle
The monitor of this project is Geoff Dahl (FL).
This group had a face to face meeting with 7 stations represented during 2012. The participants of the project have reinvigorated their direction and this is their final year. The project participants are in a rewriting phase for continuation of the project. They have appointed a coordinating committee to look at new objectives. At their annual meeting, all units that were present gave station reports. This group will likely transition into a coordinating committee. Geoff Dahl recommend they move through the rewriting phase for submission of project approval. The motion was seconded by Clint Rusk. Motion passed.

S-1044: Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency
The monitor for this project is David Gerrard.
This project is scheduled to terminate in 9/30/13. This has been a very productive group of participants with approximately 25 members. This project met a week ago and had an invited guest to deliver a presentation. Dr. Gerrard reported this was one of their most productive meetings. The project is in the rewrite phase and is making progress for renewal of the project. Dr. Gerrard made a motion to continue this project. The motion was seconded by Neal Schrick. The motion passed.

S-1045: Genetic (Co)Variance of Parasite Resistance, Temperament, and Production Traits of Traditional and Non-Bos indicus Tropically Adapted Breeds
The monitor for this project is Keith Bertrand.
The project is scheduled to terminate in 9/30/14. Eleven universities participate in this project. The 2012 meeting was held in Mississippi. Seven institutions attended the meeting. Attendance at the meeting was down due to budget reductions. During the meeting, they participated in a tour. The project was productive with 17 papers and reports last year. They reported on all 4 objectives. The next meeting for this group is scheduled for Arkansas. Keith Bertrand made the motion to continue this project. The motion was seconded by Bob Harmon. Motion passed.

S-1047: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency of Poultry
The project has been terminated.

SCC-72: Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency in Cattle
The project has been terminated.

SCC-81: Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern U.S.
The monitor for this project is Ralph Noble.
Project focus is on sustainable small ruminant production in the southeastern United States. Objectives focus on areas limiting profitable small-ruminant production to include 1.) Development of integrated gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) control methods to reduce spreading of anthelmintic resistant worms, 2.) Development of forage-based feeding systems for year round grazing, 3.) Evaluate production potential of pure and crossbred goat and sheep germplasm and 4.) Dissemination of research results and information to producers through station field days, workshops and websites. The group has expanded to institutions from 15 states including 6 — 1862s, 12 — 1890s and 2 USDA-ARS research stations. Effort addresses the land grant mission of research, Extension/outreach and education in partnership between multiple institutions primarily throughout the southeastern U.S., with each contributing their specific expertise toward the design of integrated systems. Studies are both basic and applied in nature with results distributed through peer review publications (28), abstracts (20), proceedings (23) as well as extension publications, cooperative extension agent and farmer trainings, web sites and both undergraduate special problems and graduate student theses.
The team continues to be productive making impacts on research based best management practices to sustain forage based integrated system for small ruminant production in the southeastern US. Key accomplishments include 1) Use of FAMACHA to selective identify animals for deworming, 2) Identification of germplasm from goat breeds on-station, on-farms and buck test stations that require less deworming (Boer vs. Kiki and Savanna), 3) Use of forage plants with condensed tannins (i.e. Serica lespedeza) as alternative to anthelmintics or natural dewormer to reduce parasite load in goats and sheep and 4) Fescue toxicosis reduce fetal lamb growth during gestation of sheep.
Due to their productivity and integrated approach among the institutions, I recommend we approve continuation of this project. The motion was seconded by Geoff Dahl. Motion passed.


SERA-15: Competitiveness and Sustainability of the Southern Dairy Industry
The monitor for this project is Mike Looper. The project participants held their meeting on Jan 21 and 22, 2013 in conjunction with the Southern Dairy Conference. The meeting on the 21st involved the delivery of the state report. This committee has delivered the Southern Dairy Conference for a number of years. They have recently worked on the development of the Proposed Southeast Dairy Consortium. At present, there is discussion of this group becoming a research project. Mike Looper made the motion to continue this project and seconded by Neal Schrick. Motion passed.

SERA-41: Beef Cattle Production Utilizing Forages in the Southeast to Integrate Research and Extension Programs across State Boundaries;
The monitor for this project is Neal Schrick. This group is doing very well in communicating across state boundaries with Extension group. There are a number of programs integrating across state boundaries. This year there is a greater presentation in their research reports on how they were integrated across state boundaries. They hosted a symposium at SS-ASAS and the proceedings will be in the Journal of Animal Sciences. The administrative advisor recommended they get into a writing committee. Neal Schrick made the motion and seconded by Bob Harmon. Motion passed.



Other Business:
Mark Mirando discussed duplicative awards within the same programs. Efforts are being made to certify that duplicative activity within and across programs are not being funded. At NIFA, they understand that hatch projects do not provide real dollars to scientists; but, awarded dollar grants may show up in Hatch reports as being conducted. NIFA has to have a paper trail for auditors to say that there is not duplication. If titles in CRIS reports are the same as grant, then statement of how projects are different.

Mark Mirando indicated that ‘formula funds’ will likely be referred to ‘capacity and infrastructure support funds’ by NIFA to provide a different connotation to these funds because although NIFA recognizes the importance of this funding stream to the Land Grant institutions, there is not a lot of support for formula funds in OMB. NIFA is often asked to provide impact on Hatch projects. It is difficult to go through CRIS reports and they tend to reiterate results instead of statements of. Dr. Mirando has even suggested taking journals that highlight articles identifying Hatch funds to OMB to identify impact. But, if recognition was given it would make it easier for NIFA if Hatch reported in articles. Dr. Dahl made a motion that we support any method to show Hatch and Experiment station funds into journal articles. Motion seconded by Bob Harmon. Motion passed.

White Paper: The white paper written by the Southern Department Heads got a lot of attention by the Southern region experiment stations and then taken to the national directors meeting. The white paper was on the agenda at the national meeting.

Greene reported on the importance of being a member of National Association for the Advancement of Animal Sciences (NAAAS) and encouraged departments to join the organization.

Meeting was adjourned by Chairman David Gerrard.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Name Location Email Phone
Wayne Greene Auburn (AS) wgreene@auburn.edu
334.844.1523
Ralph Noble NC A&T (AS) rcnoble@ncat.edu
336.334.7547
Geoff Dahl U. FL (AS) gdahl@ufl.edu
352.392.1981
Keith Bertrand UGA (AS) jkbert@uga.edu
706.542.6259
Bill Brown UT (Director’s Office wfbrown@utk.edu
865.974.7121
Neal Schrick UT fschrick@utk.edu
865.974.3130
Clint Rusk OSU Clint.rusk@okstate.edu
765.491.9437
Don Conner Auburn (Poultry) connede@auburn.edu
334.844.2639
Bob Harmon UK rharmon@uky.edu
859.257.2686
Mary Beck MSSTATE (Poultry) m.beck@msstate.edu
662.325.3416

Brief Summary of Minutes

Approval of Minutes:
The 2013 meeting minutes were posted to the NIMSS website. Chair Wayne Greene called for a motion to approve the 2013 minutes. Rusk moved and Dahl seconded; motion passed.

Discussion – Topics Important to Southern Region:
A. FTE’s and Teaching Credit:
Rusk suggested asking Deans to put FTE reporting into the faculty salary survey. There was discussion on the best information and format. Greene agreed to draft a request to Alan Matthews to extend the survey to include FTE in T/R/E for hard funded faculty positions.
B. Southern Section Meeting Issues:
Noble raised the issue of a conflict with SAAS this year and suggested having the Southern Section meet 2 weeks after the NCBA convention but this was not accepted as a good possibility. The change of dates is not likely to occur in the future unless some interaction with SAAS occurs. Greene will contact ASAS Executive Director or Mark Legendre to ask about timing of SAAS.
C. Sharing Information Relative to State Budgets:
Harmon suggested that funding is so different between states that it is hard to compare without knowing the Federal part, and that is complicated by the fact that information differs by year. Greene suggested possibly sharing strategies among states instead. Harmon asked about funding teaching and indicated they now have >$50k in course fees. At Florida, Dahl indicated, they collect expendable fees and long-term equipment fees, some up to $250. Harmon indicated $100 is the max at KY.
D. Teaching Loads and Subjects:
Brown asked about whether teaching loads/subjects should be shared across schools and the possibility of multi-state courses. There may be suggestions from the committee Janice Swanson is chairing, including a survey of distance ed. Ag*Idea was suggested as one option. Discussion about logistics ensued and the possibility of challenge grant opportunities. Green suggested pulling together from the Southern Region the courses in u.g. and grad programs that would lend themselves to share across schools; he will send out poll to see what courses are needed that we can’t teach at our respective institutions or at which we are not doing such a good job. Conner indicated that Ag*Idea would be a possible degree program format if well thought out ahead of time with participants well defined. It was mentioned that 75% of the fee goes somewhere else for undergrad but it does let students take special problems at other schools.

