Annual/Termination Reports:

[04/05/2000] [04/10/2001] [07/16/2002] [03/31/2003] [05/16/2005] [04/06/2006] [11/14/2006]

Report Information

Participants

Current chair:
William Hair, Crops and Soils, Clemson University
whair@clemson.edu;

Current Vice-Chair:
Roscoe Ivy, Agronomy, Mississippi State University
rli2@ra.msstate.edu;

Current Secretary-Treasurer:
Harbans Bhardwaj, Soil Science, Virginia State University
hbhardwj@vsu.edu;

Immediate Past Chair:
Dan Phillips, Plant Pathology, University of Georgia
dphilli@gaes.griffin.peachnet.edu;

Brief Summary of Minutes

(See Minutes)

Accomplishments

A major accomplishment of this group in the past eight years has been to generate interest in the development of the crop in most states in the South. However, the loss of industry support and the absence of contracted acres have resulted in a reduction in planted acres in most states in the South.<br /> <br><br /> <br>The canola list server set up in 1997 by Clemson University is still managed by Clemson and updated as clientele change. The information exchanged within this SERA-IEG 11 group has resulted in the expertise that is necessary to assist in the production of canola in the Southern States.<br /> <br>

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Roscoe Ivy, Mississippi State University, rli2@ra.msstate.edu;
Joe Johnson, Mississippi State University, jjohnson@ra.msstate.edu;
Calvin Schoulties, Clemson University, cschlts@clemson.edu;
Al Smith, University of Georgia, alsmith@arches.uga.edu;
Paul Rose, University of Georgia, prose@gaes.griffin.peachnet.edu;
Anton Coy, University of Georgia, coy@tifton.cpes.peachnet.edu;
J. LaDon Day, University of Georgia, jday@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Gary Gascho, University of Georgia, gascho@tifton.cpes.peachnet.edu;
Dan Phillips, University of Georgia, dphilli@gaes.griffin.peachnet.edu;
Paul Mask, Auburn University, pmask@acesag.auburn.edu;
David Buntin, University of Georgia, gbuntin@gaes.griffin.peachnet.edu;
Paul Raymer, University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu;
David Spradlin, University of Georgia, wspradl@gaes.griffin.peachnet.edu;
Charlie Rife, Kansas State University, crife@oznet.ksu.edu;
Dave Starner, Virginia Tech, nparec@vt.edu;
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwj@vsu.edu;

Chairman: Roscoe Ivy, Mississippi State University, rli2@ra.msstate.edu;
Secy/Treasurer: Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwj@vsu.edu;
Chairman Select: Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwj@vsu.edu;
Secy/Treasurer Select: Paul Raymer, University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu;

Brief Summary of Minutes

1.The meeting was called to order by Roscoe Ivy at 1:00 P.M. on March 28, 2001 (Wednesday) in the conference room of Stucky Building at Griffin campus of University of Georgia. All participants were introduced. $320 were collected as registration ($20 per person).



2.Paul Raymer presented an update regarding US Canola AssociationFs meeting in Washington, D.C. It was indicated that: the association is becoming rapidly influenced by North Dakota and South Dakota and that the association may be moved to North Dakota, a debate that all monies should go to areas where canola is grown is going on, there is no voice from the southern group, increase in funding to $600,000 was discussed, there are some incentives for mixtures in several states but no funding activity for biofuels, Idaho and Michigan are pushing for a National Breeding Program, national check off situation is not positive, and that there is a need for canola growers from southern stats.



3.John Kelly (University of Arkansas) presented an overview of canola research in Arkansas most research is aiming to develop superior cultivars but some effort is devoted to developing a production system.



4.David Wright could not attend the meetings but a report by D.L. Wright, B. Kidd, and P.Wiatrak was distributed. This report dealt with influence of winter cover crops (wheat and canola) on cotton, soybeans, and peanuts. The influence of wheat or canola as previous crops was not significant but a tendency to get higher yields of soybean following canola over wheat was observed. A tendency to get higher yields of peanuts following wheat over canola was also observed.



5.David Buntin presented the results of doublecrop management study and indicated that stand loss caused by Rhizoctonia solani occurred following canola but no consistent effect on disease levels, final stand, or yield of cotton was observed, fungicide use prevented stand loss, use of Temik enhanced negative effects of canola on cotton stand, thrips and aphids were reduced by canola, and false chinch bug populations were larger following canola than fallow or wheat. Copies of two publications (Response of canola to simulated diamondback moth defoliation at different growth stages, and Intraspecific competition of an insect resistant transgenic canola in seed mixtures) were distributed.



6.Gary Gascho presented results from his studies using poultry litter in canola and indicated that significant damage due to Rhizoctonia solani in peanut and Sclerotinia in canola was observed with use of poultry litter, two tons of poultry litter was ideal for canola production, and use of poultry litter would buildup phosphorus in the soil.



7.Dan Phillips indicated that black leg resistance is effective in canola, sclerotinia is becoming a problem in canola, most broad leaf plants are susceptible to sclerotinia but grasses are immune, high nitrogen increases incidence of sclerotinia, genetic analysis of 72 specimens collected from southeast indicated that pathogen from all specimens belonged to the same species, host plant resistance to sclerotinia seems not to exist, and newer genetic techniques are being studied for management of sclerotinia in canola.



