SAES-422 Multistate Research Activity Accomplishments Report

Status: Approved

Basic Information

Participants

Phil Sloderbeck, Kansas State University; Bryan Fontes, New Mexico State University; Kirk Anderson, North Dakota State University; Tom Royer, Oklahoma State University; Ed Bynum Texas, Agrilife Extension; Roxanne Fegley, Agrilife Extension; Cheryl Baker, USDA-ARS Stillwater, Oklahoma; Barbara Driskel, USDA-ARS Stillwater, Oklahoma; Do Mornihnweg, USDA-ARS Stillwater, Oklahoma; Gary Puterka, USDA-ARS Stillwater, Oklahoma; Kevin Surfran, USDA-ARS Stillwater, Oklahoma; Jim Webster, USDA-ARS Stillwater, Oklahoma; Christie Williams, USDA-ARS West Lafayette, Indiana; Vicki Tolmay, ARC-SGI Bethlehem, South Africa; Tom Holtzer, Colorado State University

WERA 066 was held in conjunction with the joint meeting of the South West Branch of the Entomological Society of America and the Society of south West Entomologists, which ran from February 23-26 in Stillwater, OK. The session took place in the Wes Watkins Center, room 101, on the campus of Oklahoma State University. 1:30 pm  Business Meeting Chair Tom Royer called the meeting to order and began with a round of introductions by those in attendance. Tom then read the minutes of the 2008 meeting that was held in Ft. Collins, CO. Phil Sloderbeck moved that the minutes be approved and Do Mornhinweg seconded the motion, which then carried. Tom Holtzer, the WERA 066 Administrative Advisor, informed the group that a mid-term review is due this year. The report will focus on outcomes and impacts of this group. This report will be prepared by Chair Tom Royer and Secretary Christie Williams. 1:55 pm  Discussion and Oral Summaries of State Reports North Dakota - Kirk Anderson Several surveys were conducted during the past two years. The 2007 IPM Survey focused on grain aphids, grasshoppers, cereal leaf beetle, wheat stem maggot and barley thrips. The use of insecticide was a key factor in preserving the high quality of barley so that farmers could sell the crop for malting rather than as lower quality feed barley. In addition, 2008 surveys were done for orange wheat blossom midge, wheat stem saw fly, plus other insects and diseases. The 2008 Hessian fly Survey characterized the utility of a five-component blend of sex-pheromones to determine geographic distribution, seasonal abundance and number of generations per year. Results indicated that the Hessian fly is distributed state-wide. Populations peaked in midsummer and again in September, indicating a lack of aestivation. The fall emergence occurred after the suggested wheat planting date (fly-free date). A general discussion about Hessian fly followed. Researchers from several states reported using or having interest in using the Hessian fly pheromones to characterize populations. Phil Sloderbeck said that, similar to North Dakota, in Kansas Hessian fly flights were later in the fall than expected, after the fly-free date for planting wheat. Some years, such as 2008, wheat must be planted late due to weather conditions. At the Colorado-Kansas border Hessian fly populations seemed high, probably due to two factors: higher than normal rainfall in August causing sprouting of volunteer wheat that serves as insect refuge and continuous no-till wheat, without rotation or fallow, that allows survival. Hessian fly hadnt been seen in that region for over 20 years. Pyrethroids were effective in controlling Hessian fly. A new flyer on Hessian fly is on Phils web site http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/library/entml2/MF2866.pdf. Kirk Anderson mentioned that in North Dakota some durum wheat cultivars that were never intentionally bred for Hessian fly-resistance are quite resistant. Similar observations were made in Oklahoma. Christie Williams notes that durum wheats have been a strong source of resistance genes that have been introgressed into common wheat in the Purdue breeding program (added to the minutes). It was mentioned that the fly-free dates that were first promoted in the 1920s may not be accurate today. Hessian flies have been observed to fly even in cold weather. It was mentioned that a fall infestation of Hessian fly may not necessarily lead to high spring infestations or crop damage. This is believed to be because Hessian flies damage the tiller on which they reside and tillers that form later are normal unless a secondary infestation occurs. A short discussion on Hessian fly population movement followed. It was reported that an edge effect can be observed in a field if adjacent to a no-till field with high populations. But Kirk Anderson and Christie Williams mentioned that Hessian flies are not strong flyers so dont migrate far, but could be dispersed by wind. Marion Harris has a paper published on this topic. Oklahoma  Do Mornhinweg, Cheryl Baker and Gary Puterka Fifty Russian Wheat Aphid-resistant barley lines have been released to date. In collaborative research QTL analysis identified two major and one minor locus contributing to resistance, and mapping of resistance genes is being pursued. Differentials for biotype 1 and 2 are being pursued. Studies are ongoing to monitor RWA biotype diversity throughout the US and identify zones where RWA may become holocyclic. Parasitoids of greenbug have been identified. A general discussion followed, concerning whether different RWA biotypes were distinct introductions or whether the same biotypes spontaneously evolved in multiple locations. Texas  Roxanne Fegley and Ed Bynum Greenbug infestations are now at levels that warrant treatment. Also, RWA and Hessian fly have been found in Texas. A study of perennial grasses offers an opportunity to monitor movement and virus vectoring of wheat curl mite. Indiana  Christie Williams Several molecular studies are underway. The Shukle lab is characterizing genes encoding Hessian fly secreted salivary gland proteins, believed to be effectors that induce plant susceptibility as well as avirulence proteins that induce resistance. The sequence diversity of these genes is greater in Israeli populations than in the US. These Israeli genes may be ancestral types. The Shukle and Williams labs have done a transmission electron microscopy study showing that midgut microvilli are disrupted in avirulent Hessian fly larvae feeding for just three hours on resistant wheat plants. After six hours of feeding the microvilli are absent. The microvilli do not deteriorate in virulent larvae and larvae starved on filter paper. Thus, the resistant wheat plant quickly responds and inflicts damage to avirulent larvae. The Williams lab has identified several genes encoding lectins that may disrupt the Hessian fly larval midgut. These lectins target high-mannose glycoproteins that are believed to be common in insect midgut. Virulent Hessian fly larvae alter the physiology of their host plants, causing them to produce aminoacids and polyamines that are beneficial to the insects. In addition their data supports findings by the Harris lab that has shown that epidermal cells of susceptible plants degrade when under attack. Virulent larvae are able to cause loss of cutin in the cuticle of wheat leaves at feeding sites and suppress production of mRNA encoding lipid transfer genes. These changes are thought to lead to loss of cell integrity and general increase in permeability that delivers nutrients to the larvae. The Stuart lab is using a map-based approach to locate Hessian fly genes that allow them to be virulent on wheat containing resistance genes H6, H9 and H13. These genes have been mapped to 80- to120-kb segments on chromosomes X1 and X2. Associative mapping with Hessian fly populations from five southeastern states identified diagnostic markers, visualized on agarose gels, for flies virulent to these genes and supports the gene-for-gene basis of interaction with wheat. 4:40 pm - Identification of Secretary and Location for Next Meeting Gary Puterka was nominated by Do Mornhinweg he and accepted. The current secretary, Christie Williams will become the next chair. Kevin Surfran moved that Ft. Collins Co be the location of the 2010 WERA 066 meeting and Phil Sloderbeck seconded the motion, which then carried. 4: 48 pm - Adjournment Phil Sloderbeck moved the meeting be adjourned and Do Mornhinweg seconded the motion, which then carried.