Reporting on Multi-State Projects:
A. S1025 – Systems for Controlling Air Pollutant Emissions and Indoor Environments of Poultry, Swine, and Dairy Facilities – Bob Harmon, Monitor:
This project has been terminated; no longer in NIMSS. Dahl moved to remove; Noble seconded. Motion passed.
B. S1027 – The Poultry Food System: A Farm to Table Model – Don Conner, Monitor:
A Development Committee is in place as SDC 349. Casey Owens had suggested combining with another project but the decision was made not to combine. The project lacks momentum but the committee will meet at PSA in the summer to decide about a re-write vs. termination. This project existed for 35-40 years as a NC project, but is not supported well now. Conner thought it ~50-50 chance to have a project in by September, though they were productive in the past. Conner moved to support the project now with a strong evaluation in the future. Dahl seconded. Motion passed.
C. S1032 – Animal Production Systems: Synthesis of Methods to Determine Triple Bottom Line Sustainability from Findings of Reductionist Research – Bob Harmon, Monitor:
This project has a new title and replaces the old 1032; approved to 2018. Report from Harmon:
The overall mission of the project is to use a systems approach to develop strategies to reduce environmental impact and enhance sustainability (environmental, social, economic). Briefly, the objectives are: 1) Engage collaborators from the needed broad range of disciplines, institutions, and stakeholder groups to work together and share data, 2) Facilitate organization, synthesis, and integration of research findings and supporting data, and 3) Discover, substantiate, and interpret the impacts of modifications to animal-production systems. Plans include a quarterly webinar for collaborators to share progress, development of a site to share data, and a workshop at each annual meeting.
The annual meeting program was a workshop on systems thinking and how techniques of systems thinking can help in research and extension on sustainable animal protein production at all scales. The workshop was facilitated by professionals, The Systems Thinking Collaborative. Twenty-eight participants were present representing all member universities. This meeting represented the kickoff for the new project. The major outcome from the meeting was the development of a Causal Loop Diagram that will provide the basis for addressing research gaps during the next 5 years. In addition, a detailed discussion was hosted on perceptions of sustainability. An impressive list of impact statements were reported in the final report and the project has been quite productive.
Recommendation: Commend the group on the new project and recommend continuation of the project. Harmon moved; Conner seconded; motion passed
D. S1035 – Nutritional and Management Abatement Strategies for Improvement of Poultry Air and Water – Mary Beck, Monitor:
This project has no report in NIMSS but it appears a development committee has been established. Tony Pescatore may be involved in a writing committee; Beck will clarify; Conner seconded; motion passed.
E. S1037 – Integrative Functional and Physiological Genomics of Poultry – Mike Kidd, Monitor:
This project has terminated; no report was given (Kidd did not attend the meeting). It is no longer in NIMSS. Schrick moved to remove from list; Dahl seconded; motion passed.
F. S1040 – Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle – Geoff Dahl, Monitor:
This project terminated on 9/20/13 and was replaced by SCC084. Notes for Coordinating Committee SCC084 from Dahl
Met at DMI headquarters in Chicago, October 21-22, 2013
Attendees: Dr. Chad Dechow (Penn State), Keith Gibson (Penn State), Dr. Brad Heins (U Minnesota), Dr. Kent Weigel (U Wisconsin), Dr. John Cole (USDA-AIPL), Dr. Les Hansen (U Minnesota), Dr. Rebecca Colburn (Virginia Tech), Dr. Heather Huson (Cornell), Dr. Albert DeVries (U Florida), Dr. Diane Spurlock (Iowa State), Dr. Mike Schutz (Purdue), Dr. Nancy Cox (Administrative Advisor), Dr. Geoff Dahl (U Florida, representing Department Chairs)

Previously known as S-1040, current project has a focus on genetic analysis to improve efficiency of dairy cattle. Station reports from all participating stations and a number of data sharing arrangements among participants resulted from discussion. Major education and outreach effort through workshop “Advancing Dairy Cattle Genetics: Genomics and Beyond”, February 17-19, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona; Registration for the conference is $150, and may be made at the following website: http://www.ans.iastate.edu/events/dairygenomics/.
Asked that Dahl emphasize to Chairs/Heads that grad student travel support be provided by departments to increase participation.
Two new members (Huson and Colburn) from stations previously engaged in the project (S-1040). John Cole elected secretary for project. Next meeting will be held October 23-24, 2014, in Ames, IA. This meeting will be organized by Diane Spurlock. Dahl moved support for this year; Bertrand seconded; motion passed.
G. S1044 – Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency – Dave Gerrard, Monitor:
Project has been replaced with S1061 and approved to 2018 with Nancy Cox Administrative Advisor. The committee met January 9-10 in Orlando. Dahl moved support continuance; Harmon seconded; motion passed.

H. S1045 – Genetic (Co)Variance of Parasite Resistance, Temperament, and Production Traits of Traditional and Non-Bos indicus Tropically Adapted Breeds – Keith Bertrand, Monitor:
There are 11 universities or government research entities participating in this project. This group met in May 29-31, 2013 at Whitaker Arena, University of Arkansas, AR to discuss progress on the project, and 21 people from all the participating institutions plus some extra institutions (Clemson, Oklahoma State Univ.) attended the meeting. The attendance at this year’s meeting was the highest of any year of the current project and was much higher than the last year’s meeting (9 people from 6 of the participating institutions). The attendance at the meeting is very encouraging and signifies that there is still great interest in this project. The S-1045 Group continues to hold their meeting each year at one of the participating universities or government research entities. However, the attendance at the annual meeting has waxed and waned through the years, and the Group should still consider holding their annual meeting in conjunction with the Southern Section Animal Science Meetings or Annual Animal Science Meetings in order to save on travel costs and to maximize the probability of participation at the meetings. An annual report was also submitted in June of 2013. The project produced 21 papers and reports during this fourth year of the project compared to 27, 15 and 17 papers and reports for the first, second and third years, respectively. There are four objectives in this project. The first objective involves the estimation of genetic variation associated with susceptibility or resistance to measures of disease stress in cattle managed on forage. Two of the stations (AR, MS) reported on status of research concerning objective 1a (Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis), two stations (AR, TX ) reported on research status of objective 1b (Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex), and one station (VI) reported on objective 1c (Specific External Parasites. Objective 2 seeks to characterize diverse, tropically adapted breeds with an emphasis on cow fertility and productivity. Two stations (MS, TX) provided research reports on their activity on objective 2. Objective 3 seeks to establish a DNA bank for the characterization of molecular markers, genetic parameters and future gene discovery. Four of the stations (AR, MS, NC, TX) provided an update on their activity on this objective. Goal of Objective 4 is to evaluate the relationship between hair coat and production traits in beef cattle. Four of the stations (AR, MS, TX, VI) provided an update on their progress on objective 4. All four objectives appear to be progressing satisfactorily. Care should be taken to ensure that all the stations are connected through the use of some common sires whenever possible. It is also important to ensure that all stations are using common scoring and measuring systems for the diseases to describe hair shedding. The project is set to end on August 30, 2014. The Group wants to submit a new project; the deadline for the new project proposal is March 1, 2014. The next meeting of the Group has been scheduled for May 27-30, 2014 in College Station, TX and the meeting will be in conjunction with the WERA Beef Cattle Breeding Group. During the Southern Department Heads/Chairs Meeting in Tampa, FL, Keith Bertrand, the monitor for the project, moved that the Heads/Chairs approve another year of continuation for the project. Geoff Dahl seconded the motion and the motion was voted on and passed to continue the project.
I. S1047 – Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency of Poultry – Mike Lacy, Monitor:
Project has been dropped and terminated in NIMSS. No development committee is in place so is dropped from SAC-2. Dahl moved removal; Conner seconded; motion passed.
J. SCC81 – Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern U.S. – Ralph Noble, Monitor:
The committee is meeting in conjunction with SAAS in Texas this week. The project has had active publication record, collaborations with 1890’s. Extension brochures for goat industry have been developed. An international Goat Conference is planned with focus on parasites and use of forages to decrease use of grain; funding is being sought. Noble moved to continue support; Schrick seconded; motion passed.
K. SERA -15 – Competitiveness and Sustainability of the Southern Dairy Industry – Mike Looper, Monitor:
Schrick indicated the project has been very active but lost a key member. Met at the SE Dairy Conference. Schrick moved continuance; Rusk seconded; motion passed.
L. SERA-41 – Beef Cattle Production Utilizing Forages in the Southeast to Integrate Research and Extension Programs across State Boundaries – Neal Schrick, Monitor:
Participants continue to perform well in the extension component of this project with several multi-state events (ex. Mid-South Stocker Conference, Deep South Stocker Conference to name just a few). Last year, the group host a symposium at SS-ASAS with proceedings published in JAS. In terms of research activities, a few universities have formed multi-state projects (ex. Clemson, Tennessee, USDA-ARS Lexington – to study fescue effects on semen parameters) but this is not the norm for most. Dr Steve Oliver who serves as the project research adviser has recommended they take a stronger approach to building multi-state research activities as a whole. A sub-committee of this group has visited with NPLs in the past to discuss funding opportunities and the potential to submit a large integrated proposal. Completion date for this project is September 30, 2014 and a large part of the agenda for their upcoming meeting on Sunday, February 2 in Dallas will focus on the re-write and objectives. Again, strong participation as a whole from the group with what I believe will continue to be a very active, extension-oriented program with research activities/opportunities continuing to build. Schrick moved continuance and urged re-write; Dahl seconded; motion passed.

