NC1142: Regulation of Photosynthetic Processes (Rev. NC-142)

(Multistate Research Project)

Status: Inactive/Terminating

NC1142: Regulation of Photosynthetic Processes (Rev. NC-142)

Duration: 10/01/2002 to 09/30/2007

Administrative Advisor(s):


NIFA Reps:


Non-Technical Summary

Statement of Issues and Justification

Photosynthesis is the primary determinant of crop productivity. It is the single process on earth that converts sunlight into biomass, sequesters atmospheric CO2 into carbohydrates, and liberates O2. Photosynthesis and the resulting yields of food and fiber products are dramatically limited by environmental constraints in agricultural contexts as reflected by the fact that average yields are typically much less than the maximal yields possible when efficiency and sustainability concerns are relaxed.

Whereas agricultural productivity continues to increase slowly, the rate of increase has declined steadily since the 1960's, and it may soon plateau (Mann, 1998). Thus, there is increasing concern that future increases, essential to enhance the competitiveness of U.S. agriculture and to fulfill global demands for food and fiber, will be dependent on the development of new approaches to increase the capacity of crop plants to produce the nutrients that support the growth of harvested plant parts. New approaches will also be required to enhance efficiency and to improve agricultural sustainability. To achieve these goals, it will be essential to gain fundamental knowledge of the underlying metabolic components that control assimilate production and utilization, and hence plant growth and development. This knowledge must include an understanding of the regulation of important photosynthetic enzymes and how environmental and developmental signals affecting photosynthetic processes are perceived at the molecular and gene levels. Such knowledge will provide new opportunities for crop improvement using the techniques of both molecular genetics and classical breeding.

The proposed multistate research project brings together some of the most outstanding, productive photosynthesis investigators in the country in an integrated effort to broaden our understanding of critically important areas of photosynthesis research. We propose a synergistic, cooperative research program that concentrates on four areas of photosynthetic regulation:

1. Photochemistry and the biogenesis of the photosynthetic apparatus. The purpose of this research is to understand the structure and function of the light harvesting and electron transfer components of the thylakoid membrane, with emphasis on Photosystem I and the mechanisms that control the stoichiometry between Photosystems I and II. Anterograde and retrograde pathways involved in coordinating the expression of nuclear and chloroplast genes for photosynthetic proteins will be studied, and novel photosynthetic proteins will be identified. The collaborating units include IA-AES, NE-AES and OR-AES (3 institutions, 4 research labs).

2. Photosynthetic capture and photorespiratory release of CO2. The goal of this research is to determine and modify the biochemical and regulatory factors that impact photosynthetic capture and photorespiratory release of CO2. Particular emphasis will be placed on understanding protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications of key photosynthetic enzymes involved in primary and secondary CO2 assimilation, as well as the mechanisms that control carbon flux through primary and secondary metabolic pathways. The collaborating units include IL-ARS, KY-AES, MO-AES, NE-AES, and NV-AES (5 institutions, 6 research labs).

3. Mechanisms regulating photosynthate partitioning. The objective of this research is to gain insight into the mechanisms that regulate photosynthate partitioning into pathways of biosynthesis and use of sucrose, starch, and sugar alcohols. These studies will examine interactions between compartments of the cell, between plant parts, and the partitioning of carbohydrates between transport, storage, and stress-protective functions. The collaborating units include FL-AES, IA-AES, IL-AES, MI-AES, MN-AES, NC-AES, NE-AES, PA-AES, SC-AES, WA-AES, WI-AES (11 institutions, 13 research labs).

4. Developmental and environmental limitations to photosynthesis. The aim of this research is to analyze the limitations and environmental factors that influence photosynthetic productivity at the whole plant and canopy levels. Particular emphasis will be placed on abiotic stresses (temperature, water, and salinity), nitrogen use, and global atmospheric change. This work will integrate understanding developed here and under objectives 1 through 3 to optimize photosynthetic production and yield under current and future environmental conditions. The collaborating units include Guam-AES, IA-AES, IL-AES, KS-AES, MI-AES, MS-ARS, NE-AES, NV-AES, OR-AES, WA-AES (10 institutions, 14 research labs).

Related, Current and Previous Work

Objective 1: Photochemistry and the Biogenesis of the Photosynthetic Apparatus

Radiant energy is harvested by pigment arrays on thylakoid membranes and stabilized as NADPH and ATP by the coupling of electron transport with ATP biosynthesis. These processes are carried out by membrane complexes that include photosystem I (PSI), photosystem II (PSII), the cytochrome b6/f complex and the ATP synthase. Much progress has been made toward understanding the architecture and function of these complexes, and NC-1142 contributions to this effort have been notable, particularly in the area of PSI (Chitnis, 2001). Another important area of investigation concerns the regulatory networks that modulate electron transport processes in response to varying supplies of the substrate (light), or in response to changes in the metabolic demands for the products (ATP and NADPH). As a prominent example, plants and other photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria, achieve proper electron flow rates by regulating the ratio of the two photosystems. The Chitnis (IA-AES) and Rodermel (IA-AES) labs have generated mutants of Arabidopsis and cyanobacteria with altered PSI/PSII stoichiometries (Chen et al., 2000), and characterization of these mutants should lend insight into the responsible regulatory mechanisms.

The biogenesis of the photosynthetic apparatus requires the concerted action of nuclear and chloroplast genes (Rodermel, 2001). Only about 100 of the estimated 2,500 chloroplast proteins are coded for by genes in the chloroplast genome; the rest are coded for by nuclear genes (Martin and Herrmann, 1998). Although many of the best-characterized biochemical pathways in plants take place in chloroplasts (e.g., photosynthetic carbon assimilation, carotenoid and chlorophyll biosynthesis), the function of most chloroplast proteins is not known. Chitnis and Rodermel have adopted a proteomics approach to identify novel thylakoid membrane proteins. Of ~150 proteins analyzed in a pilot study, 24% were derived from unidentified open reading frames. A holistic 'systems biology' approach involving mutational analysis and techniques of functional genomics will allow Chitnis and Rodermel to characterize the role of these proteins in photosynthesis.

Much of the regulatory traffic that coordinates gene expression in the chloroplast and nucleus is anterograde, i.e., from the nucleus to the plastid, in the form of nuclear gene products that control the transcription and translation of plastid genes (Rodermel, 2001). Among these products are sigma factors that regulate the activity of the plastid encoded RNA polymerase (PEP) (Allison, 2000). The Allison lab (NE-AES) has shown that two plastid-localized sigma factors are expressed differentially during the process of chloroplast biogenesis in maize (Lahiri and Allison, 2000). This is consistent with the idea that sigma factor families act as global regulators of plastid gene transcription.