Accomplishments

ACCOMPLISHMENTS HIGHLIGHTS (SEE ATTACHMENTS UNDER MINUTES FOR FULL STATE REPORTS) Colorado State University Plant Resistance 1. Winter wheat lines with the 2414-11 resistance source continue to be advanced. Lines with other sources are in earlier stages of development. 2 Surveys were conducted to determine the presence of Dn4-virulent Russian wheat aphids. Russian wheat aphid remained scarce in 2008, but the percentage of samples containing Dn-4 virulent aphids has continued to increase since the initial survey in 2004 (98% in 2008). No virulence to 2414-11 was detected. Biology and Management 1. Dryland cropping systems studies are ongoing at three locations in eastern Colorado. Stoneham, a RWA-resistant feed barley, has been added to some rotations. Generally, rotations have been modified to incorporate more forages, and sunflower has been eliminated. 2. High elevation noncultivated grass hosts were surveyed for a fifth season. Oversummering Russian wheat aphids appear to be widespread in noncultivated grasses at higher elevations, but their relationship to wheat production is unknown. +++++++++++++++++++ USDA-ARS Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 1 Analyzing the diversity of secreted salivary gland transcripts in Hessian fly populations from Israel and the United States The salivary glands and midgut of the larval Hessian fly are the primary interfaces with wheat. Little is known about the roles of these two organs in the interactions between larval Hessian fly and wheat. However, secreted salivary gland proteins (SSGPs) in the larval Hessian fly are hypothesized to be the effectors reprogramming host-plant tissues in compatible interactions with susceptible wheat and to be the avirulence gene products eliciting resistance in incompatible interactions with resistant wheat. Initial comparison of the transcripts encoding SSGPs in populations of Hessian fly from Israel has revealed greater diversity than is present in populations from the United States. Some of these divergent SSGPs in Israeli populations fall basal in phylogenetic analyses to clades containing families of SSGPs, suggesting these divergent SSGPs may represent ancestral types. Through comparative analyses, bioinformatics, and functional analyses we seek to gain insight into the possible evolution of these SSGP effectors and their roles in the interactions between larval Hessian fly and wheat. 2 Ultrastructural changes in the midgut of Hessian fly larvae feeding on resistant wheat The Hessian fly is present in all the wheat producing regions of the United States and is the most important insect pest in the southeastern soft-winter-wheat region. Genotypes of the pest that can overcome formerly resistant wheat continue to appear and pose a threat to wheat production. There is a need to better understand the mechanisms by which resistant plants are able to prevail over larval attack. The midgut is one of the major interfaces between the larval Hessian fly and its host plant. The goal of the present study was to determine if ultrastructural changes occur in the midguts of larvae feeding on resistant wheat compared to larvae feeding on susceptible wheat and larvae experiencing starvation while removed from the plant. Results have revealed that within three hours of initiating feeding on resistant wheat midgut microvilli were disrupted and after six hours microvilli were absent. These microvilli disruptions observed in Hessian fly larvae feeding on resistant wheat were similar to those occurring in midgut microvilli of Drosophila larvae fed on a diet containing 1% wheat germ agglutinin. These results suggest the midgut is a major target of toxic plant compounds such as lectins that may play a pivotal role in resistance. 3. Characterization of wheat plant processes manipulated by Hessian fly larvae Interactions of first-instar Hessian fly larvae with resistant wheat plants result in induction of plant defenses. One component of this defense response is the production of lectins that can function as feeding deterrents or antinutritional proteins when ingested by larvae. Wheat lectin genes that are responsive to avirulent Hessian fly larvae were cloned into expression vectors the proteins were harvested from E. coli. One of the lectins has been used in glycan binding arrays demonstrating its high affinity for high-mannose glycoproteins. This class of glycoproteins is common to larval midguts, suggesting that the lectin functions to disrupt the integrity of digestive membranes. Immunodetection indicated that the lectin increases in abundance once resistant plants are challenged with larvae and that larvae ingest the lectin. Messages encoding class III peroxidases also increased in abundance in resistant plants suggesting a role in resistance for genes involved in production of reactive oxygen species. 4. Hessian fly-resistance genes Previously published papers indicated that Hessian fly-resistance genes H26 and H32 reside in similar locations within the wheat genome. An integrated mapping approach demonstrated that H26 and H32 are either alternative alleles or tightly linked resistance genes that are effective against slightly different larval genotypes. Molecular markers were developed that will be useful in introgressing these genes into cultivars. +++++++++++++++++ Department of Entomology, Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 1. Progress toward understanding Hessian fly biotypes. It has long been hypothesized that single Avirulence (Avr) genes in the Hessian fly determine the virulence and avirulence of Hessian fly biotypes to specific Hessian fly resistance (R) genes in wheat. Taking a map-based approach to test this hypothesis, we have attempted to position the Avr mutations that condition virulence to R genes H6, H9, and H13 in wheat. Using backcross populations and recombinant inbred lines, we positioned Avr gene vH9, which corresponds to R gene H9, to a 120-kb segment of the genome near the telomere of the short arm of Hessian fly chromosome X1. Using the same approach, we positioned Avr gene vH13, which corresponds to R gene H13, to an 80-kb segment of the genome near the telomere of the short arm of Hessian fly chromosome X2. We then performed association mapping using Hessian fly populations collected in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Florida to determine if the positions of the genes could be further resolved. Results suggest that the mutations that caused virulence to both H9 and H13 can be easily observed on agarose gels and may serve as diagnostic markers for Hessian flies that are virulent to these genes. Results clearly indicate that Hessian fly virulence and avirulence to specific resistance genes in wheat results