Other Business:
• Schrick brought up the issue of definition of “sustainability”; from the Nebraska Beef Roundtable with industry and academic representatives came comments that McDonalds and Wal-Mart are now only taking “sustainabile” beef. Greene asked Schrick to find out more on this topic.
• There was a discussion of technology and social sustainability. GMO’s, for example, are viewed as Frankenfood. Many ignore the science and rely on perceptions, as with climate change.
• Dahl indicated that the 2015 meeting will be in San Antonio in connection with NCBA on Tuesday and Wednesday Feb. 3-4.
• Dahl moved to adjourn; Harmon seconded. Meeting adjourned.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Name Location Email Phone
Wayne Greene Auburn (AS) wgreene@auburn.edu
334.844.1523
Clint Rusk OK State (AS) Clint.rusk@okstate.edu
765.491.9437
Geoff Dahl U. FL (AS) gdahl@ufl.edu
352.392.1981
Neal Schrick UT (AS) fschrick@utk.edu
865.974.3130
David Gerrard VT (AS) Dgerrard@vt.edu
540.449.2165
Bill Brown UT (Director’s Office) wfbrown@utk.edu
865.974.7121
Richard Coffey UK (AS) Richard.Coffey@uky.edu
859.257.2686
Phil Elzer, LSU (AS) pelzer@agctr.lsu.edu
225.578.4763

Brief Summary of Minutes

Animal/Dairy/Poultry Science Chairs/Heads Meeting Agenda

January 26-27, 2016

Hilton San Diego Bayfront, 1 Park Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92101

Wayne: Initiated the meeting. Mary Beck not in attendance but joined via Skype

Mary Beck is chair, and Jim Strickland is secretary.

Start with discussion on regional projects and add to NIMSS.

Brown: current listing of heads for southern region for email list. Brown will share with Schrick.

S-1032: Connor monitor (not present), no discussion, motion to table to 2017 (Dahl, Coffey), motion passed.

S-1061: Gerard monitor, discussion: meet Jan 6-7 through Orlando with NCC 42, minutes still being put together, Motion (Gerard, Elzer) to continue, motion passed.

S-1064: Bertrand monitor (not present), Wayne forwarded report to Schrick, Motion (Wayne, Gerard) to be continued, no discussion, motion passed.

SCC-81: Noble monitor (not present), comment from Wayne: group meets at SSAS, good asset to SSAS with research presentations on small ruminants, motion (Wayne, Dahl) to continue, send message to start to rewrite now, motion passed.

SCC-84: Dahl monitor, will send Schrick report, have reloaded project with new faculty, motion (Dahl, Rusk) to continue, passed, send money for travel.

SERA 15: Looper monitor (not present), motion to continue (Schrick, Gerard) and passed, will have report sent from Looper if possible, report sent to Schrick from Wayne, should be nominated for multi-state award (Brown will check to see if SERA are eligible).

SERA 41: Schrick monitor, (Schrick, Coffey) motion to continue, passed. Schrick and Phil will add report.

Open forum: Wayne discusses white paper for additional funding.

Schrick initiated discussion on loss of multi state projects (should we meeting as one group?). Wayne: is there an area of focus we should be doing (kinds of research needed in the SE). Loss of swine, etc as an example. Should we be thinking about antibiotic resistance, pre-harvest food safety, granting agencies or grant opportunities may be directing loss, drones and livestock as a possibility (lead by Eric Young), water quality. Money typically used for travel.

Brown, faculty need to be aware that this is an opportunity to work with faculty from other institutions for proposal collaboration. Gerard and Dahl: most young faculty are a part of multistate. Dahl and Schrick, need to meet as one group (next year at Nashville 8:30-10:30).

Wayne: should we rid ourselves of the regional defining for multi state, directed toward Bill. Regional defining is used for administrative descriptors only for funding. Approval process through southern directors only and not all directors across the state (Wayne) even though multistate. Should this change? Unsure of who is western and NE admin?

Timing of the meeting conflicting with IPPE (Wayne). Participation from 1890 schools, dairy (only 3) and poultry (only 6). Wayne: what can we direct toward the directors? John: change of SCC to S.

Brown: VISA and Wage guidelines. Something has to be done. Dahl: can we get some help on the labor wage agreement. Is ALPU doing anything? Brown to bring this issue up at the directors meeting.

Graduate students: lack of students in the pipeline for ANSC faculty positions (Schrick and Green). Why? Lack of education through K-12.

Start up (Brown): 150k-500k

Gerard: federal funding used in P&T evaluation?

Green and Dahl motion to adjourn meeting.

 

 

 

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Carrera Romanini, University of Tennessee
G. Cliff Lamb (Chair), Texas A&M University
Todd See, North Carolina State University
Hongwei Xin, University of Tennessee
Todd Applegate, University of Georgia
Mike Looper, University of Arkansas
Richard Coffey, University of Kentucky
John Arthington (Secretary), University of Florida
Neal Schrick, University of Tennessee
Charles Rosenkrans, Clemson University
Ralph Noble, Fort Valley State University
Wayne Greene, Auburn University
Clint Rusk, Oklahoma State University
Dave Gerrard, Virginia Tech University

Brief Summary of Minutes

The meeting was held virtually and in cooperation with the NCAC6 Animal Science administrators.  The Chairs of the two groups started the meeting with individual introductions from Cliff Lamb (Chair of SAC-2) and Cling Krehbiel (Chair of NCAC6).

 

Administrative Advisors for both groups were present and provided reports and comments relative to their regions and valuable to all members involved (Mike White of the NC group and Hongwei Xin of the S group).

 

Notably, Mike White commented that there are some concerns that some projects lack true collaborations. Although good work is being conducted, it appears that the project is serves as resource for reporting on personal program accomplishment rather than a venue for fostering true multistate collaboration. This sentiment was largely agreed upon by members of both Sections.  Mike asked that project administrative advisors and Chairs/Heads provide guidance on this topic and promote collaborations and proper reporting of collaborations among projects. To this end, Mike suggested that projects include a section in their annual report that highlights multistate collaborations, such as joint publications, grants, and symposia.

 

Clint Krehbiel, Chair of NCAC6, guided the group through a review of each of their projects (information not included in this report).

 

Cliff Lamb, Chair of SAC-2, guided the group through a review of each of the Southern Region projects.

 

S-1074

Future Challenges in Animal Production Systems: Seeking Solutions Through Focused Facilitation

Monitor: Todd Applegate

Administrative Advisor: Elizabeth Parker

 

Todd Applegate reported very positive progress, from a truly multi-disciplinary & national group (encompassing plant/soil, ag & bio engineers, economists, animal scientists, & social scientists). The group has been successful in obtaining NSF funding via the water/energy/food nexus. The NIMMS lists 28 faculty, with publications from the 2020 report listing 22 publications. The group meets approximately monthly for targeted discussions (virtually), as well as with targeted break-out groups. Concerns are only related to specific progress to objectives (as they had been written), but are they are productive none-the-less. While funding into environmental and sustainability has waned in recent years – they are poised well for future funding opportunities.