8.David Buntin presented a report for National Canola Research Program and indicated that southeastern and mid south regions were combined into one region.



9.The group visited canola research plots from 3:15 P.M.. To approximately 5:30 P.M. which was followed by a social and a dinner.



10.The group reconvened at 8:30 A.M. ob March 29 (Thursday) in the conference room of Stucky Building on the Griffin campus of University of Georgia.



11.Charles Rife, Kansas State University, presented details of canola breeding and production research in Kansas and Southern Great Plains region. He has released two cultivars (Plainsman and Wichita) and has promising breeding material for future releases. It was indicated that approximately 2,500 acres were under canola production in Southern Great Plains region (Kansas, Colorado, and Oklahoma), the 10 year goal for this region is 250,000 acres under canola production. He also presented details of variety test: during 1999 2000 winter canola variety test seed was sent to 32 locations in 13 states, 31 locations were established, and 24 locations were harvested.



12.Paul Raymer distributed copies of "Report on the Feasibility of an Oilseed Processing Facility in Georgia" and indicated that this facility is expected to use both soybean and canola even though processing adds substantially more to the value of canola and a component of this facility is expected to extract "virgin, cold pressed oil" for specialty use. This facility is expected to cost approximately 52 million dollars.



13.David Buntin distributed a list of herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides that are approved for use on canola.



14.State reports were presented by representatives from Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Virginia indicating lack of commercial production but research is on going to facilitate canola production in the region.



15.Paul Raymer brought up the issue of weather this group (SERA IEG 11) should continue as it is or merge with a larger group. After a concerted discussion, it was decided that the group should continue as it is but should attempt to meet with teams in other regions.



16.Al Smith and Calvin Scheulties agreed to look into renewal of this group.



17.Harbans Bhardwaj (Virginia State University) assumed the role of Chairman and Paul Raymer was unanimously elected Secretary Treasurer of the group.



18.The group thanked David Bridges, David Buntin, Dan Phillips, and Paul Raymer for their support of these meetings.



19.Al Smith thanked all participants. The meeting adjourned at approximately 11:30 P.M.

Accomplishments

(None specified in minutes above.)

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Paul Raymer, The University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Al Smith, The University of Georgia, asmith@uga.edu;
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwj@vsu.edu ;
Ernst Cebert, Alabama A & M Univ., ecebert@aamu.edu;
Randy Saunders, Mississippi State University, rsaunders@ra.msstate.edu;
Joe Johnson, Mississippi State University, jjohnson@ra.msstate.edu;
Paul Rose, The University of Georgia, prose@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Dave Starner, V.P.I., nparec@vt.edu;
George A.Shumaker, University of Georgia, dphilli@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Dan Phillips, The University of Georgia, dphilli@griffin.peachnet.edu;
David Wright, The University of Florida, dlw@mail.ifas.ufl.edu;
Timothy Grey, The University of Georgia, tgrey@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Paul Mask, Auburn, University, pmask@acesag.auburn.edu;
J. LaDon Day, University of Georgia, day@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Chairman: Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwj@vsu.edu;
Secy/Treasurer: Paul Raymer, The University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Chairman Select: Paul Raymer, The University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu;
Secy/Treasurer: Ernst Cebert, Alabama A & M Univ., ecebert@aamu.edu;

Brief Summary of Minutes

1. The meeting was called to order by Harbans Bhardwaj at 1:00 P.M. on Thursday, March 28, 2002 in the conference room of the Flynt Building on the Griffin campus of The University of Georgia. All participants were introduced. $280 were collected as registrations ($20 per person) to cover meeting expenses associated with refreshments for the breaks and the evening meal.



2. Dr. Jerry Arkin, Assistant Dean and Director of the Griffin Campus, welcomed the group and challenged the group to take technologies developed through research to farmers and demonstrate impact of our combined research effort. He also pointed out the need for more industry involvement in the group.



3. Dr. Al Smith, Administrative Advisor to the group stated that a new Extension Advisor was to be appointed by the Southern Directors in April. He also indicated that a project summary was needed for the Southern Directors Web Page.



4. George Shumaker, Extension Economist with UGA made a presentation on the Georgia Oilseed Initiative, a project whereby Georgia farmers have formed a New Generation Cooperative and plan to build and operate an oilseed crushing and refining facility for Southeastern grown oilseeds including canola. This venture will be primarily focused on value added processing of identity preserved oilseeds. Dr. Shumaker also discussed other value added opportunities such as biodiesel and export of non GMO canola.



5. Dr. Harbans Bhardwaj presented data on the nutritional quality of canola seed sprouts and green foliage and discussed the potential of using canola to produce seed sprouts. Other fresh market possibilities such as use of canola for greens and flower shoots as a fresh vegetable were discussed.



