SAES-422 Multistate Research Activity Accomplishments Report

Status: Approved

Basic Information

Participants

Paul Raymer, The University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu; Al Smith, The University of Georgia, asmith@uga.edu; Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwj@vsu.edu ; Ernst Cebert, Alabama A & M Univ., ecebert@aamu.edu; Randy Saunders, Mississippi State University, rsaunders@ra.msstate.edu; Joe Johnson, Mississippi State University, jjohnson@ra.msstate.edu; Paul Rose, The University of Georgia, prose@griffin.peachnet.edu; Dave Starner, V.P.I., nparec@vt.edu; George A.Shumaker, University of Georgia, dphilli@griffin.peachnet.edu; Dan Phillips, The University of Georgia, dphilli@griffin.peachnet.edu; David Wright, The University of Florida, dlw@mail.ifas.ufl.edu; Timothy Grey, The University of Georgia, tgrey@griffin.peachnet.edu; Paul Mask, Auburn, University, pmask@acesag.auburn.edu; J. LaDon Day, University of Georgia, day@griffin.peachnet.edu; Chairman: Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, hbhardwj@vsu.edu; Secy/Treasurer: Paul Raymer, The University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu; Chairman Select: Paul Raymer, The University of Georgia, praymer@griffin.peachnet.edu; Secy/Treasurer: Ernst Cebert, Alabama A & M Univ., ecebert@aamu.edu;

1. The meeting was called to order by Harbans Bhardwaj at 1:00 P.M. on Thursday, March 28, 2002 in the conference room of the Flynt Building on the Griffin campus of The University of Georgia. All participants were introduced. $280 were collected as registrations ($20 per person) to cover meeting expenses associated with refreshments for the breaks and the evening meal.

2. Dr. Jerry Arkin, Assistant Dean and Director of the Griffin Campus, welcomed the group and challenged the group to take technologies developed through research to farmers and demonstrate impact of our combined research effort. He also pointed out the need for more industry involvement in the group.

3. Dr. Al Smith, Administrative Advisor to the group stated that a new Extension Advisor was to be appointed by the Southern Directors in April. He also indicated that a project summary was needed for the Southern Directors Web Page.

4. George Shumaker, Extension Economist with UGA made a presentation on the Georgia Oilseed Initiative, a project whereby Georgia farmers have formed a New Generation Cooperative and plan to build and operate an oilseed crushing and refining facility for Southeastern grown oilseeds including canola. This venture will be primarily focused on value added processing of identity preserved oilseeds. Dr. Shumaker also discussed other value added opportunities such as biodiesel and export of non GMO canola.

5. Dr. Harbans Bhardwaj presented data on the nutritional quality of canola seed sprouts and green foliage and discussed the potential of using canola to produce seed sprouts. Other fresh market possibilities such as use of canola for greens and flower shoots as a fresh vegetable were discussed.

6. Dr. Dan Phillips presented extensive data regarding phyto geographic and genotype symptom associations in Sclerotina, a common fungal disease of canola. His research clearly indicates that both the rosette and the more common stem infections are caused by the same organism, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum . Furthermore he was able to document the widespread presence of very old phytotypes of the fungus which were present in the Southeast long before the introduction of canola as well as the presence of ne7. Immediately following the afternoon break (3:15 P.M.), the group visited research plots located at the Bledsoe Research Farm near Griffin. Field presentations on new herbicide resistance technologies, variety testing, and cultivar development were made by Tim Grey, Don Day/Paul Rose, and Paul Raymer, respectively. The group was given the opportunity to view the associated research plots.

8. The group enjoyed and opportunity for informal conversation from 6:30 to 8:00 P.M. with a social mixer and dinner at the Woodruff Pavilion on the Griffin Campus.

9. The group reconvened at 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 29 in the Flynt Building conference on the Griffin Campus of The University of Georgia.

10. Dr. Timothy Grey presented weed control research findings on the effectiveness of herbicide resistance systems in canola. Clearfield, Roundup Ready, and Liberty Link weed control systems were compared for their ability to control wild radish, ryegrass, and other common weeds found in canola.. Based on Dr. Grey‘s first year results, it appears that both Clearfield (IMI tolerant) and Roundup Ready systems have great potential for the Southeast in that they will provide excellent control of wild radi11. Dr. David Buntin provided the group with an update on federal and state registration of canola pesticides. He distributed a list of herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides that are currently approved for use on canola.

12. Dr. David Wright made a presentation on canola production and research programs in Florida. Florida provides a testing site for southern spring cultivars through its participation in the regional testing program. Research is also underway to develop viable multiple cropping systems involving canola for the panhandle region of Florida. Data from tillage treatments within double cropping systems using canola or wheat followed by cotton, peanut, and soybean were presented. Data was also presented o13. Dr. Ernst Cebert presented an overview of past, present and future canola research at Alabama A&M University. A number of faculty there have become involved in various aspects of canola production research.

14. Following the morning break, David Buntin provided an update on the U.S. Canola Research Program. The 2002 program funded eight projects in the southern region and provided a total of $112,320 in canola related research support.

15. Dr. Paul Raymer presented an overview of the UGA canola cultivar development program. This program is focused on the development of both canola quality and speciality oil cultivars that are specifically adapted to the Southeast. Dr. Raymer indicated that good progress has been made. He has plans to release two cultivars and two germplasm lines within the next year.

16. Brief state reports were presented by representatives from Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Virginia. All indicated little or no commercial production of canola.

17. Following the state reports the group held it‘s annual business meeting. Dr. Smith informed the group that this regional project is due to terminate soon and asked for discussion regarding whether the project should be renewed. Options discussed were: 1) to continue "as is", 2) to link with other canola groups in other regions of the U.S. and rotate responsibility for hosting an annual meeting, and 3) to meet within the region in alternating years and with other regional groups the other years. A motion was made by Dan Phillips and seconded by Dave Starner to renew the project. The motion passed without opposition. Paul Raymer was directed to develop a project summary and to complete the necessary paperwork for renewal.

18. Other business included election of a new secretary/treasurer for the group. Ernst Cebert was elected to this position without opposition.

19. The venue for the 2003 meeting was discussed at length. Harbans Bhardwaj and David Starner invited the group to meet in Petersburg, VA. The possibility of meeting in Washington, D.C. in conjunction with the National Research Conference as also proposed. No consensus was reached on the venue and the officers were directed to continue to explore these possibilities as well as other options and reach a decision.

20. The group thanked David Spradlin, Dan Phillips and Paul Raymer for their assistance in preparing for the meeting. Al Smith thanked all participants. The meeting adjourned at approximately 12:00 noon.

Accomplishments

(None specified in Minutes above.)

Impacts

Publications

Log Out ?

Are you sure you want to log out?

Press No if you want to continue work. Press Yes to logout current user.

Report a Bug
Report a Bug

Describe your bug clearly, including the steps you used to create it.