SAES-422 Multistate Research Activity Accomplishments Report

Status: Approved

Basic Information

Participants

Allen, Clint (clint.allen@ars.usda.gov)  USDA ARS; Bailey, Wayne (baileyw@missouri.edu)  University of Missouri; Baute, Tracey (tracey.baute@ontario.ca)  OMAFRA; Beauzay, Patrick (Patrick.beauzay@ndsu.edu)  North Dakota State University; Boethel, Dave ( dboethel@agcenter.lsu.edu)  Louisiana State University; Buschman, Larry (lbuschma@ksu.edu)  Kansas State University; Davis, Jeff (jeffdavis@agcenter.lsu.edu)  Louisiana State University; Difonzo, Chris (difonzo@msu.edu)  Michigan State University; Chandrase, Desmi (chandr33@msu.edu)  Michigan State University; Cook, Don (dcook@drec.msstate.edu)  Mississippi State University; Hammond, Ron (hammond.5@osu.edu)  Ohio State University; Heng-Moss, Tiffany (thengmoss@unl.edu)  University of Nebraska; Hoelmer, Kim (khoelmer@udel.edu)  USDA-ARS; Hogg, Dave (hogg@entomology.wisc.edu)  University of Wisconsin; Hunt, Tom (thunt2@unl.edu)  University of Nebraska; Johnson, Doug (doug.johnson@uky.edu)  University of Kentucky; Knodel, Janet (janet.knodel@ndsu.edu)  North Dakota State University; Leonard, Roger (rleonard@agcenter.lsu.edu)  Louisiana State University; McCormick, Brian (mccormac@ksu.edu)  Kansas State University; Meyer, Rick (hmeyer@csrees.usda.gov)  USDA CSREES; Michel, Andy ( michel.70@osu.edu)  Ohio State University; Musser, Fred (fm61@msstate.edu)  Mississippi State University; ONeal, Mathew (oneal@iastate.edu)  Iowa State University; Prischmann-Veldseth, Deirdre (deirdre.prischmann@ndsu.edu)  North Dakota State University; Pulakkatu, Ishakh (ip23msstate.edu)  Mississippi State University; Ragsdale, David (ragsd001@umn.edu)  University of Minnesota; Reese, John (jreese@ksu.edu)  Kansas State University; Temple, Josh (jtemple@agcenter.lsu.edu)  Louisiana State University; Tilmon, Kelley (kelley.timon@sdstate.edu)  South Dakota State University; Voegtlin, David (dvoegtli@illinois.edu)  Illinois Natural History Survey; Tindall, Kelly (tindallk@missouri.edu)  University of Missouri