6. Dr. Dan Phillips presented extensive data regarding phyto geographic and genotype symptom associations in Sclerotina, a common fungal disease of canola. His research clearly indicates that both the rosette and the more common stem infections are caused by the same organism, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum . Furthermore he was able to document the widespread presence of very old phytotypes of the fungus which were present in the Southeast long before the introduction of canola as well as the presence of ne7. Immediately following the afternoon break (3:15 P.M.), the group visited research plots located at the Bledsoe Research Farm near Griffin. Field presentations on new herbicide resistance technologies, variety testing, and cultivar development were made by Tim Grey, Don Day/Paul Rose, and Paul Raymer, respectively. The group was given the opportunity to view the associated research plots.



8. The group enjoyed and opportunity for informal conversation from 6:30 to 8:00 P.M. with a social mixer and dinner at the Woodruff Pavilion on the Griffin Campus.



9. The group reconvened at 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 29 in the Flynt Building conference on the Griffin Campus of The University of Georgia.



10. Dr. Timothy Grey presented weed control research findings on the effectiveness of herbicide resistance systems in canola. Clearfield, Roundup Ready, and Liberty Link weed control systems were compared for their ability to control wild radish, ryegrass, and other common weeds found in canola.. Based on Dr. Grey‘s first year results, it appears that both Clearfield (IMI tolerant) and Roundup Ready systems have great potential for the Southeast in that they will provide excellent control of wild radi11. Dr. David Buntin provided the group with an update on federal and state registration of canola pesticides. He distributed a list of herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides that are currently approved for use on canola.



12. Dr. David Wright made a presentation on canola production and research programs in Florida. Florida provides a testing site for southern spring cultivars through its participation in the regional testing program. Research is also underway to develop viable multiple cropping systems involving canola for the panhandle region of Florida. Data from tillage treatments within double cropping systems using canola or wheat followed by cotton, peanut, and soybean were presented. Data was also presented o13. Dr. Ernst Cebert presented an overview of past, present and future canola research at Alabama A&M University. A number of faculty there have become involved in various aspects of canola production research.



14. Following the morning break, David Buntin provided an update on the U.S. Canola Research Program. The 2002 program funded eight projects in the southern region and provided a total of $112,320 in canola related research support.



15. Dr. Paul Raymer presented an overview of the UGA canola cultivar development program. This program is focused on the development of both canola quality and speciality oil cultivars that are specifically adapted to the Southeast. Dr. Raymer indicated that good progress has been made. He has plans to release two cultivars and two germplasm lines within the next year.



16. Brief state reports were presented by representatives from Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Virginia. All indicated little or no commercial production of canola.



17. Following the state reports the group held it‘s annual business meeting. Dr. Smith informed the group that this regional project is due to terminate soon and asked for discussion regarding whether the project should be renewed. Options discussed were: 1) to continue "as is", 2) to link with other canola groups in other regions of the U.S. and rotate responsibility for hosting an annual meeting, and 3) to meet within the region in alternating years and with other regional groups the other years. A motion was made by Dan Phillips and seconded by Dave Starner to renew the project. The motion passed without opposition. Paul Raymer was directed to develop a project summary and to complete the necessary paperwork for renewal.



18. Other business included election of a new secretary/treasurer for the group. Ernst Cebert was elected to this position without opposition.



19. The venue for the 2003 meeting was discussed at length. Harbans Bhardwaj and David Starner invited the group to meet in Petersburg, VA. The possibility of meeting in Washington, D.C. in conjunction with the National Research Conference as also proposed. No consensus was reached on the venue and the officers were directed to continue to explore these possibilities as well as other options and reach a decision.



20. The group thanked David Spradlin, Dan Phillips and Paul Raymer for their assistance in preparing for the meeting. Al Smith thanked all participants. The meeting adjourned at approximately 12:00 noon.

Accomplishments

(None specified in Minutes above.)

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Ernst Cebert, Secy/Treas 2002-03, Chairman select for 2003-04, Alabama A&M University, ecebert@aamu.edu;

Udai Bishnoi, Alabama A&M University, ubishnoi@aamu.edu;
Robert Bacon, University of Arkansas, rbacon@uark.edu;
David Buntin, University of Georgia, gbuntin@griffin.uga.edu;
Paul Raymer, Chairman 2002-03, University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.uga.edu;
Timothy Grey, University of Georgia, tgrey@tifrom.uga.edu;
Dave Starner, Secretary / Treasurer select
for 2003-04, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, nparec@vt.edu ;
Brian Wooden Jr., Virginia State University, Bwooden_jr@vsu.edu;
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwaj@vsu.edu;
Ronald Bowen, Virginia State University, rbowen@vsu.edu;

Brief Summary of Minutes

Paul Raymer, Chair, University of Georgia, called the 2003, SERA-IEG 11 meeting to order at 2:00 P.M. in the Ticonderoca room, Hyatt Regency Hotel, Washington, D.C. The meeting opened with the introduction by each participant. The meeting was held concurrent with two other US Canola Association meetings: (1) Board of Directors meeting and (2) 2003 Legislative Outlook with Congressional Staff Panel meeting.





Registration: Paul Raymer welcomed the group and provided the participants with the choice of paying a registration fee (normally $20.00). By unanimous consent, the group declined the need for the registration at this particular meeting. Registration fee will resume during the 2004 meeting. The money collected is used to cover meeting expenses associated with refreshments for breaks and the evening meal.





Business Meeting: The 2002 minutes were presented by Paul Raymer and approved by the participants.





