Duration: 10/01/2025 to 09/30/2030

Administrative Advisor(s):

NIFA Reps:

Non-Technical Summary

The agricultural workplace is dangerous, with a higher rate of injuries and fatalities than other industries (Frank et al., 2004). Farmers and farmworkers face daily risks from machines, animals, exposure to airborne contaminants, noise, and other physical and mental stressors (Donham and Thelin, 2016). These safety and occupational health challenges impact the well-being of farm operators, hired workers, and family members, and they contribute to labor shortages and economic strain. Improving safety and well-being in agriculture is crucial to protecting lives, maintaining productivity, and supporting communities.

We aim to make agriculture safer for everyone involved, with special emphasis on increasing efforts to serve those in underserved communities. We strive to tackle emerging hazards, risks and opportunities associated with new mechanical and digital technologies and to address new issues like heat stress, changing dynamics of agricultural implement roadway safety, and zoonotic infections and diseases. We also focus on supporting farmworker safety, occupational health, and mental health and increasing access to and engagement in safety programs and in pursuing new research that focuses on identification of risk factors, and development and evaluation of novel prevention and protection strategies.

The target audiences, including farmers, farmworkers, their families, rural communities, educators, healthcare professionals, and policymakers, must themselves have access and need to play a role in improving safety and health in agriculture. By focusing on these aspects, we can protect farm operators and workers, reduce economic costs, and make agricultural jobs more appealing and sustainable.

We plan to achieve outcomes through formal and informal education, including Extension and outreach education, applied research, and incorporation of a multifaceted prevention approach that includes education, training, promotion of engineered interventions, public policy, and combinations of methods. By collaborating with safety organizations, developing training programs, and building networks, we will create a safer and more healthful environment for all agricultural workers. Our activities reduce risk, support underserved populations, and build the next generation of agricultural safety experts, ultimately leading to a healthier, more resilient industry.

Statement of Issues and Justification

Agriculture: A High-Risk Industry

Agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries in the U.S. and worldwide, with a 2022 fatality rate of 18.2 per 100,000 workers as compared with an “all industry” average of 3.2/100,000 (National Safety Council, 2024; Weichelt et al., 2022). The leading causes of these injuries and fatalities often involve tractors, self-propelled farm machinery, confined spaces, falls, or contact with large animals (Li et al., 2022; Molina and Ríos-Osorio, 2020; Kica et al., 2020). Farmers, ranchers, farmworkers, and others working in agriculture face numerous health risks, including physical hazards such as loud noise, prolonged sun exposure, and equipment vibration; airborne toxins like manure gases, grain dust, pesticides, and fertilizers; and biological risks such as zoonotic diseases and pathogens. Agricultural producers and workers are also exposed to a range of stressors that significantly impact their well-being, including fatigue, distraction, suicide risk, and occupational hazards due to economic pressures (Rudolphi et al., 2020).

Health and Safety Challenges

These health and safety challenges lead to pain, suffering, reduced productivity, and significant economic costs. They also contribute to the ongoing labor shortage on farms and ranches, which directly impacts productivity and profitability (Ryan, 2023). As farmworkers become more aware of the unique health and safety risks associated with agriculture, they may view the work as dull, dirty, or dangerous, making it increasingly difficult to recruit and retain skilled employees.

Primary Stakeholders

The primary stakeholders of this work include farmers, ranchers, farmworkers, their families, and rural communities. Additionally, stakeholders encompass agricultural service providers, educators, healthcare professionals, and policymakers who are invested in improving health and safety outcomes in agriculture. Migrant and immigrant farmworkers, as well as underserved and underrepresented communities, are also key stakeholders who will benefit significantly from ongoing research and support efforts.

We also will continue to engage closely related groups in academia, NGO’s, government, and other groups involved in research, safety standards development, and outreach through both formal involvement in the network as partners, collaborators, and co-leaders. Examples of such groups include the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (and its staff), NIOSH, the NIOSH-funded Agricultural Safety and Health Centers, the National Farm Medicine Center, and National Children’s Center for Rural Agricultural Safety and Health. The activities shown below also will aim to engage various underserved and unserved educational institutions through tangible engagement and involvement.

Ongoing Research and Support

For over 70 years, faculty and staff at Land Grant universities have led research and educational initiatives to address these issues, providing essential support to farmers, their families, hired workers, and rural service providers. The NCERA 197 committee has played a crucial role in this effort for more than 20 years, fostering collaboration, mentorship, and specialization among states (Gorucu et al., 2018). This group helps set priorities, supports professional development, and ensures that emerging health and safety concerns are effectively addressed.