Executive committee met at 5:00 pm on Sunday, 22 February 2009 to appoint a committee to solicit nominations for local arrangements chair and secretary. Registration began at 8:00 am on Monday, 23 February 2009. General meeting began at 8:30 am. Jeff Davis (Local Arrangements and Secretary) and Matt ONeal (Chair) welcomed everyone and made announcements. Sign-up sheet was passed around. Administrative Advisor Dave Boethel greeted us and discussed importance of the S1039 group, past and future. Dr. Boethel started by giving us an overview of the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center; its mission, directives and research stations. He encouraged S1039 to use the new reporting format. Dr. Boethel finished by reminding us to apply for the Multi-State Project Award and to focus on the outcomes to federal partners and cost savings to producers. Next, CSREES Representative Rick Meyer discussed the changes occurring to CSREES (now NIFA) and to NRI (now AFRI). Many programs will require a 1 to 1 of matching funds but may be waived for 406 Programs, CAR, Methyl-bromide, etc. In grant writing, members should focus on promoting outcomes and impacts. Matt ONeal began a discussion of the new reporting format he initiated and discussion of reporting accomplishments, outcomes and impacts. Kelly Tilmon discussed how they changed their reporting formats. Opposition to the new format as sent by email was noted. Jeff Davis proposed using the new format but adding, as an option, the old format at the end of each state report. S1039 decided to continue to use the new format with modifications. Suggestions were made to share state reports, publications, and talks by a website. Rick Meyer suggested using the S1039 site itself. Jeff Davis is exploring these options. The next agenda item addressed was the preservation and funding of the Aphid Suction Trap Network. Dave Voegtlin led this discussion. There is currently no funding for this network. Questions asked were the network worth maintaining, how to pay for the network, and how long could it be maintained with the current staff (1 graduate student and summer interns). S1039 members all agreed that the network is worth having. Discussion then continued on the usefulness of the network. Doug Johnson uses the information extensively and receives funding from his growers for the maintenance of this trap. Suggestions were made to support the trapping network by providing $1000 to $2000 per trap. Jeff Davis led a discussion on the recent soybean breeders meeting. He reported that he had attended the meeting. Breeders are interested in incorporating host plant resistance to soybean aphid but all other insect problems are not as critical. We discussed encouraging soybean breeders to attend the S1039 meeting in the future, especially those involved in insect host plant resistance, and a possibility of holding a future meeting in conjunction with their meetings. In addition, the possibility of a symposium on soybean host plant resistance at the 2009 ESA National Meeting was proposed. Kelly Tilmon is taking the lead on organizing this. Next, Ron Hammond discussed the APHIS Soybean Commodity Survey. This survey monitors for potential invasive soybean pests in soybean fields. Chris DiFonzo then led a discussion on the new labels for fungicides that relate to plant health or vigor, for instance, the supplemental label for Headline which protects against hail. Doug Johnson mentioned that this is occurring only fungicides but insecticides as well. Reporting objectives by insect began. Soybean aphid was first. Jeff Davis gave the report from LA. Soybean aphid has not been found in LA. However, cotton aphid was found colonizing soybean throughout the state (identified by Dave Voegtlin) and reaching hundreds per plant. Life table and EPG studies were conducted with cotton aphid on soybean. Dave Hogg gave the report from WI. WI is conducting research on soybean cyst nematode and soybean aphid interactions. Alate aphid behavior affected by soybean cyst nematode infections. Failure of Rag1 is occurring with the WI soybean aphid biotype. Dowling and Jackson fail as well. Studying if methyl salicylate will attract natural enemies in soybean. John Reese gave the KS report. KS is studying how soybean aphid biotypes are overcoming soybean aphid resistance genes. Collaborating with NE on this work as well. Meeting was