Treasurer‘s Report: Paul Raymer presented a summary on the financial standing of SERA-IEG 11. A motion to accept the treasurer‘s report was given. The motion was accepted. Paul Raymer gave Ernst Cebert (Chair elect) a check for $208.20 representing the current balance. The check is from: First Union Bank, check # 214061950, dated 05/17/2002.





Election of Officers: Ernst Cebert, from Alabama A&M University was promoted as chairperson for 2003-2004. He served as secretary during the previous year. Harbans Bhardwaj, from Virginia State University nominated Dave Starner of Virginia Polytechnic for the position of Secretary / Treasurer. The motion for the nomination was accepted. Participants voted unanimously for Dave Starner to be the Secretary / Treasurer for the 2003-2004 business year.





Discussion of 2004 Meeting: Alabama A&M University was selected as the location for the 2004 SERA-IEG 11 meeting. Alabama A&M University is located in Huntsville, AL, approximately 90 miles north of Birmingham, AL and 90 miles south of Nashville, TN. The meeting date is tentatively set for April 6-7, 2004.





Paul Raymer made a motion for the discussion of new business. No new business was discussed. However, David Buntin briefed the participants about new funding opportunities. He stated that the US Canola Board will decide on specific topics for research. Once topics for research are selected, RFPs will be sent out by each respective Regional Director to participants in that region. He also stated that an extra $20,000 was made available by CSREES in addition to the standard $112,000 provided per region, resulting in a total of $132,000 to be distributed for projects funded during in 2003.

Accomplishments

<b>State Reports:</b> Representative from different states of SERA-IEG 11 provided brief report on various research activities being carried out in each state. A summary of the overall SERA-IEG 11 was provided by David Buntin as part of the scheduled regional report at the 2003, US Canola Research Conference. In addition, members of the SERA-IEG 11 presented a total of 13 posters at the conference, summarizing their local research activities.<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br><b>Summary of State Reports:</b><br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Alabama: Canola activity in Alabama is restricted to continued research at Alabama A&M University, to improve management and production practices for potential future growers. Udai Bishnoi and Ernst Cebert summarized several ongoing canola research projects addressing fertility, crop rotation, diseases, insects and development of new cultivars for the region. <br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Arkansas: Interest is growing among farmers to try canola in the area. Efforts to help interested growers are being implemented. <br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Florida: No Report<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Georgia: David Buntin presented a complete report on the progress of canola for the region. The report emphasized the continued progress in the canola breeding program at the University of Georgia, and good result in weed control experiments. Attempt by a group of growers to establish a co-op for processing canola seed in the southeast is gaining greater exposure and momentum.<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Kentucky: No Report<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Louisiana: No Report<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Mississippi: No Report<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>South Carolina: No Report<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>Virginia: Harbans Bhardwaj, (VSU) and David Starner, (VPI) summarized continuing research in the state of Virginia. They expressed concern for colder temperatures and increased winter precipitation being experienced this growing season.<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br>The common concern expressed by participants was the lack of local market outlets for canola; growers were reluctant to engage in canola production.<br /> <br><br /> <br><br /> <br><b>Other activities:</b> <br /> <br>Paul Raymer announced that a canola field day will be held at the Canola Production Center in Claxton, Georgia, on April 3, 2003. Further information would be provided via email. The group also discussed ideas for collaborative interdisciplinary regional research.

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

BATES, Robert, Virginia State Univ;
BHARDWAJ, Harbans, Virginia State Univ;
BOWEN, Ronald, Virginia State Univ;
CHAPPELL, Glenn, Virginia Tech;
CLARKE, Winfrey, Virginia State Univ;
COMBS, Michael, Virginia State Univ;
ECHOLS, Jamila, Virginia State Univ;
GRAMMAR, Rudy, Virginia State Univ;
HAMAMA, Anwar, Virginia State Univ;
JUBB, Skip, Virginia Tech;
MCNEIL, Stephanie, Virginia State Univ;
MERSIE, Wondi, Virginia State Univ;
STARNER, David, Virginia Tech;
WOODEN, Brian, Virginia State Univ;

THORENSON, Dale, Washington, D.C. US Canola Assn;

MOORE, Reuben, Mississippi State Univ;

CEBERT, Ernie, Alabama A&M Univ;

BUNTIN, David, Univ Georgia;
PHILLIPS, Dan, Univ Georgia;
SPRADLIN, David, Univ Georgia;
ROSE, Paul, Univ Georgia;

BACON, Robert, Univ Arkansas;

Brief Summary of Minutes

MULTISTATE RESEARCH COORDINATING COMMITTEE/
INFORMATION EXCHANGE GROUP, SERA 11
Review and Coordination of Oilseed Rape Research Programs in the Southern Region (IEG-55)
ANNUAL MEETING
Randolph Farm Pavilion, 4415 River Road
Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA 23806
March 23-24, 2005


I. ATTENDANCE
Participants:
Washington D.C., U.S. Canola Association
THORENSON, Dale  Guest Speaker

Mississippi State University (MSU)
MOORE, Reuben  Administrative Advisor

Virginia Tech (VT)

II. MINUTES

1. The meeting was called to order at 1:25 PM-ET, March 23, 2005.

2. Dave Starner welcomed participants to the meeting; each participant introduced him/herself.

3. Dave Starner introduced Dr. Winfrey S. Clarke (VSU, Director, Agricultural Research Station) who extended greetings to visitors; he provided an overview of the agricultural research and extension programs and activities at VSU, including research on (a) new crop (canola), (b) meat goat, (c) water quality. VSU has 10 full time research faculty; facilities include Co-op Pavilion, new Extension and Research buildings. VSU enrolls 5,000 students in four schools (no MS program in agriculture; hire mostly post-docs).
Currently, VSU hosts four field days each year, namely, (1) Small Ruminant Expo (Annual Goat day); (2) Annual Ag-Field day; (3) Horticulture Field day; and (4) Housing Improvement Field day. VSU receives 100% match in state support that allowed the addition of Food Science program which focuses on food safety.

4. BUSINESS Meeting opened with the Treasurer's report by Dave Starner. The group has a current balance of $420.00
Balance from 2004: $280.00
Registration fee (2005): $180.00
Current balance: $460.00
No expense reported for 2005 meeting. Host (VSU) provided refreshments and meals.

5. After review of 2004 minutes, a motion to accept the minutes was made by David Buntin (UGA-Griffin), seconded by Dan Phillips (UGA-Griffin); carried.

6. Dave Starner commented on the procedure to elect new officers (Chair and Treasurer); he stated that the incumbent Treasurer is normally nominated for the chairmanship position for the following year. The current treasurer, Rufina Ward (AAMU) who was represented by Ernst Cebert (AAMU) at the meeting, was voted as Chairperson for 2005-2006.

7. Ernst Cebert nominated Robert Bacon (University of Arkansas) for treasurer; election of Robert Bacon carried.

8. R. Bacon commented on location of future meetings and raised concerns about declining member participation; the group suggested joint meetings with other groups, national and/or regional, particularly with southern agricultural workers.

9. Dr. Gerald L. "Skip" Jubb (Assoc. Dir. VAES and Asst. Dean for Research in the College of Agric. And Life Sci., Virginia Tech), introduced by Dave Starner, welcomed the SERA 11 group to Virginia and said that VA Agricultural Experimental Station is combined with VA Cooperative Extension as one agency in partnership at VT."

10. Dave Starner also introduced Reuben Moore (MAFES- MSU) as the new administrative advisor for SERA 11. As an administrative advisor, R. Moore said his responsibilities were to:

a. expand impact statement

b. continue regional canola efforts

c. request minutes of meeting for regional report

11. It was noted that SERA IEG 11 regional proposal must be rewritten for 2007 submission.

12. R. Moore mentioned the possibility of a reduction in formula funding but the final decision on allocation had not been made. Moore suggested that the group may want to update the vision statement, and he encouraged soliciting more participation by extension personnel. A list of all participants would be included in the report.

13. State Reports

(a). GEORGIA

Paul Raymer's breeding program was suspended although work continues with advanced lines. Dan Phillips (Plant Pathologist, UGA- Griffin) retired but is working part time on blackleg, Sclerotinia and screening of double haploids for resistance; new lines are currently being tested.
Oil Seed Initiative (Farmer's Co-Op Oilseed) officially folded because they could not raise enough money; it is being re-organized as Limited Liability Corporation (LLC) with DOW; DOW acquired rights to new canola releases (low linoleic, potential production in Southeast) by Raymer's lab. Dave Buntin commented that the canola acreage in Clarkson, GA belonging to DOW was the only bright aspect for canola in GA.
Dan Phillips stated that trans-fat labeling was making low-linoelic canola lines more popular; additional lines from Dr. Raymer maybe released in the near future.
Tim Gray (Weed Scientist, UGA-Griffin) mentioned carry over of chemicals with the use of canola following other crops. He also said that Canola Co-Op Production Guide needed revision; the main issue was the need for information on economic production for growers.
David Buntin handed out a summary report from the Regional Canola Association.
During a discussion, it was brought up that there were no grazing studies being conducted in the southeast region; most work in this area is being done in OK and KS; Information on grazing in the region is needed.

(b). ARKANSAS

Robert Bacon reported that AR is down from 1 million acres planted to wheat to only 150,000 in 2005 because of wet fall. He noted that more people were getting involved with canola research including studies on virus, sclerotinia (gel assay; screening by USDA, etc; rotation fumigation) and growth regulators (by cotton physiologist), but no commercial activities.

(c). ALABAMA

Ernie Cebert talked about his canola research and his collaboration with the Food Science Department, AAMU; he also briefed the group on the canola research undertaken by Udai Bishnoi, Rufina Ward and Rao Mentreddy. Current canola research at AAMU includes the following:
E. Cebert--screening and breeding for agronomically superior cultivars for Alabama
U. Bishnoi--crop rotation, fertilization, forage
R. Ward--bionomics of major insect pests of canola
R. Mentreddy--economics of canola as an alternate crop to wheat
No commercial activities also for Alabama.