Historically, this committee and the networks of research, Extension, government personnel and private sector members from the U.S. and Canada has been incredibly productive.  Looking just at the last reported 12 month period from June 2023 to May 2024, the network members have generated the following, often through highly collaborative efforts involving multiple members:

• 52,029 documented educational contacts
• 461,200 contacts through online programs, YouTube videos, curricular downloads
• $9,073,874 in grant funding (12-month total - pro-rated for multi-year projects)
• 21 conference proceeding articles and presentations
• 30 Extension online programs, YouTube videos, curricular downloads
• 44 peer-reviewed journal articles
• 41 other reports, technical papers, published abstracts, and posters 

A copy of a recent impact report can be found as an attachment. Network members are very active in online contributions. Examples include the multi-state effort: https://digitalag.illinois.edu/safer-ag-workshop/

Others include (only a sampling):

• www.agrability.org
• https://ag-safety.extension.org/
• https://www.purdue.edu/engineering/ABE/agconfinespaces/
• www.agsafety4youth.info
• https://farms.extension.wisc.edu/farmstress/
• https://abe.ufl.edu/agsafety/
• https://www.asec.purdue.edu/tractor/index.html

In the next five years, the committee will emphasize expanding access and participation in programs designed for traditionally underserved and underrepresented communities. This includes migrant and immigrant farmworkers, producers, farm families, and workers served by the nation's 1890 and 1994 Land Grant universities, members of the Hispanic-Serving Agricultural Colleges and Universities (HSACU) program, as well as other groups who have not been adequately served in the past.

Opportunites to Collaborate and Partner

In preparing this proposal, we have searched and surveyed the NIMS and CRIS databases to make sure that the proposed project would not unnecessarily duplicate NCERA/NC or other regional project efforts. NC170, "Personal Protective Technologies for Current and Emerging Occupational and Environmental Hazards," appears to be a project where there are partnership opportunities, though NCERA-197 has traditionally considered personal protective equipment to be one of several intervention methods or strategies for mitigation, with workplace and system design along with safeguarding, warnings, and training being others that are of significant importance.  Another example is S1098 - Autonomy for Agricultural Production, Processing, and Research to Advance Food Security through Sustainable and Climate-Smart Methods. Safety is mentioned in their project overview, and there is one participant in their project roster indirectly involved with one of the current members of NCERA-197, but not with direct focus on safety. As part of our efforts, we will continue to purposely watch for partnership opportunities among other regional committees as well as federally-funded projects in farm health and safety - many of which involve members of the NCERA-197 committee as PIs or project collaborators.

Objectives

Procedures and Activities

As described in the objectives - our work has four central themes and purposes.  The detailed procedures and activities under each of these four objectives are described below.  Notes that SOME of the states that will lead efforts are listed with primary activities:

Obj. 1 - Address emerging hazards in agriculture and novel opportunities in agricultural safety and health.

Agriculture is changing rapidly, and during the May 2024 NCERA 197 meeting held at Purdue University, the group undertook a comprehensive analysis of the key, high priority, high risk areas and hazards that are emerging. In some cases, there is already considerable work by one or more of the states, but where the majority of states feel the need to do more.

After brainstorming and discussing these emerging and novel hazard-based needs, the group went through a quantitative evaluation based on the expressed needs of producers, agricultural service providers and other stakeholders and clientele their state as well as the interests of committee participants and the likely ability to generate funding to support work around each area. 

Emerging Technologies and Automation (States involved: IL, UT, NE, IN, OK, CA, FL, WI, and others)