 

Todd Applegate made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Neal Schrick seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1076

Fly Management in Animal Agriculture Systems & Impacts on Animal Health and Food Safety

Monitor: Charlie Rosenkrans

Administrative Advisor: David White

 

Charlie Rosenkrans reported that S1076 concluded their third year with a meeting in January 2021, and due to timing of the evaluation, their third report had not been posted at NIMSS.  Therefore, the review is based on their 2019 and 2020 annual reports and material posted on the official S1076 NIMSS site (https://www.nimss.org/projects/18522).  Both annual meeting minutes/reports were informative.  The project committee is commended for embracing a wide range of participants including research scientists from academia and USDA, Extension scientists, and industry partners and scientists.  The group has developed an outstanding website hosted on wix ( https://www.veterinaryentomology.org/s1076-project ).  That website includes excellent information and is presented in a very logical and public-friendly manner.  That site clearly demonstrates the project participants commitment:  having been awarded the “Excellence in Multistate Research Award” for their previous version of the project.  One of the expectations of a multistate project is that the project participants actually work together to solve the proposed questions and to develop educational materials as a team.  Group S1076 has succeeded at both of those goals.

 

While the group appears to be collaborative and productive, the official site and annual reports were lacking critical information.  The review committee would like to read clearly stated accomplishments and impacts for each of the five project objectives.  Neither the 2019 nor the 2020 report included those sections.  In addition, the review committee would like to see the annual list of publications associated with each objective of the project.  And finally, the wix website is outstanding, but for the ease of reviewers (department chairs/heads, upper administrators, USDA personnel, and legislative staff) we recommend that an active weblink to the wix site be prominently shown on the NIMSS site.

 

Charlie Rosenkrans made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Clint Rusk seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1081

Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency

Monitor: Dave Gerard

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

Dave Gerard reported on S-1081.  This project meets in conjunction with NCCC42 Committee on Swine Nutrition (13).  The current objectives are to: 1) determine the effects of boron supplementation on sow reproductive performance; 2) determine the effect of phytogenic feed additives on sow reproductive performance; and 3) determine the effect of altered gestational feeding of sows on sow productivity and longevity as well as offspring robustness. They always meet shortly after the first of the year, this year January 5-6 2021.  Collectively, this has been historically quite a productive group.  At the same time, S-1081 is maturing and the importance of the topic may be waning, at least in this region.  In fact, there has only been a few publications over the past several years.  The project expires in 2023.  I move the project be continued/approved.

 

Dave Gerard made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Charlie Rosenkrans seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SCC-81

Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern US

Monitor: Ralph Noble

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

Cliff Lamb provided oral report for Ralph Noble.  The project has 2 more years remaining. Ralph comments that the satisfactory progress is being made.  Nine institutions and 25 individual participants are involved (9 Institutions = 6 from 1890’s institutions, 2 from 1862 institutions and 1 ARS Station). In the past reporting cycle, the project listed 18 peer-reviewed publications, 39 abstracts and/or proceedings and 1 book chapter.  Ralph Noble believes the project is serving an important purpose and is successful.  He recommends support for continuation.

 

Cliff Lamb made motion to recommend approval to continue project on behalf of Ralph Noble

Richard Coffey seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SCC-84

Selection and mating strategies to improve dairy cattle performance, efficiency, and longevity

Monitor: John Arthington

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

John Arthington reported on SCC-84. The project held their annual meeting virtually on November 12, 2020 with 13 participants from 10 institutions (1 international). For the last year, the project reported a total of 39 publications.  Many of these involved multistate collaborations. Kent Weigel commented that the project has existed through many renewals. He suggested that it had recently been reinvigorated with new participants and new collaborations. He was enthusiastic about its future. From their report, the major impacts of this SCC84 group are be summarized as follows: (i) development and implementation of national genetic evaluations for new traits, (ii) development of crossbreeding rotations for dairy farm profitability and feed efficiency, (iii) better understanding of the genetic control of health traits for calves and cows, (iv) improvement in genomic evaluation for future traits, and (v) training of graduate student in dairy cattle genetics.  Collaborated with the National Animal Germplasm Program (NAGP) Dairy Committee, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory (AGIL), and the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) to improve genetic variation of dairy and optimize economic merit indices.

 

John Arthington made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Charlie Rosenkrans seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SERA-41

Improving Production Efficiency of the Beef Cow Herd in Southern Forage-Based Systems

Monitor: Neil Schrick

Administrative Advisor: David White

 

Neil Schrick reported that the project is mid-cycle (2019-2024). He indicated that the project continues to be Extension strong. Two symposia planned for the combined ASAS-SSASAS meeting this summer (2021). This group typically is responsible for developing two symposiums for the SSASAS meeting: (1) Kunkle Interdisciplinary Beef Symposium, and (2) SERA 41 Symposia. Other activities continue to be the Mid-South Stocker Conference, etc. Neil commented that the project has several new members and looking to increase membership. Should be continued with additional emphasis placed on promoting research activities. Officers addressed the research need during their meeting a few weeks ago (January 25, 2021) and the need for additional research faculty to join. Admin advisors also discussed this issue. Their strength is definitely Extension but growth in research is expected with new faculty joining the group.

 

Neil Schrick made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Mike Looper seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1086

Enhancing Sustainability of Beef Cattle Production in the Southern and Central US through Genetic Improvement

Monitor: Mike Looper

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

Mike Looper reported that Multi-State Project S1086 is a new rewrite (October 1, 2019 – September 30, 2024) of the former project S1064, Genetic improvement of adaptation and reproduction to enhance sustainability of cow-calf production in the Southern United States , which terminated in September, 2019). Mike reports that the project committee is commended for embracing a wide range of 14 participants from six land grants and Agricultural Experiment Station, University of the Virgin Islands.  The annual meeting for 2020 scheduled in Georgia was canceled due to COVID and no virtual meeting occurred.  He suggested that, while the group appears to be collaborative and productive from the previous project (S1064) termination report, the group did not provide a report of any activities or accomplishments for 2020. The review committee recognizes 2020 was a difficult year for all but requests the group confirm it plans to continue as a regional project group. The review committee assumes the S1086 group wishes to continue as a regional project; however, it recommends communicating with the administrative advisor for clarification on continued efforts.

 

Cliff Lamb made motion to recommend approval to continue project with the condition that a strong message be sent to members asking them to organize, recruit members, and form meaningful, productive collaborations.

Charlie Rosenkrans seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Name Institution Email
Dave Gerrard (Chair) Virginia Tech University dgerrard@vt.edu
G. Cliff Lamb Texas A&M University gclamb@tamu.edu
Todd See North Carolina State Univ. tsee@ncsu.edu
Bill Brown Texas Tech Univ. william.f.brown@ttu.edu
Todd Applegate University of Georgia applegt@uga.edu
Mike Looper University of Arkansas looper@uark.edu
Richard Coffey University of Kentucky rcoffey@uky.edu
John Arthington University of Florida jarth@ufl.edu
Neal Schrick University of Tennessee fschrick@utk.edu
Charles Rosenkrans Clemson University cfrosen@clemson.edu
Wayne Greene Auburn University wgreene@auburn.edu
Clint Rusk Oklahoma State Univ. clint.rusk@okstate.edu

Brief Summary of Minutes

Overview

 

The meeting was held virtually and in cooperation with the NCAC6 Animal Science administrators.  The Chairs of the two groups started the meeting with individual introductions.

 

Joe Cassady, Chair of NCAC6, guided the group through a review of each of their projects (information not included in this report).

 

Dave Gerrard, Chair of SAC-2, guided the group through a review of each of the Southern Region projects.