(d). VIRGINIA

According to Harbans Bhardwaj (VSU), VA will release VX1 in 2006; as in other states, no commercial production occurring in Virginia. Organic production of canola is also underway, e.g.., for seed production (on 2.5 acres), oil and greens. They are also looking at other Brassicas from India for greens and are considering Chesapeake Bay canola (in collaboration with Arcadia Biosciences) for nitrogen removal.

14. After the break, Dale Thorenson, a consultant for the US Canola Association, was introduced. He discussed the issues on budget deficit and the implications with respect to canola efforts in the US. He reported on the various national activities pertaining to canola:

a. A new biodiesel plant being built in Fargo, ND; has $10M funding

b. ND has 1M acres of canola.

c. OK and KS have 300- 20,000 acres; 100,000 acres by 2006

d. Crop insurance is the limiting factor preventing growers from adapting canola

e. D. Thorenson reported on the recent US Canola meeting (March 1, 2005)
attended by 12 senators and 16 congressmen; he noted that if canola and sunflower join forces, they make a stronger coalition for federal funding.

f. D. Thorenson also talked about Food Dietary guidelines

i. Laymen must be educated on "good" and "bad" oil.

ii. FDA ruled on canola health plan--Canola supporters must petition FDA for health plan similar to olive oil

iii. NCR requested $1M from congress

15. Group's discussion coverage included the following:

a. Biodiesel--canola will play an increasingly important role

b. There was an increase in canola acreage in OK and KS in rotation with wheat due to too much weed pressure on wheat; another reason was that winter canola is excellent for cattle grazing.

16. Report by David Buntin on US canola (printed report handed out).

a. New race of blackleg (a priority in Canada)

b. Southern region--Proposal/ RFPs--Selections are combined and sent to Washington , D.C. Canola is model program used in DC because

i. growers are primary consideration

ii. funds are distributed by competitive grants

iii. funds are appropriately accounted for

c. US Canola Pesticide Registration--printed handouts were given to participants; registration included new herbicide labels.

17. Dave Starner opened the discussion on next year's meeting. R. Bacon asked if next venue should have field plots. It was suggested that R. Ward and R. Bacon should look into the possibility of having a joint meeting with canola groups in Midwestern region for 2006.

18. The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 pm.





MARCH 24, 2005 MEETING
Presiding - David Starner

1. The group reconvened at 8:30 am at the same venue.

2. Paul Rose (UGA-Griffin) presented an overview of the canola variety testing at UGA.
He reported that six tests are being conducted in 3 locations using both spring and winter cultivars. They are looking at oil, bloom, disease and fertilization; they used Treflan for pre-germination treatment and Poast to control grass in the spring. To control cabbage seedpod weevil, Warrior and other insecticides are applied twice in the spring.

3. Robert Bacon reported on agronomic research ongoing in UAR which includes the following aspects: seeding rate, planting dates, fertilizer, drainage problem, sclerotinia.

4. Dale Thorenson (consultant for US Canola Council) raised a question on the feasibility of increasing new lines to provide necessary seeds for canola production. He touched on the World Trade Organization case regarding a dispute between the US and Brazil. He also mentioned that the US budget for agriculture is not good. He invited interested parties to attend the GCIRC Technical Meeting in Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada scheduled on June 27-28, 2005.

5. The group visited VSU canola field plots; the trip was hosted by Harbans Bhardwaj.

6. The meeting officially adjourned at 12:00 pm.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Participants:



" BACON, Robert, Univ Arkansas
" BISHNOI, Udai, Alabama A&M Univ
" BOYLES, Mark, Oklahoma State Univ
" BUNTIN, David, Univ Georgia
" CEBERT, Ernie, Alabama A&M Univ
" EMERSON, Michael, Univ Arkansas
" GERGERICH, Rose, Univ Arkansas
" GINGRAS, Leo, Riceland Foods
" GODSEY, Chad, Oklahoma State Univ
" KELLY, John, Univ Arkansas
" MARTINEZ, Andy, Winrock International
" McCASTLAIN, Cal, Patriot Biofuels, Inc
" MOORE, Reuben, Mississippi State Univ
" PARSONS, Charles, Univ Arkansas
" PHILLIPS, Dan, Univ Georgia
" POPP, Michael, Univ Arkansas
" RAYMER, Paul, Univ Georgia
" ROSE, Paul, Univ Georgia
" SHARP, Tim, Oklahoma State Univ - Okmulgee
" SPRADLIN, David, Univ Georgia
" STARNER, David, Virginia Tech
" TAGGART, Tommy, Taggart Seeds
" THORENSON, Dale, Washington, D.C. US Canola Assn
" WARD, Rufina, Alabama A&M Univ
" WIMBERLY, Jim, Winrock International

Brief Summary of Minutes

Brief Summary of Minutes of Annual Meeting:

MULTISTATE RESEARCH COORDINATING COMMITTEE/INFORMATION EXCHANGE GROUP, SERA 11 Review and Coordination of Oilseed Rape Research Programs in the Southern Region (IEG-55) ANNUAL MEETING, Arkansas Union 504, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, April 6-7, 2006.

1.The meeting was officially called to order by Rufina Ward at 1:10 p.m. on April 06, 2006. She thanked Robert Bacon and his staff for their work in preparing and hosting the meeting, and for the exciting program they had put together, before turning the podium over to Robert Bacon, incoming chair of SERA 11 IEG 55.
2.Robert Bacon started the program by introducing Dr. Greg Weidemann, University of Arkansas Dean and VP for Research. Dr. Weidemann welcomed the group and recognized canola as having excellent potential in the southeastern region. As an alternative crop, its agronomic and pest management needs must be met. The potential and need for canola for biofuel production has been demonstrated and he stressed the significance of establishing a federal partnership.

3.After the first speaker, R. Bacon welcomed all participants and they each briefly introduced themselves (see participant list).

4.John Kelly reported on the canola breeding program at the University of Arkansas. Germplasm lines of canola adapted to the Midsouth are evaluated for yield, test weight, oil composition (total oil, low erucic acid, glucosinolate), disease resistance and agronomic characteristics. Genotype evaluation, breeding trials and national variety tests are conducted in 2 locations: Marianna (east location) and Kibler (west location). Potential parent genotypes are evaluated for high yield potential, high oil content, winter hardiness, and disease resistance.

5.Rose Gergerich, Plant Virologist, University of Arkansas, reported on vectors and incidence of aster yellows on canola. She declared that it was location, location, location, when it comes to contracting plant disease. Location is an important determinant of incidence levels. Canola is infected by viruses and phytoplasmas transmitted by leafhoppers. Other hosts for these organisms are tomato, plantain, marigold, and cone flowers.

Disease symptoms of cupping of leaves, twisting of stems, and stunted plants may be caused by phytoplasmas but PCR testing is necessary to confirm infection. Fall infection may be accompanied by severe symptoms and great yield losses. Disease management options for viruses in canola include pyrethroid insecticides, good weed control, clean seed (if seed transmitted), tolerant varieties or resistant varieties. Phytoplasma has been found to be a problem. Viruses are not yet widespread but aphid vectors have potential for diseases.

6.Michael Popp spoke on the Economic Feasibility of Canola Production. The energy price outlook was for $50-65/barrel in 2004, but since that has changed dramatically, biodiesel has become economically feasible. Biodiesel can also be made from chicken fat, beef tallow, or soybean. Using biodiesel as an additive (1% biodiesel) gives lubricating properties and will replace sulfur, but will not affect diesel price much.

More oil crops are needed for biodiesel to alleviate dependence on foreign oil. Canola is a promising oil crop. Marianna, AR has been the best location for canola in Arkansas where an average of 2308 lb/acre has been produced. Prices are driven by oil/meal demand, but currently $11.50/lb is the market value in Vancouver, Canada. Canola is typically 80% of the market value of soybean. Current numbers would indicate that returns of canola production in Arkansas would be very favorable compared to wheat or soybeans.

7.Cal McCastalin from Patriot Biofuels, Inc. spoke of the growing biodiesel industry in Arkansas. The Midsouth as a region is ideally situated as a key energy producer. Besides his company, Eastman Chemicals is interested in biodiesel and is becoming a major player. The biodiesel industry is trying to encourage canola production because oil production per acre is the important issue. He felt that US policy, public agencies and industry can bring the crop to fruition and give value added to the farmers. Agriculture research and extension programs are critical because they have the network to piece everything together.

8.Mark Boyles, Extension Specialist at OSU, discussed the growing canola industry in Oklahoma. It started as small-plot research and the primary goal was to have a rotational crop with wheat to clean-up weed problems, primarily Italian Ryegrass. The effort to educate farmers on growing winter canola began in 2003 with 10 farmers with 10 acres each. It expanded in 2004 to about 16,000 acres; in 2005 it has grown to 50,000-65,000 acres. Chad Godsey, Kansas State University, discussed the KSU/OSU joint breeding program. He described the breeding objectives and variety trials that are conducted. He indicated their production research was limited to Central Great Plains.

9.Dale Thorenson updated the group on national canola issues. He discussed a crop amendment to the FY 2006 Agriculture Appropriations Bill passed by the House and Senate and signed into law concerning Federal Crop Insurance, as well as the Emergency Agricultural Disaster Assistance Act of 2006. He also talked about the efforts to get funding that would help the biodiesel industry. He announced the USCA-sponsored Canola Research Conference will be on November 12-15 in Indianapolis in conjunction with the ASA meetings.

10.The group adjourned and met at the Downtown Radisson for a reception and dinner.

11.The group reconvened on the morning of April 7. The meeting was called to order at 7:56 a.m. with Rufina Ward presiding for the business meeting. The following items were covered:

a)Minutes from 2005 meeting were presented for review. Paul Raymer made the motion to accept the minutes and David Starner seconded. The 2005 minutes were accepted.

b)Discussion: Canola Meeting. Other Canola meetings for 2006 and 2007 were announced by Dale Thorenson; they will be mailed again to everyone. It was suggested to have a meeting with other regional groups similar to the regional wheat meeting. It was announced that the International Rapeseed Meeting will be held in China in 2007.

c)Expiration Date for SERA IEG. Ruben Moore reminded the group that SERA-IEG 11 will expire in 2007, but that an easy one-year extension can be obtained. A decision must be made by next year about renewal.

d)State Reports.