1. Committee members who now work on this issue will develop Extension materials and programs, and conduct research to further efforts and practices to identify and mitigate novel safety risks associated with emerging technologies (Shutske et al., 2023). This includes automation (machines and processes), autonomous machines (tractors, harvesters, feeders, etc.), robots (specialty crops, animal care, milking, etc.), and other tech-intensive tools, machines, and methods. Further, the group acknowledges that these technologies can be leveraged to reduce human occupational exposure to hazards and improve overall safety. An excellent base for this work that has been led through the “SAFER AG” effort involving leadership from NCERA-197 committee members from the Universities of Illinois, Wisconsin, Utah State, Florida, Cal-Davis and others, as well as NCERA-197 active external partners that include the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. Thus far, the cohort of NCERA-197 members who have worked cooperatively in this area have published a series of recommendations-based papers from the SAFER AG event (Shutske et al., 2024; Lincoln and Elliot, 2023). A second major workshop will be held in December, 2024. The NCERA-197 committee and the communication and sharing infrastructure it allows for will continue to be used to develop Extension and outreach materials that come from these efforts and from published literature. In addition, workgroups that are connected to these efforts will work together on funding proposals to USDA-NIFA, NIOSH, and NSF. NCERA-197 members will continue to participate in professional societies and organizations who develop design and safety standards (ASABE) and others who focus on best practices including the International Society for Agricultural Safety and Health (ISASH) and the more industry-partnership focused group, the Agricultural Safety and Health Council of America (ASHCA). 
2. The NCERA-197 committee recognizes and shares the idea that many of the technologies in agriculture either in the early stages of adoption or being developed by both the large agricultural machinery companies and startup companies present new forms of risk/hazard, but that many of these technologies present tremendous safety-related opportunities. Members will continue to pursue and build research programs through competitive proposals for work that leverages opportunities presented through new technology-based tools methods, such as automation, autonomy, and robots recognizing that we can reduce human risk by reducing exposure to operators (replacing human operation with automation). For example, if a field or orchard sprayer operator can be replaced through autonomous operation, we reduce the exposures connected to pesticides, UV light exposure, and heat. Similarly, wearable technologies such as smartwatches, clothing, sensors, and other devices worn on or carried by a person can be used for real-time data collection for issues like heat stress, heart rate, vibration, noise exposure, or UV (sunlight) exposure. These and other novel tools including vision/image recognition sensors, generative AI, and tools will be pursued through research and development as described in the previous section as well as ongoing multi-state development and sharing of related Extension materials.'

 Heat-Related and Environmental Risks (States involved: OK, WI, FL, NIOSH and others)

1. NCERA-197 committee members are keenly interested, based on our topical and hazard-based prioritization process in issues related to heat stress, a changing climate, and closely related issues that include occupational exposures to smoke (such as via the 2023 wildfires and ongoing incidents nationally).  As of late 2024, OSHA is pursuing a heat-related safety and health standard for agricultural workers given that heat is a critical workplace health issue (DeLong and Marudo, 2024). The proposed standard includes both best practices for workers but also administrative strategies and requirements for employers such as required rest breaks, provision of shade, record keeping, and training. This issue connects to all members of the NCERA-197 committee. Even the northern Midwestern states are facing prolonged periods of high heat and relative humidity, impacting agricultural workers and production. The NCERA-197 network will work across states, encouraging partnerships that will develop and “fine-tune” region-specific strategies to reduce heat-related illnesses and injuries in agriculture. It will promote the adoption of specific heat injury prevention guidelines, and develop new materials and programs to be used in Extension programs. It will also pursue cooperative research proposals for work on issues such as monitoring the heat stress and other impacts of PPE during environmental events (such as the wildfires) and develop and/or evaluate new types of devices that can be used to supplement cooling (such as clothing) or monitor heat stress risk (through wearables). We will also look closely at opportunities to collaborate with the NC-170 committee on Personal Protective Technologies for Current and Emerging Occupational and Environmental Hazards.

Roadway Safety and Machine Visibility (States involved: NE, WI, FL, IA, OH, UT, IL, ND, MO, ASABE, NCCRAHS*, the National Farm Medicine Center, NIOSH, and others) - *note that when used in this section, this is the member organization National Children’s Center for Rural Agricultural Safety and Health

1. The issue of farm machine/motor vehicle collisions on rural and nearby suburban roadways continues to be a major issue that compounds the high rate of injuries and fatalities both for agricultural vehicle operators and workers as well as the general public (Ramirez et al., 2016; Tormoehlen and Rudolphi, 2024). This issue is exacerbated due to increasing size of machines, traffic levels, and the continued growth of the “rural/urban interface as cities and suburbs grow into rural agricultural areas. NCERA-197 members will be involved in continuing safety efforts in several ways. We will continue to represent ag safety and health interests in the development of improved standards for machine lighting and marking through ASABE. The committee will participate in or lead research efforts to improve machine visibility through enhanced lighting and marking technologies such as higher visibility LED lights and lighting patterns. The group will also work through Extension programming efforts to promote the usage of ASABE lighting and marking standard (ASABE 279) which is now embedded into federal law for newer (post- July 2017) machines while also being cognizant of the discrepancies that exist between state regulations and federal (AEM, 2018; NHTSA, 2016).