from mutations in single genes. Thus, the wheat-Hessian fly interaction clearly appears to have a gene-for-gene basis. The Hessian fly physical map is available as a Hessian fly Web FPC: http://genome.purdue.edu/WebAGCoL/Hfly/WebFPC/ +++++++++++++++++ Department of Entomology, Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 1. Feeding Behavior of Russian Wheat Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Biotype 2 in Response to Wheat Genotypes Exhibiting Antibiosis and Tolerance Resistance. Wheat genotypes containing the Dnx, Dn7, Dn6, and Dn4 genes for resistance to the Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov), along with Dn0, a susceptible control, were assessed to determine the categories of D. noxia biotype 2 (RWA2) resistance in each genotype and RWA2 feeding behaviors on Dnx and Dn0 plants by using the electronic penetration graph technique. At 14 d post-infestation, Dn0 plants exhibited intense chlorosis and leaf rolling, and all test genotypes expressed some degree of chlorosis and leaf rolling, except Dn7, which was not damaged. Both Dn7 and Dnx expressed antibiosis effects, significantly reducing the numbers of aphids on plants and the intrinsic rate of aphid increase. Dn6 plants appeared to contain tolerance, exhibiting tolerance index measurements for leaf and root dry weight and plant height that were significantly lower than those of the susceptible Dn0 plants. Principal component analyses indicated that antibiosis and leaf rolling data explained 80% of the variance among genotypes. Electronic penetration graph analysis demonstrated contrasting results between RWA1 and RWA2 phloem sieve element phase feeding events, but results indicated that Dnx resistance factors are present in the sieve element cells or phloem sap. Plants containing Dnx exhibit antibiosis resistance to D. noxia RWA2 similar to that in plants containing the rye-based Dn7 gene without the negative baking quality traits associated with Dn7. 2. Global Phylogenetics of an Invasive Aphid Species: Evidence for Multiple Invasions into North America. Critical to the study of an invasive species is understanding the number of invasions that have occurred, as well as the rate or potential of post-invasion adaptation and geographic range expansion. One virulent, invasive insect species that has caused much damage in the United States is the Russian wheat aphid, D. noxia. Past research on D. noxia has suggested that up to eight biotypes, defined based on their ability to damage different wheat and barley genotypes, have diverged and radiated across the western United States from a single, common ancestral invasion in 1986. The goal of our study was to address the basic question of are all biotypes of D. noxia the by-product of a single invasion or multiple invasions into North America?. We utilized the genome-wide technique of amplified fragment length polymorphisms, in combination with collections of D. noxia from around the World, to assess this question, as well as patterns of genetic divergence. We found that there were at least two invasions into North America, each resulting in subsequent post-invasion diversification that has since yielded multiple biotypes. 3. Categories of Resistance in Barley Against Russian Wheat Aphid, Diuraphis noxia Biotypes 1 and 2. The emergence of Russian wheat aphid, D. noxia, biotype 2 (RWA2) in Colorado has made all known Dn genes vulnerable except the Dn7 gene from rye, Secale cereale, and has warranted exploration for sources of resistance to RWA1 and RWA2. The mechanism of resistance with the resistant donor plants is considered important in terms of their influence to exert selection pressure over the aphid population for selection into new virulent population. We report tolerance and antibiosis categories of resistance to RWA1 and RWA2, in the barley cultivar Stoneham. The rate and degree of expression of resistance by Stoneham against RWA1 and RWA2 though not similar, is greater than Sidney, which showed partial resistance. Antixenosis was not apparent in either Sidney or Stoneham against either RWA1 or RWA2. Tolerance in Stoneham, expressed as reduced tissue dry weight loss and reduced tolerance index values, indicated that cultivation of Stoneham will delay the chances of RWA biotype selection. The reactions of Stoneham to RWA2 indicate that it is a good source of donor for future resistance breeding strategies against RWA. 4. Analysis of Transcripts and Proteins Expressed in the Salivary Glands of Hessian Fly Hessian fly (HF) (Mayetiola destructor) larvae are thought to manipulate host growth and metabolism through salivary secretions. However, the transcriptome and proteome of HF salivary glands have not been systematically analyzed. In this research, we analyzed Expressed-Sequence-Tags (EST) representing 6,106 cDNA clones randomly selected from four libraries made from dissected salivary glands. We also analyzed the protein composition of dissected salivary glands using one- and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis as well as LC-MS/MS analysis. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that approximately 60% of the total cDNA clones and 40% of assembled clusters encoded secretory proteins (SP). The SP-encoding cDNAs were grouped into superfamilies and families according to sequence similarities. In addition to the high percentage of SP-encoding transcripts, there was also a high percentage of transcripts encoding proteins that were either involved directly in protein synthesis or in house-keeping functions that provide conditions necessary for protein synthesis. Proteomic analysis also revealed a high percentage of proteins involved in protein synthesis either directly or indirectly. The high percentage of SP-encoding transcripts and high percentage of proteins related to protein synthesis suggested that the salivary glands of HF larvae are indeed specialized tissues for synthesis of proteins for host injection. However, LC-MS/MS analysis of 64 proteins did not identify any SPs corresponding to the cDNA sequences. The lack of accumulation of SPs in the salivary glands indicated the SPs were likely secreted as soon as they were synthesized. 5. Differential Responses of Wheat Inhibitor-Like Genes to Hessian Fly Attacks during Compatible and Incompatible Interactions. Four groups of inhibitor-like genes encoding proteins with diverse structures were identified from wheat. The majority of these genes were upregulated by avirulent Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), larvae during incompatible interactions, and were downregulated by virulent larvae during compatible interactions. The upregulation during incompatible interactions and downregulation during compatible interactions resulted in 4- to 30-fold differences between the expression levels in resistant plants and those in susceptible plants. The increased expression of inhibitor-like genes during incompatible interactions suggested that these genes are part of defense mechanisms in wheat against Hessian fly attacks, whereas the downregulation of these genes during compatible interactions suggested that virulent larvae can suppress plant defenses. Both the upregulation of the inhibitor-like genes during incompatible interactions by avirulent larvae and the downregulation during compatible interactions by virulent larvae were through mechanisms that were independent of the wound response pathway. 6. Testing Hessian Fly Populations for Virulence to Known Resistance Genes. In recent years, the number of wheat fields heavily infested by Hessian fly has increased in the Great Plains of the U.S. Historically, resistance genes in wheat have been the most efficient means of controlling this insect pest. To determine which resistance genes are still effective in this area, virulence of six Hessian fly populations from Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas was determined, using the resistance genes H3, H4, H5, H6, H7H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H16, H17, H18, H21, H22, H23, H24, H25, H26, H31, and Hdic. Five of the tested genes, H13, H21, H25, H26, and Hdic, conferred high levels of resistance (>80% of plants scored resistant) to all tested populations. Resistance levels for other genes varied depending on which Hessian fly population they were tested against. Biotype composition analysis of insects collected directly from wheat fields in Grayson county, Texas, revealed that the proportion of individuals within this population virulent to the major resistance genes was highly variable (89% for H6, 58% for H9, 28% for H5, 22% for H26, 15% for H3, 9% for H18, 4% for H21, and 0% for H13). Results also revealed that the percentages of biotypes virulent to specific resistance genes in a given population are highly correlated (r2 = 0.97) with the percentages of susceptible plants in a virulence test. This suggests that virulence assays, which require less time and effort, can be used to approximate biotype composition. We are currently looking to survey several locations in Kansas and have recently obtained a sample from Eastern Colorado. 7. K-State Wheat Insect Extension Activities We continue to add to revise our websites: (http://www.entomology.ksu.edu/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabindex=195&tabid=405) (http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/library/ENTML2/MF745.PDF). (http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/library/plant2/mf991.pdf). (http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/library/entml2/MF2866.pdf) (http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/library/entml2/MF2823.pdf ) (http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/library/entml2/MF2832.pdf). +++++++++++++++++ Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota 1. 2008 Hessian fly survey Objectives for 2008 were to determine if the sex-pheromone blend would be useful for monitoring Hessian fly in a field setting, and to establish the geographic distribution, seasonal abundance and number of generation per year of the Hessian fly in North Dakota. Six locations that represent the various climatic and cropping regions of the state were selected for the project. Three traps containing the sex-pheromone lure were deployed at each location. The traps were located in or near wheat plots with each trap positioned 30-60 cm above the ground. The sticky cards on the floor of each trap were replaced each week and the pheromone lure was replaced every 2-4 weeks. Ideally the traps were deployed immediately after the spring thaw and maintained in the field until fall freeze-up. From the 2008 trap collections it was determined that: a. North Dakota Hessian fly responded to the 5-component pheromone lure. b. Male flies were recovered from all six locations, which suggests that Hessian fly are distributed state-wide. c. Seasonal abundance of Hessian fly in 2008 was generally characterized by emergence taking place from early May into October, with 1 or 2 peaks in emergence occurring midsummer and a smaller peak in late September. d. Peak fly emergence generally occurred in late July to early August, this indicates that North Dakota Hessian fly did not go into aestivation during the warmest part of the growing season. e. In 2008, the fall emergence of Hessian fly coincided with or was slightly after the suggested planting period for winter wheat in North Dakota, this seems to imply that a fly-free date may not have worked. 2. Wheat stem sawfly in 2008 Wheat stem sawfly continues to be a concern for farmers in the southwestern and south-central parts of the state. Sweep-net samples from some locations yielded more than 150 sawfly per 100 sweeps. Although sawfly are usually considered a problem isolated to the western part of the state, reports from numerous growers indicate that it is moving eastward across the state. The most common method for controlling sawfly is with solid stemmed varieties. Farmers generally do not like using the solid stem varieties because of yield drag associated with the solid stem trait. NDSW0449, a new hard red spring wheat variety which has a semi-solid stem is in the process of being released. This variety has sawfly resistance and appears to yield better than most of the current sawfly-resistant varieties including Ernest which is the last NDSU variety released with sawfly resistance. The use of insecticides to control sawfly is also being considered. Dr. Janet Knodel is studying the use of insecticidal seed treatments such as Cruiser as a planting time management option. In addition to seed treatments, Dr. Knodel is also evaluating the application of insecticides at the 4-6 leaf and flag leaf stage to control adult sawfly as they emerge. Other strategies to control adult sawfly are underway in the neighboring state of Montana. Currently they are studying Braconid wasps as potential Biological control agents. If the researchers in Montana are successful, the use of parasitic wasps might also improve the sawfly situation in North Dakota. +++++++++++++++++ USDA, ARS, SPA Wheat, Peanut and Other Field Crops Research Unit Stillwater, Oklahoma 1. Barley Breeding Program A total of 50 RWA-resistant barley germplasm lines have been released to date. STARS 0501B  STARS 0507B are 6-rowed winter germplasm lines in a feed barley background, STARS 0601B - STARS 0619B are 6-rowed, spring germplasm lines in 4 malting barley backgrounds, STARS 0620B - STARS 0636B are 2-rowed spring barley germplasm lines in 4 malting barley backgrounds, and STARS 0637B- STARS 0643B are 2-rowed spring barley germplasm lines in 3 feed barley backgrounds. These germplasm lines encompass 36 different sources of resistance. These lines were developed by USDA-ARS in Stillwater, and evaluated and selected in Idaho, Colorado and/or Nebraska with assistance of. Phil Bregitzer and Don Obert, USDA-ARS, Aberdeen, ID, Frank Peairs, Colorado State University, and Gary Hein, University of Nebraska. Increases have been made prior to release of 10, RWA-resistant, 6-rowed, winter, feed barley germplasm lines resistant to both Greenbug and RWA. Four RWA-resistant barley cultivars are now available. Sidney and Stoneham are 2-rowed feed barleys bred for the high and dry plains of eastern CO and western NE. Burton and RWA1758 are 2-rowed spring feed barleys developed for dryland or irrigated production from ID to CO. Sidney and Burton have resistance from STARS 9301B and Stoneham and RWA1758 have resistance from STARS 9577B. QTL analysis done in cooperation with Shipra Mittal and Lynn Dahleen, USDA-ARS, Fargo, identified 3 QTLs associated with RWA resistance in STARS 9301B. Only 2 of these three were associated with resistance in STARS 9577B one of which showed a different gene action than in STARS 9301B. A cooperative project with Texas AgriLife is ongoing to map RWA resistance genes in 3 winter barley germplasm lines and Rsg1 and Rsg2 greenbug resistance genes. A breeding program has been initiated to develop winter, hulless, feed barleys resistant to both RWA and Greenbug, adapted to Oklahoma, and suitable for ethanol production. Hulless winter barleys, selected for adaptation to OK as well as percent starch of grain, were crossed as males to RWA and greenbug resistant lines developed by USDA-ARS in Stillwater. Crossing and backcrossing of hulless lines to selected females is ongoing. 4,000 F4 RWA/GB resistant hulless head rows are in the field this year for evaluation. 4,000 RWA/GB resistant F3 are being increased to F4 in the greenhouse and 104 hulless F2 bulks were planted in Woodward in the fall of 2008 for head selection. A seedling screening test for BCOA resistance has been developed and tested for repeatability. Two replications of the Barley Core Collection (960 accessions) were screened with this new technique in the summer of 2006. Survivors were grown in pots in the greenhouse and data collected for plant height, grain yield, and yield components. Five seed each of 364 survivors were screened with BCOA in the summer of 2007. An aphid free set of identical flats was also grown. Selected survivors from the screening were rescued and, along with their matching non-infested checks, transplanted into pots in the greenhouse. Infested and non-infested pots for each line were placed side by side on greenhouse benches for increase. Yield and yield components were measured in the spring of 2008. Results indicated that the proposed 1-7 rating scale should be downsized to 1-4. Further confirmation of the rating scale is planned for the summer of 2009. 2. Wheat Breeding Program We have continued to work on the purification of wheat differentials for use in Russian wheat aphid biotype screening trials. This material is available to other locations for use in screening tests. Usually the original resistance source for these differentials is a Plant Introduction received from the Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN); this USDA facility stores, maintains, and propagates material in a manner that retains as much of its original diversity as possible. Because most of the RWA resistant Plant Introductions are landraces that are highly heterogeneous, researchers cannot simply go back to GRIN to request another sample of a Plant Introduction and expect that sample to be the same as a previous sample. Inherent differences from location to location, and even within a single location, make the use of standardized differentials imperative. We have continued in the quest to find additional sources of RWA resistance that are resistant to RWA1 and RWA2. In our tests, germplasm release STARS-0601 has continued to have the strongest resistance available to all RWA biotypes against which it has been tested. 3. RWA Biotype Diversity and Ecology Studies have been ongoing since 2006 on the ecology of overwintering RWA in diverse environments to determine if and how sexual reproduction (holocycle) occurs and its role in biotype development. Only a few populations collected from the wheat belt east of the Rocky Mountains produced only oviparae, thus were not holocyclic. In 2006, this research was further expanded to include the Colorado Plateau where three other Diuraphis spp. endemic to the U.S.A., D. tritici, D. nodulus, and D. frequens, were known to produce overwintering eggs. In the spring of 2007, a small holocyclic population of RWA was located in Dolores County, Colorado. Ninty-three fundatricies were collected from grasses and wheat and identified by morphological traits at this site and evaluated on 16 plant entries that included Dn1-Dn9, CI 2401, and 2414-11 RWA resistance sources, two susceptible wheat entries, and the resistant barely sources Stars 9577B, STARS 9301, and susceptible Schyler. These evaluations determined that the population was comprised of 47 phenotypes which included biotypes RWA1, 2, 6, 7, and 8. Terry Randolf and Frank Peairs (CSU), independently evaluated 9 fundatricies from this site and identified 5 unique phenotypes. Although we were not able to locate this site in time to verify the presence of RWA males, dead oviparae were found in wheat collected from this site. We concluded that RWA can go holocyclic and lay overwintering eggs that hatch in late March. The genetic recombination that resulted from sexual reproduction is responsible for the high degree of variation in the population we sampled. Studies are ongoing to further characterize the phenotypic and genetic diversity of the RWA populations from the Colorado Plateau region. Future efforts will include monitoring locations throughout the USA to characterize RWA biotypic diversity and identify other ecological zones where RWA may go holocyclic and generate the biotypic diversity that is currently being found in the field. 4. Molecular Ecology of Cereal Aphids and their Natural Enemies The cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COXI) mtDNA gene was sequenced the from following species which are all autoecious holocyclic on grasses; D. noxia, D. tritici, D. frequens, D. mexicana, Schizaphis graminum, Sipha flava, S. elegans, and Sitobion avenae. Based on the COXI, DNA barcoding successfully identified and separated the 4 Diuraphis aphids at any life stage, including eggs. This assay can be used in field surveys to accurately determine eggs, nymphs, adults, and sexuales. In research with Dr. Jack Dillwith (Oklahoma State University), it was determined that although individual clones of Diuraphis noxia could be distinguished by cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles, biotypes 1 and 2 could not. There was continuous overlap in CHC profiles between the two biotypes. CHCs are another character in which D. noxia shows phenotypic plasticity, even within biotypes. 5. Greenbug Ecology and Biotypic Diversity A regional survey of Hymenopterous parasitoids reared from mummified cereal aphids has been completed. Parasitoids were collected from the western slope of the Rocky Mountains in New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming. Parasitoids recovered included, Aphilinus albipodus , 2 unknown A. spp., Diaeretiella rapae, Lysiphlebus testaceipes, Aphidius colemani, and Ephedrus plagiator. Parasitoids attacked aphids on a variety of host plants, including wheat, barley, mountain brome, lovegrass, and crested wheatgrass. Collaborative work with Texas AgriLife Research, Amarillo, (Y. Weng, H. Lu, and J. Rudd) focused on mapping greenbug resistance genes Gb2 and Gb6 continues, and thus far, eight markers linked with Gb2 and Gb6 have been identified. In 2008, Collaborative research with the Energy Biosciences Institute, University of Illinois (J. Prasifka and J. Bradshaw) was initiated to assess the role of potential biofuel crops as hosts/reservoirs for agricultural pests (primarily aphids). 6. Remote sensing of cereal aphids In conjunction with collaborator Georges Backoulou from Oklahoma State University we are reporting on progress in remote sensing for monitoring Russian wheat aphids and greenbugs in wheat. The objectives were to assess whether variation in light reflectance form plants infested with varying densities of greenbugs could be detected using airborne imaging obtained with a multi-spectral digital camera mounted in a fixed wing aircraft. In a replicated experiment where greenbug density was manipulated in 1-m2 plots of two winter wheat varieties (Jagger and OK 101) planted in a field, we found that wheat infested with greenbugs exhibited different reflectance responses for the two varieties. Both varieties showed a reduction in the normalized differenced vegetation index (NDVI) as greenbug density increased as indicated by a negative slope for the regression of NDVI on greenbug density. The slope for Jagger was greater in magnitude (-0.0031) than the slope for OK 101 (-0.0011). The regressions indicated that NDVI decreased more rapidly as greenbug density increased for Jagger than for OK 101. A second vegetation index, Green NDVI, responded similarly to NDVI with increasing greenbug density. In large plots in four production winter wheat fields we found significant negative correlations between greenbug density and the above mentioned vegetation indices for three of the four fields. For the Russian wheat aphid we assessed the potential of using multispectral imagery and a spatial pattern recognition approach to identify and spatially quantify D. noxia infestations within wheat fields. Data used included multispectral imagery acquired from April - May 2005, and 2007, in the vicinity of Boise City, OK. Stress to wheat in fields was grouped into categories: D. noxia, drought and cultural issues. ERDAS Imagine software was used to process and analyze images. FRAGSTATS was used to quantify spatial pattern. Ten landscape metrics were computed at the class level for each stress factor. The analysis of variance of each landscape metric revealed that the shape of each kind of stress was different. The combination of multispectral data and landscape metrics made it possible to distinguish areas in fields infested by D. noxia from areas affected by drought or cultural issues. +++++++++++++++++ Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 1. Projects in 2008 a. Intraguild Interactions among Schizaphis graminum, Lysiphlebus testaceipes, and Coccinellidae in Winter Wheat. b. Predator Movement in Wheat Cropping Systems. Studies have been initiated to examine the colonizing ability of Carabidae. Trapping and molecular techniques will be used to describe movement. c. Evaluations of Variety and Insecticidal Seed Treatments for Hessian Fly Management. Field evaluations of elite lines of wheat for control of Hessian fly. In addition, a survey of wheat fields was conducted through the Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS). Hessian fly was becoming more widely distributed, but Russian wheat aphid was not present in any of the fields checked. Barley Yellow Dwarf virus and Wheat Streak Mosaic virus were also detected. d. Synopsis of Arthropod Pest Activity in Wheat, 2007-2008 Overall, pest pressure in 2007-08 was mild. An outbreak of armyworms occurred in spring of 2007 and an outbreak of fall armyworms occurred in fall 2008. Greenbug pressure is building as of now. Hessian fly is increasing in Oklahoma. Some fields were severely infested. Problem is growing. +++++++++++++++++ USDA-ARS North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory Brookings, South Dakota 1 Overview of Cereal-Aphid Research Activities and Accomplishments The rice root aphid, Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominalis (Sasaki), is distributed worldwide and colonizes a wide range of plants. However, relatively little is known about the suitability of different host plants, optimal rearing techniques, and the aphids impact on plant fitness. To improve understanding of these factors, laboratory experiments were conducted to compare the abundance of rice root aphid on plants grown using three different soil-surface media and among selected monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Rice root aphid was more abundant on plants grown with a sandy soil surface than a surface with fine wood chips or only bare non-sandy soil. Rice root aphid was more abundant on Elbon rye than on Bart 38, Dart, Fletcher and Ramona 50 wheat. More winged rice root aphids were produced on Elbon rye than on Dart wheat, but the number of winged aphids on Elbon rye did not differ from that on other wheat lines. Rice root aphid was more abundant on Elbon rye and TAM 110 wheat than on Marmin, Marshall and Sharp wheat. Additional observations with monocotyledonous plants showed that abundance of rice root aphid on Kivu 85 triticale was comparable to that on Elbon rye. Rice root aphid did not reproduce on potato or soybean, although winged adults persisted up to 24 days on caged potato plants. The differential abundance of rice root aphid on plants has implications with regard to colony rearing, future experiments and pest management.

Impacts

  1. Improve knowledge of cereal arthropods among scientists, producers and other interested clientele.
  2. Develop new or improved management practices for cereal arthropods.
  3. Monitor for newly introduced pests or the development and spread of new, more damaging, biotypes.

Publications

Andersson, MN, J Haftmann, JJ Stuart, S Cambron, MO Harris, SP Foster, S Franke, W Francke, Y Hilbur. 2008. Identification of sex pheromone components of the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor. J Chem. Ecol. DOI 10.1007/s10886-008-9569-1. Aubrey A. Weiland, Frank B. Peairs, Terri L. Randolph, Jeffrey B. Rudolph, Scott D. Haley, and Gary J. Puterka. 2008. Biotypic Diversity in Colorado Russian Wheat Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 101(2): 569-574. Brewer, M. J., T. Noma, and N. C. Elliott. A landscape perspective in managing vegetation for beneficial plant-pest-natural enemy interactions: a foundation for areawide pest management. In O. Koul, G. W. Cuperus, and N. C. Elliott (eds.) Areawide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation. CAB International, Wallingford Oxfordshire, UK. 2008. Brewer, M. J., T. Noma, N. C. Elliott, A. N. Kravchenko, and A. L. Hild. A landscape view of cereal aphid parasitoid dynamics reveals sensitivity to farm- and region-scale vegetation structure. European Journal of Entomology 105: 503-511. 2008. Catana, V., N. Elliott, K. Giles, M. Mirik, D. Porter, G. Hein, F. B. Peairs, and J. Michels. 2008. The role of databases in areawide pest management. Pages 142-158 in O. Koul, G. W. Cuperus, and N. C. Elliott, eds., Areawide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation. CAB International. Cambridge, MA. Catana, V., N. Elliott, K. Giles, M. Mirik, D. Porter, G. Hein, F. Peairs, and J. Michels. The role of databases in areawide pest management. In O. Koul, G. W. Cuperus, and N. C. Elliott (eds.) Areawide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation. CAB International, Wallingford Oxfordshire, UK. 2008. Chen M.S., Echegaray E., Whitworth, R.J., Wang H., Sloderbeck, P.E., Knutson, A., and Giles K.L. (2009) Virulence analysis of Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor) populations from Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. Journal of Economic Entomology. In press. Chen, M.S., Zhao, H.X., Zhu, Y.C., Scheffler, B., Liu, X.M., Liu, X., Hulbert, S., and Stuart, J.J. (2008) Analysis of Transcripts and Proteins Expressed in the Salivary Glands of Hessian Fly (Mayetiola destructor) Larvae. Journal of Insect Physiology. 54:1-16. Chen, M-S, H-X Zhao, YC Zhu, B Scheffler, X Liu, X Liu, S Hulbert, and JJ Stuart. 2008. Analysis of transcripts and proteins expressed in the salivary glands of Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor) larvae. J Insect Phys. 54:1-16. DeWolf, Erick and Phillip E. Sloderbeck, 2008. Wheat Variety Disease and Insect Ratings 2008. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF991. Elliott, N. C., D. W. Onstad, and M. J. Brewer. History and ecological basis for Areawide pest management. In O. Koul, G. W. Cuperus, and N. C. Elliott (eds.) Areawide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation. CAB International, Wallingford Oxfordshire, UK. 2008. Enali, S., R. Anathakrishnan, T. Niide, L. Starkus, S. Starkey, and C. M. Smith. 2009. Comparisons of wheat and barley resistance to Russian wheat aphid biotype 2. Arthropod- Plant. Interact. 5: (In Press). Giles, K., G. L. Hein, and F. B. Peairs. 2008. Areawide pest management of cereal aphids in dryland wheat systems of the Great Plains, USA. Pp. 441 - 466 in: Koul, O., G. Cuperus, and N. Elliott, eds., Areawide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation. CAB International. Cambridge, MA. Giovanini MP, Saltzmann KD, Puthoff DP, Gonzalo M, Ohm HW Williams CE. 2007. A novel wheat gene encoding a putative chitin-binding lectin is associated with resistance against Hessian fly. Mol. Plant Path. 8:69-82. 2007. Gutsche, A., T. Heng-Moss, G. Sarath, P. Twigg, Y. Xia, G. Lu, and D.W. Mornhinweg. 2008. Gene expression profiling of tolerant barley in response to Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding. Bull. Entomol. Res. Bulletin of Entomological Research, Page 1-11. Haley, S.D., J.J. Johnson, F.B. Peairs, J.S. Quick, J.A. Stromberger, J.D. Butler, H.R. Miller, E.E. Heaton, J.B. Rudolph, B.W. Seabourn, G. Bai, Y. Jin, J.A. Kolmer and X. Chen. 2008. Registration of Bill Brown Wheat. J. Plant Registrations 2: 218-223. Hesler, L.S. & S.D. Kindler. 2007. Abundance of rice root aphid among selected plant species and on plants grown with different soil-surface media. Great Lakes Entomol. 40:83-90. Hodek, I. and J.P. Michaud. 2008. Why is Coccinella septempunctata so successful? Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 1-12. Holly Davis, Ming-Shun Chen, Jeff Whitworth, Gary Cramer, Brian McCornack, Phil Sloderbeck, Aqeel Ahmad and Mary Knapp. 2009. Hessian fly-free date in Kansas: Is it still valid after 70+ years?. Joint Meeting of the Southwestern Branch of the Entomological Society of America and WERA066 (Western Extension/Education Research Activity), February 2009, Stillwater, Oklahoma. Koul, O, G. W. Cuperus, and N. C. Elliott (eds.) Areawide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation. CAB International, Wallingford Oxfordshire, UK. 2008. Lazzari, S., S. Starkey, J. Reese, A. Ray-Chandler, and C. M. Smith. 2009. Feeding behavior of Russian wheat aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) biotype 2 in response to wheat genotypes exhibiting antibiosis and tolerance. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: (Accepted). Liu, X., J. L. Marshall, P. Stary, O. Edwards, G. Puterka, L. Dolatti, M. E. Bouhssini, J. Malinga, and C. M. Smith. 200#. Global phylogenetics of an invasive aphid species: Evidence for multiple invasions into North America. J. Heredity. (submitted). Merrill, S. C., F. B. Peairs, H. R. Miller, T. L. Randolph, J. B. Rudolph, and E. E. Talmich. 2008. Reproduction and development of Russian wheat aphid Biotype 2 on crested wheatgrass, intermediate wheatgrass, and susceptible and resistant wheat. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 541-545. Merrill, S., T. Randolph, C. B. Walker, and F. B. Peairs. 2008. 2007 Russian wheat aphid biotype survey results for Colorado. Pp. 43 - 44 in Johnson, J. J., ed. 2008. Making better decisions: 2007 Colorado wheat variety performance trials. Colorado State Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Rep. TR08-08, 47 pp. Michaud, J.P. and J.L. Jyoti. 2008. Dietary complementation across life stages in the polyphagous lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 126: 40-45 Michaud, J.P. and J.L. Jyoti. 2007. Dietary complementation across life stages in a polyphagous lady beetle, Coleomegilla maculata. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 126: 40-45. Mike Smith, Xuming Liu, Xiang Liu, Sharon Starkey, JianFa Bai, L. J. Wang and Ming-Shun Chen. 2009. Wheat Plant Gene Expression in Response to Russian Wheat Aphid Feeding. Joint Meeting of the Southwestern Branch of the Entomological Society of America and WERA066 (Western Extension/Education Research Activity), February 2009, Stillwater, Oklahoma. Miller, H. R. and F. B. Peairs. 