 

Cliff Lamb (Texas A&M University) elected as chair for 2020/21

John Arthington (University of Florida) elected as secretary for 2020/21

Project overviews:

S-1074 – Future Challenges in Animal Production Systems: Seeking Solutions Through Focused Facilitation – Making satisfactory progress; continue with the project

Todd Applegate elected as the new Monitor for the project

Ron Lacewell should likely be replaced as the Administrative Advisor

 

S-1076 – Fly Management in Agricultural Systems and Impacts on Animal Health and Food Safety – Making satisfactory progress; continue with the project

Charlie Rosenkrans elected as the new Monitor for the project

David White to remain to Administrative Advisor

 

S-1081 – Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency - Making satisfactory progress; continue with the project

David Gerrard remains Monitor for the project

Bob Godfrey remains Administrative Advisor

 

SCC-81 – Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeaster US - Making satisfactory progress; continue with the project

Ralph Noble (now at Ft. Valley, GA) remains Monitor for the project

Bob Godfrey remains Administrative Advisor

 

SCC-84 – Selection and Mating Strategies to Improve Dairy cattle Performance, Efficiency and Longevity - Making satisfactory progress; continue with the project

John Arthington elected as the new Monitor for the project

New Administrative Advisor needs to be identified

 

SERA-41 – Improving Production Efficiency of the Beef Cow Herd in Southern Forage Based Systems – Making satisfactory progress; continue with the project

Neil Schrick remains Monitor for the project

David White remains Administrative Advisor

 

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Name Institution Email
Carrera Romanini Univ. of Tennessee charri61@tennessee.edu
G. Cliff Lamb (Chair) Texas A&M University gclamb@tamu.edu
Todd See North Carolina State University tsee@ncsu.edu
Hongwei Xin University of Tennessee hxin2@tennessee.edu
Todd Applegate University of Georgia applegt@uga.edu
Mike Looper University of Arkansas looper@uark.edu
Richard Coffey University of Kentucky rcoffey@uky.edu
John Arthington (Secretary) University of Florida jarth@ufl.edu
Neal Schrick University of Tennessee fschrick@tennessee.edu
Charles Rosenkrans Clemson University cfrosen@clemson.edu
Ralph Noble Fort Valley State University ralph.noble@fvsu.edu
Wayne Greene Auburn University wgreene@auburn.edu
Clint Rusk Oklahoma State University clint.rusk@okstate.edu
Dave Gerrard Virginia Tech University dgerrard@vt.edu

Brief Summary of Minutes

Overview

 

The meeting was held virtually and in cooperation with the NCAC6 Animal Science administrators.  The Chairs of the two groups started the meeting with individual introductions from Cliff Lamb (Chair of SAC-2) and Cling Krehbiel (Chair of NCAC6).

 

Administrative Advisors for both groups were present and provided reports and comments relative to their regions and valuable to all members involved (Mike White of the NC group and Hongwei Xin of the S group).

 

Notably, Mike White commented that there are some concerns that some projects lack true collaborations. Although good work is being conducted, it appears that the project is serves as resource for reporting on personal program accomplishment rather than a venue for fostering true multistate collaboration. This sentiment was largely agreed upon by members of both Sections.  Mike asked that project administrative advisors and Chairs/Heads provide guidance on this topic and promote collaborations and proper reporting of collaborations among projects. To this end, Mike suggested that projects include a section in their annual report that highlights multistate collaborations, such as joint publications, grants, and symposia.

 

Clint Krehbiel, Chair of NCAC6, guided the group through a review of each of their projects (information not included in this report).

 

Cliff Lamb, Chair of SAC-2, guided the group through a review of each of the Southern Region projects.

 

S-1074

Future Challenges in Animal Production Systems: Seeking Solutions Through Focused Facilitation

Monitor: Todd Applegate

Administrative Advisor: Elizabeth Parker

 

Todd Applegate reported very positive progress, from a truly multi-disciplinary & national group (encompassing plant/soil, ag & bio engineers, economists, animal scientists, & social scientists). The group has been successful in obtaining NSF funding via the water/energy/food nexus. The NIMMS lists 28 faculty, with publications from the 2020 report listing 22 publications. The group meets approximately monthly for targeted discussions (virtually), as well as with targeted break-out groups. Concerns are only related to specific progress to objectives (as they had been written), but are they are productive none-the-less. While funding into environmental and sustainability has waned in recent years – they are poised well for future funding opportunities.

 

Todd Applegate made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Neal Schrick seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1076

Fly Management in Animal Agriculture Systems & Impacts on Animal Health and Food Safety

Monitor: Charlie Rosenkrans

Administrative Advisor: David White

 

Charlie Rosenkrans reported that S1076 concluded their third year with a meeting in January 2021, and due to timing of the evaluation, their third report had not been posted at NIMSS.  Therefore, the review is based on their 2019 and 2020 annual reports and material posted on the official S1076 NIMSS site (https://www.nimss.org/projects/18522).  Both annual meeting minutes/reports were informative.  The project committee is commended for embracing a wide range of participants including research scientists from academia and USDA, Extension scientists, and industry partners and scientists.  The group has developed an outstanding website hosted on wix ( https://www.veterinaryentomology.org/s1076-project ).  That website includes excellent information and is presented in a very logical and public-friendly manner.  That site clearly demonstrates the project participants commitment:  having been awarded the “Excellence in Multistate Research Award” for their previous version of the project.  One of the expectations of a multistate project is that the project participants actually work together to solve the proposed questions and to develop educational materials as a team.  Group S1076 has succeeded at both of those goals.

 

While the group appears to be collaborative and productive, the official site and annual reports were lacking critical information.  The review committee would like to read clearly stated accomplishments and impacts for each of the five project objectives.  Neither the 2019 nor the 2020 report included those sections.  In addition, the review committee would like to see the annual list of publications associated with each objective of the project.  And finally, the wix website is outstanding, but for the ease of reviewers (department chairs/heads, upper administrators, USDA personnel, and legislative staff) we recommend that an active weblink to the wix site be prominently shown on the NIMSS site.

 

Charlie Rosenkrans made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Clint Rusk seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1081

Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency

Monitor: Dave Gerard

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

Dave Gerard reported on S-1081.  This project meets in conjunction with NCCC42 Committee on Swine Nutrition (13).  The current objectives are to: 1) determine the effects of boron supplementation on sow reproductive performance; 2) determine the effect of phytogenic feed additives on sow reproductive performance; and 3) determine the effect of altered gestational feeding of sows on sow productivity and longevity as well as offspring robustness. They always meet shortly after the first of the year, this year January 5-6 2021.  Collectively, this has been historically quite a productive group.  At the same time, S-1081 is maturing and the importance of the topic may be waning, at least in this region.  In fact, there has only been a few publications over the past several years.  The project expires in 2023.  I move the project be continued/approved.

 

Dave Gerard made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Charlie Rosenkrans seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SCC-81

Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern US

Monitor: Ralph Noble

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

Cliff Lamb provided oral report for Ralph Noble.  The project has 2 more years remaining. Ralph comments that the satisfactory progress is being made.  Nine institutions and 25 individual participants are involved (9 Institutions = 6 from 1890’s institutions, 2 from 1862 institutions and 1 ARS Station). In the past reporting cycle, the project listed 18 peer-reviewed publications, 39 abstracts and/or proceedings and 1 book chapter.  Ralph Noble believes the project is serving an important purpose and is successful.  He recommends support for continuation.

 

Cliff Lamb made motion to recommend approval to continue project on behalf of Ralph Noble

Richard Coffey seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SCC-84

Selection and mating strategies to improve dairy cattle performance, efficiency, and longevity

Monitor: John Arthington

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

John Arthington reported on SCC-84. The project held their annual meeting virtually on November 12, 2020 with 13 participants from 10 institutions (1 international). For the last year, the project reported a total of 39 publications.  Many of these involved multistate collaborations. Kent Weigel commented that the project has existed through many renewals. He suggested that it had recently been reinvigorated with new participants and new collaborations. He was enthusiastic about its future. From their report, the major impacts of this SCC84 group are be summarized as follows: (i) development and implementation of national genetic evaluations for new traits, (ii) development of crossbreeding rotations for dairy farm profitability and feed efficiency, (iii) better understanding of the genetic control of health traits for calves and cows, (iv) improvement in genomic evaluation for future traits, and (v) training of graduate student in dairy cattle genetics.  Collaborated with the National Animal Germplasm Program (NAGP) Dairy Committee, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory (AGIL), and the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) to improve genetic variation of dairy and optimize economic merit indices.

 

John Arthington made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Charlie Rosenkrans seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SERA-41

Improving Production Efficiency of the Beef Cow Herd in Southern Forage-Based Systems

Monitor: Neil Schrick

Administrative Advisor: David White

 

Neil Schrick reported that the project is mid-cycle (2019-2024). He indicated that the project continues to be Extension strong. Two symposia planned for the combined ASAS-SSASAS meeting this summer (2021). This group typically is responsible for developing two symposiums for the SSASAS meeting: (1) Kunkle Interdisciplinary Beef Symposium, and (2) SERA 41 Symposia. Other activities continue to be the Mid-South Stocker Conference, etc. Neil commented that the project has several new members and looking to increase membership. Should be continued with additional emphasis placed on promoting research activities. Officers addressed the research need during their meeting a few weeks ago (January 25, 2021) and the need for additional research faculty to join. Admin advisors also discussed this issue. Their strength is definitely Extension but growth in research is expected with new faculty joining the group.