In addition to anterograde traffic, retrograde traffic occurs between the plastid and nucleus in the form of "plastid signals" that regulate the transcription of nuclear genes for photosynthetic proteins (Rodermel, 2001). The Rodermel group (IA-AES) has used the immutans and var2 variegation mutants of Arabidopsis as models to understand these retrograde mechanisms. These mutants have green sectors with morphologically normal chloroplasts and white sectors with abnormal (non-pigmented) plastids that are blocked in the process of chloroplast biogenesis. Photosynthetic rates are markedly higher than normal in the green sectors of the mutants, and leaf morphogenesis is impaired in both, indicating a disruption in retrograde signaling (Aluru et al., 2001). Positional-cloning has revealed that IMMUTANS is a novel terminal oxidase that resides in the thylakoid membrane (Wu et al., 2000), and that VAR2 is a thylakoid membrane FtsH metalloprotease (Chen et al., 2000). Functional analyses of the IMMUTANS and VAR2 proteins by the Rodermel (IA-AES), Chitnis (IA-AES) and Daley (OR-AES) groups should lend insight into mechanisms of retrograde signaling, as well as provide information about factors that control photosynthetic rates.

Objective 2: Photosynthetic Capture and Photorespiratory Release of CO2

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) initiates the major pathway of CO2 capture from the atmosphere by catalyzing the reaction between ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) and CO2 to produce two molecules of phosphoglycerate (Spreitzer, 1999). However, atmospheric O2 competes with CO2, and oxygenation of RuBP initiates the nonessential photorespiratory pathway that leads to the loss of CO2. Thus, if carboxylation could be increased or oxygenation decreased, a significant increase in crop plant productivity might be realized. Rubisco is comprised of eight 55-kD large subunits coded for by a single rbcL gene on the multicopy chloroplast DNA, and of eight 16-kD small subunits coded for by a family of RbcS genes in the nucleus. Because rbcL and RbcS are present in multiple copies per cell, it will be difficult to eliminate or transform engineered copies of these genes in crop plants. Despite these limitations, natural variation exists in the kinetic and regulatory properties of Rubisco from different species (Spreitzer, 1999), and thus it is possible that with advances in technology an improved higher plant enzyme might be created. For example, methods have been developed for engineering the small subunit by the Spreitzer group (NE-AES) (Spreitzer et al., 2001), and progress has been made with nuclear and chloroplast transformation of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and of land plants by the Spreitzer groups and Allison (NE-AES) labs (Spreitzer, 1998; Daniell et al., 2002). These transformation technologies should provide new opportunities to study structure/function relationships of Rubisco. Many Rubisco X-ray crystal structures have now been solved that might also aid genetic engineering strategies (Taylor et al., 2002).

Modifications in the regulation of Rubisco might result in improved plant productivity, and models have been constructed that predict patterns of CO2 uptake by the Long (IL-AES) and Portis (IL-ARS) groups (Bernacchi et al., 2001). Rubisco activase enhances the activity of Rubisco by removing inhibitory sugar phosphates from the active site, and the Portis (IL-ARS) and Spretizer (NE-AES) groups have identified the site of interaction between activase and Rubisco (reviewed by Portis, 2001). The creation of transgenic plants with altered forms of Rubisco activase by the Portis group has shown that the amount and redox control of activase are important for growth (Zhang et al., 2001). However, increased knowledge of how activation varies in different plants is necessary for ultimately improving the regulatory mechanism. As another means of Rubisco regulation, enzymes involved in Rubisco modification have been characterized by the Houtz group (KY-AES) (Ying et al., 1999; Dirk et al., 2001); altered modification enzymes might prove to be appealing targets for genetic modification of crop plants if they result in more efficient carboxylation.

In C4 and Crassulacean (CAM) plants, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) catalyzes the initial fixation of atmospheric CO2 into C4-decarboxylic acids. Because this pathway concentrates CO2 in the vicinity of Rubisco, PEPC and its regulation are attractive targets for the genetic engineering of improvements in CO2 fixation. The Chollet (NE-AES) and Cushman (NV-AES) groups have shown that PEPC activity is tightly controlled by metabolites, as well as by reversible phosphorylation via PEPC kinase (PPcK) and protein phosphatase 2A (Vidal and Chollet, 1997; Taybi and Cushman, 1999). Molecular cloning of PPcK genes has allowed biochemical studies of the recombinant kinase and the development of immunological reagents for tracking its expression in various plant tissues. This work has increased our understanding of the regulation of PEPC in C/N partitioning and N2 fixation in legume nodules (Bakrim et al., 2001; Taybi et al., 2000). The Chollet group (NE-AES) has found that the chloroplast enzyme pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK) is also controlled by phosphorylation in C4 and CAM photosynthesis (Chastain et al., 2000).

The mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (mtPDC) controls carbon flow from glycolysis to the Krebs cycle by catalyzing the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA. The Randall group (MO-AES) has found that inhibition of the mtPDC by reversible phosphorylation might reduce CO2 release from respiration (Leuthy et al., 2001). Because the mitochondrial and chloroplast forms of PDC are involved in the generation of fatty acids (oil), further analysis of the mechanism of mtPDC phosphorylation might lead to the genetic engineering of value-added crops.

Objective 3: Mechanisms Regulating Photosynthate Partitioning

Critical steps in the conversion of photosynthate to harvested materials can affect the photosynthetic process itself, as well as the amount of fixed carbohydrates allocated to yield. Key points in this regulation offer exciting avenues for manipulation; however, underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Feasible long-term targets for altered partitioning begin at the metabolic level (photosynthetic end-products) and extend to the whole plant level (importing plant parts). Recent work from NC-142 investigators and elsewhere indicate three especially promising avenues for regulation of photosynthate partitioning:

Sucrose biosynthesis and metabolism are key components of long-distance transport of photosynthates in vascular plants, and the extent of sucrose formation, metabolism, and sites of its conversion can markedly affect exporting and importing organs at many levels. Sucrose is typically synthesized in leaves via SPS (sucrose-P synthase) and cleaved at sites of import by either SuSy (sucrose synthase, a reversible reaction) or one of the invertases (in cell walls or vacuoles). Products of the invertase and SuSy paths differ (hexoses vs. fructose + UDPG), and so too does their potential to generate sugar signals. The Koch lab (FL-AES) has shown that these signals can repress genes for photosynthesis, and also affect invertase and SuSy genes themselves (Koch, 1996; Xu et al., 1996; Koch et al., 2000). In addition, sugar signals sensed through hexokinase can potentially be amplified by repeated cycles of sucrose cleavage and re-synthesis (Moore and Sheen, 1999; Rolland et al., 2001). Invertase action and the resulting signals are typically associated with growth, expansion and cell division, whereas SuSy is more often linked with biosynthesis of cell walls and storage materials (Sturm and Tang, 1999; Koch et al., 2000). SuSy also has broadly pleiotropic effects that include tuber yield and starch content in potato (Zrenner et al, 1995); flood tolerance in maize (Ricard et al., 1998; Zeng et al., 1998, 1999); fruit set under specific conditions in tomato (D!&Aoust et al., 1999); and a critical, drought-sensitive step in N-fixing nodules of legumes (Arrese-Igor et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 1999); the Koch (FL-AES) and Chollet (NE-AES) groups have played seminal roles in these discoveries (Zeng et al., 1998, 1999; Zhang et al., 1999).

Invertase and SuSy regulation extends from transcriptional to post-transcriptional mechanisms. The Koch group (FL-AES) has found that transcription of genes for both enzymes responds strongly to sugars, oxygen status and other abiotic factors, and that both are also regulated at the level of mRNA stability (Koch, 1996; Xu et al, 1996; Zeng et al., 1999; Koch et al., 2000). The Huber (NC-AES) and Chollet (NE-AES) groups have found that SuSy proteins from both maize and soybean nodules can be phosphorylated at multiple sites; CDPKs and/or SnRKs have been implicated in these phosphorylation events (Huber et al., 1996; Zhang and Chollet, 1997; Nakai et al., 1998; Anguenot et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 1999).