 ATV Safety (States involved: CA, PA, and others)

1. Several states with representatives on the NCERA-197 committee have done focused research on all terrain vehicle use, best practices, and machine design (Araujo et al., 2023). This work is critical given the important stability and controllability issues associated with ATVs and the growing use of utility task vehicles (UTV) on farms and ranches. The committee will continue to work together to share information through its activities and ongoing work within ISASH, ASABE and other organizations. This includes multi-state developing and sharing of educational curricula and Extension/outreach materials and cooperative work on UTV and ATV research that focuses on design, eventual autonomous functionality, and other risk factors and hazards. 

Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious Diseases (States involved: WI, NE, NIOSH, and others)

1. The majority of emerging infectious diseases worldwide are considered zoonotic in that they can be shared between animals and humans. An obvious example is the different strains of influenza which mutate in different parts of the world as they are passed between species (poultry, pigs, humans, etc.) (Otte and Pica-Ciamarra, 2021). Zoonotic disease concerns are greater now as a result of climate change, extending the range of insects and other vectors.  Farmers, farmworkers, and others who work in close proximity to animals are at particularly high risk (Klous et al., 2016). Historically, the NCERA-197 committee has not had an explicit focus in this area, but members are called upon by colleagues in veterinary science, animal science, public health, epidemiology, medicine, and other disciplines to be part of multidisciplinary teams doing research or creating Extension materials.  Increasingly, there is the need to provide educational material and intervention curricula in non-English languages.  During this five year period, emphasis will be on encouraging NCERA-197 members to share experiences, materials, and best practices for multidisciplinary collaboration with various partner organizations and academic disciplines. The development of multi-state research proposals will be encouraged. The committee will also work to define the interface that exists between zoonotic disease, climate change, and other key public health issues of global concern, and through these efforts to define the key opportunities and core competencies for agricultural safety and health professionals who wish to work in this field.

Obj. 2 - Foster agricultural safety and health research, outreach, and Extension partnerships to expand program impact.

Health and Safety Collaborations (all involved)

1. NCERA-197 members have historically been deeply involved as members and as leaders in various organizations and associations that have a primary or secondary focus in agricultural safety and health. Groups mentioned previously include ASABE, ASHCA, and ISASH. The group’s members will also continue to build connections and explore partnerships and funding through their connections with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s Agricultural Safety and Health (ASH) Centers. This connection to the country’s 12 ASH centers is vital as the majority of CDC-NIOSH funds are allocated through these centers sometimes through subawards to projects and activities at other land grant universities or institutions with a strong focus on ag safety and health. We will also continue to support and build membership and participation in ASABE. This organization is a key to information sharing, particularly in areas where there are engineering/design solutions to agricultural health and injury-related concerns. It is also critical that NCERA-197 continue to encourage the creation and ongoing review of important engineering design and safety standards. This includes standards for some of the key “hazards” and conditions from the previous section including automated and autonomous machines, heat and environmental control and comfort for workers (through ventilation, system design, etc.), roadway travel of agricultural machines, UTV and ATV safety and design, and zoonotic disease detection, control, and mitigation. Likewise, we will encourage member involvement in the development and review of ISO (International Standards Organizations) standards as many standards that ASABE members work on actually end up having international significance through ISO and input from the agricultural safety and health “practice” and academic discipline is sometimes missing from those ISO processes.

 Partnerships with One-Health Focused Organizations (States involved: WI, NE, and others)

1. NCERA-197 members will focus on building new connections with groups that have a primary focus on prevention and protection from emerging zoonotic disease exposures and related health risks connected to farmer, rancher, and worker health. This new set of connections (some members are already engaged) will serve to better connect our community to veterinarians, public health researchers, and other similar groups, allowing us to participate and even lead research and Extension activities that are designed to tackle emerging zoonotic disease exposures and related health risks in agriculture.

Collaboration and Activity Leadership with Regional Farm and Ranch Stress Center (all NC states involved)

1. USDA-NIFA funds the Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network (FRSAN) active in  all areas of the country. In the North Central Region the network (based out of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) has engaged all states in the region with considerable involvement and “activity leadership” from NCERA-197 committee members (Cutherbertson, 2024). We expect this connection to continue, pending any type of ongoing funding (to be determined), and because of the strong connections and linkages between stress which is a risk factor for agricultural injury as well as health problems and concerns. We will look to maintain and support and hopefully grow this involvement through a combination of robust Extension activity as well as pursuing research related to farm and ranch mental health both as a condition itself but also as a risk factor for injury and health concerns.