adjourned at 12:00 pm for lunch. Lunch was provided by Syngenta Crop Protection. Meeting resumed at 1:00 pm with Chris DiFonzo giving the MI report. Soybean grower survey was conducted this year asking questions about using the soybean aphid threshold. Discussed work on soybean aphid resistance. Dave Voegtlin gave the IL report. Discussed soybean aphid on winter hosts. Soybean aphid overcoming Rag1 and Rag2. Kim Hoelmer gave the USDA-ARS Beneficial Insects Lab report. Discussed the new foreign exploration of natural enemies for soybean aphid in Asia. Tom Hunt gave the NE report. Focusing soybean aphid resistance on tolerance. Warrior is not controlling soybean aphid in 2008. Andy Michel gave the OH report. Using seven polymorphic molecular markers to identify genetic differences between soybean aphids throughout the Mid-West. No significant differences found. Tracey Baute gave the OMAFRA report. Low soybean aphid populations last year. Rag1 will have commercial release in Canada this year. Matt ONeal gave the IA report. Erin Hodgson hired by Iowa State (70% extension/30% research). Discussed natural enemy work in relationship to soybean aphid and modeling aphid emigration. Wayne Bailey gave the MO report. Soybean aphid still being found on horsenettle. Kelly Tilmon gave the SD report. Rag1 soybean aphid resistant plants had upwards of 500 soybean aphids per plant, with resistance breaking down. Natural enemy numbers increased dramatically in 2008. Compared how aphids on resistant plants respond to susceptible plants and how aphids on susceptible plants respond to resistant plants. David Ragsdale gave the report from MN. Soybean aphid yield loss the same in different row spacing. Janet Knodel gave the ND report. One foliar spray at threshold provides season long control against soybean aphid in ND. Most significant beneficials in ND soybean are Nabids. Meeting was adjourned for the day. General meeting resumed at 8:30 am on 24 February 2009. Nominations were made for Secretary. Brian McCornack was elected Secretary for the 2010 meeting. Jeff Davis will move to Chair. Nominations were made for Local Arrangements Chair. Fred Musser was elected Local Arrangements Chair. Meeting will be held in Biloxi, MS or Tunica Falls, MS in 2010. Meeting will be February 21 to 23, 2010. Members will arrive the 21 February. Meeting will be held for two full days instead of one and a half days. Members will leave the evening of the 23 February 2010. Reporting objectives by insect continued, focusing on stink bugs. Josh Temple gave the LA report. Redbanded stink bug is the most common species found in soybean in LA. Redbanded stink bug is much harder to control with current insecticides compared to other stink bug species. Kathy Kamminga gave the report from VA. Stink bug thresholds (1 per row ft) were re-evaluated in VA, MD, and DE. No damage found at this threshold. Suggestions were to increase numbers to evaluate thresholds. Fred Musser gave the MS report. Reported on consultant survey. Stink bugs were treated in 50% of MS soybean fields. Reporting objectives by insect continued, focusing on bean leaf beetle. Fred Musser gave the MS report. Bean leaf beetles becoming highly resistant to pyrethroids in MS. Reporting objectives by insect continued, focusing on Dectes stem borer. Kelly Tindall gave MO report. Dectes infesting many soybean fields. Research focusing on all aspects of life history. Larry Buschman gave KS report. Survey conducted over last 25 years. Dectes infestations are rising. Conducted study on yield response to Dectes with and without insecticide seed treatments. Overall, 8 bu/a increase with seed treatment. Screening for host plant resistance. PI165673 appears to have antibiosis as effective as fipronil. Brian McCornack (KS) gave a report on the cooling point studies he is conducting on Dectes. Don Cook gave the MS report. Conducted fipronil seed treatment study. Reporting objectives by insect continued, focusing on corn earworm. Kathy Kamminga gave the VA report. Corn earworm has become the most important soybean pest in VA. She discussed the importance of monitoring for pyrethroid resistance. Reporting objectives by insect continued, focusing on threecornered alfalfa hopper. Ishakh Pulakkatu Thodi gave MS report. Conducting research to determine yield loss from threecornered alfalfa hopper at different R stages. Meeting was adjourned at 12:00 pm.

