SAES-422 Multistate Research Activity Accomplishments Report

Status: Approved

Basic Information

Participants

A list of meeting participants from our 2012 Fall Meeting and Scientific Symposium can be downloaded from our website (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/conf/2012/), along with all of the presentations, posters, and other materials. There were 139 registrants and attendees at this years meeting.

All meeting minutes from our 2012 Spring Meeting (business meeting) and our 2012 Fall Meeting and Scientific Symposium (business, subcommittee meetings) are available on our website (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/committees/minutes.aspx). Several of the subcommittee minutes are delayed, but will be posted soon.

Accomplishments

The NRSP-3 provides a framework for cooperation among State Agricultural Experiment Stations (SAES), the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and other cooperating governmental and nongovernmental organizations that support the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP). The NADP provides quality-assured data and information on the exposure of managed and natural ecosystems and cultural resources to acidic compounds, nutrients, base cations, and mercury in precipitation and through dry deposition of several of these compounds. NADP data support informed decisions on air quality issues related to precipitation chemistry. Specifically, researchers use NADP data to investigate the impacts of atmospheric deposition on the productivity of managed and natural ecosystems; the chemistry of estuarine, surface, and ground waters; and the biodiversity in forests, shrubs, grasslands, deserts, and alpine vegetation. These research activities address environmental stewardship, one of the Experiment Station Sections research challenges. Researchers also use NADP Mercury Deposition Network data to examine the role of atmospheric deposition in affecting the mercury content of fish, and to better understand the link between environmental and dietary mercury and human health. This fits with another research priority of relationship of food to human health. The NADP operates three precipitation chemistry networks: the National Trends Network (NTN), the Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring Network (AIRMoN), and the Mercury Deposition Network (MDN). The NTN provides the only long-term nationwide record of basic ion wet deposition in the United States. Sample analysis for these samples includes free acidity (H+ as pH), specific conductance, and concentration and deposition measurements for calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, sulfate, nitrate, chloride, bromide (new), and ammonium. We also measure orthophosphate ions (PO43-, the inorganic form), but only for quality assurance as an indicator of sample contamination. At the end of September, 2012, 257 NTN stations were collecting one-week precipitation samples in 48 states, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Canada, and a new site in Argentina. Additionally, there are multiple quality assurance and test sites. Complementing the NTN is the seven-site AIRMoN. AIRMoN sites are essentially NTN sites operated on a daily basis (i.e., single precipitation events), with samples collected to support continued research of atmospheric transport and removal of air pollutants and development of computer simulations of these processes. The 110-site MDN offers the only long-term and routine measurements of mercury in North American precipitation. Measurements of total mercury concentration and deposition (and optional methyl-mercury) are used to quantify mercury deposition to water bodies, some of which have fish and wildlife mercury consumption advisories. In 2008, every state and 10 Canadian provinces listed advisories warning people to limit fish consumption due to high mercury levels. Coastal advisories are also in place for Atlantic waters from Maine to Rhode Island, from North Carolina to Florida, for the entire U.S. Gulf Coast, and for coastal Hawaii and Alaska. The NADP operates two newer gaseous atmospheric chemistry networks: the Atmospheric Mercury Network (AMNet) and the Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN), which is NADPs newest network. In each case, the network goal is to provide atmospheric concentrations of these particular gases, and then to estimate the rate of dry deposition (without precipitation) of the gas. In many cases, dry deposition of the gas could far exceed the wet deposition of the same compound. At the end of September 2012, 22 AMNet sites were collecting five-minute estimates of gaseous elemental mercury and two-hourly average concentrations of gaseous oxidized mercury and particulate bound mercury. The AMNet provides the only long-term region-wide record of basic atmospheric mercury concentrations in the United States. The AMoN has 58 sites operating as of September 2012, where two-week averages of atmospheric ammonia gas are being collected with passive devices. This low-cost network is designed to provide long-running estimates of ammonia in the atmosphere. These data are particularly important to agriculture, since many sources of ammonia are agricultural in nature. Data from both gaseous networks support continued research of atmospheric transport and removal of air pollutants and development of computer simulations of these processes. Short-term Outcomes and Outputs. Samples Collected. NADPs principal objective and accomplishment/outcome is the collection and analysis of samples for precipitation chemistry. Briefly, the NADP processed a total of 13,251 samples from the NTN, including 246 quality assurance (QA) samples. The analyses included observations of 10 different analyte concentrations and precipitation volume, which allow for calculation of deposition flux for each analyte. These same data were collected daily (i.e., every day with measurable precipitation) from the AIRMoN network. For the year, AIRMoN collected and processed 1,128 precipitation samples, including 168 QA samples. The MDN collected and processed 4,309 weekly mercury-in-precipitation samples, including 3,582 QA samples. The AMoN collected and quality assured 2,937 ammonia samples, which included 1,390 QA samples. The AMNet collected, quality assured, and produced approximately 38,000 hourly and two-hourly averages. NADP Database. Our second most important accomplishment/outcome is making data available to all for the support of continued research. Scientists, policymakers, educators, students, and others are encouraged to access data at no charge from the NADP website (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu). This site offers online retrieval of individual data points, seasonal and annual averages, trend plots, concentration and deposition maps, reports, manuals, and other data and information about the program. As of today, 2011 calendar year data are complete and online, along with data through June of 2012. Data through September will be posted very soon. Website usage statistics provide evidence that our data are being used. During FY2012, website usage continued to grow. More than 40,000 registered users accessed our information, and have recorded over 27,800 data downloads from the site. The site annually receives well over than 1.25 million hits. We continually divide users into types, and for FY2012 about 40% were from federal and state agencies (somewhat higher than normal), 36% from universities, 16% from K-to-12 schools, and 8% from other individuals or organizations. The NADP website has registered users from more than 150 countries across the globe. These statistics demonstrate that NADP continues to be relevant to both the scientific and educational communities, and continues to attract new users. Map Summary. As with every year, during FY12 the annual maps of atmospheric pollutant concentrations and depositions were developed. These maps are used widely and constitute one of the major products of the network. Individual maps are filed by network, year, and constituent, and can be downloaded in several formats, with other formats planned (see examples at http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/data/annualiso.aspx). Individual maps are compiled into annual Map Summary reports, and the 2011 Map Summary is also available for download (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/lib/dataReports.aspx). We print 2,000 copies of the Annual Summary each year, and we have now completed the distribution of the 2010 Map Summary. Scientific Meeting (Fall 2011). At the end of each federal year, a combined business and scientific meeting is held to showcase some of the latest deposition research that occurred during the year. During FY11, the meeting focused on NADP at the Nexus: Cross System Connections with a goal of determining new directions for the program (October 25 to 28, 2011 in Providence, Rhode Island). The meeting attracted 130 registered participants, and included six sessions, 30 oral presentations, and 24 posters. Individual talks discussed deposition estimates of other chemical species not currently sampled for, including organic nitrogen, metals, and bromine (new at the time). All presentations, posters, and meeting proceedings are available on the NADP website (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/conf/2011/). Scientific Meeting (Fall 2012). The latest scientific meeting was held in Portland, ME (October 1-5, 2012, The NADP Cooperative: State, Local, and tribal Perspectives). The goal of this meeting was to highlight the non-federal perspectives of the network and data use. The meeting had 139 registered participants, and included eight sessions, 41 oral presentations, and 18 posters. An agriculture/ammonia session discussed better emission inventories, confined animal emission rates, and using isotopes for ammonia deposition source attribution. All presentations, posters, and meeting proceedings are available on the NADP website (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/conf/2012/). Of specific note for this meeting was a session held on October 5th focusing on improving the estimates of total deposition (wet plus dry deposition). This session was very well attended, and minutes should also be available online soon (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/committees/tdep/minutes.aspx). These basic activities fulfilled the project objectives: (1) coordination of three networks; (2) quality assurance to ensure consistency; and (3) analytical, site support, and data validation services for the sites financed directly through this agreement. Additional Operation Notes. The NADP continues to convert our precipitation gages to an all-digital network, originating with a Technical Committee decision in 2006 (http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/newissues/newgages/newequip.aspx). Currently, the network is operating with approximately 85% new digital networks. Further, an independent committee conducted an external review of the Mercury Analytical Laboratory during the summer of 2012. Reports of the review were provided at the Fall Meeting 2012, with a formal response and questions provided to the Executive Committee, with final reports forthcoming. Each laboratory and the Program Office (management) are independently reviewed every three years (one every year). NADPs fifth network, the Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN) has agricultural scientists in mind. Ammonia is of great concern regarding agriculture and air pollution. AMoN currently operates 58 sites, and has approximately 10,500 observations of atmospheric ammonia. AMoNs cost-efficient passive measurements can be used to estimate ammonia dry deposition, a process which is being considered (nadpweb.isws.illinois.edu/nh3net/). The Central Analytical Laboratory has begun to measure the concentration of bromide ion in all NADP samples as a routine analyte of the NTN and AIRMoN sites. Regular measurements will be released for the 2012 year. Bromide is important to agricultural users, given its fumigant usage. During the 2012 calendar year, 166 journal articles and reports were generated using the NADP data. These are listed in the Publications section. This is again evidence that NADP is producing data that are both valuable and useful. The USGS and NADP collaborated on tracking radionuclides wet deposition (131I, 134Cs, 137Cs) from the Japanese nuclear incident resulting from the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Normal precipitation samples from the NTN, AIRMoN, and MDN were used during the project, and the resulting studies (Wetherbee et al., 2012) can be found on the NADP website. By using the existing infrastructure of the NADPs networks in a new and important way, measurements were made that greatly added to the body of information on the impact of this accident on U.S. lands and population. At the Spring 2011 Meeting, the NADP committees voted to modify the maps from an earlier discrete contour map style to a new continuous color gradient map. The new maps are now available going back to 1994, and the older-style maps are also still available through 2010. These maps provide much more information to the depositional community by adding precipitation adjustments for elevation and locations. U.S. EPA scientists, with NADP, continued special studies to determine whether organic nitrogen deposition can be measured reliably and accurately. The results indicated that the measurements are reliable, and that organic N can be differentiated from the inorganic N in our samples. This will add much needed information to the understanding of N deposition patterns and sources. A new litterfall mercury monitoring initiative will measure mercury and methyl mercury in forest litterfall (leaves, twigs, etc.). These dry deposition estimates will complement the MDN wet deposition mercury monitoring. Initiation of the trial began in September 2012. Analysis and field support will be provided through the USGS.

Impacts

  1. As a National Research Support Project, the NADPs most important impact is that our data are used in research, per our research support mission. From January through December 2012, we identified 166 journal articles and reports that used NADP data, maps, and procedures in their own research; for modeling applications, etc.; and for comparison to NADP results. These articles are included in our online database of NADP publications. Here is a short summary of 11 articles and a listing of theses and dissertations that are of particular interest to the agricultural community.
  2. 1) Qi et al. (USDA-ARS scientists) developed a carbon-nitrogen cycle module for use in the Great Plains Framework for Agriculture Resource Management model (GPFARM-Range, simulations of forage growth and cowcalf production). This module predicts crop carbon and soil carbon and nitrogen over time. The model was verified against measurements in Wyoming. The model was developed to be used directly with NADP data; observations of ammonium and nitrate are N inputs to the module and system being evaluated.
  3. 2) Carlo and Norris evaluated the uptake of nitrogen directly by flower petals, showing experimentally that flower petals are very effective at capturing and absorbing atmospheric nitrogen deposited by wet deposition. Using simulated rain per the typical concentrations as measured by NADP, N was incorporated rapidly (in hours) and moved into ovaries and seeds (as shown by N isotopes). This N was very efficiently incorporated into the seeds (44%), as opposed to soil (<10%). A range of NADP-observed precipitation concentrations were used in their experiments.
  4. 3) Angradi et al. used a straightforward regression model, based upon land use and other sources, to predict the background concentrations of total nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended solids in the midcontinent Great Rivers (Miss., Ohio, Mo.). These estimates can be used as basic water concentrations before anthropogenic and agricultural additions are made. The modelers used the 20012007 NADP nitrate and ammonium observations over the greater Midwest region as model input.
  5. 4) Han and Allen estimated the input of nitrogen to the Lake Michigan Basin from 1880 through 2000, showing six-fold increases until about 1980, and stable levels since that point. This increase corresponds to large increases in nitrogen fertilizers and atmospheric deposition. Nitrogen deposition was the dominant input early (66% of a modest amount), and is still a very significant input (48% currently). The authors used nitrate and ammonium NADP observations from about 40 sites and 25 years to make their estimates.
  6. 5) Ketterings et al. (including SAES and Extension scientists) conducted field trials of the application of sulfur-containing fertilizer to alfalfa crops. With application, alfalfa yields increased at several sites, but no increase in diary output was noted. The authors conclude that soil monitoring of S is important for yield increases. NADP observations of S wet deposition from 12 NY sites were used to monitor the input of S to the systems.
  7. 6) Lawrence et al. (including USDA and SAES scientists) report early indications of soil recovery from reduced acidic deposition in Northeast forests. Their results suggest the beginnings of pH increases in soils, an ending of calcium loss, decreasing mobilization of aluminum into the B soil horizon, etc. The authors used NADP sulfate and pH observations from five NADP sites from 1985 through 2004.
  8. 7) Liao et al. developed a chemical transport model to track the movement of agricultural chemicals (nitrate in particular) into groundwater. The model was tested at 14 sites across the country with a variety of soil and cover crop types. The results show vertical profiles of a number of chemical species. Downward nitrate migration was present at sites with low denitrification rates, and nitrate concentrations in groundwater are, in part, a function of nitrogen application rates. Infiltration rates were determined using several environmental tracers, including chloride. The chloride deposition rates for all sites were developed from long-term NADP Cl observations at each of the sites.
  9. 8) Moore et al. (SAES and extension scientists) quantified the change in recharge rates in semiarid rangelands with brush management of the surface. The authors conclude that with removal of brush, modest but significant reductions in evapotranspiration and increases in groundwater recharge are realized. The researchers used nine Texas NADP sites and chloride observations as an environmental tracer to determine accurate recharge rates across the State of Texas.
  10. 9) Yager and McMahon compared the sources of groundwater nitrogen from an agricultural biosolids application project in Colorado. Prior to the addition of biosolids, the major N sources, animal manure, inorganic fertilizer, and atmospheric deposition, were all likely important sources. However, after the application, the biosolids were also a major N source, but the authors could not conclude that biosolids were more important than the animal manure. NADP N data were used to determine the atmospheric deposition source strength over time (back to 1983), and chloride values were used to determine infiltration rates.
  11. 10) Cai et al. evaluated soil chemistry in a high-elevation forest (TN) to compare trends in soil chemistry to the trends in chemical deposition as measured by NADP. With sulfate deposition decreasing, the soil was not decreasing in sulfate as expected, but still adsorbing sulfate (S sink). This was somewhat surprising, due to the long-term decreasing trend of sulfate (1980 to 2007) in the forest as measured by the NADP site very near the forest.
  12. 11) Fernandez et al. (SAES scientists) evaluated the response of corn to sulfur fertilizer addition, noting the serious reduction of sulfur deposition as measured by the NADP program. With field-scale plots, the researchers showed that surface soils had reached their full capacity to supply S to corn, and that sulfate migration from the subsoils or atmospheric deposition of S were required to meet the S needs. Some evidence for increased yield was evident with S application.
  13. 12) During this annual review of publications, we were able to identify four Masters theses and eight Doctoral dissertations that used NADP data and information. These are of particular importance, given the educational role that we were able to support with these students. Each reference is listed in the publications section.

Publications

2012 NADP Reference Listing Includes 166 publications that used NADP data or resulted from NRSP-3 activities in 2012. A publically available online database that lists citations using NADP data is accessible at: http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/lib/bibsearch.asp. 1. Air Resources Specialists, Inc., 2012. Oil and Gas Leasing in the Wyoming Range: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Air Quality Analysis Technical Support Document for Bridger-Teton National Forest, 71 pp. 2. Alam, M. J., & Goodall, J. L., 2012. Toward disentangling the effect of hydrologic and nitrogen source changes from 1992 to 2001 on incremental nitrogen yield in the contiguous United States. Water Resources Research 48(4): W04506. 3. Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Pinder, R. W., Henderson, B. H., Appel, K. W., & Prados, A., 2012. Impact of lightning-NO on eastern United States photochemistry during the summer of 2006 as determined using the CMAQ model. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 12: 1737 - 1758. 4. Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Holmes, C. D., Fisher, J. A., Wang, Q., Yantosca, R. M., et al., 2012. Gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 12(1): 591 - 603. 5. Angradi, T. R., Bolgrien, D. W., Starry, M. A., & Hill, B. H., 2012. Modeled summer background concentration of nutrients and suspended sediment in the midcontinent (USA) great rivers. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48(5): 1054 - 1070. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00669.x. 6. Arnett, H. A., Saros, J. E., & Alisa Mast, M., 2012. A caveat regarding diatom-inferred nitrogen concentrations in oligotrophic lakes. J Paleolimnology 47: 277 - 291. doi:10.1007/s10933-011-9576-z. 7. Arundale, R., 2012. The higher productivity of the bioenergy feedstock Miscanthus x giganteus relative to Panicum virgatum is seen both into the long term and beyond Illinois. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 116 pp. 8. Bagui, S., Brown, J., Caffrey, J., & Bagui, S., 2012. Designing a relational database for tracking and analysis of atmospheric deposition of mercury and trace metals in the Pensacola (Florida) Bay Watershed. International Journal of Sustainable Society 4(3): 240 - 265. 9. Bain, D. J., Yesilonis, I. D., & Pouyat, R. V., 2012. Metal concentrations in urban riparian sediments along an urbanization gradient. Biogeochemistry 107(1-3): 67 - 79. 10. Baiser, B., Gotelli, N. J., Buckley, H. L., Miller, T. E., & Ellison, A. M., 2012. Geographic variation in network structure of a nearctic aquatic food web. Global Ecology & Biogeography 21(5): 579 - 591. 11. Baker, K. R., & Bash, J. O., 2012. Regional scale photochemical model evaluation of total mercury wet deposition and speciated ambient mercury. Atmospheric Environment 49: 151 - 162. 12. Bash, J. O., Cooter, E. J., Dennis, R. L., Walker, J. T., & Pleim, J. E., 2012. Evaluation of a regional air-quality model with bi-directional NH3 exchange coupled to an agro-ecosystem model. Biogeosciences Discussions 9(8): 11375 - 11401. 13. Beaulieu, K. M., Button, D. T., Scudder Eikenberry, B. C., Riva-Murray, K., Chasar, L. C., Bradley, P. M., and Burns, D. A., 2012. Mercury bioaccumulation studies in the National Water-Quality Assessment ProgramBiological data from New York and South Carolina, 2005 - 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 705, 13 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/705/. 14. Berkelhammer, M., Stott, L., Yoshimura, K., Johnson, K., & Sinha, A., 2012. Synoptic and mesoscale controls on the isotopic composition of precipitation in the western United States. Climate Dynamics 38: 433 - 454. 15. Bradley, P. M., Journey, C. A., Lowery, M. A., Brigham, M. E., Burns, D. A., Button, D. T., ... & Riva-Murray, K., 2012. Shallow groundwater mercury supply in a coastal plain stream. Environmental Science & Technology 46(14): 7503 - 7511. 16. Brooks, R. T., Eggert, S. L., Nislow, K. H., Kolka, R. K., Chen, C. Y., & Ward, D. M., 2012. Preliminary assessment of mercury accumulation in Massachusetts and Minnesota seasonal forest pools. Wetlands 32: 653 - 663. 17. Brown, T. C., & Froemke, P., 2012. Nationwide assessment of nonpoint source threats to water quality. BioScience 62(2): 136 - 146. 18. Brown, T. C., & Froemke, P., 2012. Improved measures of atmospheric deposition have a negligible effect on multivariate measures of risk of water-quality impairment: response from Brown and Froemke. BioScience 62(7): 621 - 622. 19. Bruder, S. R., 2012. Prediction of spatial-temporal distribution of algal metabolites in Eagle Creek Reservoir, Indianapolis, IN. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University, 142 pp. 20. Bruesewitz, D. A., Tank, J. L., & Hamilton, S. K., 2012. Incorporating spatial variation of nitrification and denitrification rates into whole-lake nitrogen dynamics. J Geophysical Research. 117: G00N07, doi:10.1029/2012JG002006. 21. Buenning, N. H., Stott, L., Yoshimura, K., & Berkelhammer, M., 2012. The cause of the seasonal variation in the oxygen isotopic composition of precipitation along the western U.S. coast. J Geophysical Research 117: 18114. 22. Cai, M., Johnson, A., Schwartz, J., Moore, S., & Kulp, M., 2012. Soil acid-base chemistry of a high-elevation forest watershed in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Influence of acidic deposition. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223(1): 289 - 303. 23. Calvo, A. I., Pont, V., Olmo, F. J., Castro, A., Alados-Arboledas, L., Vicente, A. M., ... & Fraile, R., 2012. Air masses and weather types: a useful tool for characterizing precipitation chemistry and wet deposition. Aerosol & Air Quality Research 12: 856 - 878. 24. Canham, C. D., Pace, M. L., Weathers, K. C., McNeil, E. W., Bedford, B. L., Murphy, L., & Quinn, S., 2012. Nitrogen deposition and lake nitrogen concentrations: a regional analysis of terrestrial controls and aquatic linkages. Ecosphere 3(7): 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00090.1. 25. Carey, R. O., Hochmuth, G. J., Martinez, C. J., Boyer, T. H., Nair, V. D., Dukes, M. D., ... & Sartain, J. B., 2012. Regulatory and resource management practices for urban watersheds: the Florida experience. Hort. Technology 22(4): 418 - 429. 26. Carlo, T. A., & Norris, A. E., 2012. Direct nitrogen intake by petals. Oikos 121: 1953 - 1958. 27. Castro, M. S., Moore, C., Sherwell, J., & Brooks, S. B., 2012. Dry deposition of gaseous oxidized mercury in western Maryland. Science of the Total Environment 417 - 418: 232 - 240. 28. Catalano, J. G., Huhmann, B. L., Luo, Y., Mitnick, E. H., Slavney, A., & Giammar, D. E., 2012. Metal release and speciation changes during wet aging of coal fly ashes. Environmental Science & Technology 46(21): 11804 - 11812. 29. Chen, C. Y., Driscoll, C. T., & Kamman, N. C., 2012. Mercury hotspots in freshwater ecosystems. Mercury in the Environment: Pattern and Process, 143, 340 pp. 30. Chen, J., Hintelmann, H., Feng, X., & Dimock, B., 2012. Unusual fractionation of both odd and even mercury isotopes in precipitation from Peterborough, ON., Canada. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 90: 33 - 46. 31. Clark, E., Schlenker, K., & Filardi, C., 2012. Wilderness character monitoring report hyalite porcupine buffalo horn wilderness study area. U.S. Forest Service, Region 1 Report, Gallatin National Forest, 109 pp. 32. Coleman Wasik, J. K., Mitchell, C. P., Engstrom, D. R., Swain, E. B., Monson, B. A., Balogh, S. J., ... & Almendinger, J. E., 2012. Methylmercury declines in a boreal peatland when experimental sulfate deposition decreases. Environmental Science & Technology 46(12): 6663 - 6671. 33. Committee on Preparing for the Third Decade (Cycle 3) of the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program, & National Research Council, 2012. Preparing for the third decade (cycle 3) of the national water-quality assessment (NAWQA) program (prepublication copy). The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 160 pp. 34. Cope, B., & Roberts, M., 2012. Draft for stakeholder review: review and synthesis of available information to estimate human impacts to dissolved oxygen in hood canal. Office of Environmental Assessment Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 Seattle, Washington and Environmental Assessment Program Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington, 94 pp. 35. Cronan, C. S., 2012. Biogeochemistry of the Penobscot River watershed, Maine, USA: nutrient export patterns for carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment 184(7): 4279 - 4288. 36. Darrouzet-Nardi, A., Erbland, J., Bowman, W. D., Savarino, J., & Williams, M. W., 2012. Landscape-level nitrogen import and export in an ecosystem with complex terrain, Colorado Front Range. Biogeochemistry 109(1): 271 - 285. 37. Day, D. E., Chen, X., Gebhart, K. A., Carrico, C. M., Schwandner, F. M., Benedict, K. B., ... & Collett, J. L., 2012. Spatial and temporal variability of ammonia and other inorganic aerosol species. Atmospheric Environment 61: 490 - 498. 38. Denkenberger, J. S., Driscoll, C. T., Branfireun, B. A., Eckley, C. S., Cohen, M., & Selvendiran, P., 2012. A synthesis of rates and controls on elemental mercury evasion in the Great Lakes Basin. Environmental Pollution 161: 291 - 298. 39. Dilley, G., Council, D. R. A. Q., Morris, R., Koo, B., Tai, E., McNally, D., et al., 2012. Revised base case modeling and model performance evaluation for the Denver 2008 ozone episode. Final Report (Project 06-26421A), Denver Regional Air Quality Council, August, 113 pp. 40. Dodson, J., 2012. Draft report: nutrient TMDL for Jackson Blue Spring and Merritts Mill Pond (WBIDs 180Z and 180A), for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, November, 95 pp. 41. Dohleman, F. G., Heaton, E. A., Arundale, R. A., & Long, S. P., 2012. Seasonal dynamics of aboveand belowground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus× giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing seasons. GCB Bioenergy 4: 534 - 544. 42. Drevnick, P. E., Engstrom, D. R., Driscoll, C. T., Swain, E. B., Balogh, S. J., Kamman, N. C., et al., 2012. Spatial and temporal patterns of mercury accumulation in lacustrine sediments across the laurentian great lakes region. Environmental Pollution 161: 252 - 260. 43. Ebel, J. D., 2012. Biofilm responses to salmon carcass addition in central Idaho. Masters thesis (in Biological Sciences), Michigan Technology University, 70 pp. 44. Ebel, B. A., Moody, J. A., & Martin, D. A., 2012. Hydrologic conditions controlling runoff generation immediately after wildfire. Water Resources Research 48(3): W03529. 45. Fenn, M. E., Bytnerowicz, A., & Liptzin, D., 2012. Nationwide maps of atmospheric deposition are highly skewed when based solely on wet deposition. BioScience 62(7): 621 - 621. 46. Fernández, F. G., Ebelhar, S., Greer, K., & Brown, H., 2012. Corn response to sulfur in Illinois. Illinois Fertilizer & Chemical Association, FREC Reports, http://www.ifca.com/FREC%20Proceedings/. 47. Feyte, S., Gobeil, C., Tessier, A., & Cossa, D., 2012. Mercury dynamics in lake sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 82: 92 - 112. 48. Fissore, C., Hobbie, S. E., King, J. Y., McFadden, J. P., Nelson, K. C., & Baker, L. A., 2012. The residential landscape: fluxes of elements and the role of household decisions. Urban Ecosystems 15(1): 1 - 18. 49. Freppaz, M., Williams, M. W., Seastedt, T., & Filippa, G., 2012. Response of soil organic and inorganic nutrients in alpine soils to a 16-year factorial snow and N-fertilization experiment, Colorado Front Range, USA. Applied Soil Ecology 62: 131 - 141. 50. Forbes, M. G., Back, J., & Doyle, R. D., 2012. Nutrient transformation and retention by coastal prairie wetlands, upper Gulf Coast, Texas. Wetlands 32: 705 - 715. 51. Gao, X., 2012. Draft TMDL Report Nutrient TMDLs for Sykes Creek/Barge Canal (WBID 3044B), Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 75 pp. 52. Gillespie, J., Nelson, S. T., Mayo, A. L., & Tingey, D. G., 2012. Why conceptual groundwater flow models matter: a trans-boundary example from the arid Great Basin, western USA. Hydrogeology Journal 20: 1133 - 1147. 53. Gopalakrishnan, G., Cristina Negri, M., & Salas, W., 2012. Modeling biogeochemical impacts of bioenergy buffers with perennial grasses for a row-crop field in Illinois. GCB Bioenergy 4: 739 - 750, doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01145.x . 54. Grant, C. A., Mahli, S. S., & Karamanos, R. E., 2012. Sulfur management for rapeseed. Field Crops Research 128: 119 - 128. 55. Greaver, T. L., Sullivan, T. J., Herrick, J. D., Barber, M. C., Baron, J. S., Cosby, B. J., ... & Novak, K. J., 2012. Ecological effects of nitrogen and sulfur air pollution in the US: what do we know? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(7): 365 - 372. 