Support and Expand Efforts Connected to Farm and Ranch Emergency Preparedness and Response (States involved:  UT, OH, NE, FL, and others)

1. Effective preparedness and response is an essential component of agricultural safety and health and loss reduction from any type of unexpected or expected events (Etienne, 2024; Byrne et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2018). Not all safety and health issues are completely predictable and preventable, so an overall loss reduction strategy is to respond to events quickly and in a planful manner to keep losses to a minimum. Members of NCERA-197 will continue to pursue research opportunities through competitive grants (USDA, NIOSH, NSF, and others) to enhance emergency medical service access through surveillance tools like GIS mapping and educational efforts that address rural disparities in EMS services, in part because of gaps in broadband access, resource availability (for training and equipment). In numerous states, NCERA-197 members are involved in development of training programs for EMTs, paramedics, and other local emergency medical service volunteers and professionals. This work will continue and member states will participate in updates to training materials that were once developed by the NRAES publications unit about three decades ago.
2. NCERA-197 members are now somewhat involved in the Extension Disaster Education Network (EDEN). The degree of involvement has fluctuated over the past 5-15 years, though at this time, only one of the EDEN state points of contact is an active NCERA-197 Committee member. While EDEN focuses more on preparedness and response to natural disasters, two points are in order. First, farm and ranch safety issues that result in injury often do occur during extreme or disaster conditions (fire, floods, heat, etc.). Additionally, many of the occupational health issues that NCERA-197 committee members have expertise in (respiratory disease, skin cancers, chemical exposures) are also tied to natural disasters and the goals of EDEN. The second major overlap is in the area of zoonotic disease outbreaks. EDEN historically has had some focus on biosecurity education and other measures to protect animals from disease outbreaks, while NCERA-197 is more focused on human disease implications and best practices. Since a stated goal of the current EDEN three-year strategic plan includes: “Develop a recruitment strategy to encompass more participation from land grant universities in each region, agencies, and potential partners…” We hope in our NCERA-197 work to spend some time exploring the possible connections and synergies with EDEN. This will occur through more purposeful conversations at EDEN annual conferences, inviting EDEN leadership to participate in NCERA-197 events, and finding other ways to create synergies. We will also work as a committee to make sure all practitioners who focus on agricultural safety and health have a good understanding of the workings of various state, regional, and national agencies and groups that focus on emergencies and disaster preparedness and response as a core competency (see coming section on mentoring and professional development).

 

Obj. 3 - Serve new and underserved agricultural audiences.

Continue to Expand Partnerships with Institutions Serving Underserved Audiences (all states involved)

1.  In the last project period (2020-2025), we have made modest progress in engaging the 1890s institutions by engaging in their academic-based associations and organizations. This includes participation in bimonthly meetings of the Association of Extension Administrators of the 1890 Land Grant Universities, and the symposium of the Association of 1890 Research Directors. In a few of the states represented, there have been efforts through research project proposals, Extension programs, significant AgrAbility effort and other activities to engage the 1890s. Similarly, the group has engaged in conversation involving individuals (faculty and administrative leaders) from the Federally Recognized Tribes Extension Program (FRTEP) and 1994 institutions. In a few states, there have been Extension program efforts in various areas (bison safety, machinery and harvest equipment safety) during the last two years. Still, we do not yet have a clearly identifiable set of outcomes from these initiatives.  During the coming project period (2025-2030) and beginning in 2025, we will have specific, strategic, engaged conversations within NCERA-197 on significantly and measurably increasing our engagement with the 1890 and 1994 institutions. This is likely to take the form of two subcommittees that will focus efforts on identifying and engaging key leaders and other individuals; encouraging their participation in NCERA-197 and our engagement in their initiatives as is appropriate; and other ways to grow our connections. It will also be critical that we develop plans to attend in-person meetings when possible and/or to engage members of these institutions in NCERA-197 gatherings. Possible outcomes to be determined by two-way engagement and conversation could include, but are not limited to: continued engagement in the development of funding proposals, collaborative work in Extension program activities, and involvement of 1890 and 1994 faculty and staff in the objective four activities connected to mentorship and capacity development in agricultural safety and health.