Starch synthesis and degradation occur in chloroplasts of leaves and amyloplasts of non-green starch storage tissues (e.g., seeds and tubers). The extent of starch formation and use can be linked to both export and import of photosynthates by different plant parts. Starch is typically a composite of both amylose (unbranched a-l,4 glucan) and amylopectin (a-l,4 and a-1,6 branched glucan). Its synthesis requires three enzymes: AGP (ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase), starch synthase, and BE (branching enzyme). In addition, a de-branching enzyme (Sugary-1 in maize) appears to be necessary for starch granule formation. AGP is an important regulatory enzyme and in many tissues it is activated by 3-P-glycerate and inhibited by inorganic phosphate. The Okita (WA-AES), Edwards (WA-AES) and Preiss (MI-AES) groups have analyzed the catalytic and regulatory sites of AGPs (Binderup et al., 2000; Frueauf et al., 2001; Sikka et al., 2001; Kavakli et al., 2001a; 2001b), and the Okita lab has found that starch content can be manipulated by altering the properties of AGP in transgenic plants (Slattery et al., 2000). The Preiss (MI-AES) and Guiltinen (PA-AES) labs have shown that starch quality depends on the properties of starch synthase and branching enzyme (Binderup et al., 2001; Blauth et al., 2001a, 2001b; Hong et al., 2001). Although little is known about the regulation of starch degradation, two amylolytic enzymes have been identified in chloroplasts of pea and Arabidopsis: one is an a-glucosidase and another is a Ca2+-independent a-amylase. The Duke group (WI-AES) has found that the latter enzyme might facilitate carbon export at night. A further understanding of the enzymes involved in starch metabolism might lead to strategies to manipulate starch quality or utilization.

Partitioning of photosynthates to sugar alcohols is a central feature of several plant species that shunt recently fixed C into acyclic polyols such as mannitol and sorbitol, or cyclitols such as ononitol. In addition to their transport and storage roles, the Bohnert (IL-AES) and Loescher (MI-AES) groups have shown that these assimilates might function as osmoprotectants for plants experiencing salt and water stress (Shen et al., 1997; Sheveleva et al., 1997; Gao and Loescher, 2000; Loescher and Everard, 2000). Stress-susceptible model or crop plants have been transformed with genes involved in the synthesis of these protectants by the Bohnert and Loescher labs, and while stress resistance is often observed, more detailed studies of the mechanisms are required.

Objective 4: Developmental and Environmental Limitations to Photosynthesis

Factors that enhance or limit agricultural productivity do so by impacting photosynthesis. Gains in yield of the major crops over the past half-century have been predominantly through improved harvest index (HI). HI has approached the maximum achievable for many crops, and future gains will depend on increasing total production. This, in turn, will depend on improving the efficiency of crop canopy light interception and utilization. It will therefore be important to maximize these efficiencies under optimal and stress conditions, consonant with global atmospheric change.

NC-1142 collaborators have been active in a number of investigations that have explored developmental and environmental limitations to photosynthesis. These include nitrogen use, water use, stress (temperature, salt, drought, CO2), and developmental factors associated with canopy architecture and leaf ontogeny. Nitrogen acquisition and use is key to increasing actual efficiencies of light interception and use; improvements in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) will also reduce the input of fertilizer needed for high yields. The Below group (IL-AES) has been studying the Illinois Protein Strains of maize --a germplasm with a wide range of NUEs - Xand found that little genetic variation exits for NUE in corn, probably because current hybrids have been selected under high N (Gentry et al., 2001). The Markwell group (NE-AES) has found that one-carbon metabolism plays a role in water-stress; they have focused on formate dehydrogenase as a means of increasing water use efficiency at the leaf level (Olson et al., 2000).

Stresses represent major limitations to photosynthesis and yield. The Jones group (MN-AES) has shown that maize kernel development is sensitive to heat stress during the first six days following pollination and is associated with decreased endogenous cytokinin levels (Commuri and Jones, 2001). Heat stress also disrupts amyloplast initiation, starch granule development, and storage protein levels. The Bohnert (IL-AES) and Cushman (NV-AES) groups have pioneered the use of microarrays, gene mining, and mutant analyses to investigate the mechanisms of drought and salt stress and the role of osmoprotectants in these processes (Cushman and Bohnert, 2000; Hasegawa et al., 2000).

Field studies of the effects of global change have scaled from photosynthetic processes to yield in two agricultural systems: increased N-deposition and drought in rangeland by the Knapp group (KS-AES) (Silletti and Knapp, 2001) and increased CO2 in soybean by the Long lab (IL-AES) (Hymus et al., 2001). Both showed changes in production anticipated from prior laboratory studies, but the mechanisms differed from expectations, emphasizing the importance of interaction between field and laboratory. For soybean, significantly increased canopy duration was a major factor, whereas for rangeland an increased contribution from the C4 photosynthetic component was a key factor.

Developmental factors also represent a major limitation to photosynthesis. For example, a model for light distribution within row-planted cotton canopies, based on the existing formulations for radiation transfer, has been integrated into a geometric model of the cotton canopy by the Sassenrath-Cole lab (MS-ARS). This model revealed that changes in leaf structure can enhance photosynthetic production. The Daley (OR-AES), Rodermel (IA-AES) and Edwards (WA-AES) groups have examined discontinuities in photosynthetic efficiency via fluorometry and found that these correlated with germplasm observations of dividing chloroplasts (Zheng et al., 2001a, 2001b). In addition it has been found that negative effects on photosynthesis attributed to environmental stresses are not only the direct result of decreases in photosynthesis but also a consequence of changes in plant development, e.g., that occur during the progression of leaf ontogeny (Rodermel, 1999).

Objectives

  1. To examine the dynamic regulation of radiant energy capture and utilization in photosynthesis, and to study the architecture, function and biogenesis of the photosynthetic apparatus.
  2. To determine and modify the biochemical and regulatory factors that impact the photosynthetic capture and photorespiratory release of CO2.
  3. To understand the mechanisms that regulate photosynthate partitioning into paths for biosynthesis and use of sucrose, starch, and sugar alcohols.
  4. To analyze the limitations and environmental factors that influence photosynthetic productivity at the whole plant and canopy levels.

Methods

Objective 1: Photochemistry and the Biogenesis of the Photosynthetic Apparatus

The Chitnis and Rodermel groups (IA-AES) will collaborate to develop tools of functional genomics analysis to define the components of the thylakoid membrane, how these membranes are synthesized, and how they function. In particular, they will identify proteins of unknown function using proteomics analysis of cyanobacterial and plant thylakoid membranes. Knockout mutants of cyanobacteria and Arabidopsis will be isolated that contain insertions in genes for the unknown proteins; the Chitnis, Rodermel and Daley (OR-AES) groups will integrate their efforts to characterize these mutants as a first step to examine protein function. The three groups will also collaborate to examine other mutants of cyanobacteria and Arabidopsis that are perturbed in thylakoid membrane biogenesis and function (such as immutans and var2 of Arabidopsis). These mutants should provide insight into retrograde signaling pathways, as well as into mechanisms that govern PSI and PSII stoichiometry. The mutant studies of Chitnis, Rodermel and Daley will set the stage for collaborations with other members of the NC-142 group, e.g., to examine how lesions in thylakoid membrane function affect downstream photosynthetic events, such as partitioning of photosynthate into sucrose versus starch (Objetctive 3). Allison (NE-AES) will develop tools of chloroplast transformation that will form the basis for future NC-142 collaborations (especially with members whose primary area of expertise is Objective 2 or 3, see below). She will also study the role of sigma factors in chloroplast biogenesis by examining the consequences of sigma factor gene disruption in insertion mutants of maize and Arabidopsis. The mutants will be analyzed by functional genomics approaches, including microarray analyses. Objective 2. Photosynthetic Capture and Photorespiratory Release of CO2

By exploiting methods of chloroplast and nuclear transformation in Chlamydomonas, the Spretizer lab (NE-AES) will investigate the importance of large and small subunit residues that differ relative to those conserved in crop plant Rubisco enzymes. The Houtz group (KY-AES) will continue to define the biochemical significance of post-translational Rubisco methylations and hydroxylations and will exploit mutant Chlamydomonas enzymes that have been engineered by the Spreitzer group (NE-AES) to promote or block such modifications. By using tobacco chloroplast transformation performed in collaboration with the Allison group (NE-AES), the KY-AES will also create amino acid substitutions to introduce post-translationally modified residues into crop plants. Knowledge of Rubisco posttranslational modifications will be important in efforts by the Portis group (IL-ARS) to replace the endogenous Rubisco in tobacco and soybeans with the Chlamydomonas enzyme (via genes provided by the NE-AES), which has more favorable kinetic properties at high CO2. The Portis and Spreitzer labs will continue to collaborate on determining the structural basis for the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase using Chlamydomonas chloroplast transformation. A large subunit loop that is known to influence this interaction will be replaced with the loop from crop plants. The Portis lab will also continue studies of the impact of transforming the rca mutant of Arabidopsis activase with mutant proteins that have altered catalytic and regulatory properties. The Chollet (NE-AES) and Cushman (NV-AES) groups will continue to coordinate their biochemical, molecular, and physiological investigations into the functional contribution and metabolic regulation of PEPC, PPcK, and PPDK. Because this research has direct relevance to plant regulatory protein phosphorylation in general, collaborations with the Randall (MO-AES), and Huber (NC-ARS) groups will accelerate progress. The Chollet group will characterize the bifunctional regulatory protein involved in the (de)phosphorylation of PPDK, and begin to investigate divergent forms of PEPC as a means of gaining a deeper understanding of enzyme regulation. The Chollet and Cushman groups will coordinate and expand their investigations of PPcK in C3, C4, and CAM plants by molecular and biochemical characterization of other isozymes. Investigations into the regulation and substrate specificity of PPcK and closely-related calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) will be conducted in collaboration with the Huber group (NC-AES). The Randall group (MO-AES) will define the biochemical and regulatory properties of the protein kinase that regulates the mitochondrial PDC and coordinates photosynthetic and photorespiratory metabolism in mitochondria. The primary mechanism is reversible phosphorylation, similar to that controlling PEPC, SuSy, SPS and NR. Thus, Randall interacts and exchanges information with the Chollet, Huber and Cushman groups through efforts to understand and characterize plant protein kinases. Knockouts of kinases and phosphatases in the various systems should reveal any overlapping properties of these regulatory enzymes and their effects on photosynthesis and enhanced storage-oil synthesis. Objective 3: Mechanisms Regulating Photosynthate Partitioning

The steps involved in C-flow into and out of sucrose, starch, and sugar alcohols represent key points of control for photosynthate partitioning at the metabolic and whole plant levels. The proposed research will define mechanisms of regulation for each of these processes, and how they can be manipulated to increase productivity and yield. Regulation of sucrose biosynthesis and metabolism will be approached in several ways. Regulation can be modulated in both exporting and importing tissues: for example, at points of sucrose formation via SPS (sucrose-P synthase) or cleavage by SuSy (sucrose synthase) or invertases (vacuolar and cell wall forms). To gain insight into mechanisms of sugar sensing, the Rodermel (IA-AES) and Moore (SC-AES) groups will collaborate in using mutant and transgenic Arabidopsis with altered soluble invertase activities or with altered hexose sensing capacities. Both approaches should decrease hexose-based sugar signals. The impact of these alterations will be assessed by examining photosynthesis, plant development, diurnal carbohydrate profiles, and activities of sucrose-cycling enzymes, and by conducting isotope assays of sucrose cycling. Invertase regulation and its role in development will be further examined using transgenic maize in collaborative research by the Koch (FL-AES), Jones (MN-AES) and Huber (NC-AES) groups. In these experiments (also performed in collaboration with Pioneer Hi-Bred), several types of transgenic lines will be generated: a) invertase promoter-GUS constructs for analysis of transcriptional control (FL-AES, NC-AES); b) lines that over-express soluble invertase in specific tissues to examine the developmental role of invertase (FL-AES); and c) lines in which cytokinin metabolism is altered to assess its impact in young kernels (MN-AES). A final regulatory aspect of sucrose metabolism that will be investigated is SuSy phosphorylation in coordinated research by the Koch (FL-AES), Chollet (NB-AES) and Huber (NC-AES) groups. Stable and transient expression approaches will be used to test functionality, localization, and substrate characteristics of non-phosphorylatable SuSy enzymes. Both maize and soybean will be utilized (vegetative and nodule tissues), together with antibodies to specific sites of SuSy phosphorylation (developed by the NC- and NB-AESs). Of particular interest will be the identification of the effector kinase (a CDPK or SnRK). Regulation of starch biosynthesis and degradation will include a major focus on AGP due to its central role in starch formation. One of the approaches will be to alter the regulatory properties of AGP by modifying the binding sites for 3-PGA activation or Pi inhibition. Ongoing work by the Preiss (MI-AES), Edwards (WA-AES) and Okita (WA-AES) groups indicates that inhibition of AGP by Pi might involve both N- and C-terminal domains of the protein; mutant proteins are being constructed to test this hypothesis. If these enzymes are less sensitive to Pi inhibition, or require less activator, they could be valuable resources for increasing starch and crop yields. The Preiss, Edwards and Okita groups will coordinate their examinations of mutant AGP proteins for altered binding of the 3-PGA activator, and will evaluate and compare the physiological effects of the mutant enzymes in transgenic plants of Arabidopsis (WA-AES), rice (WA-AES), and potato (MI-AES). In these studies, rice will serve as a model system, and mutant AGPs will be targeted to leaves, or to one of two compartments in cells of the seed endosperm (cytosol or amyloplasts). This approach will allow an independent assessment of the potential for starch storage in exporting versus importing tissues. CAM mutants of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum defective in starch synthesis, which have been isolated by the Cushman group (NV-AES), also will be characterized by Preiss (MI-AES) for defects in the three starch biosynthetic enzymes. Another focus of research in this objective will be the molecular mechanisms regulating the activity of BE (branching enzyme). The Preiss group will utilize PCR random mutagenesis to alter BE structure and properties, whereas the Edwards and Okita groups will use Mu insertional mutants to study effects of altered BE enzymes in vivo and in vitro. The Duke group (WI-AES) will study the regulation of starch degradation by generating Arabidopsis mutants with defects in the chloroplast a-glucosidase and Ca2+-independent a-amylase; the mutants will be examined using procedures similar to those discussed above for the AGP mutants. The role of polyol sugars in imparting protection from drought or salt stress will be studied in coordinated efforts by the Bohnert (IL-AES) and Loescher (MI-AES) groups using stable transgenic model and crop plants. Photosynthetic characteristics of transformed tobacco and Arabidopsis plants producing mannitol, sorbitol, or ononitol will be assessed after salt stress. The importance of having cytosolic or chloroplastic polyols will be examined further. These experiments will define the protective characteristics of each polyol and the preferred compartment for its synthesis and accumulation, thereby providing insights into the use of polyols for engineering stress tolerance (see Objective 4). Recent progress in regeneration and transformation of celery (a mannitol syntheziser) and cherry (a sorbitol synthesizer) by the Loescher group (MI-AES) will allow study of genetically modified polyol biosynthesis. Objective 4: Developmental and Environmental Limitations to Photosynthesis

NC-142 collaborators will focus on the impact of six major developmental and environmental limitations to photosynthesis:

  1. Nitrogen use. Physiological components of NUE will be determined by the Below group (IL-AES) in field trials of different genotype x N rate treatments using resources of the Illinois Protein Strains of maize. In addition to physiological studies, the plant samples will be assayed for changes in the expression of genes known to be involved in nitrogen metabolism and storage product deposition. The NE-AES (Markwell group) will determine whether the expression of uricase, which is essential for mobilization of fixed N2, might be used as a QTL marker in different soybean breeding lines.
  2. Temperature stress. The Knapp group (IA-AES) will study the effects of low temperature stress on photosynthesis and yield using a range of maize genotypes that differ in their tolerance to low temperature. The transition of seedlings from heterotrophic to autotrophic growth will be characterized and genotypes screened for photosynthetic competence. The Knapp (IA-AES) and Jones (MN-AES) groups will compare tolerance to low and high temperature stresses and will provide tissue material to the Chitnis group (IA-AES) for characterization of the proteomes of the stressed plants in order to identify proteins that might be targeted for genetic manipulation.
  3. CO2 and ozone stress. Field studies of the impacts of global change on photosynthetic production will be expanded by the Long (IL-AES) and Knapp (KS-AES) groups. Tropospheric ozone is thought to account for $6 billion of crop losses in the US, and its continued rate of increase might eliminate any increase in production due to rising CO2. The new Free-Air Concentration Enrichment experiment (SoyFACE) will add ozone (1.5x ambient) to its elevated CO2 treatment (1.5x ambient). This will be the first field system worldwide that simultaneously treats crops in the open air with both ozone and CO2 elevated to predicted future levels. This is a resource that will be used by other NC-142 participants. For example, the Rodermel group (IA-AES) will use proteomics to characterize changes in expressed polypeptides and the Portis group (IL-USDA) will specifically examine the levels of Rubisco and activase in samples obtained from the SoyFACE facility. The KS-AES (Knapp) will conduct parallel studies of global change effects on rangeland, focusing on increased N-deposition and drought incidence.
  4. Photosynthetic limitations in canopies. Cotton will be used as a model system. Monitoring crop performance on the broad scale required of production agriculture is challenging, tedious, and error-prone. Within-field spatial variability affects canopy microclimate, crop growth, cotton fiber development, and final fiber quality and yield, and can cause significant reductions in the net return to farmers. The Sassenrath-Cole group (MS-ARS) will explore edaphic x microclimate effects on cotton production systems. Photosynthetic limitations in canopies will be assessed via geometric models of canopy structure, radiation transfer, and microclimate. This information will benefit efforts by the Long group (IL-AES) to develop remote sensing techniques at the Soyface facility, and will also contribute to the work in Obectives 1 and 2.
  5. Salt and drought stress response. The role of signal transduction in stress sensing and tolerance responses will be studied by the Bohnert group (IL-AES). Transcriptional and post-translational responses in gene regulation to varied salt concentrations will be determined. Collaborative studies with the Cushman group (NV-AES) will elucidate the physiological aspects of salt and drought tolerance in whole plants, and both groups will coordinate mechanistic studies that involve genome-wide transcript expression profiles (microarrays), gene mining, and mutant analyses (see Cushman and Bohnert, 2000).
  6. Water-use efficiency. The Markwell group (NE-AES) will examine whether altering one-carbon metabolism by overexpressing formate dehydrogenase in transgenic tobacco alters water-use efficiency. Plants with 25 to 50-fold elevated levels of the enzyme will be grown under water-sufficient and !Vdeficient conditions and WUE will be assess by 13C-isotope ratio mass spectrometry.
In addition to these six major initiatives, other NC-142 participants will contribute to this objective, but in more limited ways. For example, the impact of taxol on photosynthesis and plant development will be assessed by the Daley group (OR-AES). The IA-AES (Rodermel group) will also use antisense Rubisco mutants to assess the impact of Rubisco on photosynthesis and plant growth, and variegation mutants to understand developmental effects on photosynthesis.

Measurement of Progress and Results

Outputs

  • <B>Objective 1:</B><UL> <LI>The features of quinones and of quinone-binding sites that are essential for their function as redox centers in PSI will be determined (IA-AES). <LI>Mechanisms that control PSI and PSII stoichiometry will be identified (IA-AES, OR-AES) <LI>A map of the thylakoid proteome will be expanded and novel proteins characterized (IA-AES) <LI>Plastid transcripts that are expressed in different tissues and under different growth conditions will be identified (NE-AES). <LI>Components of plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction pathways and of thylakoid membrane biogenesis will be clarified (IA-AES, OR-AES).<P></UL> <B>Objective 2:</b><UL> <LI>The role of the Rubisco small subunit in determining Rubisco catalytic efficiency will be elucidated (NE-AES). <LI>Enzymes, mechanisms, and the significance of Rubisco post-translational modifications will be defined with respect to Rubisco synthesis, structure, and function (KY-AES, NE-AES). <LI>Structural interactions between Rubisco and Rubisco activase will be established with respect to both proteins (IL-ARS, NE-AES). <LI>Mutant forms of Rubisco activase will be created in vivo for physiological studies (IL-ARS). <LI>Signal transduction pathways for the regulatory phosphorylation of enzymes involved in C4 and CAM metabolism will be elucidated (NE-AES, NV-AES, NC-AES). <LI>The function of PPcK will be examined in transgenic C3/C4 and CAM model species (NV-AES, NE-AES). <LI>A collection of CAM-deficient mutants will be created (NV-AES). <LI>The function of the mtPDC and its associated regulatory proteins will be examined in transgenic C3 model species (MO-AES, NE-AES, NV-AES, NC-AES). <LI>Knockout mutants of Arabidopsis will be isolated and evaluated for increased carbohydrate and oil composition (MO-AES).</ul><P> <B>Objective 3:</B><ul><LI>Transgenic Arabidopsis with altered soluble invertase activity will be generated (IA-AES). <LI>Transgenic maize with altered genes for invertases (FL-AES), cytokinin oxidase (MN-AES), and sucrose synthase will be generated (Fl-AES, NC-AES). <LI>Antibodies to specific forms of phosphorylated forms of sucrose synthase from maize (NC-AES) and soybean will be produced (NB-AES). <LI>Transgenic Arabidopsis and rice plants with altered AGP and starch storage capacity in leaves and seeds will be generated (WA-AES). <LI>Maize mutants will be created with altered genes for BE and starch quality (PA-AES). <LI>Modified genes for AGP with regulatory properties that facilitate greater starch production will be produced (MI-AES, WA-AES). <LI>Modified genes for BE that allow analysis of its regulation and control of starch quality will be generated (MI-AES, PA-AES). <LI>Structural information will be produced on genes for starch biosynthesis that allows further regulatory control. <LI>Polyol transporters for sorbitol and mannitol will be identified.</ul><P> <b>Objective 4: </b><ul><LI>Improved models for optimizing light distribution in cotton canopies will be defined (MS-ARS). <LI>The role of endogenous cytokinin production in temperature response of early kernel filling in corn will be established (MN-AES). <LI>Genes or pathways will be discovered that are associated with or that potentially regulate NUE, storage product deposition, and salinity tolerance (IL-AES, NV-AES). <LI>Genotypes, including growth forms, will be identified that have increased yields under atmospheric change (IL-AES, KS-AES). <LI>The role of taxol in photosynthesis and plant development will be established (OR-AES). <LI>The significance of uricase in mobilization of fixed N2 in soybean will be established (NE-AES). <LI>The role of C-1 metabolism in photosynthetic efficiency will be elucidated (NE-AES).</ul>

Outcomes or Projected Impacts

  • <B>Objective 1:</b><ul><LI> Improved models for optimizing light distribution in cotton canopies will be defined (MS-ARS). <LI>The role of endogenous cytokinin production in temperature response of early kernel filling in corn will be established (MN-AES). <LI>Genes or pathways will be discovered that are associated with or that potentially regulate NUE, storage product deposition, and salinity tolerance (IL-AES, NV-AES). <LI>Genotypes, including growth forms, will be identified that have increased yields under atmospheric change (IL-AES, KS-AES). <LI>The role of taxol in photosynthesis and plant development will be established (OR-AES). <LI>The significance of uricase in mobilization of fixed N2 in soybean will be established (NE-AES). <LI>The role of C-1 metabolism in photosynthetic efficiency will be elucidated (NE-AES).</ul> <b>Objective 2:</b><UL><LI>Genetic engineering of the Rubisco small subunit, post-translational modifications, and/or interactions with Rubisco activase might increase carboxylation efficiency and crop plant productivity (NE-AES, KY-AES, IL-ARS). <LI>A deeper knowledge of regulatory phosphorylation and PEPC structure/function relationships in C4 and CAM plants might allow CO2 concentrating mechanisms to be genetically improved or transferred to C3 crop plants (NE-AES, NV-AES). <LI>Genetic engineering of the mtPDC and its associated mechanisms of regulation might reduce the loss of CO2 and increase oil production (MO-AES).</ul> <B>Objective 3: </B> <ul><LI>Data will show whether sucrose cycling can affect signals to sugar-responsive genes (SC-AES). <LI>Results will define transcriptional regulation of maize invertase, its impact on kernel development, and the role of cytokinin metabolism by young kernels (FL-AES, MN-AES). <LI>Information will determine roles and regulation of SuSy phosphorylation as well as the kinases involved (FL-AES, NB-AES, NC-AES). Localization and activity of SuSy could markedly affect sucrose use in many plant parts, and provide a valuable tool for its manipulation. <LI>Collectively, the above will enhance understanding of the molecular mechanisms for photosynthate partitioning, and could profoundly affect approaches to yield improvement. <LI>Information and materials from the molecular to whole-plant levels will allow starch storage and yield to be increased through control of AGP. <LI>Molecular information and mutant plants will facilitate the first steps toward manipulation of starch quality through regulation of BE. <LI>Definition of starch breakdown mechanisms could provide new means of controlling its storage, and determine a role for a potentially valuable, but enigmatic enzyme (Q amylase). <LI>Crop plants with improved productivity (stress tolerance) will be generated (IL-AES, MI-AES). </ul> <B>Objective 4:</b><ul><LI>Germplasm will be developed with increased photosynthetic potential under elevated CO2 and ozone for use in breeding programs (IL-AES). <LI>Corn germplasm will be developed for increased NUE that might save growers money spent on N fertilizer and decrease N runoff (IL-AES). <LI>The uricase gene will be developed as a QTL marker in soybean selection (NE-ARS). <LI>New criteria will be established for selection of canopy properties in cotton breeding (MS-ARS).</ul>

Milestones

(0):ctive 1:</B> <ul><LI> Cyanobacterial mutants will need to be generated by years 1 and 2 to study structure-function relationships in PSI and to study the regulation of photosystem stoichiometry (IA-AES). <LI>Knockout and RNAi mutants will need to be produced in years 1, 2 and 3 in genes for novel thylakoid proteins in cyanobacteria and plants, and for sigma factor genes in maize and Arabidopsis (IA-AE, NE-AES). </ul>

(0):ctive 2: </b> <ul><LI>Transformation of genetically-engineered rbcL genes into tobacco (NE-AES) will be required by year 2 to provide material for studies on Rubisco post-translational methylation (KY-AES). <LI>Directed mutants of Chlamydomonas Rubisco will need to be generated in the Rubisco activase binding region via chloroplast transformation (NE-AES) by year 3 and analyzed for effects on activation efficiency (IL-ARS). <LI>The gene encoding the regulatory protein of PPDK will need to be cloned by year 2 as a means for defining the biochemistry of regulatory phosphorylation (NE-AES).<LI>CAM mutants of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum will need to be generated by years 1 through 4 (NV-AES) for use in analyzing C4 (NE-AES, NV-AES) and starch (MI-AES, PA-AES) metabolism. <LI>Arabidopsis knockout mutants will need to be identified by year 2 for subsequent use in the study of mtPDC regulatory phosphorylation (MO-AES).</ul>

(0):ective 3:</b><ul><LI> Production of necessary transgenic Arabidopsis plants will need to be competed within the first year, and their initial characterization should be finished within the following two years. <LI>Transgenic maize materials should be ready for testing after the second year. <LI>Antibodies to specific phosphorylated forms of SuSy will be available within the first year. <LI>Transgenic Arabidopsis with altered AGP will need to be generated within the first year. <LI>Transgenic rice with new constructs should be available after the second year. <LI>Crystal structure of AGP should be more fully defined within 2 to 3 years. <LI>Transgenic Arabidopsis with altered capacity for polyol biosynthesis will be generated within the first year, and these will then be used to analyze both primary and secondary effects of these biosynthetic genes in photosynthesis, partitioning, and stress tolerance.</ul>

(0):ctive 4:</B> <ul><LI>Free-air concentration enrichment will need to be developed by year 2, constructed, and deployed for controlled increase in ozone within soybean in the open-air (IL-AES). <LI>Three years of trials and analysis of the effects of elevated CO2 and two of ozone on soybean photosynthetic production will need to be completed (IL-AES).</ul>

(0):0

Projected Participation

View Appendix E: Participation

Outreach Plan

We will engage in a multi-pronged outreach plan to dissemeinate the results of the project. As in past proposals, the major advances and discoveries will be published in scientific journals and meeting proceedings. Peer-reviewed publication is the best practical method for evaluating the quality and impact of the research results. NC-142 investigators have been successful in this endeavor, as illustrated by the large number of articles published by the groups members in high impact, high quality journals (See APPENDIX 2). Research results will also be presented as platform lectures and poster presentations at local, regional, national, and international scientific meetings. NC-142 collaborators have also been successful in this arena, delivering many high profile presentations (See APPENDIX 3).

We will also engage in several new initiatives:
1. We will establish an NC-142 website for information exchange among collaborators and for dissemination of research results to the public (including commodities groups) in lay language.
2. Field days will be organized at the SoyFACE facility for commodity/grower groups to explain the facility and results, both state and national, via the National Soybean Research Laboratory and soybean commodity groups. An annual field day will also be held for grower groups to show progress in selection of improved NUE (IL-AES).
3. We will invite selected faculty from the 1890 schools to our NC-142 annual meeting so that our findings reach minority schools; this will also serve to foster research collaboarations.

Organization/Governance

Standard

Literature Cited

Allison LA (2000) The role of sigma factors in plastid transcription. Biochimie 82: 537-548

Aluru M, Bae H, Wu D, Rodermel S (2001) The Arabidopsis immutans mutation affects plastid differentiation and the morphogenesis of white and green sectors in variegated plants. Plant Physiol 127: 67-77

Anguenot R, Yelle S, Nguyen-Quoc B (1999) Purification of tomato sucrose synthase phosphorylated isoforms by Fe(III)-immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Arch Biochem Biophs 365: 163-169

Arrese-Igor C, Gonzalez EM, Gordon AJ, Minchin FR, Galvez L, Royuela M, Cabrerizo PM, Aparicio-Tejo PM (1999) Sucrose synthase and nodule nitrogen fixation under drought and other environmental stresses. Symbiosis 27:189-212

Bakrim N, Brulfert J, Vidal J, Chollet R (2001) Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase is controlled by a similar signaling cascade in CAM and C4 plants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286: 1158-1162

Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR Jr, Long SP (2001) Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 24: 253-259

Binderup K, Watanabe L, Polikarpov I, Preiss J, Arni RK (2000) Crystalization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the catalytic subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from potato tuber. Acta Crystalographica D56:192-194

Binderup K, Mikkelsen R, Preiss J (2001) Truncation of the amino-terminus of branching enzyme changes branching pattern. Arch Biochem Biophys (In press)

Blauth SL, Klucinec J, Yao Y, Shannon JC, Thompson DP, Guiltinen MJ (2001a) Identification of Mutator insertional mutants of starch branching enzyme 2a (Sbe2a) in Zea mays L. Plant Physiol 125:1396-1405

Blauth SL, Klucinec J, Shannon JC, Thompson DB, Guiltinen MJ (2001b) Identification of Mutator insertional mutants of starch branching enzyme 1 (Sbe1) in Zea mays L. Plant Physiol (In press)

Bohnert HJ, Ayoubi P, Borchert C, Bressan RA, Burnap RL, Cushman JC et al. (2001) A genomics approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 39:295-311

Chastain, CJ, Botschner M, Harrington GE, Thompson BJ, Mills SE, Sarath G, Chollet R (2000) Further analysis of maize C4-pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase phosphorylation by its bifunctional regulatory protein using selective substitutions of the regulatory Thr-456 and catalytic His-458 residues. Arch Biochem Biophys 375: 165-170

Chen M, Choi Y, Voytas DF, Rodermel S (2000) Mutations in the Arabidopsis VAR2 locus cause leaf variegation due to the loss of a chloroplast FtsH protease. Plant J 22: 303-313

Chitnis PR (2001) Photosystem I: function and physiology. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52: 593-626

Commuri PD, Jones RJ (2001) High temperature during endosperm cell division in maize: a genotypic comparison under in vitro and field conditions. Plant Sci. 41: 1222-1130

Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ (2000) Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 117-124

Daniell H, Khan MS, Allison LA (2002) Milestones in chloroplast genetic engineering: an environmentally friendly era in biotechnology. Trends Plant Sci (In press).

Dirk LMA, Williams MA, Houtz RL (2001) Eukaryotic peptide deformylases. Nuclear-encoded and chloroplast-targeted enzymes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 127: 97-107

Frueauf JB, Ballicora AM, Preiss J (2001) Aspartate residue 142 is important for catalysis by ADPGlc pyrophosphorylase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem (In press)

Gao Z, Loescher WH (2000) NADPH supply and mannitol biosynthesis. Characterization, cloning, and regulation of the non-reversible glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase in celery leaves. Plant Physiol 124: 321-330

Gentry LE, Below FE, David MB, Bergerou JA (2001) Source of the soybean N credit in maize production. Plant Soil, in press

Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ (2000) Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51: 463-499

Hong S, Mikkelsen R, Preiss J. (2001) Analysis of maize branching enzyme II by PCR random mutagenesis. Arch.Biochem.Biophys. 386: 62-68

Huber SC, Huber JL, Liao PC, Guage DA, McMichael RW Jr,. Chourey PS, Hannah LC, Koch KE (1996) Phosphorylation of serine-15 of maize leaf sucrose synthase. Plant Physiol 112: 793-802

Hymus GJ, Baker NR, Long SP (2001) Growth in elevated CO2 can both increase and decrease photochemistry and photoinhibition of photosynthesis in a predictable manner. Dactylis glomerata grown in two levels of nitrogen nutrition. Plant Physiol 127: 1204-1211

Kavakli IH, Greene TW, Salamone PR, Choi S-B, Okita TW (2001a) M143, a mutation in the large subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, which affects substrate binding. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 281: 783-787

Kavakli IH, Park J-S, Slattery CJ, Salamone PR, Frohlick J, Okita T (2001b) Analysis of allosteric effector binding sites of potato ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase through error-prone PCR. J Biol Chem (In press)

Koch, KE (1996) Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47: 509-540

Koch KE, Zeng Y, Wu Y, Avigne WT (2000) Multiple paths of sugar sensing and a sugar/ oxygen overlap for genes of sucrose and ethanol metabolism. J Exp Bot 51: 417-427

Lahiri SD, Allison LA (2000) Complementary expression of two plastid-localized sigma-like factors in maize. Plant Physiol 123: 883-894

Leuthy MH, Gemel J, Johnston ML, Mooney BP, Miernyk JA, Randall DD (2001) Developmental expression of the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in pea (Pisum sativum) seedlings. Physiol Plant 112: 559-566

Loescher WH, Everard JD (2000) Regulation of sugar alcohol biosynthesis. In RC Leegood, TD Sharkey, S von Caemmerer, eds, Photosynthesis: Physiology and Metabolism. Kluwer Acad Pub, Dordrecht, pp 275-299