 

Neil Schrick made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Mike Looper seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1086

Enhancing Sustainability of Beef Cattle Production in the Southern and Central US through Genetic Improvement

Monitor: Mike Looper

Administrative Advisor: Bob Godfrey

 

Mike Looper reported that Multi-State Project S1086 is a new rewrite (October 1, 2019 – September 30, 2024) of the former project S1064, Genetic improvement of adaptation and reproduction to enhance sustainability of cow-calf production in the Southern United States , which terminated in September, 2019). Mike reports that the project committee is commended for embracing a wide range of 14 participants from six land grants and Agricultural Experiment Station, University of the Virgin Islands.  The annual meeting for 2020 scheduled in Georgia was canceled due to COVID and no virtual meeting occurred.  He suggested that, while the group appears to be collaborative and productive from the previous project (S1064) termination report, the group did not provide a report of any activities or accomplishments for 2020. The review committee recognizes 2020 was a difficult year for all but requests the group confirm it plans to continue as a regional project group. The review committee assumes the S1086 group wishes to continue as a regional project; however, it recommends communicating with the administrative advisor for clarification on continued efforts.

 

Cliff Lamb made motion to recommend approval to continue project with the condition that a strong message be sent to members asking them to organize, recruit members, and form meaningful, productive collaborations.

Charlie Rosenkrans seconded motion

Cliff Lamb called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Participants

Name Institution Email
Hongwei Xin University of Tennessee hxin2@tennessee.edu
Robert Godfrey USDA-NIFA Robert.Godfrey@usda.gov
Mike Looper (Secretary) University of Arkansas looper@uark.edu
Neal Schrick University of Tennessee fschrick@tennessee.edu
Charles Rosenkrans (Chair) Clemson University cfrosen@clemson.edu
Ralph Noble Fort Valley State University ralph.noble@fvsu.edu
Wayne Greene Auburn University wgreene@auburn.edu
Dave Gerrard Virginia Tech University dgerrard@vt.edu
Tony Pescatore University of Kentucky apescato@uky.edu
William Dozer Auburn University bill.dozier@auburn.edu
Kim Linton University of Tennessee klinton1@utk.edu

Brief Summary of Minutes

Overview

 

The meeting was held virtually, and Charles Rosenkrans (Chair of SAC-2) started the meeting with individual introductions from participants.

 

Administrative Advisor, Hongwei Xin provided updates and comments relative to the group and valuable to all members involved.

 

Notably, Hongwei Xin provided information on the Excellence in Multistate Project nominations due February 28; and the Second U.S. Precision Livestock Farming Conference (USPLF2023) that will be held May 21-24, 2023 in Knoxville, TN. Hongwei also reiterated the importance of true collaborations in these projects; encourage faculty and advisors to facilitate fostering true multistate collaboration. Hongwei also reported that John Arthington has volunteered to serve as the monitor for S-1093 “Management systems for beef cattle reared in subtropical and tropical environments” (10/22-9/27).

 

USDA-NIFA representative, Robert Godfrey provided updates and comments relative to the group and valuable to all members involved.

 

Notably, NIFA is almost completely at full staff; all are working remotely with some telecommuting (2 days/pay period in the offices either in Kansas City or DC). Many staff are new, so processes may take more time as people learn their responsibilities. Budget for FY23 is $1.7 billion, an increase over FY22. Robert provided deadlines and updates on several RFAs. Listening session is planned for February 14 on “Laying hens/turkeys”; new program that will provide funds by end of fiscal year. He recommended the group to encourage early career faculty to participate in grant panel reviews.  

 

Francis Fluharty was unanimously elected as the incoming Secretary for the upcoming year replacing Mike Looper that will serve as chair.

 

Charles Rosenkrans, Chair of SAC-2, guided the group through a review of each of the Southern Region projects. Charles will upload the minutes from the 2022 meeting.

 

S-1074

Future Challenges in Animal Production Systems: Seeking Solutions Through Focused Facilitation

Monitor: Todd Applegate

Administrative Advisor: Wendy Powers

 

Mike Looper reported on S-1074. The S1074 team has 28 faculty members from 20 participating states as January 2023. The group held a hybrid model annual meeting in Oregon, Ohio on April 22, 2022. Dr. Lingying Zhao at Ohio State University was elected as incoming secretary for S1074 for 2022 – 2023 at the project annual meeting. An add-on conference “Waste to Worth 2022” (about 60 presentations and 20 posters) was organized by the team from April 19-22, 2022. In addition, the project team organized a webinar on February 28th, 2022: Dr. Gary Anderson from South Dakota State University gave a presentation about his research work titled “Different Perspective: Design of Livestock Buildings. State of the Science Review on Methane Emissions from Manure Storages.” For the publication, the project team published 48 journal articles, 34 conference proceedings, and 67 extension articles during 2021-2022. The group is currently developing a new proposal “tentative title - Fostering Technologies, Metrics, and Behaviors for Sustainable Advances in Animal Agriculture” for renewing the project from 2023-2028.

 

Hongwei Xin asked if Wendy Powers would continue as advisor. Powers is now dean at Washington State University.

 

Wayne Greene suggested we remind all groups that have projects ending in 2023 establish a rewrite committee.

 

Dave Gerrard made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Wayne Greene seconded motion

Charles Rosenkrans called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1076

Fly Management in Animal Agriculture Systems & Impacts on Animal Health and Food Safety

Monitor: Charlie Rosenkrans

Administrative Advisor: David White

 

Project S1076 concluded their fifth year with a meeting in January 2023, and due to timing of the evaluation, their fifth report had not been posted at NIMSS.  Therefore, the review is based on their 2021 and 2022 annual reports and material posted on the official S1076 NIMSS site (https://www.nimss.org/projects/18522). 

 

Activities: Both annual meeting minutes/reports were informative.  At the 2022 virtual meeting hosted by Oklahoma State University, they had 57 participants from more than 35 organizations.  The project committee is commended for embracing a wide range of participants including research scientists from academia and USDA, Extension scientists, and industry partners and scientists.  The group has developed an outstanding website hosted on wix ( https://www.veterinaryentomology.org/s1076-project ).  That website includes excellent information and is presented in a very logical and public-friendly manner.  That site clearly demonstrates the project participants commitment:  having been awarded the “Excellence in Multistate Research Award” for their previous version of the project.  One of the expectations of a multistate project is that the project participants actually work together to solve the proposed questions and to develop educational materials as a team.  Group S1076 has succeeded at both of those goals.  On the agenda for the January 9-10, 2023 meeting that was held in Orlando Florida, they had scheduled time to organize a rewrite committee.

 

Suggestions: While the group appears to be collaborative and productive, the official site and annual reports were lacking critical information.  The review committee would like to read clearly stated accomplishments and impacts for each of the five project objectives, and indications of collaborations across organizations.  In addition, the review committee would like to see the annual list of publications associated with each objective of the project.  And finally, the wix website is outstanding, but for the ease of reviewers (department chairs/heads, upper administrators, USDA personnel, and legislative staff) we recommend that an active weblink to the wix site be prominently shown on the NIMSS site.

 

Recommendation: Overall, the review committee recommended continued funding and support of multistate project S1076.

 

Charles Rosenkrans made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Dave Gerrard seconded motion

Charles Rosenkrans called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1081

Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency

Monitor: Dave Gerrard

Administrative Advisor: James Matthews

 

Dave Gerrard reported on S-1081.  S-1081 Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency (8) meets in conjunction with NCCC42 Committee on Swine Nutrition (13).  The current objectives are to: 1) determine the effects of boron supplementation on sow reproductive performance; 2) determine the effect of phytogenic feed additives on sow reproductive performance; and 3) determine the effect of altered gestational feeding of sows on sow productivity and longevity as well as offspring robustness. For years, the groups met shortly after the first of the year, and this past year they met on January 5-6, 2022.  Given the dates of last year’s SAC2 meeting, a report of this project was given last year.  However, the committee has decided to move their meeting later in the year (May) to Des Moines, IA.   To that end, the report submitted last year was in effect also a report for this year.  The project expires in 2023 but based on historical performances, I move the project be continued/approved.