Support for Immigrant and Migrant Farmworkers (all states involved)

1. There is strongly growing recognition of the role of hired labor as operations get larger, the ownership demographics of farms and ranches age and have less access to immediate family labor, and the work becomes more intense. This includes immigrant workers from countries like Mexico, Nicaragua, Honduras, Haiti, as well as other Central and South America countries and parts of Asia, Europe, and Africa (USDA- Economic Research Service, 2024). The NCERA-197 committee will strongly encourage the building of collaborative partnerships and engagement with these underserved communities. We will develop a whitepaper that documents “best practices” for agricultural safety and health research and Extension programming to include specific needs including language, authentic stakeholder engagement, navigating partnerships that bridge employer/employee relationships, and solid practices around program planning and evaluation. Some of this work has occurred as a starting point by NCERA-197 members including engagement by immigrant worker groups in the last 3-4 years (interest was accelerated during COVID-19). And demonstrating the importance of grounding safety and health programming around holistic public-health based models like the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Health Belief Model.
2. We will also plan for at least two significant research or integrated research/Extension project proposals to come from multiple members of the NCERA-197 network. The specific topics will be determined by the partners, but based on Objective 1 priorities, may include proposed activities around heat stress; zoonotic occupational disease/health; and/or safety impacts of automation and autonomy including safety needs where there are mixed levels of automation on individual farms ranging from traditional to totally autonomous machines. 

Address and Plan for Varying Levels of  Broadband and Digital Literacy and Access (all states involved)

1. Work in NCERA-197 member states and the USDA Census of Agriculture around broadband access and use among farm and ranch operators shows that adoption and use of broadband connectivity, computers, smartphones, tablets, apps, and a range of digital tools and practices has permeated around 80% of operations (Drewry et  al., 2019). The remaining 20% are influenced by issues such as affordable access (including lack of cellular or land-based connectivity); age; and comfort level with the technology. In some instances, access is based on unique cultural or religious characteristics and beliefs. Yet, with many of our NCERA-197 institutions, Internet-delivered content has become the norm, and the majority of “traditional content” that has been around (like ROPS on tractors, PTO safety, etc.) is almost an Internet commodity. NCERA-197 will discuss and develop a short recommendations document on information dissemination to groups that lack access or for which access is not practical/possible based on language, religious beliefs, housing status, or affordability. This document will be shared with agriculture and natural resource leaders and Extension leaders in the region for consideration as organizations plan for future Internet presence practices as well as the implementation of new digital means of reaching and communicating with Extension clientele.

Obj 4- Build capacity and mentorship for the next generation of agricultural safety and health professionals.

Professional Development (States involved: WI, ND, PA, MO, NCCRAHS and others)

1. The NCERA-197 Committee is made up of a diverse group of committee members. They include faculty in college academic departments, Extension staff who work on campus or in more local or regional settings, and staff who work for organizations including governmental and industry associations. The group also represents a broad range of length of time in service, ranging from relatively “new” faculty and staff to those with 30-40 years of experience in their roles. Similarly, there is a range of experience in agricultural safety and health. In some cases, there are specialists who have spent their entire career in the field, and  in other cases, there are individuals with other specialized education and experience in agriculture, but not necessarily formal education and/or research experience in ASH. In this project period, the NCERA-197 committee will use existing and past work and current experience to develop a list of suggested core skills, background knowledge, and competencies that are desirable for ASH practitioners. This work and the need is well described in the literature. Further, we will crosswalk this core competency list with recommended professional development opportunities and encourage each member to pursue those that fill professional gaps. In areas where necessary core competency-based professional development opportunities do not exist, the committee will pursue these avenues:  1) Partnering and co-sponsoring or coordinating targeted special sessions and half- or full-day professional development sessions that can be done with ASABE, ISASH, and other professional groups.  2) Assisting one or more of the NIOSH-funded ASH centers to host similar professional development sessions. 3) NCERA-197 members working in small teams to develop modular materials and presenting them online for use with other members as well as professionals outside the NCERA-197 committee. Several modules have been developed by current or past members of NCERA-197, thanks to sponsorship and coordination by ASHCA. These modules that already exist will be promoted to NCERA-197 members as a way to build toward more uniform core competencies. Additional literature that documents this need and informs our approaches can be found in Fetzer et al., (2023) as well as Pierson and Murphy (1996).

Build Understanding of ASH Profession within the Land-Grant System (States involved: WI, SD, IN, IA, NCCRAHS, and others)

 

1. The committee will share the “core competency” list and inventory of activities and programs with Extension and university administrative leaders in appropriate ways (through email and possibly in person at NC regional meetings). The purpose of this sharing is two-fold. First, it will elevate the stature of the profession. In some cases, land-grant programmatic and administrative leaders do not fully understand the full scale and scope of agricultural safety and occupational health, or the research and science that underpins ASH. The second reason for sharing is to encourage local investment in those states with little or often no existing capacity on agricultural safety and health.