Mann CM (1998) Science 283: 310-314

Martin W, Herrmann RG (1998) Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: how much, what happens, and why? Plant Physiol 118: 9-17

Moore BD, Sheen J (1999) Plant sugar sensing and signaling - a complex reality. TIPS 4:250

Nakai T, Konishi T, Zang X-Q, Chollet R, Tonouchi R, Tsuchida T, Yoshinaga F, More H, Sakai F, Hyashi T (1998) An increase in apparent affinity for sucrose of mung bean sucrose synthase is caused by in vitro phosphorylation or directed mutagenesis of Ser-11. Plant Cell Physiol 39: 1337-1341

Olson BJSC, Skavdahl M, Ramberg H, Osterman JC, Markwell J (2000) Formate dehydrogenase in Arabidopsis thaliana: characterization and possible targeting to the chloroplast. Plant Sci 159: 205-212

Portis AR Jr (2001) The Rubisco activase!VRubisco system: an ATPase-dependent association that regulates photosynthesis. In M McManus, W Laing, A Allen, eds, Protein!VProtein Interactions in Plant Biology, Annual Plant Reviews, Vol 7. Academic, Sheffield, (in press)

Ricard B, VanToai T, Chourey P, Saglio P (1998) Evidence for the critical role of sucrose synthase for anoxia tolerance of maize roots using a double mutant. Plant Physiol 116: 1323-1331

Rodermel S (1999)..Subunit control of Rubisco biosynthesis!Xa relic of an endosymbiont past? Photosyn Res 59: 105-123

Rodermel S (2001) Pathways of plastid-to-nucleus signaling. Trends Plant Sci 6: 471-478
Rolland F, Moore BD, Sheen J (2001) Sugar sensing and signaling in plants. Plant Cell (In press)

Shen B, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ (1997) Increased resistance to oxidative stress in transgenic plants by targeting mannitol biosynthesis to chloroplasts. Plant Physiol 113: 1177-1183

Sheveleva E, Chmara W, Bohnert HJ, Jensen RG (1997) Increased salt and drought tolerance by D-ononitol production in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. Plant Physiol 115: 1211-1219

Sikka VK, Choi S-B, Kavakli IH, Sakulsingharoj C, Gupta S, Ito H, Okita T (2001) Subcellular compartmentation and allosteric regulation of the rice endosperm ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase. Plant Sci 161: 461-468

Silletti AM, Knapp AK (2001) Responses of the co-dominant grassland species Andropogon gerardii and Sorghastrum nutans to long-term manipulations of nitrogen and water. Amer Midl Natur 145: 159-167

Slattery CJ, Kavakli H, Okita TW (2000) Engineering starch for increased quantity and quality. Trends in Plant Sci 5: 291-298

Spreitzer RJ (1998) Genetic Engineering of Rubisco. In JD Rochaix, M Goldschmidt-Clermont, S Merchant, eds, The Molecular Biology of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Chlamydomonas. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 515-527

Spreitzer RJ (1999) Questions about the complexity of chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Photosynth Res 60: 29-42

Spreitzer RJ, Esquivel MG, Du Y, McLaughlin PD (2001) Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the small-subunit bA-bB loop of chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: Substitution at Arg-71 affects thermal stability and CO2/O2 specificity. Biochemistry 40: 5615-5621

Sturm A, Tang G-Q (1999) The sucrose cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development, growth, and carbon partitioning. Trends Plant Sci 4: 401-406

Taybi T, Cushman JC (1999) Signaling events leading to Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) induction in the common ice plant, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Physiol 121: 545-555

Taybi T, Patil S, Chollet R, Cushman JC (2000) A minimal serine/threonine protein kinase circadianly regulates phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in Crassulacean acid metabolism-induced leaves of the common ice plant. Plant Physiol 123: 1471-1481

Taylor TC, Backlund A, Bjorhall K, Spreitzer RJ, Andersson I (2001) First crystal structure of Rubisco from a green alga !V Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biol Chem (in press)

Vidal J, Chollet R (1997) Regulatory phosphorylation of C4 PEP carboxylase. Trends Plant Sci 2: 230-237

Wu D, Wright D, Wetzel C, Voytas DF, Rodermel SR (1999) The IMMUTANS variegation locus of Arabidopsis defines a mitochondrial alternative oxidase homolog that functions during early chloroplast biogenesis. Plant Cell 11: 43-55

Xu J, Avigne WT, McCarty DR, Koch KE (1996) A similar dichotomy of sugar modulation and developmental expression affects both paths of sucrose metabolism: Evidence from a maize invertase gene family. Plant Cell 8: 1209-1220

Ying Z, Mulligan RM, Janney J, Royer M, Houtz RL (1999) Rubisco SSMT and LSMT: Related aN- and eN-methyltransferases that methylate the large and small subunits of Rubisco. J Biol Chem 274: 36750-36756

Zeng Y, Koch KE (2001) Molecular approaches to altered C-partitioning; genes for sucrose metabolism. Hort Sci (In press)

Zeng Y, Wu Y, Avigne WT, Koch KE (1998) Hypoxia and anoxia induce different sugar-sensitive sucrose synthases via complementary transcriptional and translational mechanisms. Plant Physiol 116: 1573-1583

Zeng Y, Wu Y, Avigne WT, Koch KE (1999) Rapid repression of maize invertases by low oxygen: invertase/sucrose synthase balance, sugar signaling potential, and seedling survival. Plant Physiol 121: 599-608

Zhang X-Q, Chollet R (1997) Seryl-phosphorylation of soybean nodule sucrose synthase (nodulin-100) by a CDPK. FEBS Lett 410: 126-130

Zhang X-Q, Lund AA, Sarath G, Cerny RL, Roberts DM, Chollet R (1999) Soybean nodule sucrose synthase (nodulin-100): further analysis of its phosphorylation using recombinant and authentic root nodule enzymes. Arch Biochem Biophys 371: 70-82

Zhang N, Sch|rmann P, Portis AR Jr (2001) Characterization of the regulatory function of the 46-kDa isoform of Rubisco activase from Arabidopsis. Photosynth Res 68: 29-37

Zheng P, Ammar K, Girard AM, Wetzel C, Rodermel S, Thomas DR, Ning L, Callis JB, Edwards GE, Daley L (2001) Tests of in vivo method to detect chloroplast division in crop plants: Part 1. Discovery of the phenomena. Spectroscopy (accepted).

Zheng P, Ammar K, Girard AM, Wetzel C, Rodermel S, Thomas DR, Ning L, Callis JB, Edwards GE, Daley L (2001) Tests of in vivo method to detect chloroplast division in crop plants: Part 2. Verification of phenomena by germplasm methods and confocal microscopy. Spectroscopy (accepted)

Zrenner R, Salanoubat M, Willmitzer L, Sonnewald U (1995) Evidence for the crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants. Plant J 7: 97-107

Attachments

Land Grant Participating States/Institutions

FL, GU, IA, IL, KS, KY, ME, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, PA, SC, TX, WA, WI

Non Land Grant Participating States/Institutions

USDA-ARS
Log Out ?

Are you sure you want to log out?

Press No if you want to continue work. Press Yes to logout current user.

Report a Bug
Report a Bug

Describe your bug clearly, including the steps you used to create it.