Accomplishments

Characterize insect-soybean interactions and their impact on plant growth, grain quality, and yield. Sub-objective 1a. Establish or modify thresholds of important regional pests to account for maturity group, planting systems, plant age, and natural enemy populations. Soybean aphid economic thresholds for row spacing less than 30 inches were redefined. To measure adoption of IPM practices for soybean aphid, a full-length survey instrument was mailed in early 2008 to randomly-selected growers on soybean commodity lists in Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. The effect of southern green stink bug feeding on soybeans during the R7 stage was conducted in MS. Studies were conducted in DE, MD, and VA to re-evaluate the threshold of 1 stink bug/row ft for the green stink bug and the brown stink bug. Studies were conducted in LA to determine thresholds for redbanded stink bug. Studies were conducted to determine spatial movement and field colonization of stink bugs in insecticide treated and untreated fields in LA. Insecticide trials were conducted in LA to determine at what reproductive stage redbanded stink bug control can be terminated at. A survey was conducted to determine stink bug species composition in MG IV, V, and VI soybeans in LA. Late-season impact of threecornered alfalfa hopper on soybeans was evaluated in LA and MS. Studies on green bean syndrome (plants remain green and dont senesce) in GA soybeans indicate that planting date, pod injury, and drought all contribute to green bean syndrome symptoms. Studies on green bean syndrome in LA indicate that variety, stink bug damage, fungicides, drought, and glyphosate all contribute to green bean syndrome symptoms. Experiments were conducted in TX to determine if redbanded stink bug is responsible for causing flat pod syndrome. Conducted a preliminary study to examine the relationship between densities of Japanese beetles and soybean yield. Sub-objective 1b. Characterize the unique relationships between insect pests and organic/ specialty beans. Determined the impact of soybean aphids, soybean cyst nematode, and brown stem rot, alone and in combination, on yield and composition of commodity and low linolenic varieties. Determined the susceptibility of low-linolenic soybean varieties to soybean aphids, soybean cyst nematode and brown stem rot. Determined whether soybean leaf fatty acid levels can be used to predict differences in soybean grain composition. Edamame was shown to be efficiently produced in southern GA utilizing most of the soybean culture that is currently being recommended. When edamame is planted from mid- April to mid-May, insect-induced crop injury caused by stink bugs and caterpillars is reduced compared to a June planted crop. Experiments were conducted for to compare soybean aphid, leafhopper and natural enemy populations within conventional and organic soybean and alfalfa cropping systems. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of methyl salicylate as an organic attractant for natural enemies in soybean fields. Sub-objective 1c. Understand the movement of pest Lepidoptera as it relates to pest management Pyrethroid resistance monitoring of the corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) continued in LA, MS, VA, Sub-objective 1d. Maintain the North central regional aphid suction trap network. Suction trap monitoring to assess aphid migration continued through the fall of 2008 in 42 Midwestern locations. Conducted a weekly survey for soybean aphids in 26 commercial soybean fields in north-central and northwestern Illinois from mid-June through mid-September to correlate in-field, in-season densities of soybean aphids with captures of winged soybean aphids in suction traps. Objective 2. Develop and validate tactics for management of key soybean insects. Sub-objective 2a. Efficacy of seed treatments and foliar insecticides for key soybean insects. Field trials to evaluate efficacy of foliar and seed applied insecticide against bean leaf beetle were conducted in LA, KS, MS, and NE. Insecticide evaluation programs were conducted to evaluate what products offered the most consistent control of soybean aphids and if soybean aphids should be treated when they exceed the economic threshold on late stage soybeans (R6-stage). An assay was developed to expose aphids to insecticides, classifying aphids as walking, poisoned or dead. Field trials to evaluate efficacy of foliar and seed applied insecticide against soybean aphid were conducted in IA, IL, KS, MN, NE, ND, and WI. Field trials to evaluate efficacy of seed applied insecticide against Dectes stem borer were conducted in KS and KY. Field trials to evaluate efficacy of foliar and seed applied insecticides against stink bug species were conducted in LA, MS, TX, and VA. Laboratory insecticide bioassays were conducted in LA to determine efficacy of current products labeled for use in soybean on redbanded stink bug. Field trials to evaluate efficacy of foliar and seed applied insecticides against threecornered alfalfa hopper were conducted in LA, and MS. Field trials to evaluate efficacy of foliar applied insecticides against corn earworm were conducted in VA. Conducted an efficacy trial to compare foliar-applied insecticides for control of Japanese beetles in soybeans in IL. Sub-objective 2b. Enhance biological control of soybean aphid, using both conservation of natural enemies and classical biological control releases. Release/monitoring program for the soybean aphid parasitoid, Binodoxys communis was expanded. Released B. communis in soybeans and buckthorn under varying densities of aphids. Field studies were conducted on the interaction between natural enemies and resistant varieties for soybean aphid suppression. The effects of reconstructed tall grass prairie and surrounding landscapes dominated by corn-soybean production on soybean aphid and natural enemy communities were evaluated. The effects of buffer zones in organic production on soybean aphid and natural enemy communities were evaluated. Foreign exploration of soybean aphid biological control in Asia and host range evaluation of candidate natural enemies in quarantine laboratories was conducted. Sub-objective 2c. Screen, characterize, and incorporate host plant resistance to soybean aphid and other key insects. Soybean lines from North Central working group breeding programs were screened for soybean aphid resistance in the field and greenhouse. This included an intensive "second tier" field screening of one or two select lines from 2007 first-tier screening to determine yield benefits of tolerance vs. antibiosis Six soybean lines were screened for Dectes stem borer resistance. Twenty-eight soybean breeding lines (including the Hutcheson and Dillon cultivars) were screened for stink bug and lepidopteran resistance in GA, LA, and TX. Transgenic soybean lines expressing cry1A from Bacillus thuringiensis were examined for the suppression of naturally occurring population densities of lepidopteran pests. Conducted a research trial to investigate soybean aphid biotypes among different soybean lines. Conducted trials to determine plant-mediated interspecific interactions between soybean aphids and soybean cyst nematodes.

Impacts

  1. S1039 scientists conducted research showing host plant resistance, biological control, landscape heterogeneity, and insecticides can mitigate soybean aphid outbreaks.
  2. S1039 scientists have shown that vegetable soybean production (edamame) can provide an efficient alternative crop for producers looking for new ways to improve the profitability of their farming operation.
  3. S1039 scientists have concluded that the soybean aphid is now established in Georgia.
  4. S1039 scientists have concluded that the soybean aphid is not established in Louisiana.
  5. S1039 scientists confirmed colonization of soybean in Louisiana by green peach aphid and cotton aphid.
  6. S1039 scientists have identified soybean breeding lines with substantial resistance to stink bugs and/or velvetbean caterpillars. These lines will provide genetic material for future crosses and result in the release of resistant varieties.
  7. S1039 scientists have evaluated Bt transgenic soybeans. These lines provide excellent season-long control of lepidopteran pests and have yields equal to standard cultivars being planted. Once available to producers, this Bt technology should provide the southern region with an effective insect pest management option that would enhance the sustainability and profitability of soybean production.
  8. S1039 scientists have determined that the southern green stink bug threshold of 1 stink bug/row ft. should be maintained during earlier growth stages but be increased to 3 stink bugs/row ft. during the R7 stage.
  9. S1039 scientists have determined that most significant insect threats to mid-South soybean production (LA, MS, and TX) are stink bugs and soybean looper.
  10. S1039 scientists have determined that corn earworm is the most common and destructive pest in VA. This has lead to the development of The Virginia Corn Earworm Advisory whose goal is to provide relevant and timely information on corn earworm pest status during the season so as to encourage growers and crop advisors to scout fields, use established economic thresholds, and limit insecticide treatment to only those fields at risk to economic loss.
  11. S1039 scientists have documented significant variability in the resistance to soybean aphid of different soybean lines, gathered resistance information on specific genes, gathered data in support of the commercial deployment of the Rag1 resistance gene in 2010, and laid the groundwork for further research on incorporating host plant resistance into IPM.
  12. S1039 scientists have determined that ladybeetle species such as Harmonia axyridis are a dominant predator in the soybean aphid system and deserve further research focus to incorporate them into IPM.
  13. S1039 scientists recommendations on soybean aphid thresholds have prevented losses by this insect of at least $40.00/acre. U.S. soybean producers will save $13.3 Billion using soybean aphid economic threshold over the next 15 years.
  14. S1039 scientists have determined that under heavy soybean aphid pressure, insecticide seed treatment only provided significant suppression of soybean aphid densities in latest planting dates. This suppression was not below the economic threshold of 250 aphids per plant. Normal planting dates using insecticide treated seed provide no significant soybean aphid control because of the long colonization period.
  15. S1039 scientists have determined that fungicide applications targeting soybean foliar pathogens such as Asian soybean rust do interfere with entomopathogenic fungi that are key regulators of soybean aphids.
  16. S1039 scientists have increased the use of host plant resistance in soybean, decreasing pesticide usage, improving integrated pest management systems, and reducing inputs which, in turn, increase the sustainability of soybean production.
  17. S1039 scientists are using aphid suction trap data to provide a forewarning of potential soybean aphid outbreaks.
  18. S1039 scientists have determined that seed-applied insecticides and soybean aphid-resistant soybean lines have no direct negative impact on predators of soybean aphids, suggesting integration of management tactics will reduce the threat from soybean aphids.
  19. S1039 scientists have detected soybean aphid biotype(s) capable of overcoming RagI gene (soybean aphid resistance).
  20. S1039 scientists studies of alate aphids on resistant soybean plants indicate that resistant plants increased the activity of alate aphids, suggesting that soybean aphid resistant varieties may enhance the spread of non-persistent viruses.
  21. S1039 scientists have determined that soybean cyst nematode infection may indirectly influence virus spread through its effects on soybean aphid alate behavior.
  22. S1039 scientists have identified two major recessive genes involved in soybean aphid resistance in PI 567541B and PI 567598B. These genes have been identified and termed Rag3 and Rag4. This will increase efficiency in developing commercial soybean cultivars with a different form of antibiosis resistance than Rag1.
  23. S1039 scientist producer surveys confirm widespread knowledge and use of the IPM-based recommendations for SBA control, particularly adoption of the 250 aphid/plant threshold.
  24. S1039 scientists have determined that insecticide applications to reduce yield loss from redbanded stink bug should be continued through R6.
  25. S1039 scientists have determined that insecticide seed treatments used in mid-South provide a 3 bu/acre increase.
  26. S1039 scientists have determined that the redbanded stink bug is the most common stink bug found in soybeans in LA, comprising as much as 80% of stink bugs surveyed.
  27. S1039 scientists have determined that the redbanded stink bug is more tolerant to current chemistries used for stink bug control.
  28. S1039 scientists have determined that soybean aphid alights in potato fields but can not colonize potato. Soybean aphid probes and feeds on potato equal to green peach aphid and can transmit PLRV.

Publications

Beauzay, P. and J. Knodel. 2008. Soybean aphids increasing in Red River Valley. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 11, p. 2. Boerboom, C., E. Cullen, P. Esker, R. Flashinski, C. Grau, B. Jensen, and M. Renz. 2008. Pest Management in Wisconsin Field Crops. University of Wisconsin-Extension Publication #A3646. Buschman, L., H. Davis, and P. Sloderbeck. 2008. Efficacy of Monsanto Stacked Event Corn Hybrids for Control of Southwestern Corn Borer and Corn Earworm, 2007. K-State Univ. SW KS Res.-Ext. Center Report of Progress #997. pp 64-68. http://www.entomology.ksu.edu/DesktopModules/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=4583. Catchot, A. L. J. Long and J. F. Smith. 2008. Efficacy of foliar insecticides against soybean looper in soybean, 2006. Arthropod Management Tests 33:F59. Cook, D. R. 2008. Efficacy of selected insecticides against stink bugs on soybean I, 2007. Arthropod Management Tests 33:F13. Cook, D. R. 2008. Efficacy of selected insecticides against stink bugs on soybean II, 2007. Arthropod Management Tests 33:F14. Cullen, E. 2008. Soybean aphid in the ipmPIPE. Wisconsin Soy Sentinel 5(1):4. Cullen, E. 2008. Soybean aphid increasing and variable-scout fields now. Wisconsin Crop Manager 15(20):119-120. Cullen, E. 2008. Soybean aphid update for late August 2008. Wisconsin Crop Manager 15(24):129-130. Cullen, E. 2008. Soybean aphid update. Wisconsin Crop Manager 15(16):97-98. Davis, J. A., and E. B. Radcliffe. 2008. The importance of an invasive aphid species in vectoring a persistently transmitted potato virus: Aphis glycines Matsumura is a vector of PLRV. Plant Dis.92:1515-1523. Davis, H., L. Buschman, P. Sloderbeck, and A. Joshi. 2008. Efficacy of Fipronil Applied as Foliar and Seed Treatment to Control Dectes Stem Borers in Soybean, Garden City, KS, 2007 - South Circle. K-State Univ. SW KS Res.-Ext. Center Report of Progress #997. pp 49-53. http://www.entomology.ksu.edu/DesktopModules/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=4580. DiFonzo, C.D. and K. Agle. 2008. Soybean aphid development on, and BCMV transmission to, Otebo dry bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2008-0916-01-RS. Gardiner, M.M, D.A. Landis, C.D. DiFonzo, C. Gratton, M.E. ONeal, J. Heimpel, M. Wayo, N. Schmidt, E. Mueller, and J. Chacon. 2009. Landscape diversity impacts biocontrol services in north-central U.S. soybean. Ecological Applications. 19: 143-154. Giesler, Loren, Bernards, Mark, Hunt, Tom, Sandell, Lowell and Seymour, Ron. 2008. Managing New and Emerging Disease, Insect and Weed Problems. Soybean Management Field Days Proceedings. pp. 1-6. Herbert, D.A., Jr. 2008. Corn earworm update: moth activity, thresholds and pyrethroid insecticide issue. Virginia Soybean Update. Vol. 11, No. 6. Herbert, D.A., Jr. and S. Malone. 2008. Insect Control in Soybeans (pp. 61-73), In Pest Management Guide for Field Crops. Virginia Cooperative Extension Publ. 456-016. Herbert, D.A., Jr., Malone, S., Kuhar, T.P., Portillo, H.E., Saienni, J.P., and Williams, R.W. 2008. Adult corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) susceptibility to methomly. Online. Plant Health Progress doi: 1.109/PHP-2008-0312-01-RS. Herbert. D.A., Jr., S. Malone, and K. Kamminga. 2008. Insect Pest Management in Virginia Cotton, Peanut and Soybean. Virginia Cooperative Extension Publ. 444-380. Hunt, T., K. Jarvi, R. Wright and G. Hein. 2008. Integrated Pest Management: As important now as ever. pp. 47-50, Proceedings of Crop Protection Clinics. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. Hunt, T., K. Jarvi, R. Wright and G. Hein. 2008. Integrated Pest Management: As important now as ever. pp. 47-50, Proceedings of Crop Protection Clinics. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. Hunt, T., K. Jarvi. 2008. Soybean Insect 2007 Update. pp. 61-66. Proceedings of Crop Protection Clinics. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. Johnson, K.D, M.E. ONeal, J. Bradshaw and M.E. Rice. 2008. Management of bean leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) does not protect soybeans from Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae) infestations in Iowa. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 801-809. Kamminga, K., D.A. Herbert, Jr., and S. Malone. 2008. Evaluation of selected foliar applied insecticides for control of corn earworm in Virginia soybean, 2007. Arthropod Management Tests 33, F30. Knodel, J., J. Hochhalter and P.B. Beauzay. 2009. Evaluation of foliar and seed-applied insecticides for control of soybean aphid in North Dakota and Minnesota. In: Crop Production Guide 2009, H. Kandel (ed.), NDSU Extension Service Crop Production Guide 19, p. 260-264. Prepared in 2008 for use in 2009. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Recent field observations of insect pests. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 7, p. 2. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Scout for two-spotted spider mites in soybeans and dry beans. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 13, p. 2. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Soybean aphid moving to buckthorn. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 15, p. 2. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Soybean aphid update. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 6, p. 2. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Soybean aphids continue to increase. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 12, p. 4. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Soybean aphids move further west. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 13, p. 4. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Soybean aphids moving field to field and white dwarfs present. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 14, p. 1. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Time to scout for soybean aphids. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 9, p. 2. Knodel, J.J. 2008. Time to scout for the second generation bean leaf beetle in soybeans. NDSU Extension Service Crop & Pest Report No. 13, p. 4. Knodel, J.J., J. Hochhalter, and P.B. Beauzay. 2008. Evaluation of foliar and seed-applied insecticides for control of soybean aphid in North Dakota and Minnesota. Final report to the North Dakota Soybean Council. Knodel, J.J., P.Beauzay, M. Boetel, and D. Markle. 2008. 2008 North Dakota Field Crop Insect Management Guide. NDSU Extension Service, publication E-1143. Koch, Karrie A., M.S. 5/2008, Thesis Title: Effects of Soybean Rust Fungicides on Fungal Entomopathogens of Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura. Kraiss, H., and E. Cullen. 2008. Efficacy and non-target effects of reduced-risk insecticides on Aphis glycines (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its biological control agent, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 391-398. Kraiss, H., and E. Cullen. 2008. Insect growth regulator effects of azadirachtin and neem oil on survivorship, development and fecundity of Aphis glycines (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its predator Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Pest Management Science, 64: 660-668. Magalhaes, L.C., B.W. French, T.E. Hunt, and B.D. Siegfried. 2008. Development of methods to evaluate susceptibility of soybean aphid to imidacloprid and thiamethoxam at lethal and sublethal concentrations. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 128: 330-336. McCornack, Brian P., Ph.D. 8/2007, Dissertation Title: Integrated Pest Management for Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in the North Central U.S. McPherson, R. M. 2008. Evaluation of planting date effects on the incidence of arthropod pest and beneficial species, seed damage and yield in snap beans. Ga. Veg. Research-Extension Report 2007: 2pp. McPherson, R. M., W. C. Johnson, III, E. G. Fonsah, and P. M. Roberts. 2008. Insect pests and yield potential of vegetable soybean (edamame) produced in Georgia. J. Entomol. Sci. 43: 225-240. Mensah, C., C. D. DiFonzo, and D. Wang. 2008. Inheritance of Soybean Aphid Resistance in PI567541B and PI 567598B. Crop Sci. 48: 1759-1763. Musser, F. R. and A. L. Catchot. 2008. Mississippi soybean insect losses. Midsouth Entomologist 1:29-36. Mutti, N., J. Louis, L. K. Pappan, K. Pappan, K. Begum, M.-S. Chen, Y. Park, N. Dittmer, J. Marshall, J. C. Reese, and G. R. Reeck. 2008. A protein from the salivary glands of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, is essential in feeding in host plant. PNAS. 105: 9965-9969. Niide, T., L., Buschman, B. Gordon, P. Sloderbeck, H. Davis, and C. Khajuria. 2008. Efficacy of Fipronil Applied as Foliar and Seed Treatment to Control Dectes Stem Borers in Soybean, Scandia, KS, 2007. K-State Univ. SW KS Res.-Ext. Center Report of Progress #997. pp 54-58. http://www.entomology.ksu.edu/DesktopModules/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=4581. Olson, K.D, T. Badibanga, and C.D. DiFonzo. 2008. Farmers Awareness and Use of IPM for Soybean Aphid Control: Report of Survey Results for the 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 Crop Years. Staff Paper 378.776 D34 S73 08-12, Dept. of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota. Radcliffe, E.B., D.W. Ragsdale, R.A. Suranyi, C.D. DiFonzo and E.E. Hladilek. 2008. Aphid Alert: How it came to be, what it achieved, and why it proved unsustainable. Pp 227-241 In: Area Wide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation, O. Koul, G.W. Cuperus and N.C. Elliott (eds.). CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Rice, M.E., and M.E. ONeal. 2008. Soybean Aphid Management Field Guide 2008. Iowa State University. University Extension, CSI 0011. 44 pp Roberts, P. and R. M. McPherson. 2008. Insect Management. Georgia Soybean Production Guide. CSS 08-02:5pp. Roberts, P. and R. M. McPherson. 2008. Soybean insect control. Georgia Soybean Production Guide. CSS 08-02:5pp. Schmidt, N.P., M.E. ONeal and P.M. Dixon. 2008. Aphidophagous predators in Iowa soybean: a community comparison across multiple sampling methods. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 101: 341-350. Schulte, L.A., H. Asbjornsen, R. Atwell, C. Hart, M. Helmers, T. Isenhart, R. Kolka, M. Liebman, J. Neal, M.E. O'Neal, S. Secchi, R. Schultz, J. Thompson, M. Tomer, and J. Tyndall. 2008. A targeted conservation approach for improving environmental quality: multiple benefits and expanded opportunities. Iowa State University, University Extension. PMR 1002. 23 pp Sloderbeck, P. E., J. P. Michaud, and R. J. Whitworth. 2009. Soybean insect management 2009. Kansas State University Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-743. Smith, J. F. and A. L. Catchot. 2008. Efficacy of foliar insecticides against bean leaf beetle on soybean, 2007A. Arthropod Management Tests 33:F61. Smith, J. F. and A. L. Catchot. 2008. Efficacy of foliar insecticides against bean leaf beetle on soybean, 2007B. Arthropod Management Tests 33:F62. Smith, J. F. and A. L. Catchot. 2008. Efficacy of foliar insecticides against southern green stink bug, threecornered alfalfa hopper, bean leaf beetle and soybean looper on soybean, 2007. Arthropod Management Tests 33:F63. Tinsley, N. A., K. L. Steffey, R. E. Estes, J. R. Heeren, M. E. Gray, and B. W. Diers. Effects of current and future soybean aphid management tactics on soybean aphids (Aphis glycines) and their natural enemies in Illinois in 2007 and 2008. (oral presentation). Way, M. O., M. S. Nunez and R. A. Pearson. 2008. Evaluation of Diamond 0.83EC for control of Lepidoptera in soybeans, 2005. Arthropod Management Tests. Vol. 33. F67. Way, M. O., M. S. Nunez and R. A. Pearson. 2008. Evaluation of Novaluron for control of redbanded stink bug. 2006. Arthropod Management Tests. Vol. 33. F69. Way, M. O., M. S. Nunez and R. A. Pearson. 2008. Evaluation of selected insecticides for brown stink bugs, 2006. Arthropod Management Tests. Vol. 33. F68. Way, M. O., M. S. Nunez and R. A. Pearson. 2008. Evaluation of selected insecticides for redbanded stink bug, 2006. Arthropod Management Tests. Vol. 33. F70. Whitworth, R. J. and A. Ahmad. 2008. Kansas crops pests: Bean leaf beetle. Kansas State University Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF2824. Whitworth, R. J., P. Sloderbeck, and H. Davis. 2008. Pillbugs: Perennial pests. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-2855. Wyckhuys, K.A.G., Stone, L., Desneux, N., Hoelmer, K., Hopper, K.R., and Heimpel, G.E. 2008. Parasitism of the soybean aphid Aphis glycines by Binodoxys communis: the role of aphid defensive behavior and parasitoid reproductive performance. Bulletin of Entomological Research 98: 361-370.
Log Out ?

Are you sure you want to log out?

Press No if you want to continue work. Press Yes to logout current user.

Report a Bug
Report a Bug

Describe your bug clearly, including the steps you used to create it.