i)Alabama Report: U.R. Bishnoi. Although there is no commercial acreage of canola in AL, he recommended other universities should follow Oklahomas lead in getting farmers to grow canola. Although in Alabama, Auburn University dropped canola due to lack of interest by growers, the AAMU Research Director supported canola research. Ernie Cebert discussed ongoing breeding for early maturity. The thesis work on blackleg by A. Ananga has been completed with promising results. A biomass and nutrient uptake study is ongoing by C. Bell. Additional studies include rapeseed biofumigation work in rotation with cotton and a nutritional study of canola as a green vegetable. Rufina Ward summarized ongoing work on insect-canola interaction at AAMU. She is involved in bionomics study and the chemical control of cabbage seedpod weevil.

ii)Arkansas Report: Robert Bacon. Although there was no commercial acreage of canola in AR for 2005-06, it appears that some acreage may be planted during the 2006-07 season. The breeding program continues with several germplasm lines released and if commercial production begins in the state it is anticipated that the next release will be a variety. There are currently two biodiesel plants operating with more being planned for the state.

iii)Georgia Report: Paul Raymer. He indicated that the breeding program is suspended and that no more crosses are being made. However they will continue moving advanced lines, mostly spring types and specialty oil lines.

Double haploid work for IMI resistance continues and advances are being made in blackleg resistance with North Dakotas Carl Bradley. Variety testing continues with Paul Rose and Don Day. The Disease Nursery (managed by Don Phillips and David Spalding) for blackleg and scleretonia continues to identify resistant germplasm. There are about 100 acres of winter canola production. There are two biodiesel plants in GA - Rome and a new plant in Dublin.

iv)Virginia Report: David Starner. He discussed work on canola nutritional requirements and response (boron, sulfur, phosphorus). Results indicate that high P provides good winter resistance. There is biodiesel interest by small groups in VA. There is no commercial production; however, 600 acres will be planted by a group of entrepreneurs for biodiesel to be used in construction vehicles in D.C. The breeding line VX1 is being increased for release.

End of State Reports

e)General Discussions:

Paul Raymer reminded the group they should thank David Buntin for being the representative for SERA and keeping the funds coming to the region. On behalf of the group Ernst Cebert thanked Rufina Ward and Robert Bacon for working hard to bring representatives from the Midwest (OK and KS) to participate in the SERA-IEG 11 meeting. Rufina Ward also thanked Dr. Moore for his leadership as coordinator for the SERA-IEG 11. Dr. Moore suggested that the group should seek to get research money from the DOE.

Paul Rose suggested that the SERA meeting could be held for one day rather than the current two half-day arrangement. The ensuing discussion and vote resulted in continuing the current system of two half-day meetings. It was decided that the group should meet at ASA in Indianapolis (November 2006) to serve as a substitute for the 2007 SERA-IEG 11 meeting. It was pointed out that the Midwest does not have an organized group similar to SERA-IEG. Oklahoma was suggested as a potential host for future SERA-IEG annual meetings. Maybe SERA-IEG should invite the Southern Illinois canola group to join SERA-IEG. The group will use the ASA/canola symposium in Indianapolis in November 2006 to discuss the possibility of bringing all groups together.

Dr. Ward pointed out the NIMSS website needs to be up-dated or that SERA-IEG 11 should possibly have its own website.

f)Financial Report: Robert Bacon

2005 from Virginia: $180 registration
$280 previous balance
Balance $460

2006 @ Arkansas: $505 registration
$460 previous balance
Balance:$965

g)Nomination of Secretary/Treasurer for 2007:

Ernst Cebert nominated Paul Rose of Georgia. Dave Starner and David Buntin seconded the motion. Paul Rose was unanimously elected as Secretary/Treasurer.

Business meeting adjourned at 10:22 a.m. central standard time.

The group proceeded to visit winter canola field plots at the University of Arkansas research station in Fayetteville.

Accomplishments:

Impact Statements:

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top

Report Information

Participants

Robert Bacon  University of Arkansas
John Kelly  University of Arkansas
Ruben Moore  Mississippi State University (Administrative Advisor)
Charles Parsons  University of Arkansas
Paul Raymer  University of Georgia
David Starner  Virginia Tech University
Rufina Ward  Alabama A & M University

Brief Summary of Minutes

" The minutes of April 6-7, 2006 meeting as posted on the SERA IEG website and the financial report presented by R. Bacon were unanimously approved.

" Discussion was opened regarding the need to nominate a new Treasurer since Paul Rose, who was elected at the meeting in Fayetteville in April 2006, no longer works for the University of Georgia. After some discussion, a motion was made and the vote carried that a new nominee would be selected by asking the participants, through the groups list-serve, to nominate candidates after which an electronic vote would be conducted to elect the Chairperson for 2007-2008. It was agreed that once a new officer is elected, that person will select a site for the 2008 meeting.

" It was discussed and agreed that efforts should be made to include the Midwest Canola group in our activities as much as possible.

" A motion was made and the vote carried that the November 14, 2006 meeting would substitute for the 2007 annual meeting.

" It was noted that the SERA 11 IEG 55 regional proposal must be rewritten for 2007 submission.

The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 pm by Robert Bacon.

Accomplishments

Publications

Impact Statements

Back to top