Mentorship (States involved: WI, ND, PA, MO, NCCRAHS and others)

 

1. The NCERA-197 will be purposeful in recruiting membership and creating mentoring opportunities for all members on a volunteer basis.  A list of experienced mentors will be made available to all members who will be free and encouraged to build connections. Mentors will “check in” with new members as needed or bi-monthly.  Mentors will encourage questions and engagement with mentees. Mentors will also learn from the experiences of newer and/or younger colleagues making the two-way exchange valuable for both. The core competency checklist will be used as necessary along with encouraging and making introductions to various professional development opportunities described above. For faculty and staff in Extension and college departments, mentor programs are common that help individuals progress through processes like promotion, tenure, etc. This will supplement that mentorship on the content side as ASH professionals often operate more “alone” at universities relative to other faculty and staff who might work in the animal or plant sciences. 

 Utilize eXtension Platform (States involved: WI, ND, PA, MO, NCCRAHS and others)  

1. In an earlier section, there was discussion of NCERA-197 membership sharing content modules that could be shared with other members as part of a professional development strategy. Several current members have been active in using various eXtension platforms for online learning, curriculum delivery, and publication distribution. We will much more fully and purposely explore eXtension’s use for programs, modules, and regional materials and publications around the more “hazard-based” topics described in this proposal (heat stress, roadway safety, etc.). And, we will use the platform as a preferred provider in supporting the capacity development of new professionals, including especially NCERA-197 membership.

 Program Evaluation and Communication (NCCRAHS, WI, and others)

1. The ability to evaluate the outcomes and impacts of programs in Extension, outreach, and other forms of adult and youth education has always been a challenge. NCERA-197 will place an emphasis on building capacities among all members in program evaluation. We will focus on methods, best practices, analysis methods and techniques that allow for more robust evaluation of agricultural safety and health programs. Outcomes of excellent programs need to show behavioral changes, but we will also use the public health “behavioral change” models of the theory of planned behavior to increase analysis in behavioral intentions as a precursor to behavioral changes, ultimately leading to fewer injuries, occupational health incidents, and positive changes to work environments through hazard reduction. Specifically, we will build program evaluation into our set of core competencies for ASH professionals.  We will work with existing ISASH and ASABE committees and/or with the NIOSH ASH Centers to host additional professional development sessions (at least one in the five year period) and focus on program evaluation in the mentoring portion of this activity.

Expected Outcomes and Impacts

Projected Participation

View Appendix E: Participation

Educational Plan

This committee, established in 2000, has a long-standing record of exchange for research and educational programming information through its annual meetings, publications, conference presentations, news releases and websites. The group uses opportunities such as open forums, concurrent educational programs, and invited presentations at professional meetings to distribute information and engage external stakeholder groups. The 2020-25 project will add new members to the full Committee and engage additional external audiences, including leaders in federal positions and public policy agencies. Participants with an outreach and extension role will further disseminate best management practices within the agricultural community.

 

Organization/Governance

There will be two officers for NCERA 197. A secretary and chair will be elected every two years at the appropriate annual meeting. The secretary records and distributes minutes of the annual meeting, and shares responsibility with the chair to prepare official communications to the administrative advisor, NIMSS, and other external parties. Upon completion of the 2-yr term, the secretary becomes chair of the committee for the following two years. The chair serves as the liaison between the committee and the administrative advisor, directs the activities of the committee, and makes arrangements for Committee meetings. Subcommittees will be named by the chair as needed for specific assignments.

 

