
NCDC240: Perennial Grain Systems
(Multistate Research Coordinating Committee and Information Exchange Group)
Status: Inactive/Terminating
Date of Annual Report: 07/16/2025
Report Information
Period the Report Covers: 10/01/2024 - 05/31/2025
Participants
Virtual Zoom Attendees:Valentin Picasso, University of Wisconsin
Matt Ryan, Cornell University
Julie Dawson, University of Wisconsin
Kevin Smith, University of Minnesota
Jennifer Blesh, University of Michigan
Prabin Bajbain, USDA ARS
Alex Huddell, University of Delaware
Lauren Brzozowski, University of Kentucky
Manbir Rakkar, Ohio State University
Shuwen Wang, Land Institute
Christina Hamilton, Agricultural Experiment Station, manages NIMSS for NC region
In Person Attendees
Laura van de Pol, the Land Institute
Steve Culman, Oregon State University
Andrea Basche, University of Nebraska
Ben Robinson, Ohio State
Clair Keene, NDSU
Lee DeHaan, the Land Institute
Hannah Stoll, UMN
Jared Crain, Kansas State
James Anderson, UMN
Jake Jungers, UMN
Brief Summary of Minutes
Agenda for June 9 meeting
3:00 pm - Intros
3:15 pm - Process to move from “development committee” to “Coordinating Committee”
3:25 pm - Deliverables and timeline for NIFA
3:35 pm - Discuss aspects of the proposal
Meeting Notes
Christina Hamilton updates group about the process of moving from development committee to coordinating committee.
We are beginning the process of a two year development committee. Verbally we can tell her what type of project we want to move to (assuming its a coordinating committee). She will set up a proposal template, someone is assigned to technical leadership to edit in the NIMSS system. Submission for full proposal would be Dec 1, but she likes to have objectives up by October 15, good to begin discussion even ahead of that. Sept 15 is the request to submit proposal deadline. More or less can follow the process that is described on the website. Gets reviewed by leadership in winter, then the full experiment station team in spring, will provide feedback, proposal in full due October 2026.
https://www.aginnovationnc.org/new-renewal-nc-project-instructions
We had some discussion about the difference between forming a research committee versus coordinating committee. Every station will provide funds via a different process for multistate research project. Research projects require more reporting, expectation of development of a research projects/outcomes. She has never seen a research project proposal rejected but they can suggest major revisions. Cannot be duplicative of another project - would want to make sure there is not another analogous project. Need to meet a few “grand challenges” for ag innovation/national priorities (she will send that to us), could include NIFA priorities. Want to see how you are working together across states, not in individual silos.
Clair asked a question about how the universities disperse experiment station funds. Christina noted that 25% of hatch funds are meant to go to multistate projects.
Discussion with the group if we should form a research committee versus coordinating committee. Jake note that we are definitely in a mode of needing research resources so exploring the RC is worthwhile. Valentin explained how the hatch funds are dispersed differently (faculty salary, competitive grants).
Andrea has had mixed experience with complicated process for applying and accessing Hatch funds, but thinks it is worthwhile to pursue since we are all seeking additional research funds
Next steps: Talk to local contacts at your university to seek funding from local university (i.e.could be ~$10k annually); very institutionally specific availability and process (not all folks may be eligible to apply. For example Clair at NDSU has a majority Extension appointment… but unclear whether she could access Hatch funds for a research group – and may need to partner with someone with a majority Research appointment)
Could be other benefits of being in a research group like this even if you do not get funding from it since you could be included on a list of membership
Clair: If a research committee is not much more effort than a coordinating committee – that could be more beneficial than just funds for travel
NEXT STEP for all at a Land Grant: AES Director - Find out what you are eligible for your institution. Jake will make a section of notes to keep track of this information
Steve question about how we got to this point which would be helpful for context. Valentin described that the funds that are available for multi-state projects. Shared his experience with forage researchers which led to the resilience CAP. This came up as a part of the discussion as the kernza CAP is winding now, how to get more research for perennial grains, how to fund travel to conferences, etc. Even though we are “NC” north central region anyone is eligible to join. “DC” is a two year development committee to write a proposal for a RC research committee or CC coordinating committee. The travel funds are only available if you are a part of the project and you ask for them.
Proposal is fairly simple (~5 pgs, overview, objectives, etc)
Alex Huddell: Has been able to get small amount of research funding in Delaware Land Grant; supports another research group
Valentin note that the spirit of the process is to share and coordinate
Laura question about how the activities and goals work, Jake and Andrea note that the objectives are usually broad and reporting encompasses both individual and collaborative efforts
Valentin: need to make sure there are a few people who take on responsibility of reporting/organizing, good for these responsibilities to rotate. Also proposed the question of if this is going to be worthwhile for all - most seemed in agreement that yes let’s move forward. Also proposed a core group to stay in closer communications, draft materials - Andrea, Jake, Matt Ryan, Manbir, Alex agreed.
Next steps
-Valentin to coordinate with Christina Hamilton about reporting/templates
-Jake will share notes, including google doc where everyone can fill in what they learn from agricultural experiment station -Clair note about sharing this and the questions that are asked
-Got a group of a few people who are willing to stay in touch about next steps
Accomplishments
Publications
Impact Statements
Date of Annual Report: 10/07/2026
Report Information
Period the Report Covers: 07/01/2025 - 06/01/2026
Participants
Virtual Attendees: Christina Hamilton, Clair Keene (NDSU)In-Person Attendees: Steve Culman (OSU), Leo Deiss (CSU), Andrea Basche (UNL), Natasha Djuric (Cornell), Christina Sprunger (MSU), Eeusha Nafi (MSU), Laura van der Pol (TLI), Marie Schaedel (OSU)
Brief Summary of Minutes
NCDC240 Meeting Notes 2026
Meeting date and time: June 24, 2026. 3:30 pm PDT
Location: 111 Tykeson Hall, Oregon State University Cascades Campus, 1500 SW Chandler Ave, Bend, Oregon 97702
Purpose statement on NIMSS:
The purpose of this 2-year NC Development Committee is for the members to meet and prepare a full, 5-year NC multistate research project.
Meeting summary:
The committee first discussed the history of this NCDC240 and its value to advancing perennial grain agriculture. The committee agreed that this concerted, national effort is highly valuable for coordinating foundational research needed to develop perennial grain crops and conduct the research needed to ensure that they can be grown profitably and used in a range of food products. The committee noted that members had collaborated with one another for many years prior to the development of NCDC240, but this committee provided an important opportunity to share results from past collaborations and offer opportunities to support future collaborations, especially in a way that broadens participation.
The committee noted that the 2-year development phase was coming to an end and thus started to discuss the next phase of this group. Members weighed the various options for phase II including forming a NC Coordinating Committee (NCCC) or a standard NC multistate research project. The committee decided to pursue a standard NC multistate research project, and the remainder of the meeting was spent discussing the application process.
The meeting concluded after determining a timeline for the development of an NC proposal and assigning tasks to individual committee members to assist with application preparation.