56. Grenon, J. A., 2012. Epiphytic lichens, nitrogen deposition and climate in the US northern Rocky Mountain states, Doctoral dissertation, Montana State University, Bozeman, 162 pp. 57. Grigal, D. F., 2012. Atmospheric Deposition and Inorganic Nitrogen Flux. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223: 3565 - 3575. 58. Gupta, V. K., 2012. Environmental water: advances in treatment, remediation and recycling. Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands, ISBN: 978-0-444-59399-3, 211 pp. 59. Gurdak, J. J., & Qi, S. L., 2012. Vulnerability of recently recharged groundwater in principle aquifers of the United States to nitrate contamination. Environmental Science & Technology 46(11): 6004 - 6012. 60. Han, H., & Allan, J. D., 2012. Uneven rise in N inputs to the Lake Michigan Basin over the 20th century corresponds to agricultural and societal transitions. Biogeochemistry 109(1): 175 - 187. 61. Hansen, J., 2012. Assessment of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: possible effects on alpine ecosystems above 9000 feet in Grand Teton National Park. Masters thesis, Utah State University, All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1250, 185 pp. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1250. 62. Harms, T. K., & Jones, J. B., 2012. Thaw depth determines reaction and transport of inorganic nitrogen in valley bottom permafrost soils. Global Change Biology 18 2958 - 2968, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02731.x. 63. Harms, T. K., & Grimm, N. B., 2012. Responses of trace gases to hydrologic pulses in desert floodplains. J Geophysical Research 117(G1): G01035. 64. Harris, R., Pollman, C., Landing, W., Evans, D., Axelrad, D., Hutchinson, D., ... & Sunderland, E., 2012. Mercury in the Gulf of Mexico: sources to receptors. Environmental Research 119: 42 - 52. 65. Haynes, K. M., & Mitchell, C. P., 2012. Inter-annual and spatial variability in hillslope runoff and mercury flux during spring snowmelt. J Environmental Monitoring 14: 2083. 66. He, W. M., Montesinos, D., Thelen, G. C., & Callaway, R. M., 2012. Growth and competitive effects of Centaurea stoebe populations in response to simulated nitrogen deposition. PLOS ONE 7(4): e36257. 67. Hicks, R., & Holland, K., 2012. Nutrient TMDL for Silver Springs, Silver Springs group, and upper Silver River (WBIDs 2772A, 2772C, and 2772E). Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed Restoration, 104 pp. 68. Holloway, T., Voigt, C., Morton, J., Spak, S. N., Rutter, A. P., & Schauer, J. J., 2012. An assessment of atmospheric mercury in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions 12: 2131 - 2166. 69. Hong, Y.S., Hunter, S., Clayton, L. A., Rifkin E,. & Bouwer E J. 2012. Assessment of mercury and selenium concentrations in captive bottlenose dolphin's (Tursiops truncatus) diet fish, blood, and tissue. Science of the Total Environment 414: 220 - 226. 70. Huang, J., Kang, S., Zhang, Q., Yan, H., Guo, J., Jenkins, M. G., et al. Wet deposition of mercury at a remote site in the Tibetan plateau: Concentrations, speciation, and fluxes. Atmospheric Environment 62: 540 - 550. 71. Huang, J., & Gustin, M. S., 2012. Evidence for a free troposphere source of mercury in wet deposition in the western United States. Environmental Science & Technology 46(12): 6621 - 6629. 72. Jacobson, G. L., Norton, S. A., Grimm, E. C., & Edgar, T., 2012. Changing climate and sea level alter hg mobility at Lake Tulane, Florida, U.S. Environmental Science & Technology 46(21): 11710 - 11717. 73. Journey, C. A., Burns, D. A., Riva-Murray, K., Brigham, M. E., Button, D. T., Feaster, T. D., Petkewich, M. D., & Bradley, P. M., 2012. Fluvial transport of mercury, organic carbon, suspended sediment, and selected major ions in contrasting stream basins in South Carolina and New York, October 2004 to September 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012 - 5173, 125 p. 74. Kappel, C. V., Halpern, B. S., & Napoli, N., 2012. Mapping cumulative impacts of human activities on marine ecosystems. Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning, Report #03.NCEAS.12, 109 pp. 75. Ketterings, Q. M., Godwin, G., Gami, S., Dietzel, K., Lawrence, J., Barney, P., ... & Czymmek, K. J., 2012. Soil and tissue testing for sulfur management of alfalfa in New York State. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76(1): 298 - 306. 76. Kim, J. H., & Jackson, R. B., 2012. A global analysis of groundwater recharge for vegetation, climate, and soils. Vadose Zone Journal 11(1), doi: 10.2136/vzj2011. 77. Kim, M. K., & Zoh, K. D., 2012. Fate and transport of mercury in environmental media and human exposure. J Preventive Medicine and Public Health 45(6): 335 - 343. 78. Konkler, M. J., & Hammerschmidt, C. R., 2012. Methylmercury in mosquitoes around a large coalfired power plant in central Ohio. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry 31(7): 1657 - 1661. 79. Koo, B., Piyachaturawat, P., Morris, R., & Knipping, E., 2012. Evaluation of the variability in chemical transport model performance for deposition and ambient concentrations of nitrogen and sulfur compounds. Atmosphere 3(3): 400 - 418. 80. Koskelo, A. I., Fisher, T. R., Utz, R., & Jordan, T. E., 2012. A new precipitation-based method of baseflow separation and event identification for small watersheds (< 50 km2). J Hydrology 450 - 451: 267 - 278. 81. Lan, X., Talbot, R., Castro, M., Perry, K., & Luke, W., 2012. Seasonal and diurnal variations of atmospheric mercury across the US determined from AMNet monitoring data. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions 12: 10845 - 10878. 82. Latysh, N., & Wetherbee, G., 2012. Improved mapping of national atmospheric deposition program wet-deposition in complex terrain using PRISM-gridded data sets. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment 184(2): 913 - 928. 83. Lawrence, G. B., Shortle, W. C., David, M. B., Smith, K. T., Warby, R. A. F., & Lapenis, A. G., 2012. Early indications of soil recovery from acidic deposition in U.S. red spruce forests. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76(4): 1407 - 1417. 84. Lee, K. S., Lee, D. S., Lim, S. S., Kwak, J. H., Jeon, B. J., Lee, S. I., ... & Choi, W. J., 2012. Nitrogen isotope ratios of dissolved organic nitrogen in wet precipitation in a metropolis surrounded by agricultural areas in southern Korea. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 159: 161 - 169. 