Literature Cited

1. AEM (2018). Lighting and marking of agricultural equipment on highways guide. Association of Equipment Manufacturers. https://shop.aem.org/en/AEM%20Safety/aem-safety-products/lighting-and-marking-of-agricultural-equipment-on-highways-guide
2. Araujo, G. D. M., Khorsandi, F. K., & Fathallah, F. A. (2023). Ability of youth operators to reach agricultural all-terrain vehicles controls. Journal of Safety Research, 84, 353-363.
3. Byrne, J. P., Mann, N. C., Dai, M., Mason, S. A., Karanicolas, P., Rizoli, S., & Nathens, A. B. (2019). Association between emergency medical service response time and motor vehicle crash mortality in the United States. JAMA Surgery, 154(4), 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5097
4. Cuthbertson, C. (2024). Sowing seeds: health extension’s role in supporting agricultural mental health. Health Extension: Cooperative Extension’s Role in Community-Based Healthcare (C. Eschbach, E. Weybright, and J. Dwyer, editors). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
5. DeLong, C., & Marudo, C. (2024).  Boiling point: the health risks of heat protection restrictions for agriculture and construction workers. Frontiers in Public Health, Volume 12-2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1484975
6. Donham, K. J., & Thelin, A. (2016). Agricultural medicine: Rural occupational and environmental health, safety, and prevention. John Wiley & Sons.
7. Drewry, J. L., Shutske, J. M., Trechter, D., Luck, B. D., & Pitman, L. (2019). Assessment of digital technology adoption and access barriers among crop, dairy, and livestock producers in Wisconsin. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 165, 104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104960
8. Etienne, A. (2024). Assessment of technologies and response strategies for lone agricultural worker incidents (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
9. Fetzer, L., Boyer, P., Hirabayashi, L. (2023) Building capacity through the northeast agricultural safety and health coalition. Journal of Agromedicine. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2296665.
10. Frank, A. L., McKnight, R., Kirkhorn, S. R., & Gunderson, P. (2004). Issues of agricultural safety and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 25(1), 225-245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123007
11. Gorucu, S., Murphy, D., Yoder, A., & Pate, M. (2018). National research and extension agenda for agricultural safety and health assessment. Journal of Agromedicine, 23(3), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924x.2018.1467807
12. Hu, W., Dong, Q., & Huang, B. (2018). Effects of distance and rescue time to medical facilities on traffic mortality utilizing GIS. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 25(3), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2018.1431931
13. Kica, J., & Rosenman, K. D. (2020). Multisource surveillance for non-fatal work-related agricultural injuries. Journal of Agromedicine, 25(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924x.2019.1606746
14. Klous, G., Huss, A., Heederik, D. J., & Coutinho, R. A. (2016). Human–livestock contacts and their relationship to transmission of zoonotic pathogens, a systematic review of literature. One Health, 2, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.03.001
15. Li, S., Aby, G. R., Aherin, R., & Issa, S. F. (2022). Farm fatal injury trends in Illinois from 1999 to 2019. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 28(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.14898
16. Lincoln, J. M., & Elliott, K. C. (2023). Emerging technology in agriculture: Opportunities and considerations for occupational safety and health researchers. Journal of Safety Research, 86, 92-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.06.001
17. Molina-Guzmán, L. P., & Ríos-Osorio, L. A. (2020). Occupational health and safety in agriculture. A systematic review. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 68(4), 625-638.
18. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2016), Lighting and marking on agricultural equipment - machinery illumination safety.  NHTSA.  https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/06/22/2016-14571/lighting-and-marking-on-agricultural-equipment
19. National Safety Council. (2024). Injury facts. https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/work/work-overview/work-safety-introduction/
20. Otte, J., & Pica-Ciamarra, U. (2021). Emerging infectious zoonotic diseases: The neglected role of food animals. One Health, 13, 100323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100323
21. Pierson, T. G., & Murphy, D. J. (1996). Safety and health educational needs of agricultural education and industry professionals. Journal of Safety Research, 27(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(96)00004-7
22. Ramirez, M., Bedford, R., Wu, H., Harland, K., Cavanaugh, J. E., & Peek-Asa, C. (2016). Lighting and marking policies are associated with reduced farm equipment-related crash rates: a policy analysis of nine Midwestern US states. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 73(9), 621-626. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103672
23. Rudolphi, J. M., Berg, R. L., & Parsaik, A. (2020). Depression, anxiety and stress among young farmers and ranchers: a pilot study. Community mental health journal, 56(1), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00480-y
24. Ryan M. (2023).  Labour and skills shortages in the agro-food sector. OECD Food, Agriculture Fisheries Papers, vol. 189, 2023.
25. Shutske, J. M., Sandner, K. J., & Jamieson, Z. (2023). Risk assessment methods for autonomous agricultural machines: A review of current practices and future needs. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 39(1), 109-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aea.15281
26. Shutske, J. M., Issa, S. F., Johnson, T., Lincoln, J., Khorsandi, F., Pate, M. L., ... & Aby, G. R. (2024). SaferAg–Risk Assessment, Data, Design Standards, and Regulation: Needs and Recommendations. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health (in press).
27. Tormoehlen, S., & Rudolphi, J. M. (2024). Summary of roadway incidents involving farm equipment in five midwestern states using the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Journal of Agromedicine, 9(3):504-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924x.2024.2333552
28. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (2024). Farm labor. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-labor/
29. Weichelt, B., Scott, E., Burke, R., Shutske, J., Gorucu, S., Sanderson, W., ... & Rautiainen, R. (2022). What about the rest of them? Fatal injuries related to production agriculture not captured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI). Journal of Agromedicine, 27(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924x.2021.1956663

Attachments

Land Grant Participating States/Institutions

AL, IL, MN, MO, NE, OK, PA, UT, WI

Non Land Grant Participating States/Institutions

National Children’s Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety