NC125: Biological Control of Soil-and Residue-Borne Plant Pathogens
(Multistate Research Project)
Status: Inactive/Terminating
NC125: Biological Control of Soil-and Residue-Borne Plant Pathogens
Duration: 10/01/1999 to 09/30/2004
Administrative Advisor(s):
NIFA Reps:
Non-Technical Summary
Statement of Issues and Justification
Plant pathogens that are harbored in soil and crop residue continue to cause diseases that dramatically impact the yield and quality of crops and plants produced in the North Central region. There are limited effective management options for most of these pathogens, so biological control offers novel alternatives. This project addresses the interactions of applied and resident microorganisms with this group of pathogens and their host plants within the varied environments of the region. The ultimate objective is to develop practical disease management systems that maximize the benefits of applied and resident microbial agents.
JUSTIFICATION:
Crop and plant production and processing of agricultural products are important to the economy of the North Central Region of the United States. Some of the most important field and horticultural crops in the US, e.g., corn, soybean, wheat, barley, potato, tomato, common bean, sugar beet, turfgrass, and ornamental plants, are produced abundantly in this region. Almost all agriculturally-important plants are affected by soil- and residue-borne pathogens. Some pathogens cause substantial losses in the field, while others cause loss of crops in storage or affect the quality and safety of the agricultural product. In addition, managing these pathogens requires crop rotation and other practices that are costly to growers. The effect of these pathogens can be extremely damaging. For example, Fusarium head blight (scab) epidemics of the upper Great Plains from 1993 to 1997 caused several billion dollars in damage to the small grain industry, devastated the farm economy in many rural areas, and nearly eliminated mailing barley production (McMullen et al, 1997).
There are many other examples of important soil- and residue-borne pathogens (Agrios, 1988). With the shift from intensive cultivation to minimum tillage cropping systems, diseases caused by these pathogens have become increasingly prevalent. For example, Phytophthora sojae and the soybean cyst nematode, two important soybean pathogens in the USA, caused an estimated yield loss in 1994 of 2,500,000 metic tons (Wrather et al, 1997). Rhizoctonia solani, the cause of damping-off and root rot diseases found on almost all crops, has been a serious problem because of a lack of adequate controls. Pythium and Aphanomyces on pea, sugarbeet and other crops cause serious losses on seedlings. Sclerotinia is a major pathogen of bean, soybean, canola and other broadleaf crops. In the last ten years this pathogen has gone from being rare to become a major disease on soybean in the North Central Region. Other pathogens such as Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, the cause of tan spot of wheat, Gaeumannomyces graminis, the cause of take-all of grasses, and Cercospora zeae-maydis, the cause of leaf spot of corn, are all residue-borne pathogens of major importance. Diseases incited by pathogens such as Fusarium moniliforme, which causes corn ear and stalk rot and can contaminate grain with fumonisin mycotoxins, result in yield losses and in human and animal health problems (Munkvold and Desjardins, 1997).
Soil- and residue-borne pathogens are among the most difficult to control, especially those that infect plants through the roots. Genetic resistance is available to control some, but not most, of these pathogens. Cultural controls have been widely used for these pathogens, but vary greatly ineffectiveness, and are not always economically feasible for growers or agribusinesses to implement. Fungicides have not been economically feasible for most root-infecting pathogens because of the inaccessibility of the infection site and biological complexity of the soil environment. Current public sentiments towards pesticides suggest that there will be a decrease, rather than an expansion, in the use of synthetic pesticides. There is recognition in the agricultural community that alternative control strategies for soil- and residue-borne pathogens are needed that are compatible with agricultural production methods, environmentally safe, and fit into integrated pest management systems. Biological control is an alternative strategy that could play an important role in the future of US agriculture.
Biological control of plant pathogens has been intensely researched for the past 30 years. Progress has been made in identifying biocontrol agents, understanding their basic biology, testing efficacy of biocontrol against a wide range of pathogens, and evaluating them under commercial plant production practices. Indeed, in the past five years, new biological control products have been registered by the EPA and are sold commercially. Biological control of soil and residue-borne pathogens, however, has not been widely implemented in agriculture, especially in field crops. Much basic and applied research is needed to realize a consistent and economically sound use of biological control and an integration into current crop management practices. A greater understanding of the ecology, physiology and genetic variation of biocontrol agents, their methods of application, and their interactions with pathogens, hosts, environments and agricultural systems is necessary before there is widespread commercial-scale use of biocontrol.
The nature of biocontrol, using one or several organisms against another, is an intrinsically difficult biological problem that requires much understanding before it can be effectively used. In addition, cooperative efforts between scientists working on similar biocontrol agents and pathogens within similar agroecosystems are required to make progress toward implementation of biocontrol.2 Regional cooperation among scientists working on biocontrol can advance knowledge on how to use this important technology. Sharing of biocontrol agents and testing on various crops under a wide range of environments and soil types is one type of cooperation. Another is the development of techniques for producing, storing, and delivering biocontrol agents. The standardization of protocols for testing is an important result of cooperation. Also important, regional cooperation provides a forum for discussion where results and ideas are exchanged and debated and cooperative efforts are enhanced and broadened.
This five-year project will build on the past success of cooperative efforts on biocontrol in the North Central Region. We will compare efficacy of biocontrol systems on economic plants, and compare methods of production, delivery and enhancement of applied and indigenous biocontrol agents. Biocontrol systems have already been identified by cooperating scientists. We also will investigate the influences of host and environment on biocontrol efficacy. There also will be a major effort to determine the mechanism of action of biocontrol systems. We will study the nature of biocontrol agent-crop-pathogen interactions and elucidate the biochemical and genetic basis for interactions. We intend to foster the development of new ideas and approaches for biocontrol through the interaction of scientists during this project. The results of this project will have direct application to the use of biocontrol to protect important economic plants from soil- and residue-borne pathogens.
This project falls within several North Central Regional Association (NCRA) crosscutting research areas. Its primary involvement is in the Integrated Pest Management area and specifically addresses these priority objectives:
- Develop alternative controls based on biological control and cultural practices.
- Reduce pesticide use and the risk of human, animal and environmental exposure to pesticides through research and citizen/consumer education.
The project is also relevant to the Food Production, Processing and Distribution area in the objective.
- Develop improved animal, plant and microbial production, processing and marketing systems which are environmentally sound and profitable.
The project also addresses the Natural Resources and the Environment objective.
- Identify and apply ecosystem management principles and practices for the utilization and protection of resources, restoration of natural systems and management of rural landscapes.
In addition, some of the activities speak to the Genetic Resources Development and Manipulation area objectives:
- Collect, preserve, share, enhance and evaluate germplasm at the molecular, cellular and/or organismal levels; and
- Develop increased knowledge of the interactions and interrelationships of the various life forms.