2008. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Colorado dryland cropping systems. Southwestern Entomologist 33: 31 - 42. Mittal, S., L.S. Dahleen, and D.W. Mornhinweg. 2008. Locations of quantitative trait loci (QTL) conferring Russian wheat aphid resistance in barley germplasm STARS-9301B. Crop Sci. 48(4):1452-1458. Mittapalli, O. and Shukle, R. H. 2008. Molecular characterization and responsive expression of a defender against apoptotoic cell death homologue from Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B, 149; 517-523. Mittapalli, O., Neal, J. J., and Shukle, R. H. 2007. Antioxidant defense response in a galling insect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA); 104(6); 1889-1894. Mittapalli, O., Neal, J. J., and Shukle, R. H. 2007. Tissue and life stage specificity of glutathione S-transferase expression in the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor: Implications for resistance to host allelochemicals. Journal of Insect Science, 7; article 20. Mittapalli, O., Sardesai, N., and Shukle, R. H. 2007. cDNA cloning and transcriptional expression of a peritorphin-like gene in the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say). Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 64; 19-29. Mornhinweg, D.W., P. Bregitzer, and D.R. Porter. 2007. Registration of nineteen spring six-rowed barley germplasm lines resistant to Russian wheat aphid. Journal of Plant Registrations 1: Journal of Plant Registrations 1: 137-138. Mornhinweg, D.W., P. Bregitzer, and D.R. Porter. 2007. Registration of seventeen spring two-rowed barley germplasm lines resistant to Russian wheat aphid. Journal of Plant Registrations 1: 1 (2): 135-136. Mornhinweg, D.W., P.P. Bregitzer, and D.R. Porter. 2008. Registration of seven spring two-rowed barley germplasm lines resistant to Russian wheat aphid. J. Plant Registrations 2(3):1-5. Peairs, F. B., J. B. Rudolph, T. L. Randolph, and S. Merrill. 2008. 2007 Colorado field crop insect management research and demonstration trials. Colorado State Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Rep. TR08-06, 34 pp. Randolph, T. L., S. C. Merrill, and F. B. Peairs. 2008. Reproductive rates of Russian wheat aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Biotypes 1 and 2 on a susceptible and a resistant wheat at three temperature regimes. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 955 - 958. Saltzmann KD, Giovanini MP, Zheng, C, Williams CE. 2008. Viruent Hessian fly larvae manipulate the free amino acid content of host wheat plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 34:1401-1410. Seifers, D.L., T.J. Martin, T.L. Harvey, J.P. Fellers, & J.P. Michaud. 2009. Identification of the wheat curl mite as the vector of Triticum mosaic virus. Plant Disease 93: 25-29 Shufran, K.A., D.W. Mornhinweg, C.A. Baker, and D.R. Porter. 2007. Variation to cause host injury between Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) clones virulent to Dn4 wheat. J. Econ. Entomol. 100(5):1685-1691. Shukle, R. H., Mittapalli, O., Morton, P. K., Chen, M. S. 2009. Characterization and expression analysis of a gene encoding a secreted lipase-like protein expressed in the salivary glands of the larval Hessia fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say). Journal of Insect Physiology, 55; 104-111. Shukle, R. H., Yoshiyama, M., Morton, P.K., Johnson, A. J., and Schemerhorn, B.J. 2008. Tissue and developmental expression of a gene from Hessian fly encoding an ABC-active-transporter protein: Implications for Malpighian tubule function during interactions with wheat. Journal of Insect Physiology, 54(1); 146-154. Sloderbeck, Phillip E., J.P. Michaud and R. Jeff Whitworth. Wheat Insect Management 2008. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF745. Smith, C. M. 2009. Advances in Breeding for Host Plant Resistance. pp. 235-246, In: Integrated Pest Management, eds. E. B. Radcliffe, W. D. Hutchison and R. F. Cancelado. Cambridge University Press. Sotelo, P., S. Starkey, P. Voothuluru, G. Wilde, and C. M. Smith. 2009. Resistance to Russian Wheat Aphid Biotype 2 in CIMMYT Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat Lines. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: (In Press). Subramanyam S, Smith DF, Clemens JC, Webb MA, Sardesai N, Williams CE. 2008. Functional characterization of HFR-1, a high-mannose N-glycan-specific wheat lectin induced by Hessian fly larvae. Plant Physiology 147:1412-1426. Tarver, M. R., Shade, R. E., Shukle, R. H., Moar, Muir, W. M., Murdock, L. M., and Pittendrigh, B. P. 2007. Pyramiding of insecticidal compounds for control of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus Maculatus F.). Pest Management Science, 63(5); 440-446. Weiland, A. A., F. B. Peairs, T. L. Randolph, J. B. Rudolph, S. D. Haley, and G. J. Puterka. 2008. Biotypic diversity in Colorado Russian wheat aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 569-574. Whitworth, R. Jeff and Aqeel Ahmad, 2008. Bird Cherry-oat Aphid. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-2823 Whitworth, R. Jeff and Aqeel Ahmad, 2008. Flea Beetle. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-2832 Whitworth, R. Jeff, Phil Sloderbeck, Holly Davis and Gary Cramer, 2009. Hessian Fly, Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-2866. Wu J.-X., Liu X.-M., Zhang S.-Z., Y.-C. Zhu, Whitworth R.J., Chen M.-S. (2008) Differential responses of wheat inhibitor-like genes to Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor, attacks during compatible and incompatible interactions. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 34:1005-1012. Wu, Y. and Huang, Y. 2008. Molecular mapping of QTLs for resistance to the greenbug Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) in Sorghum bicolor (Moench). Theor Appl Genet. 117:117-124. Xiang Liu, Jeremy Marshall, Sharon Starkey, Petr Starry, John Burd, Gary Puterka, L. Dolatti, Owain Edwards, Mustapha El Bouhssini, Joyce Malinga, Jacob Lage, and Mike Smith. 2009, Global Phylogenetics of an Invasive Aphid Species: Evidence for Multiple Invasions into North America. Joint Meeting of the Southwestern Branch of the Entomological Society of America and WERA066 (Western Extension/Education Research Activity), February 2009, Stillwater, Oklahoma. Zhu, L, X Liu, X Liu, R Jeannotte, JC Reese, M Harris, JJ Stuart, and M-S Chen. 2008. Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor) attack causes a dramatic shift in carbon and nitrogen metabolism in wheat. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions 21:7078 Zhu, L., Liu, X.M., Liu, X., Jeannotte, R., Reese, J.C., Harris, M., Stuart, J.J., and Chen, M.S. (2008) Hessian Fly (Mayetiola Destructor) Attack Causes Dramatic Shift in Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in Wheat. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 21:70-78.
Log Out ?

Are you sure you want to log out?

Press No if you want to continue work. Press Yes to logout current user.

Report a Bug
Report a Bug

Describe your bug clearly, including the steps you used to create it.