85. Leibensperger, E. M., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Chen, W. T., Seinfeld, J. H., Nenes, A., ... & Rind, D., 2012. Climatic effects of 1950 - 2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols - part 1: aerosol trends and radiative forcing. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 12, 3333 - 3348. 86. Lessard, C., 2012. Mass balance model of mercury for the St. Lawrence River, Cornwall, Ontario. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, 109 pp. 87. Li, Y., Tang, J., Yu, X., Xu, X., Cheng, H., & Wang, S., 2012. Characteristics of precipitation chemistry at Lushan Mountain, East China: 1992 - 2009. Environmental Science & Pollution Research 19: 2329 - 2343. 88. Liao, L., Green, C. T., Bekins, B. A., & Böhlke, J. K., 2012. Factors controlling nitrate fluxes in groundwater in agricultural areas. Water Resources Research 48: W00L09. 89. Lin, C. J., Shetty, S. K., Pan, L., Pongprueksa, P., Jang, C., & Chu, H. W., 2012. Source attribution for mercury deposition in the contiguous United States: Regional difference and seasonal variation. J Air & Waste Management Association 62(1): 52 - 63. 90. Lutz, B. D., Mulholland, P. J., & Bernhardt, E. S., 2012. Long-term data reveal patterns and controls on stream water chemistry in a forested stream: Walker Branch, Tennessee. Ecological Monographs 82(3): 367 - 387. 91. Mallikarachchi, T. D. 2012. Exfiltration trenches for post construction storm water management for linear transportation projects: site investigation on metal removal. Masters thesis, Ohio University, Civil Engineering (Engineering and Technology), 231 pp. 92. Marshall, B. D., Moscati, R. J., & Patterson, G. L., 2012. Fluid geochemistry of Yucca Mountain and vicinity. Hydrology and Geochemistry of Yucca Mountain and Vicinity, Southern Nevada and California, 143. 93. Mason, R. P., 2012. A framework for a mercury monitoring and assessment program. Mercury in the Environment: Pattern and Process, 81. 94. McCrackin, M. L., & Elser, J. J., 2012. Denitrification kinetics and denitrifier abundances in sediments of lakes receiving atmospheric nitrogen deposition (Colorado, USA). Biogeochemistry 108: 39 - 54. 95. McLauchlan, K. K., & Craine, J. M., 2012. Species-specific trajectories of nitrogen isotopes in Indiana hardwood forests, USA. Biogeosciences 9: 867 - 874. 96. Metcalf, J., & Mose, D. G., 2012. Monitoring sources of mercury in the atmosphere. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, Water & Energy: Vol. 17, Article 4. 97. Minogue, P. J., Miwa, M., Rockwood, D. L., & Mackowiak, C. L., 2012. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus by Eucalyptus and Populus at a tertiary treated municipal wastewater sprayfield. International J of Phytoremediation 14(10): 1010 - 1023. 98. Mladenov, N., Williams, M. W., Schmidt, S. K., & Cawley, K., 2012. Atmospheric deposition as a source of carbon and nutrients to an alpine catchment of the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Biogeosciences 9: 3337 - 3355. 99. Montgomery, E. L., Calle, L. M., Curran, J. C., & Kolody, M. R. 2012. Timescale correlation between marine atmospheric exposure and accelerated corrosion testing - part 2. National Aeronotics and Space Administration, Technical Report # KSC-2012-049, 17 pp. 100. Moore, C. W., & Castro, M. S., 2012. Investigation of factors affecting gaseous mercury concentrations in soils. Science of the Total Environment 419: 136 - 143. 101. Moore, G. W., Barre, D. A., & Owens, M. K., 2012. Does shrub removal increase groundwater recharge in southwestern Texas semiarid rangelands? Rangeland Ecology & Management 65(1): 1 - 10. 102. Moore, J., Lichtner, P. C., White, A. F., & Brantley, S. L., 2012. Using a reactive transport model to elucidate differences between laboratory and field dissolution rates in regolith. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 93: 235 - 261. 103. Morano, S., Stewart, K. M., Sedinger, J. S., Nicolai, C. A., & Vavra, M., 2012. Life-history strategies of North American elk: Trade-offs associated with reproduction and survival. J Mammalogy, (in press). 104. Nair, U. S., Wu, Y., Walters, J., Jansen, J., & Edgerton, E. S., 2012. Diurnal and seasonal variation of mercury species at coastal-suburban, urban, and rural sites in the southeastern United States. Atmospheric Environment 47: 499 - 508. 105. Nanus, L., Clow, D. W., Saros, J. E., Stephens, V. C., & Campbell, D. H., 2012. Mapping critical loads of nitrogen deposition for aquatic ecosystems in the Rocky Mountains, USA. Environmental Pollution 166: 125 - 135. 106. Nasr, M., Malloch, D. D., & Arp, P. A. Quantifying hg within ectomycorrhizal fruiting bodies, from emergence to senescence. Fungal Biology 116: 1163 - 1177. 107. Nikopoulou, Z., Cullinane, K., & Jensen, A., 2012. The role of a cap-and-trade market in reducing NOx and SOx emissions: prospects and benefits for ships within the northern european ECA. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment, (in press). 108. Obrist, D., 2012. Mercury distribution across 14 US forests, part II: patterns of methyl mercury concentrations and areal mass of total and methyl mercury. Environmental Science & Technology 46(11): 5921 - 5930. 109. O'Driscoll, M. A., 2012. The 1909 North Carolina drainage act and agricultural drainage effects in eastern North Carolina. Journal of North Carolina Academy of Science 128(3): 59-73. 110. Olson, J. R., 2012. The influence of geology and other environmental factors on stream water chemistry and benthic invertebrate assemblages. Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, May. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1327, 162 pp. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1327. 111. Olson, J. R., & Hawkins, C. P., 2012. Predicting natural base-flow stream water chemistry in the western United States. Water Resources Research 48(2): W02504. 112. Peters, E., Wythers, K., Bradford, J., & Reich, P., 2012. Influence of disturbance on temperate forest productivity. Ecosystems (online) 1 - 16. 113. Phillis, C. C., O.Regan, S. M., Green, S. J., Bruce, J. E. B., Anderson, S. C., Linton, J. N., et al., 2012. Multiple pathways to conservation success. Conservation Letters doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00294.x. 114. Peterson, C., Alishahi, M., & Gustin, M. S., 2012. Testing the use of passive sampling systems for understanding air mercury concentrations and dry deposition across Florida, USA. Science of the Total Environment 424: 297 - 307. 