 

Dave Gerrard made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Ralph Noble seconded motion

Charles Rosenkrans called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SCC-81

Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern US

Monitor: Ralph Noble

Administrative Advisor: Ralph Noble

 

Date:  January 10, 2023

1. What stage / year is project in?

Completing first year of 5-year project.

 

2. Is satisfactory progress being made? Yes

• 5 Objectives fulfill through collaboration of


• 10 institutions à 6 – 1890s, + 3-1862 + 1-ARS station


• 8 Collaborators à 1 – 1890 + 7 - 1862


• 25 individuals

 

• Publications:


• 10 station reports presented at the annual meeting in Raleigh, NC 1/22/2023.


• 18 peer review journal articles


• 35 abstracts and proceedings


• 10 popular press articles

 

3. Should project continue? Yes

 

The project is serving an important purpose and there are several new collaborations; exciting time for this project. Recommends support for continuation.

 

Ralph Noble made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Neal Schrick seconded motion

Charles Rosenkrans called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SCC-84

Selection and mating strategies to improve dairy cattle performance, efficiency, and longevity

Monitor: John Arthington

Administrative Advisor: Neal Schrick

 

Charles Rosenkrans reported on SCC-84. The project held their annual meeting on October 17-19, 2022 in East Lansing, MI. Twenty-seven participants (faculty, post-docs, and students) from eight institutions were present with virtual reports from Neal Schrick and Frank Siewerdt. For the last year, the project reported a total of 25 publications.  Many of these involved multistate collaborations. Albert De Vries will repeat as chair, and Brad Heins will lead the rewrite efforts. From their report, the major impacts of this SCC84 group are be summarized as follows: (i) development and implementation of national genetic evaluations for new traits, (ii) development of crossbreeding rotations for dairy farm profitability and feed efficiency, (iii) better understanding of the genetic control of health traits for calves and cows, (iv) improvement in genomic evaluation for future traits, and (v) training of graduate student in dairy cattle genetics.  Collaborated with the National Animal Germplasm Program (NAGP) Dairy Committee, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory (AGIL), and the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) to improve genetic variation of dairy and optimize economic merit indices.

 

Charles Rosenkrans made motion to recommend approval to continue project on behalf of John Arthington

Neal Schrick seconded motion

Charles Rosenkrans called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

SERA-41

Improving Production Efficiency of the Beef Cow Herd in Southern Forage-Based Systems

Monitor: Neil Schrick

Administrative Advisor: Cliff Lamb, Mark McCann

 

Project members met at SSAS meetings in Raleigh, NC recently (January 22, 2023). During the meeting, it was noted that the project ends in 2024 and discussion was initiated about a re-write of the project. Furthermore, the 2023 SERA 41 Symposium (Challenges to the adoption rate of research-proven practices in Southeastern cow-calf herds) was held immediately prior to the project meeting with speakers discussing several topics related to adoption of research findings and recommendations by beef producers in the southeast. Project members also discussed topics for the 2024 Symposium which will continue via email after the meeting.

 

Recommendation: Continue support for the current project and recommend the project members organize a potential writing committee to complete the re-write in a timely manner. Reach out during the re-write to include new participants if available. Neil Schrick indicated that the project continues to be Extension strong; has encouraged group to bring in research component.

 

Neil Schrick made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Wayne Greene seconded motion

Charles Rosenkrans called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously

 

S-1086

Enhancing Sustainability of Beef Cattle Production in the Southern and Central US through Genetic Improvement

Monitor: Mike Looper

Administrative Advisor: James Matthews

 

Mike Looper reported on Multi-State Project S1086. The project held their annual meeting in McGregor, TX at the TAMU Research Station on May 24-25, 2022 with 12 participants from 7 institutions. For the last year, the project reported a total of 3 refereed publications and 4 abstracts/presentations. Many of these involved multistate collaborations. New officers were elected, and the University of Arkansas was identified as the location for the 2023 annual meeting, May 24-25. From their report (https://www.nimss.org/seas/51936), the major impacts of this S1086 group are be summarized as follows: (i) udder/teat scores of Brahman cows at weaning appear to be more useful metric as they were more strongly associated with calf weaning weight than those measured mid-lactation in Brahman cows, (ii) sound feet are important components in cattle production systems and can influence nutritional aspects of cattle, (iii) hoof soundness was reported to have effects on breeding and reproductive success and both body weight and body composition, (iv) hair shedding scores, although subjective, are well within the reach of both commercial and seedstock breeders, (v) hair coat shedding had an effect on ipsilateral uterine artery development and pulsatility during gestation in Angus cattle, (vi) hair coat shedding scores must be considered differently in cattle with more than ¼ Bos indicus, as they do not grow or shed a winter coat similar to Bos taurus cattle, (vii) beneficial effect of Brahman genetics is dependent on the magnitude of environmental heat stress, (viii) breed groups with 75% and 100% Brahman genes had superior resilience to heat stress, breed groups with 25%, 34.5% and 50% were intermediate between Brahman and Angus group and the purebred Angus group had the lowest heat stress resilience, and (ix) cow herd performance was affected by month of first shedding in crossbred Angus cows with shedding score varying by cow age and influencing calf birth weight and cow prebreeding and weaning BCS.  Collaboration opportunities including the potential for joint grant applications were explored, and an upcoming rewrite of the project objectives was discussed.

 

Mike Looper made motion to recommend approval to continue project

Ralph Noble seconded motion

Charles Rosenkrans called for vote of members

Motion passed unanimously  

Accomplishments

<p>See Summary of Minutes</p>

Publications

<p>Refer to individual projects</p>

Impact Statements

1. Refer to the Summary of Minutes

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Name Institution Email
Hongwei Xin University of Tennessee hxin2@tennessee.edu
Robert Godfrey USDA-NIFA Robert.Godfrey@usda.gov
Mike Looper (Chair) University of Arkansas looper@uark.edu
Neal Schrick University of Tennessee fschrick@tennessee.edu
Dave Gerrard Virginia Tech University dgerrard@vt.edu
Kim Linton University of Tennessee klinton1@utk.edu
Scott Radcliffe University of Kentucky scott.radcliffe@uky.edu
David Caldwell University of Arkansas caldweld@uark.edu
Peter Ferket North Carolina State University pferket@ncsu.edu
Todd See North Carolina State University tsee@ncsu.edu
Nannan Liu Auburn University liunann@auburn.edu
Francis Fluharty (Secretary) University of Georgia ffluharty@uga.edu
John Arthington University of Florida arth@ufl.edu

Brief Summary of Minutes

Overview
The meeting was held virtually, and Michael Looper (Chair of SAC-2) started the meeting with individual introductions from participants.

Administrative Advisor, Dr. Hongwei Xin provided updates and comments relative to the group and valuable to all members involved. He also agreed with Dr. Michael Looper that the participants list on the SAC-2 website should be updated to reflect the current membership. Dr. Xin asked the group to continue encouraging faculty to participate in true multistate collaboration. The ASRED/SAAESD joint meeting will be held on March 25-28, 2024 in Lexington, KY. The joint session will include two panel presentations and discussion: 1) Food Waste/Loss Reduction, and 2) PLF Technologies and Field Applications. The 3rd U.S. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) Conference will be held at University of Nebraska–Lincoln in 2025.

USDA-NIFA representative, Dr. Robert Godfrey provided updates and comments relative to the group and valuable to all members involved. Specifically, that NIFA was still waiting on final appropriations before any funds could be released.
Scott Radcliffe was unanimously elected as the incoming Secretary for the upcoming year replacing Francis Fluharty who will serve as chair for 2025.
Michael Looper, Chair of SAC-2, guided the group through a review of each of the Southern

S-1074
Future Challenges in Animal Production Systems: Seeking Solutions Through Focused Facilitation
Monitor: Todd Applegate
Administrative Advisor: Wendy Powers
No one was in attendance and no report was submitted prior to the meeting. Dr. Michael Looper will investigate and send information to the group. As such, no motion was made and vote was taken on the continuation of the project.

S-1076
Fly Management in Animal Agriculture Systems & Impacts on Animal Health and Food Safety
Monitor: Charlie Rosenkrans
Administrative Advisor: David White
Dr. Charles Rosenkras submitted the report via email, following the meeting.
General: Project S1076 concluded their fifth year with a meeting in January 2023, and new project group had their first meeting January 10-12, 2024 in Las Cruces NM, and via Zoom. Their report can be found at: https://nimss.org/storage/4130/S1076-2024-minutes.pdf .
Activities: The NIMSS site only contains “Basic Information” at this time; however, the current version of the project is just one year old, and their first meeting was just a few weeks ago. That meeting was well attended with 19 in person and 34 online participants. The project committee is commended for embracing a wide range of participants including research scientists from academia and USDA, Extension scientists, and industry partners and scientists. The group developed and continues to maintain an outstanding website hosted on wix (https://www.veterinaryentomology.org/s1076-project ). That website includes excellent information and is presented in a very logical and public-friendly manner. That site clearly demonstrates the project participants commitment: having been awarded the “Excellence in Multistate Research Award” for a previous version of the project. One of the expectations of a multistate project is that the project participants actually work together to solve the proposed questions and to develop educational materials as a team. Group S1076 has succeeded at both of those goals.
Suggestions: The group is very productive, but as suggested previously, they need to add materials to the NIMSS site. To their credit, in the meeting minutes, they plan to add funding, impact statements, outputs, and synergistic activities. In addition, the review committee would like to see the annual list of publications associated with each objective of the project. And finally, the wix website is outstanding, but for the ease of reviewers (department chairs/heads, upper administrators, USDA personnel, and legislative staff) we recommend that an active weblink to the wix site be prominently shown on theNIMSS site.
Recommendation: Overall, the review committee recommended continued funding and support of multistate project S1076.

S-1081
Nutritional Systems for Swine to Increase Reproductive Efficiency
Monitor: Dave Gerrard
Administrative Advisor: James Matthews
Dave Gerrard reported on S-1081. S-1081 met with NCCC42 on January 4-5 in a hybrid session, four members in the flesh, and three virtually. Three members listed in NIMSS did not attend. Drs Godfrey (USDA-NIFA), Moeller (USDA-ARS), Hostetler (Pork Board) Frank (AFIA) and Risley (IFEEDER) attended as guests. Administrative advisors Drs. Schuh (NCCC-42) and Matthews (S-1081) attended as well. Nine station reports ensued. NCCC42 submitted a new proposal Dec 23 and it was discussed. The two groups broke out and discussed research projects that morning. The afternoon was a joint venture filled with discussion of additional topic to study. As in the past, the speakers and discussions were fairly extensive. Next year’s meeting will be held in Nashville, again around the first of the year.
Dave Gerrard made motion to recommend approval to continue project
Neal Schrick seconded motion
Michael Looper called for vote of members
Motion passed unanimously

SCC-81
Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in the Southeastern US
Monitor: Todd See
Administrative Advisor: Ralph Noble
There was no response from Dr. Ralph Noble or Dr. Noble’s replacement. It was mentioned that the group met during the ASAS Southern Section meeting which was held in Louisville, Kentucky in January 2024. Dr. John Arthington was going to speak to a colleague, Radiah Minor (rcminor@ncat.edu), that is a member of this group for a more in-depth update. Dr. Todd See volunteered to become the monitor of the group moving forward. All unanimously agreed to accept his offer.
Information from SCC-881 Report: SCC 81 met during the Southern Section ASAS meeting in NIMSS site.
eight participants. They are working towards and reported progress on all five of their objectives.
Objectives:
1.Utilization of gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) control methods including feedingDuddingtonia flagrans, forage/grazing management, and animal selection for GINresistance.
2.Emphasis of forage feeding systems for year-round grazing to meet nutritionalrequirements that mitigate drought and other plant and animal stressors.
3.Strategies for the improvement of small ruminant reproduction.
4.Disseminate research results and information to stakeholders.
5.Identify producers’ challenges and opportunities in marketing goats and goat products.
This year's draft report includes 10 peer review journal articles, 24 abstracts and proceedings and 6 popular press articles. They also worked on planning a symposium to be held with their annual meeting at next year's Southern Section ASAS meeting focused on "Taking us to the future: Lessons learned across species." The symposium will have a genetics focus with speakers that have sheep and cattle experience discussing tools and technology that could be better utilized across species. Richard Browning (Tennessee State) is the new Chair and Diwakar Vyas (University of Florida) is the new secretary.
Todd See made motion to recommend approval to continue project (via email)
Richard Coffey seconded motion
Michael Looper called for vote of members
Motion passed unanimously

S-1096 (SCC-84)
Selection and mating strategies to improve dairy cattle performance, efficiency, and longevity
Monitor: John Arthington
Administrative Advisor: Neal Schrick
Project members had begun working on a re-write in September/October. The re-write was scheduled to be submitted by March 15 for approval. The re-write objectives include: Recommend breeding strategies for optimal use of breed resources, maintenance It was stated that a new monitor was needed and Neal Schrick volunteered. The group unanimously agreed to accept the offer.

SERA-41

Improving Production Efficiency of the Beef Cow Herd in Southern Forage-Based Systems

Monitor: Neil Schrick
Administrative Advisor: Cliff Lamb, Mark McCann
Project members met in January 2024 at the ASAS Southern Section meeting in Louisville, Kentucky. (Attendance was low, perhaps because the project meeting was held at the same time as student presentations.) The planned re-write will occur during the Fall of 2024 and the members are working to bring in additional researchers.
Neil Schrick made motion to recommend approval to continue project
David Gerrard seconded motion
Michael Looper called for vote of members
Motion passed unanimously

S-1086
Enhancing Sustainability of Beef Cattle Production in the Southern and Central US through Genetic Improvement
Monitor: Mike Looper
Administrative Advisor: James Matthews
Project members met in Fayetteville in May 2023 with 17 attendees from five different universities. (It was mentioned that it appears that Mississippi State, University of Arkansas and Texas A&M appear to be the most active participants based on attendance.) During the meeting, members agreed this is a re-write year; voted on new project officers and set the 2024 meeting date.

They discussed the need for an upcoming renewal, since the project is currently in year 4 of 5 of the project life cycle. Members were then selected on a volunteer basis for the Nominating Committee (Dr. Rhonda Vann, Dr. Trent Smith, and Dr. Andy Herring) and the Resolutions Committee (Dr. David Riley and Dr. Bryan Kutz). Dr. Powell then gave a presentation to further elaborate on plans for the renewal. Proposed objectives were drafted by the group and will be shared by email with members. A summary of the discussion for the next projects objectives includes:
Recommend breeding strategies for optimal use of breed resources, maintenance
and(or) exploitation of within-breed (additive and non-additive) genetic variation.
Deriving novel traits based on longitudinal datasets from precision livestock farming to
improve sustainability, welfare, and resilience.
Develop variant discovery strategies to incorporate functional –omics data into breeding
schemes to improve genetic variation of dairy and optimize economic merit indices.
Create a pipeline of diverse graduate students in the fields of quantitative and
functional genetics and bioinformatics via outreach and educational opportunities.
Proposed Title: Characterizing adaptation of cattle to their production environment
Proposed Objective Areas:
•Adaptation to local production and environmental challenges
oHeat stress and sweat glands
oWater intake
oGenetic resistance to parasites
oTeeth and longevity
oForage/animal interaction
•Heterosis: Brahman and Angus•Systems approach to analyzing novel ERTs associated with production includinglongevity, fertility and meat quality database creation.
oBirth weight
oHeifer development
oSire
oTemperament
oCarcass ultrasonography
oFertility
oParasite loads
Mike Looper made motion to recommend approval to continue project
John Arthington seconded motion
Michael Looper called for vote of members
Motion passed unanimously

S-1093
Management Systems for beef cattle Reared in Subtropical and Tropical Environments
Monitor: John Arthington They discussed the need for an upcoming renewal, since the project is currently in year 4 of 5 of the project life cycle. Members were then selected on a volunteer basis for the Nominating Committee (Dr. Rhonda Vann, Dr. Trent Smith, and Dr. Andy Herring) and the Resolutions Committee (Dr. David Riley and Dr. Bryan Kutz). Dr. Powell then gave a presentation to further elaborate on plans for the renewal. Proposed objectives were drafted by the group and will be shared by email with members. A summary of the discussion for the next projects objectives includes:

See Summary of minutes, attached.

Accomplishments

<p>See Summary of Minutes.</p>

Publications

<p>Refer to individual projects.</p>

Impact Statements

1. Refer to the Summary of Minutes

Back to top