115. Poulette, M. M., 2012. Ecosystem impacts of the invasive shrub Lonicera Maackii are influence by associations with native tree species. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 196 pp., http://uknowledge.uky.edu/biology_etds/6. 116. Price, J. R., Hardy, C. R., Tefend, K. S., & Szymanski, D. W., 2012. Solute geochemical mass-balances and mineral weathering rates in small watersheds II: biomass nutrient uptake, more equations in more unknowns, and land use/land cover effects. Applied Geochemistry 27: 1247 - 1265. 117. Qi, Z., Bartling, P. N., Ahuja, L. R., Derner, J. D., Dunn, G. H., & Ma, L., 2012. Development and evaluation of the carbon - nitrogen cycle module for the GPFARM-Range model. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture 83: 1 - 10. 118. Reynolds, K. M., Hessburg, P. F., Sullivan, T., Povak, N., McDonnell, T., Cosby, B., & Jackson, W., 2012. Spatial decision support for assessing impacts of atmospheric sulfur deposition on aquatic ecosystems in the Southern Appalachian Region. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1197 - 1206. 119. Risch, M. R., DeWild, J. F., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Kolka, R. K., & Zhang, L., 2012. Litterfall mercury dry deposition in the eastern USA. Environmental Pollution 161: 284 - 290. 120. Risch, M. R., Gay, D. A., Fowler, K. K., Keeler, G. J., Backus, S. M., Blanchard, P., et al., 2012. Spatial patterns and temporal trends in mercury concentrations, precipitation depths, and mercury wet deposition in the North American great lakes region, 2002 - 2008. Environmental Pollution 161: 261 - 271. 121. Rolison, C. J., 2012. Soil nitrification and mineralization rates along an elevation gradient in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Master's thesis, University of Tennessee, http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1199. 122. Rueda-Holgado, F., Bernalte, E., Palomo-Marín, M. R., Calvo-Blázquez, L., Cereceda-Balic, F., & Pinilla-Gil, E. Miniaturized voltammetric stripping on screen printed gold electrodes for field determination of copper in atmospheric deposition. Talanta 101(11): 435 - 439. 123. Ruiz Diaz, D. A., Mengel, D. B., Lamond, R. E., Duncan, S. R., Whitney, D. A., & Maxwell, T. M., 2012. Meta-analysis of winter wheat response to chloride fertilization in Kansas. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis 43(18): 2437 - 2447. 124. SanClements, M. D., Oelsner, G. P., McKnight, D. M., Stoddard, J. L., & Nelson, S. J., 2012. New insights into the source of decadal increases of dissolved organic matter in acid-sensitive lakes of the northeastern United States. Environmental Science & Technology 46(6): 3212 - 3219. 125. Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R., Strassberg, G., Huang, Y., & Senay, G., 2012. Estimation of groundwater recharge to the Gulf Coast aquifer in Texas, USA: final contract report to Texas water development board. University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geoscience 128 pp. 126. Schlenker, K., & Filardi, C., 2012. Wilderness character monitoring report Hyalite Porcupine Buffalo Horn Wilderness study area. U.S. Forest Service, Region 1, Gallatin National Forest, 111 pp. 127. Scudder Eikenberry, B.C., Riva-Murray, K., Smith, M. J., Bradley, P. M., Button, D. T., Clark, J. M., Burns, D. A., & Journey, C. A., 2012. Environmental settings of selected streams sampled for mercury in New York and South Carolina, 2005 - 09: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011 - 1318, 36 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/ofr/2011/1318/. 128. Selin, N. E., 2012. Atmospheric chemistry, modeling, and biogeochemistry of mercury. Mercury in the Environment: Pattern and Process, 73. 129. Simon, H., Baker, K. R., & Phillips, S., 2012. Compilation and interpretation of photochemical model performance statistics published between 2006 and 2012. Atmospheric Environment 61: 124 - 139. 130. Shrestha, S., & Fang, X. 2012. Application of WARMF model to study the effect of land use change and climate change in the Saugahatchee Creek Watershed. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012, Crossing Boundaries (pp. 1794 - 1805). ASCE. 131. Smeltzer, E., Shambaugh, A. D., & Stangel, P., 2012. Environmental change in lake champlain revealed by long-term monitoring. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 38, Supplement 1, 6 - 18. 132. Spence, P. L., Osmond, D. L., Childres, W., Heitman, J. L., & Robarge, W. P., 2012. Effects of lawn maintenance on nutrient losses via overland flow during natural rainfall events. J American Water Resources Association 48(5): 909 - 924. 133. State of Maryland, 2012. Watershed report for biological impairment of the Deep Creek Lake watershed in Garrett County, Maryland. Biological Stressor Identification Analysis Results and Interpretation, Revised Final Report, 35 pp. 134. Steffen, A., Scherz, T., Olson, M., Gay, D., & Blanchard, P., 2012. A comparison of data quality control protocols for atmospheric mercury speciation measurements. J Environmental Monitoring 14(3): 752 - 765. 135. Stephan, K., Kavanagh, K. L., & Koyama, A., 2012. Effects of spring prescribed burning and wildfires on watershed nitrogen dynamics of central Idaho headwater areas. Forest Ecology & Management 263: 240 - 252. 136. Straub, D. J., Hutchings, J. W., & Herckes, P., 2012. Measurements of fog composition at a rural site. Atmospheric Environment 47: 195 - 205. 137. Strauss, S., Day, T., & Garcia-Pichel, F., 2012. Nitrogen cycling in desert biological soil crusts across biogeographic regions in the southwestern United States. Biogeochemistry 108(1): 171 - 182. 138. Stuckless, J. S., 2012. Hydrology and geochemistry of Yucca Mountain and vicinity, southern Nevada and California. Geological Society of America Memoir 209, p 1 - 7. 139. Sullivan, T. J., Cosby, B. J., Driscoll, C. T., McDonnell, T. C., Herlihy, A. T., & Burns, D. A., 2012. Target loads of atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen deposition for protection of acid sensitive aquatic resources in the Adirondack Mountains, New York. Water Resources Research 48(1): W01547. 140. Sullivan, T., Cosby, B., McDonnell, T., Porter, E., Blett, T., Haeuber, R., et al., 2012. Critical loads of acidity to protect and restore acid-sensitive streams in Virginia and West Virginia. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223: 5759 - 5771, doi:10.1007/s11270-012-1312-4. 141. Sverdrup, H., McDonnell, T. C., Sullivan, T. J., Nihlgård, B., Belyazid, S., Rihm, B., ... & Geiser, L., 2012. Testing the feasibility of using the ForSAFE-VEG model to map the critical load of nitrogen to protect plant biodiversity in the Rocky Mountains region, USA. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223(1): 371 - 387. 142. Tank, S. E., Frey, K. E., Striegl, R. G., Raymond, P. A., Holmes, R. M., McClelland, J. W., & Peterson, B. J., 2012. Landscape-level controls on dissolved carbon flux from diverse catchments of the circumboreal. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 26: GB0E02. 143. Taylor, A., 2012. Phosphorus mass balance for hypertrophic Grand Lake St. Marys, Ohio. Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University, 96 pp. 144. Templer, P. H., Pinder, R. W., & Goodale, C. L., 2012. Effects of nitrogen deposition on greenhouse-gas fluxes for forests and grasslands of North America. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(10): 547 - 553. 145. Trammell, T. L., Ralston, H. A., Scroggins, S. A., & Carreiro, M. M., 2012. Foliar production and decomposition rates in urban forests invaded by the exotic invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii. Biological Invasions 14(3): 529 - 545. 146. Uejio, C. K., Peters, T. W., & Patz, J. A., 2012. Inland lake indicator bacteria: long-term impervious surface and weather influences and a predictive bayesian model. Lake & Reservoir Management 28(3): 232 - 244. 147. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, 2012. Air program national accomplishments and successes, 2010. USDA-Forest Service, Air Resource Management Program National Report, 23 pp. 148. Van Metre, P. C., 2012. Increased atmospheric deposition of mercury in reference lakes near major urban areas. Environmental Pollution 162: 209 - 215. 149. Volk, J. A., Scudlark, J. R., Savidge, K. B., Andres, A. S., Stenger, R. J., & Ullman, W. J., 2012. Intra- and inter-annual trends in phosphorus loads and comparison with nitrogen loads to Rehoboth Bay, Delaware (USA). Estuarine, Coastal & Shelf Science 96(1): 139 - 150. 150. Walker, J. T., Dombek, T., Green, L., Gartman, N., & Lehmann, C., 2012. Stability of organic nitrogen in NADP wet deposition samples. Atmospheric Environment 60: 573 - 582. 151. Waller, K., Driscoll, C., Lynch, J., Newcomb, D., & Roy, K., 2012. Long-term recovery of lakes in the Adirondack region of New York to decreases in acidic deposition. Atmospheric Environment 46: 56 - 64. 152. Wang, K., & Zhang, Y., 2012. Application, evaluation, and process analysis of the US EPAs 2002 Multiple-Pollutant Air Quality Modeling platform. Atmospheric & Climate Sciences 2(3): 254 - 289. 153. Warrender, R., Bowell, R., Prestia, A., Barnes, A., Mansanares, W., & Miller, M., 2012. The application of predictive geochemical modelling to determine backfill requirements at turquoise ridge joint venture, Nevada. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 12(4): 339 - 347. 154. Welker, J. M., 2012. ENSO effects on ´18O, ´2H and dexcess values in precipitation across the US using a highdensity, longterm network (USNIP). Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 26(17): 1893 - 1898. 155. Wetherbee, G. A., Gay, D. A., Debey, T. M., Lehmann, C. M. B., & Nilles, M. A. Wet deposition of fission-product isotopes to North America from the Fukushima Dai-ichi incident, March 2011. Environmental Science & Technology 46(5): 2574 - 2582. 156. Weiss-Penzias, P. S., Ortiz Jr., C., Acosta, R. P., Heim, W., Ryan, J. P., Fernandez, D., Collett J. L. Jr., & Flegal, A. R., 2012. Total and monomethyl mercury in fog water from the central California coast. Geophysical Research Letters 39: L03804, doi:10.1029/2011GL050324. 157. Winder V.L., & Emslie S.D., 2012. Mercury in Nelson's Sparrow subspecies at breeding sites. PLOS 158. Winnick, M., Welker, J., & Chamberlain, C., 2012. Stable isotopic evidence of el niño-like atmospheric circulation in the pliocene western United States. Climate of the Past Discussions 8: 5083 - 5108. 159. Yager, T. J. B., & McMahon, P. B., 2012. Preliminary assessment of sources of nitrogen in groundwater at a biosolids-application area near Deer Trail, Colorado, 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012 - 5056, 30 pp. 160. Yang, Y., Liu, J., Di, Y., Yang, J., Wen, T., Li, Y., et al., 2012. Major ionic composition of precipitation in the Shigatse region, southern Tibetan plateau. Advanced Materials Research 347-353: 1005 - 1011. 161. Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Johnson, D., Dastoor, A., Ryzhkov, A., Lin, C. J., et al., 2012. Assessment of modeled mercury dry deposition over the great lakes region. Environmental Pollution 161: 272 - 283. 162. Zhang, L., Blanchard, P., Gay, D. A., Prestbo, E. M., Risch, M. R., Johnson, D., ... & Dalziel, J., 2012. Estimation of speciated and total mercury dry deposition at monitoring locations in eastern and central North America. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 12: 4327 - 4340. 163. Zhang, L., Jacob, D. J., Knipping, E. M., Kumar, N., Munger, J. W., Carouge, C. C., et al., 2012. Nitrogen deposition to the United States: distribution, sources, and processes. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 12(10): 4539 - 4554. 164. Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Sarwar, G., & Schere, K., 2012. Impact of gas-phase mechanisms on Weather Research Forecasting Model with Chemistry (WRF/Chem) predictions: mechanism implementation and comparative evaluation. J Geophysical Research 117(D1): D01301. 165. Zhang, Y., Karamchandani, P., Glotfelty, T., Streets, D. G., Grell, G., Nenes, A., ... & Bennartz, R., 2012. Development and initial application of the global-through-urban weather research and forecasting model with chemistry (GU-WRF/Chem). J Geophysical Research 117(D20): D20206. 166. Zhang, Y., Jaeglé, L., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Holmes, C. D., Amos, H. M., ... & Zsolway, R., 2012. Nested-grid simulation of mercury over North America. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 12: 6095 - 6111.
Log Out ?

Are you sure you want to log out?

Press No if you want to continue work. Press Yes to logout current user.

Report a Bug
Report a Bug

Describe your bug clearly, including the steps you used to create it.